Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.r354-tall-178024402800186.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool itstools
Input is SupplyChain-PT-00020, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r354-tall-178024402800186
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 540K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 27 07:36 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 27 07:36 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 27 07:36 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 27 07:36 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 27 10:57 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 27 10:57 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 27 10:57 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 27 10:57 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 26 18:17 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 27 07:36 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 27 07:36 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 27 07:36 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 27 07:36 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 27 10:57 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 27 10:57 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 26 18:17 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 26 18:17 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 26 18:17 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 26 18:17 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1780250663533

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SupplyChain-PT-00020
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202604301425
[2026-05-31 18:04:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2026-05-31 18:04:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 71 ms
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Transformed 264 places.
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Transformed 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 264 places and 163 transitions and 726 arcs in 181 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 133 out of 264 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 48 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 216 transition count 163
Applied a total of 48 rules in 24 ms. Remains 216 /264 variables (removed 48) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9780996680622576170.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2527534599751351990.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9780996680622576170.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2527534599751351990.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 32 columns.
Culled 32 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 184 cols 524 entries
Finished phase 1 with 102 SingleSign rule and 20 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 94 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2527534599751351990.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:04:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 38/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/202 variables, 40/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/216 variables, 14/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/378 variables, 216/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/379 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/379 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 12439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 52/52 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 38/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/202 variables, 40/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/216 variables, 14/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/378 variables, 216/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 143/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 1/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/379 variables, 0/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/379 variables, and 455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 16758 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 52/52 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 29365ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29388ms
[2026-05-31 18:04:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:04:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [1, 73, 77, 81, 90, 91, 103, 198, 204, 215]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/264 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 29611 ms. Remains : 206/264 places, 163/163 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-16974064433457087766.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-18193408225447088156.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:04:54] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-16974064433457087766.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-18193408225447088156.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 32 columns.
Culled 32 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:04:54] [INFO ] Computed 84 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 84 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-18193408225447088156.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:04:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 30/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/192 variables, 39/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/206 variables, 14/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/368 variables, 206/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/369 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 11131 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 44/44 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 30/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/192 variables, 39/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/206 variables, 14/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/368 variables, 206/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 143/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/369 variables, 1/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 435 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 17689 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 44/44 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28852ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28853ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:05:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2026-05-31 18:05:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:05:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-31 18:05:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29078 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Support contains 133 out of 206 places after structural reductions.
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
Support contains 128 out of 206 places (down from 133) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 21777 steps (209 resets) in 655 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 0/68 properties
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
Computed a total of 206 stabilizing places and 162 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 26 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 180 transition count 163
Applied a total of 26 rules in 7 ms. Remains 180 /206 variables (removed 26) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-14023938280593377875.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10320001040553847098.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-14023938280593377875.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10320001040553847098.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 6 columns.
Culled 6 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-10320001040553847098.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:05:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/180 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/342 variables, 180/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/342 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/343 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 10387 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/180 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/342 variables, 180/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/342 variables, 143/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/342 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/343 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 383 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 15186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25613ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25613ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [0, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 178, 179]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 25753 ms. Remains : 151/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8570999298890980802.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5626745941565466626.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8570999298890980802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5626745941565466626.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.67684,77916,2,53923,5,433221,6,0,743,257515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11980689563478092470.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11980689563478092470.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11980689563478092470.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11980689563478092470.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11980689563478092470.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 28 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2680024129474837842.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:06:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15016559498311647419.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2680024129474837842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15016559498311647419.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 30 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 176 transition count 163
Applied a total of 30 rules in 17 ms. Remains 176 /206 variables (removed 30) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7283556361139792954.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7082868466061264169.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:06:50] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7283556361139792954.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7082868466061264169.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 2 columns.
Culled 2 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:06:50] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 54 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7082868466061264169.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:06:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 339/339 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 10185 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 143/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 339/339 variables, and 375 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 14806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25029ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25030ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned [0, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 160, 161, 162, 164, 165, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 25183 ms. Remains : 148/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9174760722849898267.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2649311326538597141.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9174760722849898267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2649311326538597141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,3.99662,111164,2,63884,5,525759,6,0,733,472934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8885997062260625776.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8885997062260625776.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8885997062260625776.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8885997062260625776.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8885997062260625776.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 78 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5126787610225338509.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:07:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability137459929394064230.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5126787610225338509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability137459929394064230.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Reduce places removed 35 places and 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 171 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 147 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 142 transition count 104
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 142 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 107 transition count 85
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 107 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 103 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 9 places and 9 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 94 transition count 72
Applied a total of 153 rules in 41 ms. Remains 94 /206 variables (removed 112) and now considering 72/163 (removed 91) transitions.
Running 38 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7709615294076625784.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15173826154727644157.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:16] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7709615294076625784.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15173826154727644157.kers]
Normalized transition count is 71 out of 72 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 4 columns.
Culled 4 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 90 cols 192 entries
Finished phase 1 with 55 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:16] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 39 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15173826154727644157.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/93 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 71/165 variables, 94/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1656 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/93 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 71/165 variables, 94/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 38/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3064ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3065ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/206 places, 72/163 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 79 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 65 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 64 transition count 43
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 64 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 51 transition count 30
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 51 transition count 29
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 51 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 50 transition count 28
Applied a total of 73 rules in 20 ms. Remains 50 /79 variables (removed 29) and now considering 28/72 (removed 44) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12411668124649807802.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13701746492899029532.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12411668124649807802.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13701746492899029532.kers]
Normalized transition count is 27 out of 28 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 4 columns.
Culled 4 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 46 cols 73 entries
Finished phase 1 with 26 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 24 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-13701746492899029532.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/206 places, 28/163 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3344 ms. Remains : 50/206 places, 28/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8538493095354419606.gal : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13616465610405282212.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8538493095354419606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13616465610405282212.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71859e+06,0.077462,7068,2,4236,5,14850,6,0,207,5948,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG((((p25>=1)&&(p44>=1))&&(p143>=1))) + EG((((p129<1)||(p210<1))||(p233<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((((p129<1)||(p210<1))||(p233<1))))) * !(EG((((p25>=1)&&(p44>=1))&&(p143>=1)))))] = FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
(forward)formula 0,0,0.634963,30800,1,0,126,127416,80,35,1208,75967,214
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 places
Reduce places removed 38 places and 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 168 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 140 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 126 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 124 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 123 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 122 transition count 91
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 122 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 76 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 10 places and 10 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 66 transition count 50
Applied a total of 199 rules in 22 ms. Remains 66 /206 variables (removed 140) and now considering 50/163 (removed 113) transitions.
Running 19 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-593855382043825766.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-297559715218731606.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:20] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-593855382043825766.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-297559715218731606.kers]
Normalized transition count is 49 out of 50 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 66 cols 144 entries
Finished phase 1 with 34 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:20] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 32 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-297559715218731606.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/66 variables, 16/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 49/115 variables, 66/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 525 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/66 variables, 16/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 49/115 variables, 66/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 19/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 518 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1071ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1071ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 38]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/206 places, 50/163 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 50 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 35 transition count 20
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 35 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 14 places
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 6 transition count 5
Applied a total of 89 rules in 7 ms. Remains 6 /50 variables (removed 44) and now considering 5/50 (removed 45) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10687981791691995717.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2977088040135070062.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10687981791691995717.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2977088040135070062.kers]
Normalized transition count is 4 out of 5 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols 9 entries
Finished phase 1 with 4 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 2 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2977088040135070062.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 22 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/206 places, 5/163 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 5 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 4 /5 variables (removed 1) and now considering 4/5 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17243888621216041204.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8797975940100049982.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17243888621216041204.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8797975940100049982.kers]
Normalized transition count is 3 out of 4 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 4 cols 6 entries
Finished phase 1 with 3 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 1 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-8797975940100049982.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1260 ms. Remains : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 4 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16538591045125205512.gal : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11627223181591299070.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16538591045125205512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11627223181591299070.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4,0.003467,3732,2,8,5,29,6,0,19,16,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p173>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p173>=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,0,0.00496,4096,1,0,15,69,32,12,91,72,27
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 23 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 183 transition count 163
Applied a total of 23 rules in 3 ms. Remains 183 /206 variables (removed 23) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12882395586729753429.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6604485342860451828.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12882395586729753429.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6604485342860451828.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 9 columns.
Culled 9 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 61 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-6604485342860451828.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:08:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/182 variables, 39/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/345 variables, 183/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/346 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/346 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 346/346 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 10142 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/182 variables, 39/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/345 variables, 183/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 143/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/346 variables, 1/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/346 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 346/346 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 14584 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24748ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24748ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [0, 66, 67, 68, 69, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 157 /157 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 24870 ms. Remains : 157/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18423348241301475020.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:08:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7985368779416917115.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18423348241301475020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7985368779416917115.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,4.77109,129476,2,94925,5,696298,6,0,770,458752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2369111582057919049.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2369111582057919049.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2369111582057919049.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2369111582057919049.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2369111582057919049.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13884164021014697060.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:09:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5462923462662249646.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13884164021014697060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5462923462662249646.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 177 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 5 ms. Remains 177 /206 variables (removed 29) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8673411519419615625.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7680288982091740731.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:09:46] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8673411519419615625.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7680288982091740731.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 3 columns.
Culled 3 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 55 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7680288982091740731.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:09:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/177 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 340/340 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 10239 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/177 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 143/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 340/340 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 15597 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25864ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25865ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 120 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 25993 ms. Remains : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11587246271871714683.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13073293983232891114.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11587246271871714683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13073293983232891114.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,3.62605,93052,2,65780,5,538447,6,0,736,238364,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1680405960041466260.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1680405960041466260.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1680405960041466260.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1680405960041466260.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1680405960041466260.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3227491551337398126.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16180207893080421339.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3227491551337398126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16180207893080421339.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 28 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 178 /206 variables (removed 28) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7247298420537279856.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-9333409064882872090.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:11:12] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7247298420537279856.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-9333409064882872090.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 4 columns.
Culled 4 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:11:12] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 56 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-9333409064882872090.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:11:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/178 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/340 variables, 178/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 236 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 9985 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/178 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/340 variables, 178/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 143/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 13969 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23992ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [0, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 75, 76, 77, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 24112 ms. Remains : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15055619481790452526.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:11:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10280840541116510112.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15055619481790452526.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10280840541116510112.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,5.10273,141108,2,112422,5,858250,6,0,741,221227,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4043617350571585232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4043617350571585232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4043617350571585232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4043617350571585232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4043617350571585232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 74 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1332630241961499319.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14070712692637519900.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1332630241961499319.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14070712692637519900.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 places
Reduce places removed 38 places and 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 168 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 138 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 121 transition count 90
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 121 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 75 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 10 places and 10 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 65 transition count 49
Applied a total of 201 rules in 20 ms. Remains 65 /206 variables (removed 141) and now considering 49/163 (removed 114) transitions.
Running 19 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6086170872605210671.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2240995150146773551.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:12:37] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6086170872605210671.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2240995150146773551.kers]
Normalized transition count is 48 out of 49 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 65 cols 144 entries
Finished phase 1 with 32 SingleSign rule and 1 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:12:37] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 32 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2240995150146773551.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:12:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/65 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/113 variables, 65/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 609 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/65 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/113 variables, 65/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 19/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1181ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1181ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 59]
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/206 places, 49/163 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 35 transition count 21
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 35 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 8 transition count 7
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 8 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 8 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 7 transition count 5
Applied a total of 86 rules in 5 ms. Remains 7 /49 variables (removed 42) and now considering 5/49 (removed 44) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9859518600330336859.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7800036982029867908.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9859518600330336859.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7800036982029867908.kers]
Normalized transition count is 4 out of 5 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 7 cols 11 entries
Finished phase 1 with 4 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 3 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7800036982029867908.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [4, 6]
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 30 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 6/206 places, 5/163 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 5 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 4 /6 variables (removed 2) and now considering 4/5 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7560684492730760731.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-993060631085615978.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7560684492730760731.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-993060631085615978.kers]
Normalized transition count is 3 out of 4 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 4 cols 6 entries
Finished phase 1 with 3 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 1 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-993060631085615978.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 38 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1347 ms. Remains : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 4 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18260081484996889302.gal : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4098192558026542465.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18260081484996889302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4098192558026542465.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4,0.005414,3744,2,10,5,29,6,0,19,15,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p155<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p155<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.006278,4016,1,0,10,65,19,2,87,42,11
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 30 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 176 transition count 163
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 176 /206 variables (removed 30) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17618776165640937612.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1988727872900726944.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17618776165640937612.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1988727872900726944.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 2 columns.
Culled 2 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 54 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-1988727872900726944.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:12:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 339/339 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 8919 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 143/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 339/339 variables, and 375 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 14640 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23578ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23578ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 77, 160, 161, 162, 163, 165, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 174]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 23697 ms. Remains : 151/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13775330770657750225.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14041774102545315582.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13775330770657750225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14041774102545315582.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.80496,83804,2,62048,5,498817,6,0,747,222559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2044734928633136019.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2044734928633136019.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2044734928633136019.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2044734928633136019.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2044734928633136019.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 82 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4560480693945359706.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7556337427318117698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4560480693945359706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7556337427318117698.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 places
Reduce places removed 37 places and 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 169 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 139 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 122 transition count 91
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 122 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 74 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 10 places and 10 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 64 transition count 49
Applied a total of 204 rules in 10 ms. Remains 64 /206 variables (removed 142) and now considering 49/163 (removed 114) transitions.
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5271780929583771987.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5476317813727480225.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:14:02] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5271780929583771987.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5476317813727480225.kers]
Normalized transition count is 48 out of 49 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 64 cols 142 entries
Finished phase 1 with 33 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:14:02] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 31 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-5476317813727480225.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:14:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/64 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/112 variables, 64/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 113/113 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 550 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/64 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/112 variables, 64/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 113/113 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 549 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1111ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1111ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/206 places, 49/163 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 48 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 34 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 33 transition count 19
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 33 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 6 transition count 5
Applied a total of 86 rules in 2 ms. Remains 6 /48 variables (removed 42) and now considering 5/49 (removed 44) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-3915038608738708065.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17946661303098027883.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-3915038608738708065.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17946661303098027883.kers]
Normalized transition count is 4 out of 5 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols 9 entries
Finished phase 1 with 4 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 2 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-17946661303098027883.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/206 places, 5/163 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 5 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 4 /5 variables (removed 1) and now considering 4/5 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2357604818413972868.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-16545939070080710896.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2357604818413972868.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-16545939070080710896.kers]
Normalized transition count is 3 out of 4 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 4 cols 6 entries
Finished phase 1 with 3 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 1 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-16545939070080710896.kers
Total runtime 0 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 19 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 39 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1273 ms. Remains : 4/206 places, 4/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 4 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10423934595969681584.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7912183328070468986.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10423934595969681584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7912183328070468986.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4,0.002332,3736,2,8,5,29,6,0,19,16,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p176<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p176<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.003121,4012,1,0,10,66,19,2,91,46,11
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 177 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 2 ms. Remains 177 /206 variables (removed 29) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8640362915849930825.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-14179942468602162072.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8640362915849930825.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-14179942468602162072.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 3 columns.
Culled 3 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 55 P flows in 0 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-14179942468602162072.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:14:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 340/340 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 9857 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 143/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 340/340 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 15042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24921ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24921ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [0, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 25058 ms. Remains : 148/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16504987074434472277.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11197679540857028987.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16504987074434472277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11197679540857028987.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.5341,82500,2,60715,5,479907,6,0,734,198033,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7805970254683625660.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7805970254683625660.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7805970254683625660.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7805970254683625660.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7805970254683625660.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9072354221352826238.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5123783288918866585.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9072354221352826238.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5123783288918866585.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 177 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 4 ms. Remains 177 /206 variables (removed 29) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-14075505362503432635.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6444667474378581312.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:15:29] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-14075505362503432635.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6444667474378581312.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 3 columns.
Culled 3 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:15:29] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 55 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-6444667474378581312.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:15:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/177 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 340/340 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 10164 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/177 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 143/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 340/340 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 14486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24676ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24677ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [0, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 161, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 176]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 24793 ms. Remains : 152/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1700752320273884344.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:15:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8632330494610653947.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1700752320273884344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8632330494610653947.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,5.57017,159752,2,117599,5,942809,6,0,748,324335,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:16:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:16:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:16:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13516151509767584001.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13516151509767584001.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13516151509767584001.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13516151509767584001.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13516151509767584001.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 80 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9622568192254918503.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:16:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9516269941331884166.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9622568192254918503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9516269941331884166.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 174 transition count 163
Applied a total of 32 rules in 5 ms. Remains 174 /206 variables (removed 32) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10883851470367428547.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15556896585095985763.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:16:54] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10883851470367428547.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15556896585095985763.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:16:54] [INFO ] Computed 52 invariants in 3 ms
Computed 52 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15556896585095985763.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:16:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/336 variables, 174/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 8459 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 174/174 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/336 variables, 174/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 143/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 371 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 13340 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 174/174 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 21827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21827ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned [0, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 158, 159, 161, 162, 163, 165, 167, 168, 169, 171, 172, 173]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 21945 ms. Remains : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3953732807943227651.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2799224993188726204.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3953732807943227651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2799224993188726204.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.64271,80264,2,61642,5,464560,6,0,743,216836,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14420832836350873133.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14420832836350873133.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14420832836350873133.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14420832836350873133.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14420832836350873133.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability300606531239061904.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2462610808795678252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability300606531239061904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2462610808795678252.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 177 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 4 ms. Remains 177 /206 variables (removed 29) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6207698435688057573.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-4108756710053899064.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:18:16] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6207698435688057573.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-4108756710053899064.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 3 columns.
Culled 3 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:18:16] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 55 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-4108756710053899064.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:18:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 340/340 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 9720 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/176 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/339 variables, 177/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 143/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/340 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 340/340 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 13760 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23505ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [0, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175, 176]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 23624 ms. Remains : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4729133291211751698.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5310221849767585701.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4729133291211751698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5310221849767585701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.85137,83140,2,60570,5,479430,6,0,738,224533,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18039535732728960679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18039535732728960679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18039535732728960679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18039535732728960679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18039535732728960679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:19:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:19:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:19:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8193635150910775504.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6622013809336668611.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8193635150910775504.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6622013809336668611.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 177 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 2 ms. Remains 177 /206 variables (removed 29) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Skipped dead transition search.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-991623361952301334.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-3761900539540671416.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-991623361952301334.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-3761900539540671416.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 3 columns.
Culled 3 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 55 P flows in 6 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-3761900539540671416.kers
Total runtime 6 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned [0, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 77, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 170, 173, 174, 175, 176]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 241 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 150/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13784555886805518287.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17964064222528908616.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13784555886805518287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17964064222528908616.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.4134,79052,2,61606,5,458183,6,0,742,202764,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1950583057912064200.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1950583057912064200.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1950583057912064200.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1950583057912064200.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1950583057912064200.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5180230123189020576.gal : 13 ms
[2026-05-31 18:20:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3257109945828904514.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5180230123189020576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3257109945828904514.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 30 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 176 transition count 163
Applied a total of 30 rules in 3 ms. Remains 176 /206 variables (removed 30) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8855861697759253016.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13984947073814354335.kers'
[2026-05-31 18:20:40] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8855861697759253016.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13984947073814354335.kers]
Normalized transition count is 162 out of 163 initially.
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 2 columns.
Culled 2 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 174 cols 492 entries
Finished phase 1 with 110 SingleSign rule and 12 generalized
[2026-05-31 18:20:40] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 54 P flows in 14 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-13984947073814354335.kers
Total runtime 14 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:20:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 339/339 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 9790 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/174 variables, 39/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/338 variables, 176/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 143/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/339 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 339/339 variables, and 375 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 14802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24629ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24631ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [0, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 24752 ms. Remains : 149/206 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14275159641607076630.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3197740831025326823.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14275159641607076630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3197740831025326823.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,2.28773,79640,2,56941,5,413676,6,0,737,311940,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17263923266795682080.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17263923266795682080.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17263923266795682080.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17263923266795682080.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17263923266795682080.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4490278101303262721.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-31 18:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10782496083278776826.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4490278101303262721.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10782496083278776826.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1993690551792956943.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1993690551792956943.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1993690551792956943.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1993690551792956943.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1993690551792956943.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 62 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9041751690413495145.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-31 18:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6822772937976450982.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9041751690413495145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6822772937976450982.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58434e+16,17.8377,513716,10381,43706,314519,798193,362,1.06504e+06,229,5.37805e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF((EG((((u35.p131<1)||(u35.p212<1))||(u35.p235<1))) * EX(EG((((i20.u16.p118>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i20.u53.p95>=1)))))) + (((i21.u17....373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!((EG((((u35.p131<1)||(u35.p212<1))||(u35.p235<1))) * EX(EG((((i20.u16.p118>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1...424
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t71, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :...166
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 0,1,218.026,2438268,1,0,6.01754e+06,1.05889e+06,687,3.86722e+06,602,6.82597e+06,1527874
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG(((((((i11.u4.p108<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i11.u39.p86<1))&&((i16.u47.p31<1)||(i16.u47.p50<1))) + AF(((i21.u29.p39<1)||(i21.u29.p56<1)))) *...333
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((i11.u4.p108<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i11.u39.p86<1))&&((i16.u47.p31<1)||(i16.u47.p...473
(forward)formula 1,1,257.578,2618344,1,0,6.74826e+06,1.05889e+06,3246,3.86722e+06,738,6.82597e+06,5090930
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(AF((i14.u43.p165>=1)) U (!((((EG(((((i2.u20.p22>=1)&&(i2.u20.p59>=1))&&((u35.p131>=1)&&(u35.p212>=1)))&&(u35.p235>=1))) + E((((i0.u8.p1...649
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((((EG(((((i2.u20.p22>=1)&&(i2.u20.p59>=1))&&((u35.p131>=1)&&(u35.p212>=1)))&&(u35.p235>=1)))...1958
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 2,0,428.761,2953516,1,0,7.41358e+06,1.05889e+06,2737,4.18879e+06,646,6.82597e+06,3342127
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((((AG(EX(((i18.u22.p168<1)||(i18.u3.p187<1)))) + (i3.u23.p32<1)) + ((i3.u23.p51<1)||(i19.u45.p29<1))) + (((i19.u52.p48<1)||(i13.u42.p...330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((((!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i18.u22.p168<1)||(i18.u3.p187<1)))))) + (i3.u23.p32<1)) + ((i3.u23.p51<1)||(i...399
(forward)formula 3,1,450.731,2953516,1,0,7.41358e+06,1.05889e+06,3124,4.18879e+06,688,6.82597e+06,6310176
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((EG(EX((i20.u49.p179<1))) * (((((i20.u53.p38>=1)&&(i20.u49.p55>=1)) * (AF(((i0.u25.p34>=1)&&(i0.u25.p53>=1))) * AG((((u35.p124<1)||(u3...393
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG(EX((i20.u49.p179<1)))) * ((i21.u29.p180>=1)&&(i21.u17.p197>=1))) * ((i20.u53.p38>=1)...784
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 4,1,452.738,2953516,1,0,7.41358e+06,1.05889e+06,3307,4.18879e+06,724,6.82597e+06,6537058
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(EF(((((AX((((i21.u17.p119>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i21.u54.p96>=1))) * AF(((i1.u41.p199<1)||(i1.u50.p81<1)))) * ((i1.u19.p121>=1)&&(u35.p2...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((((!(EX(!((((i21.u17.p119>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i21.u54.p96>=1))))) * !(EG(!(((i1.u41.p1...473
(forward)formula 5,1,480.765,3018948,1,0,8.10393e+06,1.05889e+06,3479,4.23398e+06,769,6.82597e+06,9531757
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AG(((i3.u23.p173<1)&&(i13.u0.p144<1))) * ((((i21.u54.p136>=1)&&(i21.u54.p217>=1))&&(i21.u54.p242>=1)) + (AX(((i3.u23.p32>=1)&&(i3.u23...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u23.p173<1)&&(i13.u0.p144<1)))))) * (((i21.u54.p136>=1)&&(i21.u54.p217>=...414
(forward)formula 6,1,481.192,3036700,1,0,8.15064e+06,1.05889e+06,3501,4.26215e+06,773,6.82597e+06,9588272
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(!(((!(((((((i9.u2.p106>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i9.u36.p84>=1))||(i20.u49.p179>=1))&&(i2.u11.p143>=1))&&((i15.u46.p171>=1)&&(i15.u33.p190>=...585
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(((E(!(EX(!((((i21.u17.p119>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i21.u54.p96>=1))))) U !((E(!((i2.u11.p143>=1...1563
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 7,0,586.719,3260328,1,0,8.72827e+06,1.05889e+06,3248,4.57489e+06,688,6.82597e+06,8746778
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((EG(AG((((i4.u7.p113<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i4.u7.p91<1)))) * ((i7.u34.p198<1)||(i7.u30.p80<1))) * ((AF((((i20.u16.p118<1)||(u35.p21<1))|...372
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG(!(E(TRUE U !((((i4.u7.p113<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i4.u7.p91<1)))))) * ((i7.u34.p198<1)||(i7.u30.p8...441
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 8,1,843.999,4009828,1,0,1.01197e+07,1.05889e+06,692,6.5385e+06,602,6.82597e+06,1788483
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AX(AX(((((i12.u15.p117<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i12.u40.p94<1))&&((i12.u28.p178<1)||(i12.u40.p195<1))))) * (AF(((i8.u21.p25<1)||(i8.u21.p44...340
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(((((i12.u15.p117<1)||(u35.p21<1))||(i12.u40.p94<1))&&((i12.u28.p178<1)||(i12...568
(forward)formula 9,1,855.679,4009828,1,0,1.01197e+07,1.05889e+06,2502,6.5385e+06,716,6.82597e+06,3701977
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX((AG((EX((((i4.u7.p132>=1)&&(i4.u7.p213>=1))&&(i4.u7.p236>=1))) + AF(((i7.u30.p181>=1)&&(i7.u34.p198>=1))))) + (((i12.u15.p117>=1)&&(u...350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EX((!(E(TRUE U !((EX((((i4.u7.p132>=1)&&(i4.u7.p213>=1))&&(i4.u7.p236>=1))) + !(EG(!(((i7.u30.p18...424
(forward)formula 10,1,865.66,4009828,1,0,1.01197e+07,1.05889e+06,3289,6.5385e+06,748,6.82597e+06,5195228
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AF((!(E(EX(((i9.u44.p167>=1)&&(i9.u32.p186>=1))) U !((((i3.u13.p112>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i3.u23.p90>=1))))) + (((i8.u21.p25<1)||(i8.u2...321
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E(EX(((i9.u44.p167>=1)&&(i9.u32.p186>=1))) U !((((i3.u13.p112>=1)&&(u35.p21>=1))&&(i3...373
(forward)formula 11,1,986.141,4446756,1,0,1.12501e+07,1.05889e+06,686,7.51341e+06,590,6.85717e+06,2203408
FORMULA SupplyChain-PT-00020-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2052914 ms.

BK_STOP 1780252717823

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202604301425.jar
+ VERSION=202604301425
+ echo 'Running Version 202604301425'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SupplyChain-PT-00020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SupplyChain-PT-00020, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r354-tall-178024402800186"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SupplyChain-PT-00020.tgz
mv SupplyChain-PT-00020 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;