Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.r112-tall-177955701200553.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool gold2025
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-010, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r112-tall-177955701200553
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Mar 6 16:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K Mar 6 16:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Mar 6 16:57 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K Mar 6 16:57 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Mar 15 09:36 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Mar 15 09:36 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Mar 15 09:36 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Mar 15 09:36 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Mar 6 16:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K Mar 6 16:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Mar 6 16:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K Mar 6 16:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Mar 15 09:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 15 09:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 3 18:30 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 169K Mar 3 18:30 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME StableMarking

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1779631448170

Invoking MCC driver with
GOLD_TOOL=
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=DoubleExponent-PT-010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
StableMarking PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Transformed 534 places.
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Transformed 498 transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:04:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 534 places and 498 transitions and 1404 arcs in 178 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 11 places are NOT stable. Took 9 ms.
[2026-05-24 14:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 171 ms
[2026-05-24 14:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2026-05-24 14:04:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17202279600518103700.gal : 49 ms
[2026-05-24 14:04:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16323130510555399065.prop : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17202279600518103700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16323130510555399065.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1314 resets) in 2447 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 479/523 properties

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 52 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (10 resets) in 41 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16323130510555399065.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (11 resets) in 67 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 52 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 41 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 18 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (10 resets) in 22 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 24 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (9 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 29 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 24 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (10 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 20 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 13 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,523 properties remain. new max is 4
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 20 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
SDD size :1 after 4
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 21 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 18 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 18 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (9 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,523 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :4 after 7
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (10 resets) in 24 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
Invariant property smplace_523 does not hold.
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (10 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 13 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (12 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
Invariant property smplace_78 does not hold.
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
Invariant property smplace_67 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_56 does not hold.
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (11 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,519 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :7 after 11
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 24 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 22 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (11 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (12 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (12 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 400 steps (11 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (11 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (9 resets) in 18 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 479/479 properties
Invariant property smplace_89 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_12 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,517 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :11 after 12
Invariant property smplace_487 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_486 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_485 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_234 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_211 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_200 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_189 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_178 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_134 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_123 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_112 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_100 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,505 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :12 after 20
Invariant property smplace_256 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_245 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_223 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,502 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :20 after 23
Invariant property smplace_278 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_267 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_23 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,499 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :23 after 26
Invariant property smplace_467 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_456 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_445 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_289 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,495 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :26 after 29
SDD proceeding with computation,495 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :29 after 31
SDD proceeding with computation,495 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :31 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,495 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :32 after 44
Invariant property smplace_484 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_478 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,493 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :44 after 57
Invariant property smplace_422 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_411 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_400 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_389 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_378 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_367 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_356 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_345 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_334 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_322 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_311 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_300 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_156 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_145 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,479 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :57 after 77
SDD proceeding with computation,479 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :77 after 95
SDD proceeding with computation,479 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :95 after 137
Invariant property smplace_533 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_532 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_531 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_516 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_515 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_514 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_513 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_511 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_510 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_509 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_508 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_507 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_506 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_505 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_500 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_499 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_498 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_497 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_496 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_495 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_494 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_493 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_492 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_491 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_489 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_488 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_433 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_167 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_13 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_11 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_10 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_6 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_5 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_4 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_3 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_2 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,443 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :137 after 194
Invariant property smplace_8 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_7 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,441 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :194 after 511
SDD proceeding with computation,441 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :511 after 862
Invariant property smplace_529 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_528 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_527 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_526 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_525 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_524 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_522 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_521 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_520 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_519 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_518 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_517 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_503 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_502 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_9 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,426 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :862 after 1773
SDD proceeding with computation,426 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1773 after 3363
Invariant property smplace_530 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_504 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_71 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_70 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_69 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_66 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_65 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_64 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_63 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_62 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_61 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_60 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_59 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_58 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_57 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_41 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_40 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_39 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_38 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_37 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_36 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_35 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_33 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_32 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_31 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_30 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_26 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_25 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_24 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_22 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_21 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_20 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_19 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_18 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_17 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_16 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_15 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_14 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,388 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :3363 after 10260
SDD proceeding with computation,388 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :10260 after 37617
Invariant property smplace_68 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_54 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_53 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_52 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_51 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_50 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_49 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_48 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_47 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_46 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_44 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_43 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_42 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_28 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_27 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,373 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :37617 after 143855
SDD proceeding with computation,373 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :143855 after 284282
SDD proceeding with computation,373 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :284282 after 568510
SDD proceeding with computation,373 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :568510 after 1.1534e+06
Probabilistic random walk after 100001 steps, saw 50005 distinct states, run finished after 2865 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties seen :91
// Phase 1: matrix 498 rows 534 cols
Invariant property smplace_130 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_129 does not hold.
[2026-05-24 14:04:14] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 75 ms
Invariant property smplace_128 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_124 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_122 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_121 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_120 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_119 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_118 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_117 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_116 does not hold.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Invariant property smplace_99 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_98 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_97 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_96 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_95 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_94 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_93 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_92 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_91 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_90 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_88 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_84 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_83 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_82 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_81 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_80 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_79 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_77 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_76 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_75 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_74 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_73 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_72 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_55 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_29 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,337 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :1.1534e+06 after 2.41362e+06
Invariant property smplace_126 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_125 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :2.41362e+06 after 6.32616e+07
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :6.32616e+07 after 2.07016e+08
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :2.07016e+08 after 6.6513e+08
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 337 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s29 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s55 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s72 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s73 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s74 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s75 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s76 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s77 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s79 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s80 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s81 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s82 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s83 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s84 (/ 3.0 2.0))
(s85 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s86 (/ 11.0 8.0))
(s87 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s88 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s98 0.0)
(s99 (/ 5.0 4.0))
(s101 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s102 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s103 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s104 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s105 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s106 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s107 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s108 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s109 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s110 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s113 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/1032 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved in 5046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 35/51 constraints, State Equation: 0/534 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 373/373 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :6.6513e+08 after 2.05329e+09
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 110/445 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 307 places in 162 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 445/1032 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved in 5013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 31/51 constraints, State Equation: 0/534 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/373 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10244ms problems are : Problem set: 38 solved, 335 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 335 out of 534 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 534/534 places, 498/498 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 534 transition count 456
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 492 transition count 456
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 492 transition count 449
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 485 transition count 449
Performed 39 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 8 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 446 transition count 410
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 8 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 439 transition count 410
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 439 transition count 400
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 429 transition count 400
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 15 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 15 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 429 transition count 400
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 428 transition count 399
Applied a total of 226 rules in 152 ms. Remains 428 /534 variables (removed 106) and now considering 399/498 (removed 99) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 428/534 places, 399/498 transitions.
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :2.05329e+09 after 6.23837e+09
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (512097 resets) in 82980 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3390 resets) in 843 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3352 resets) in 745 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3413 resets) in 701 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3342 resets) in 709 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3413 resets) in 675 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3383 resets) in 563 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3366 resets) in 694 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3356 resets) in 605 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3408 resets) in 707 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3399 resets) in 523 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3453 resets) in 591 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3438 resets) in 586 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3423 resets) in 662 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3425 resets) in 662 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3374 resets) in 678 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3347 resets) in 583 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3384 resets) in 674 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3344 resets) in 659 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3365 resets) in 683 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3444 resets) in 616 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3423 resets) in 609 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3422 resets) in 596 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3373 resets) in 683 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (3373 resets) in 616 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3360 resets) in 643 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3422 resets) in 585 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3464 resets) in 653 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3405 resets) in 527 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3407 resets) in 577 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3403 resets) in 617 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3432 resets) in 714 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3397 resets) in 610 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3455 resets) in 596 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3388 resets) in 682 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3397 resets) in 681 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3367 resets) in 642 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3386 resets) in 706 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,335 properties remain. new max is 524288
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3361 resets) in 577 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
SDD size :6.23837e+09 after 1.85475e+10
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3406 resets) in 655 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3431 resets) in 604 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3371 resets) in 567 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3333 resets) in 591 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3365 resets) in 592 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3345 resets) in 687 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3409 resets) in 610 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3411 resets) in 631 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3378 resets) in 629 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3432 resets) in 578 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3433 resets) in 608 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3377 resets) in 618 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 335/335 properties
Invariant property smplace_127 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_114 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_113 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_110 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_109 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_108 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_107 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_106 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_105 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_104 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_103 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_102 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_101 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_86 does not hold.
Invariant property smplace_85 does not hold.
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :1.85475e+10 after 5.08871e+10
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 1048576
SDD size :5.08871e+10 after 8.86916e+10
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 3745527 steps, run timeout after 96001 ms. (steps per millisecond=39 ) properties seen :0 out of 335
Probabilistic random walk after 3745527 steps, saw 1872735 distinct states, run finished after 96005 ms. (steps per millisecond=39 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 399 rows 428 cols
[2026-05-24 14:06:33] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 24 ms
[2026-05-24 14:06:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/335 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/420 variables, 19/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/424 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 399/823 variables, 424/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/823 variables, 12/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/823 variables, 0/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/827 variables, 4/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/827 variables, 2/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 2097152
SDD size :8.86916e+10 after 1.62972e+11
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/827 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/827 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 827/827 variables, and 494 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 45015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 428/428 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/335 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 126 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 6/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/420 variables, 19/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 148 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 207 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 182 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 176 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 184 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 174 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 173 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 171 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 181 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 173 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 176 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 185 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 157 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 158 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 175 places in 190 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 178 places in 180 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 187 places in 183 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 8/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/424 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 424/827 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 45015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 0/428 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/320 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 90096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 320 out of 428 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 428/428 places, 399/399 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 428 transition count 396
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 425 transition count 396
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 425 transition count 395
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 424 transition count 395
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 422 transition count 393
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 421 transition count 393
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 421 transition count 390
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 418 transition count 390
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 418 transition count 390
Applied a total of 21 rules in 94 ms. Remains 418 /428 variables (removed 10) and now considering 390/399 (removed 9) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 418/428 places, 390/399 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (512863 resets) in 97016 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3339 resets) in 660 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3373 resets) in 659 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3394 resets) in 564 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3367 resets) in 550 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3405 resets) in 586 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3402 resets) in 689 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3371 resets) in 589 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3335 resets) in 688 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3369 resets) in 677 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3372 resets) in 584 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3388 resets) in 655 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3424 resets) in 650 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3388 resets) in 538 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3346 resets) in 564 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3370 resets) in 679 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3348 resets) in 575 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3339 resets) in 657 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3449 resets) in 532 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3385 resets) in 638 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3345 resets) in 512 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3378 resets) in 547 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3374 resets) in 603 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3396 resets) in 653 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3412 resets) in 681 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3390 resets) in 671 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3382 resets) in 596 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3379 resets) in 567 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3406 resets) in 660 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3375 resets) in 649 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3368 resets) in 566 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3376 resets) in 535 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (3434 resets) in 587 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3369 resets) in 655 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3369 resets) in 565 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3391 resets) in 671 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3366 resets) in 518 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3392 resets) in 745 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3384 resets) in 577 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3393 resets) in 656 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3352 resets) in 555 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3352 resets) in 550 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3360 resets) in 518 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3333 resets) in 535 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3435 resets) in 559 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3428 resets) in 734 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3370 resets) in 569 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3353 resets) in 625 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3390 resets) in 518 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3366 resets) in 585 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3349 resets) in 561 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 4194304
SDD size :1.62972e+11 after 2.88883e+11
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 4501767 steps, run timeout after 111001 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties seen :0 out of 320
Probabilistic random walk after 4501767 steps, saw 2250774 distinct states, run finished after 111001 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 390 rows 418 cols
[2026-05-24 14:10:31] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 21 ms
[2026-05-24 14:10:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 13/333 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/402 variables, 17/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/414 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 390/804 variables, 414/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 14/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 0/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/808 variables, 4/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/808 variables, 2/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/808 variables, 0/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/808 variables, 0/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 808/808 variables, and 486 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 46360 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 418/418 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 13/333 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 137 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 128 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 128 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 118 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 118 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 119 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 119 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 122 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 106 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 118 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 121 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 69/402 variables, 17/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 119 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 183 places in 120 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 164 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 161 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 163 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 15/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 178 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 163 places in 173 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 179 places in 178 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 141 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 141 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 10/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 168 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 170 places in 113 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 168 places in 117 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 170 places in 114 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 173 places in 122 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 181 places in 126 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 174 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 178 places in 129 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 180 places in 133 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 181 places in 133 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 182 places in 165 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 186 places in 165 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 168 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 189 places in 165 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 182 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 186 places in 165 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 167 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 189 places in 175 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 190 places in 157 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 194 places in 166 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 163 places in 159 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 165 places in 164 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 170 places in 117 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 173 places in 138 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 162 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 6/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 164 places in 119 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 176 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 177 places in 174 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 8/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 175 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 183 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 181 places in 120 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 181 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 4/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 178 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 167 places in 175 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 168 places in 149 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 175 places in 185 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/808 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 75015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/51 constraints, State Equation: 0/418 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/320 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 121424ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 320 out of 418 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 418/418 places, 390/390 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 35 ms. Remains 418 /418 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 418/418 places, 390/390 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 418/418 places, 390/390 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 418 /418 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 894 ms returned [20, 26, 47, 211, 336, 409, 415]
[2026-05-24 14:12:33] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [336, 211]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 910 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 416/418 places, 390/390 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 416 transition count 389
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 415 transition count 389
Applied a total of 2 rules in 18 ms. Remains 415 /416 variables (removed 1) and now considering 389/390 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 389 rows 415 cols
[2026-05-24 14:12:33] [INFO ] Computed 52 invariants in 34 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 874 ms returned [20, 26, 47, 406, 412]
[2026-05-24 14:12:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [412, 406]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 877 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 413/418 places, 389/390 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 413 transition count 388
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 412 transition count 388
Applied a total of 2 rules in 24 ms. Remains 412 /413 variables (removed 1) and now considering 388/389 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 388 rows 412 cols
[2026-05-24 14:12:34] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 36 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 721 ms returned [20, 26, 47]
[2026-05-24 14:12:35] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [26, 20]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 726 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 410/418 places, 388/390 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 410 transition count 387
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 409 transition count 387
Applied a total of 2 rules in 34 ms. Remains 409 /410 variables (removed 1) and now considering 387/388 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 409 cols
[2026-05-24 14:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 39 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 573 ms returned [44]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 574 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 408/418 places, 387/390 transitions.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 408 transition count 387
Applied a total of 1 rules in 30 ms. Remains 408 /408 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 408 cols
[2026-05-24 14:12:36] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 565 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:12:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:12:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1484 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2051 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 408/418 places, 387/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 5 iterations and 5259 ms. Remains : 408/418 places, 387/390 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (576473 resets) in 77454 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3650 resets) in 533 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3623 resets) in 644 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3720 resets) in 530 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3715 resets) in 608 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3660 resets) in 525 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3672 resets) in 716 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3667 resets) in 634 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3701 resets) in 653 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3665 resets) in 536 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3625 resets) in 524 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3652 resets) in 525 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3622 resets) in 603 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3649 resets) in 624 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3657 resets) in 541 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3684 resets) in 599 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3652 resets) in 470 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3645 resets) in 769 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3705 resets) in 790 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3677 resets) in 695 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3695 resets) in 506 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3687 resets) in 507 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3624 resets) in 641 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3664 resets) in 502 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3595 resets) in 568 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3682 resets) in 622 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3667 resets) in 594 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3581 resets) in 598 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3654 resets) in 536 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3621 resets) in 692 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3670 resets) in 640 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3633 resets) in 512 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3691 resets) in 491 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3615 resets) in 477 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3680 resets) in 473 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3647 resets) in 506 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3681 resets) in 662 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3626 resets) in 541 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3618 resets) in 625 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3652 resets) in 607 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3679 resets) in 581 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3608 resets) in 528 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3702 resets) in 549 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3652 resets) in 612 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3647 resets) in 516 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3682 resets) in 584 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3633 resets) in 585 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3609 resets) in 525 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3596 resets) in 615 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3665 resets) in 632 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3616 resets) in 498 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 14:14:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2026-05-24 14:14:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 14:14:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3005181636552990687.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3005181636552990687.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3005181636552990687.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3005181636552990687.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3005181636552990687.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 137 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 35 ms.
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15031869557817154572.gal : 34 ms
[2026-05-24 14:14:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17420526242564791833.prop : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15031869557817154572.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17420526242564791833.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...309
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17420526242564791833.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 1
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :1 after 1
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :233 after 246
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :3707 after 3755
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 4011268 steps, run timeout after 93001 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties seen :0 out of 320
Probabilistic random walk after 4011268 steps, saw 2005466 distinct states, run finished after 93001 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:14:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:14:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/374 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/404 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 42308 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/374 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :2.38507e+06 after 2.3851e+06
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/404 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 148 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 178 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 154 places in 201 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 147 places in 181 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 181 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 188 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 166 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 183 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 320/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 791/795 variables, and 809 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 90022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 404/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 132359ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 320 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 408 /408 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 408 /408 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:16:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 532 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:16:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:16:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1508 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2042 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:16:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 35 ms returned []
Running 386 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:16:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:16:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 35/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/405 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 8/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30079ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30081ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 32173 ms. Remains : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 400000 steps (57443 resets) in 8649 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
Running SMT prover for 320 properties.
[2026-05-24 14:17:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:17:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 43 generalized place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:17:31] [INFO ] After 2244ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
[2026-05-24 14:17:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:17:33] [INFO ] After 1765ms SMT Verify possible using 14 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2026-05-24 14:17:44] [INFO ] After 12310ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:320
[2026-05-24 14:17:44] [INFO ] After 14834ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:320
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:17:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 43 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:17:46] [INFO ] After 2117ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
[2026-05-24 14:17:49] [INFO ] After 2941ms SMT Verify possible using 14 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:49] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 147 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:50] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 222 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 446 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 146 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 161 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 532 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 207 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 184 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 219 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:17:54] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 281 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 161 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 172 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 175 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 178 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 170 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 159 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 164 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 167 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 167 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 156 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 161 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 146 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 178 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 149 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 167 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 162 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 163 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 158 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 163 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 167 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 151 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 149 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 157 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 160 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 154 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 166 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 162 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 169 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 160 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 159 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 163 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 171 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 169 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 164 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 167 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 166 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 147 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 160 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 150 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 167 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 170 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 169 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 164 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 160 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 172 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 171 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 153 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 152 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 168 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 166 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 154 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 164 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 156 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 161 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 153 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 160 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 157 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 162 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 172 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 154 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 163 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 169 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 161 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 165 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 165 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 151 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 159 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 159 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 150 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 156 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 164 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 153 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 150 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 155 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 159 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 158 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 157 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 159 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 163 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 161 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 156 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 149 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 157 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 155 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 155 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 167 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 174 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 148 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 143 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 161 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 159 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 169 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 155 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 160 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 161 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 165 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 159 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 158 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 163 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 158 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 156 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 159 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 142 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 171 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 168 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 144 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 155 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 149 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 161 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 148 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 143 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 145 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 160 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 160 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 162 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 165 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 173 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 161 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 147 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 165 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 162 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 169 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 165 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 166 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 165 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 154 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 150 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 152 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 167 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 151 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 167 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 168 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 165 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 165 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 165 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 170 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 164 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 158 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 166 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 166 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 171 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 146 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 156 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 155 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 149 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 151 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 162 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 151 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 153 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 157 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 156 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 165 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 158 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 158 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 159 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 149 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 151 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 159 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 152 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 154 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 146 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 152 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 161 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 168 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 154 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 147 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 168 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 149 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 171 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 161 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 163 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 155 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 148 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 229/228 trap constraints in 43490 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 146 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 149 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 150 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 576 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 135 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 163 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 151 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 152 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 168 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 152 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 150 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 151 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 148 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 150 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 171 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 169 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 168 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 163 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 170 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 153 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 155 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 162 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 165 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 165 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 166 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 159 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 162 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 160 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 165 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 152 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 154 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 167 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 171 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 165 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 162 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 167 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 147 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 164 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 163 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 151 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 150 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 164 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 170 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 167 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 165 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 160 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 163 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 154 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 57/56 trap constraints in 11047 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 149 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 174 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 432 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 153 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 155 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 401 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 328 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:18:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 404 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:03] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 1083 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 165 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 170 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 155 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 167 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 179 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 174 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 169 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 181 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 176 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 175 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :2.3851e+06 after 2.39128e+06
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 162 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 168 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 169 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 162 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 165 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 165 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 162 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 158 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 161 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 165 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 163 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 175 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 173 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 173 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 169 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 163 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 188 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 169 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 173 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 169 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 166 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 167 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 166 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 173 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 38/37 trap constraints in 36658 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 149 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 117 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 161 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 163 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 220 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 170 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 222 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:19:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 168 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 173 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 290 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:03] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 262 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 166 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 214 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 217 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 173 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 172 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 171 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 169 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 2089 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 170 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 228 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 571 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 179 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:16] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 239 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 1135 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 178 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:20:22] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 224 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 3
[2026-05-24 14:21:04] [INFO ] After 197523ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :319
[2026-05-24 14:21:04] [INFO ] After 200031ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :319
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (576773 resets) in 84919 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3705 resets) in 603 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3598 resets) in 606 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3636 resets) in 631 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3644 resets) in 533 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3683 resets) in 594 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3652 resets) in 546 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3682 resets) in 643 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3658 resets) in 558 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3648 resets) in 492 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3658 resets) in 599 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3635 resets) in 609 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3649 resets) in 549 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3634 resets) in 611 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3700 resets) in 676 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3597 resets) in 630 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3761 resets) in 668 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3695 resets) in 613 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3648 resets) in 607 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3660 resets) in 594 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3652 resets) in 572 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3693 resets) in 664 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3653 resets) in 619 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3666 resets) in 525 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3660 resets) in 548 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3635 resets) in 538 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3628 resets) in 657 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3664 resets) in 792 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3654 resets) in 605 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3588 resets) in 747 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3654 resets) in 782 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3705 resets) in 757 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3617 resets) in 1215 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3661 resets) in 1051 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3622 resets) in 628 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3665 resets) in 555 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3682 resets) in 549 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3731 resets) in 648 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3646 resets) in 488 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3653 resets) in 622 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3661 resets) in 716 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3656 resets) in 616 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3700 resets) in 600 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3672 resets) in 492 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3610 resets) in 472 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3668 resets) in 542 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3663 resets) in 547 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3634 resets) in 629 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3617 resets) in 534 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3671 resets) in 553 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3630 resets) in 546 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,320 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2.39128e+06 after 2.39232e+06
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 3758461 steps, run timeout after 99001 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties seen :0 out of 320
Probabilistic random walk after 3758461 steps, saw 1879095 distinct states, run finished after 99001 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:23:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:23:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 105.0 s and query timeout 10500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/374 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/404 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 43550 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 105.0 s and query timeout 10500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/374 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/404 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 167 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 154 places in 176 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 147 places in 172 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 168 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 170 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 156 places in 158 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 180 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 320/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 150 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 160 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 171 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 178 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 791/795 variables, and 813 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved in 105018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 404/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 148605ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 320 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 320 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 408 /408 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 9 ms. Remains : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 408 /408 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:25:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 538 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:25:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1526 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2066 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:25:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 386 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:25:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:25:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 35/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/405 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 8/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30045ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 386 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30047ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 32145 ms. Remains : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 400000 steps (57879 resets) in 6215 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 320/320 properties
Running SMT prover for 320 properties.
[2026-05-24 14:26:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:26:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 43 generalized place invariants in 22 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:26:21] [INFO ] After 2426ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
[2026-05-24 14:26:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:26:23] [INFO ] After 1858ms SMT Verify possible using 14 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2026-05-24 14:26:33] [INFO ] After 12322ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:320
[2026-05-24 14:26:33] [INFO ] After 15030ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:320
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:26:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 43 generalized place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:26:36] [INFO ] After 2163ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
[2026-05-24 14:26:39] [INFO ] After 2979ms SMT Verify possible using 14 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :320
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:39] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 142 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:40] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 234 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 478 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 147 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 164 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 541 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 227 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 181 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:43] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 226 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 275 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 166 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 162 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 165 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 164 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 170 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 172 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 168 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 172 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 171 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 170 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 172 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 159 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 173 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 171 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 168 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 173 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 172 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 159 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 164 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 165 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 170 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 168 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 180 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 166 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 179 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 199 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 170 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 182 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 158 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 160 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 169 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 169 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 168 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 174 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 162 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 157 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 172 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 169 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 183 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 176 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 162 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 175 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 167 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 160 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 165 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 162 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 151 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 166 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 162 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 151 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 173 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 171 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 177 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 167 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 171 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 172 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 189 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 179 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 173 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 153 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 163 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 169 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 173 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 180 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 173 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 168 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 173 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 179 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 173 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 168 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 167 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 188 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 177 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 172 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 178 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 187 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 171 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 181 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 191 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 175 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 175 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 172 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 183 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 175 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 166 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 167 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 175 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 171 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 165 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 163 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 163 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 159 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 145 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 153 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 162 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 148 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 151 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 160 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 167 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 161 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 162 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 161 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 161 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 174 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 171 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 171 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 171 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 152 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 157 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 163 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 158 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 174 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 155 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 151 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 176 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 170 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 173 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 173 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 171 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 160 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 160 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 173 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 170 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 166 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 164 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 165 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 169 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 155 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 177 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 172 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 147 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 145 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 152 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 160 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 147 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 160 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 155 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 164 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 158 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 160 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 167 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 159 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 164 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 168 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 166 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 144 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 157 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 159 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 168 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 160 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 168 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 162 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 176 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 173 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 170 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 170 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 149 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 160 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 170 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 159 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 157 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 150 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 162 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 164 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 169 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 171 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 170 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 161 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 161 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 164 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 162 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 160 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 164 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 146 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 150 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 162 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 156 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 157 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 159 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 166 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 165 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 153 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 156 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 154 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 154 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 170 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 154 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 151 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 159 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 150 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 152 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 171 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 149 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 152 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 151 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 151 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 181 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 171 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 155 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 159 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 173 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 157 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 169 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 167 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 175 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 156 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 153 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 229/228 trap constraints in 43755 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 147 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 147 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 146 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 555 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 124 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 164 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 163 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 169 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 147 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 157 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 160 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 173 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 151 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 158 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 160 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 157 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 157 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 156 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 176 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 170 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 172 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 173 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 179 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 177 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 165 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 173 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 167 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 148 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 151 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 167 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 167 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 171 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 168 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 160 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 168 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 166 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 162 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 164 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 161 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 162 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 168 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 167 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 169 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 174 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 164 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 151 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 171 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 163 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 153 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 156 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 171 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 164 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 163 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 172 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 169 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 169 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 160 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 157 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 57/56 trap constraints in 10895 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 169 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 186 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 460 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 161 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 161 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 414 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 328 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 398 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:27:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 1052 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 164 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 167 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 167 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 179 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 172 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 172 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 175 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 170 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 174 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 179 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 165 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 166 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 163 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 167 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 163 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 162 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 174 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 163 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 170 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 175 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 176 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 162 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 166 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 175 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 171 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 176 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 174 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 176 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 175 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 181 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 166 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 165 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 166 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 172 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 164 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 158 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:30] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 38/37 trap constraints in 36590 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 154 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 112 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 158 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 168 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 221 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 168 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 218 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 163 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 160 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 275 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 260 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 170 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 222 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 171 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 226 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 178 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 178 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 162 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 170 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:28:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 2075 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 164 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:29:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 224 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:29:03] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 546 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 174 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:29:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 231 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:29:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 1138 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 181 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:29:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 235 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 3
[2026-05-24 14:29:53] [INFO ] After 197449ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :319
[2026-05-24 14:29:54] [INFO ] After 200026ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :319
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5801 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3640 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 599255 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=199 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 599255 steps, saw 299686 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=199 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:29:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:29:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 304/305 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 99/404 variables, 43/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 299 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 304/305 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 99/404 variables, 43/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 153 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 795/795 variables, and 472 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 815 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 58 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 902 edges and 408 vertex of which 402 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 401 transition count 311
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 327 transition count 311
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 327 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 315 transition count 299
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 260 transition count 244
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 250 transition count 244
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 23 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 250 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 227 transition count 221
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 26 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 26 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 227 transition count 221
Applied a total of 378 rules in 36 ms. Remains 227 /408 variables (removed 181) and now considering 221/387 (removed 166) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 36 ms. Remains : 227/408 places, 221/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5794 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3683 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 778618 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=259 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 778618 steps, saw 389385 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=259 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 227 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 19 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 149/150 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/223 variables, 29/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 221/444 variables, 223/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 38/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/448 variables, 4/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/448 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/448 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 205 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 149/150 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/223 variables, 29/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 221/444 variables, 223/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 38/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/448 variables, 4/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/448 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/448 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1261 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1492ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 42 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 227 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 227/227 places, 221/221 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 221/221 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 227/227 places, 221/221 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 227/227 places, 221/221 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 221/221 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:30:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 558 ms returned [48, 70, 75, 95, 101, 122, 127, 147, 152, 173, 179, 193, 198]
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [48]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 560 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 226/227 places, 221/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 226 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 225 transition count 220
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 225 /226 variables (removed 1) and now considering 220/221 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 225 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 531 ms returned [68, 73, 93, 99, 120, 125, 145, 150, 171, 177, 191, 196]
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [73, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 532 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 223/227 places, 220/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 223 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 222 transition count 219
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 222 /223 variables (removed 1) and now considering 219/220 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 222 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:03] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 460 ms returned [90, 96, 117, 122, 142, 147, 168, 174, 188, 193]
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [96, 90]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 461 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 220/227 places, 219/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 220 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 219 transition count 218
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 219 /220 variables (removed 1) and now considering 218/219 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 219 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 441 ms returned [114, 119, 139, 144, 165, 171, 185, 190]
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [119, 114]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 442 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 217/227 places, 218/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 217 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 217
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 216 /217 variables (removed 1) and now considering 217/218 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 216 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 372 ms returned [136, 141, 162, 168, 182, 187]
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [141, 136]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 373 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 214/227 places, 217/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 214 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 213 transition count 216
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 213 /214 variables (removed 1) and now considering 216/217 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 216 rows 213 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 354 ms returned [159, 165, 179, 184]
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [159, 165]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 358 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 6 : 211/227 places, 216/221 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 211 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 210 transition count 215
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 210 /211 variables (removed 1) and now considering 215/216 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 210 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 329 ms returned [176, 181]
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [176]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 330 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 7 : 209/227 places, 215/221 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 208 transition count 214
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 208 /209 variables (removed 1) and now considering 214/215 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 208 cols
[2026-05-24 14:30:05] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 325 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2523 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 8 : 208/227 places, 214/221 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 8 iterations and 5667 ms. Remains : 208/227 places, 214/221 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5742 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3600 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 758052 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=252 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 758052 steps, saw 379105 distinct states, run finished after 3003 ms. (steps per millisecond=252 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:30:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 148/149 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/203 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 214/417 variables, 203/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 38/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/422 variables, 5/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 2/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/422 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 422/422 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 179 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 148/149 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 54/203 variables, 18/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 7/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 214/417 variables, 203/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 38/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/422 variables, 5/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/422 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 422/422 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1179ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 45 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 208 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 208/208 places, 214/214 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 208 /208 variables (removed 0) and now considering 214/214 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 208/208 places, 214/214 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 208/208 places, 214/214 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 208 /208 variables (removed 0) and now considering 214/214 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2535 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 213 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:30:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:30:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 214/422 variables, 208/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 38/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/422 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 422/422 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved in 14850 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 213/213 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 214/422 variables, 208/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 38/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 213/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 110 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 122 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 114 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 422/422 variables, and 510 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 213/213 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 44957ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44957ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 47514 ms. Remains : 208/208 places, 214/214 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 208 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 190 transition count 196
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 181 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 181 transition count 187
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 180 transition count 186
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 178 transition count 184
Applied a total of 60 rules in 33 ms. Remains 178 /208 variables (removed 30) and now considering 184/214 (removed 30) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 178 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] After 57ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] After 96ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] After 9ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 78 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] After 115ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:31:00] [INFO ] After 281ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 385 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5739 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3582 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 591923 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=197 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 591923 steps, saw 296020 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=197 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 408 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:03] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 21 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 293/294 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/305 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 99/404 variables, 43/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 293/294 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/305 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 99/404 variables, 43/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 795/795 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 68 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 902 edges and 408 vertex of which 402 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 401 transition count 311
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 327 transition count 310
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 326 transition count 310
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 326 transition count 298
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 314 transition count 298
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 259 transition count 243
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 249 transition count 243
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 21 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 249 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 228 transition count 222
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 26 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 26 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 228 transition count 222
Applied a total of 376 rules in 104 ms. Remains 228 /408 variables (removed 180) and now considering 222/387 (removed 165) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 228/408 places, 222/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5786 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3687 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 771239 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 771239 steps, saw 385697 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 222 rows 228 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 16 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/224 variables, 38/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 222/446 variables, 224/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 38/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/450 variables, 4/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/450 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/450 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 228/228 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/224 variables, 38/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 222/446 variables, 224/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 38/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/450 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/450 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/450 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 724 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 228/228 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 949ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 67 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 228 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 228/228 places, 222/222 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 228 /228 variables (removed 0) and now considering 222/222 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 228/228 places, 222/222 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 228/228 places, 222/222 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 228 /228 variables (removed 0) and now considering 222/222 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:31:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 673 ms returned [70, 75, 96, 102, 123, 128, 148, 153, 174, 180, 194, 199]
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [75, 70]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 675 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 226/228 places, 222/222 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 226 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 225 transition count 221
Applied a total of 2 rules in 16 ms. Remains 225 /226 variables (removed 1) and now considering 221/222 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 225 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 415 ms returned [93, 99, 120, 125, 145, 150, 171, 177, 191, 196]
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [99, 93]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 428 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 223/228 places, 221/222 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 223 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 222 transition count 220
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 222 /223 variables (removed 1) and now considering 220/221 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 222 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 343 ms returned [117, 122, 142, 147, 168, 174, 188, 193]
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [122, 117]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 359 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 220/228 places, 220/222 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 220 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 219 transition count 219
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 219 /220 variables (removed 1) and now considering 219/220 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 219 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:10] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 330 ms returned [139, 144, 165, 171, 185, 190]
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [144, 139]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 342 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 217/228 places, 219/222 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 217 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 218
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 216 /217 variables (removed 1) and now considering 218/219 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 216 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 341 ms returned [162, 168, 182, 187]
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [162, 168]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 342 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 214/228 places, 218/222 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 214 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 213 transition count 217
Applied a total of 2 rules in 23 ms. Remains 213 /214 variables (removed 1) and now considering 217/218 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 213 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 291 ms returned [179, 184]
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [179]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 292 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 6 : 212/228 places, 217/222 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 211 transition count 216
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 211 /212 variables (removed 1) and now considering 216/217 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 216 rows 211 cols
[2026-05-24 14:31:11] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 252 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:31:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:31:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1953 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 7 : 211/228 places, 216/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 7 iterations and 4749 ms. Remains : 211/228 places, 216/222 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5791 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3666 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 796341 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=265 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 796341 steps, saw 398242 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=265 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/152 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/206 variables, 18/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 216/422 variables, 206/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 38/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/427 variables, 5/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 2/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/152 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/206 variables, 18/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 216/422 variables, 206/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 38/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/427 variables, 5/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 653 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 820ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 45 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 216/216 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 216/216 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 216/216 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 216/216 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 216/216 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:31:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:31:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1984 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:31:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:31:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/211 variables, 12/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 216/427 variables, 211/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 38/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 14248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/211 variables, 12/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 216/427 variables, 211/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 38/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 215/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 20/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 516 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 44297ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44298ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 46562 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 216/216 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 211 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 193 transition count 198
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 185 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 185 transition count 190
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 184 transition count 189
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 184 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 182 transition count 187
Applied a total of 58 rules in 12 ms. Remains 182 /211 variables (removed 29) and now considering 187/216 (removed 29) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 182 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] After 37ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive and 25 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] After 90ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] After 21ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:32:04] [INFO ] After 170ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 234 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5725 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3706 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 584428 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=194 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 584428 steps, saw 292275 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=194 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 408 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 23 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 291/292 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/309 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/404 variables, 42/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 314 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 291/292 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/309 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/404 variables, 42/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 6/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 795/795 variables, and 478 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 98 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 902 edges and 408 vertex of which 402 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 401 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 329 transition count 312
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 328 transition count 312
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 328 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 316 transition count 300
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 261 transition count 245
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 251 transition count 245
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 26 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 251 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 225 transition count 219
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 25 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 25 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 225 transition count 219
Applied a total of 381 rules in 25 ms. Remains 225 /408 variables (removed 183) and now considering 219/387 (removed 168) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 225/408 places, 219/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5745 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3659 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 753897 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=251 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 753897 steps, saw 377025 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=251 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 225 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:13] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 13 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 114/120 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/221 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 219/440 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 38/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/444 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 444/444 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 204 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 114/120 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/221 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 219/440 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 38/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/444 variables, 4/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 444/444 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 297 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 526ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 35 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 225 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 219/219 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 219/219 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:32:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 620 ms returned [47, 68, 73, 93, 99, 120, 125, 145, 150, 171, 177, 191, 196]
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 621 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 224/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 224 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 223 transition count 218
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 223 /224 variables (removed 1) and now considering 218/219 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 223 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 484 ms returned [66, 71, 91, 97, 118, 123, 143, 148, 169, 175, 189, 194]
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [71, 66]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 486 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 221/225 places, 218/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 221 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 220 transition count 217
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 220 /221 variables (removed 1) and now considering 217/218 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 220 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:14] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 445 ms returned [88, 94, 115, 120, 140, 145, 166, 172, 186, 191]
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [94, 88]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 446 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 218/225 places, 217/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 218 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 217 transition count 216
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 217 /218 variables (removed 1) and now considering 216/217 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 216 rows 217 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 434 ms returned [112, 117, 137, 142, 163, 169, 183, 188]
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [117, 112]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 450 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 215/225 places, 216/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 215 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 214 transition count 215
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 214 /215 variables (removed 1) and now considering 215/216 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 214 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 455 ms returned [134, 139, 160, 166, 180, 185]
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [139, 134]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 457 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 212/225 places, 215/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 212 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 211 transition count 214
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 211 /212 variables (removed 1) and now considering 214/215 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 211 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 353 ms returned [157, 163, 177, 182]
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [157, 163]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 354 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 6 : 209/225 places, 214/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 209 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 208 transition count 213
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 208 /209 variables (removed 1) and now considering 213/214 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 213 rows 208 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 333 ms returned [174, 179]
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [174]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 333 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 7 : 207/225 places, 213/219 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 212
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 212/213 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 206 cols
[2026-05-24 14:32:16] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 336 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:32:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1704 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2044 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 8 : 206/225 places, 212/219 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 8 iterations and 5258 ms. Remains : 206/225 places, 212/219 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5732 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3657 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 792868 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=264 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 792868 steps, saw 396505 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=264 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:32:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:32:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/131 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/151 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 50/201 variables, 17/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 154 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/131 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 20/151 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 50/201 variables, 17/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 17/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 2617 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2786ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 34 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:32:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 439 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:32:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1738 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:32:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:32:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 13462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 211/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 139 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 116 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 129 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 134 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 141 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 20/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 506 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43558ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43558ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45770 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 206 transition count 194
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 188 transition count 194
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 179 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 179 transition count 185
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 178 transition count 184
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 178 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 176 transition count 182
Applied a total of 60 rules in 13 ms. Remains 176 /206 variables (removed 30) and now considering 182/212 (removed 30) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 176 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] After 45ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] After 97ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] After 33ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2026-05-24 14:33:11] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 320 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2026-05-24 14:33:11] [INFO ] After 389ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2026-05-24 14:33:11] [INFO ] After 548ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 637 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5813 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3659 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 588052 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=195 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 588052 steps, saw 294083 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=195 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 408 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:14] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 22 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 291/292 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/309 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/404 variables, 42/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 795/795 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 496 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 291/292 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/309 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/404 variables, 42/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 387/791 variables, 404/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 14/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 151 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 4/795 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/795 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/795 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 795/795 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1152 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 408/408 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1707ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 88 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 408 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 408/408 places, 387/387 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 902 edges and 408 vertex of which 402 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 401 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 329 transition count 312
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 328 transition count 312
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 328 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 316 transition count 300
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 261 transition count 245
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 251 transition count 245
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 26 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 251 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 225 transition count 219
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 25 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 25 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 225 transition count 219
Applied a total of 381 rules in 25 ms. Remains 225 /408 variables (removed 183) and now considering 219/387 (removed 168) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 225/408 places, 219/387 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5779 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (3642 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 764012 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=254 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 764012 steps, saw 382083 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=254 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 225 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:19] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 11 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 114/120 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/221 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 219/440 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 38/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/444 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 444/444 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 157 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 114/120 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/221 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 219/440 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 38/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/444 variables, 4/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 444/444 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 662 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 866ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 112 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 225 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 219/219 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 225/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 219/219 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:33:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 570 ms returned [47, 68, 73, 93, 99, 120, 125, 145, 150, 171, 177, 191, 196]
[2026-05-24 14:33:20] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 581 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 224/225 places, 219/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 224 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 223 transition count 218
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 223 /224 variables (removed 1) and now considering 218/219 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 223 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:20] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 513 ms returned [66, 71, 91, 97, 118, 123, 143, 148, 169, 175, 189, 194]
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [71, 66]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 523 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 221/225 places, 218/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 221 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 220 transition count 217
Applied a total of 2 rules in 25 ms. Remains 220 /221 variables (removed 1) and now considering 217/218 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 220 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 448 ms returned [88, 94, 115, 120, 140, 145, 166, 172, 186, 191]
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [94, 88]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 476 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 218/225 places, 217/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 218 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 217 transition count 216
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 217 /218 variables (removed 1) and now considering 216/217 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 216 rows 217 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:21] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 449 ms returned [112, 117, 137, 142, 163, 169, 183, 188]
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [117, 112]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 459 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 215/225 places, 216/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 215 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 214 transition count 215
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 214 /215 variables (removed 1) and now considering 215/216 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 214 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 376 ms returned [134, 139, 160, 166, 180, 185]
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [139, 134]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 391 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 212/225 places, 215/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 212 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 211 transition count 214
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 211 /212 variables (removed 1) and now considering 214/215 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 211 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 362 ms returned [157, 163, 177, 182]
[2026-05-24 14:33:22] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [157, 163]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 366 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 6 : 209/225 places, 214/219 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 209 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 208 transition count 213
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 208 /209 variables (removed 1) and now considering 213/214 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 213 rows 208 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 309 ms returned [174, 179]
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [174]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 319 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 7 : 207/225 places, 213/219 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 212
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 212/213 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 206 cols
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 312 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:33:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1702 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2041 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 8 : 206/225 places, 212/219 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 8 iterations and 5235 ms. Remains : 206/225 places, 212/219 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5783 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3642 resets) in 36 ms. (1081 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 791628 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 791628 steps, saw 395886 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 14:33:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:33:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/131 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/151 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 50/201 variables, 17/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 174 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/131 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 20/151 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 50/201 variables, 17/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 3365 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3579ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 88 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:33:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 14:33:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-24 14:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1745 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2075 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 14:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 14:33:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 13598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 211/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-24 14:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ StableMarking = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution StableMarking -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="gold2025"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool gold2025"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-010, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r112-tall-177955701200553"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-010.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-010 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StableMarking.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;