Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.r096-smll-177946996500174.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool gold2025
Input is Dekker-PT-050, examination is Liveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r096-smll-177946996500174
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.0M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Mar 4 18:53 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Mar 4 18:53 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Mar 4 18:51 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Mar 4 18:51 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 15 08:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Mar 15 08:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Mar 15 08:53 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Mar 15 08:53 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 4 18:53 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 155K Mar 4 18:53 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Mar 4 18:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K Mar 4 18:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 15 08:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 15 08:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 3 18:30 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5M Mar 3 18:30 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME Liveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1779531375306

Invoking MCC driver with
GOLD_TOOL=
BK_EXAMINATION=Liveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
Liveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2026-05-23 10:16:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, Liveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2026-05-23 10:16:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-23 10:16:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 577 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:18] [INFO ] Transformed 250 places.
[2026-05-23 10:16:18] [INFO ] Transformed 2600 transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:16:18] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2026-05-23 10:16:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 250 places and 2600 transitions and 20100 arcs in 822 ms.
Built sparse matrix representations for Structural reductions in 33 ms.30846KB memory used
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 318 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 344 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 170 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:16:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 250 cols
[2026-05-23 10:16:19] [INFO ] Computed 150 invariants in 31 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 447 ms returned []
[2026-05-23 10:16:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2026-05-23 10:16:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 669 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 372 ms returned []
Running 2550 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-23 10:16:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 200/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 50/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 50/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/450 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved in 30131 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 200/250 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/100 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 0/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2550/2500 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 200/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 50/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 50/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/450 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved in 30072 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 200/250 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/100 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 0/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/2500 constraints, Known Traps: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61894ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61973ms
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 63757 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Random walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 19644 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=63 )
Random directed walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 21687 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=57 )
[2026-05-23 10:18:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2026-05-23 10:18:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 100 positive place invariants in 54 ms returned sat
[2026-05-23 10:18:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 100 positive and 50 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned unsat
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:18:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2026-05-23 10:18:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 2313 ms returned [100, 103, 106, 109, 112, 115, 118, 121, 124, 127, 130, 133, 136, 139, 142, 145, 148, 151, 154, 157, 160, 163, 166, 169, 172, 175, 178, 181, 184, 187, 190, 193, 196, 199, 202, 205, 208, 211, 214, 217, 220, 223, 226, 229, 232, 235, 238, 241, 244, 247]
Discarding 50 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 2320 ms to find 50 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 200/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 2 iterations and 2357 ms. Remains : 200/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Discarding 50 transitions out of 2600. Remains 2550
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 4821 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 89/2550 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 150 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 87/89 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 135 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 86/87 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 85/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 83/85 properties
[2026-05-23 10:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 733 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 81/83 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 80/81 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 61 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 79/80 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 78/79 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 77/78 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 76/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 74/76 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 72/74 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 71/72 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 70/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 69/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 68/69 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 67/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 66/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 64/66 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 63/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 62/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 61/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 60/61 properties
[2026-05-23 10:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 373 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 58/60 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 56 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 57/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 56/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 57 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 54/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 62 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 52/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 51/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 50/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 48/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 47/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 70 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 45/47 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 43/45 properties
[2026-05-23 10:18:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13295493843380949081.gal : 147 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 42/43 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 41/42 properties
[2026-05-23 10:18:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5232871911493759681.prop : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13295493843380949081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5232871911493759681.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 40/41 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 39/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 38/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 37/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 68 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 35/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 33/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 32/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 31/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 30/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 29/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 80 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 28/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 27/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 25/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 24/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 98 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 18/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 16/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 15/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 14/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 13/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 8/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 6/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 3821 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 2550 properties.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 27 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:18:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2026-05-23 10:18:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 2209 ms returned [100, 103, 106, 109, 112, 115, 118, 121, 124, 127, 130, 133, 136, 139, 142, 145, 148, 151, 154, 157, 160, 163, 166, 169, 172, 175, 178, 181, 184, 187, 190, 193, 196, 199, 202, 205, 208, 211, 214, 217, 220, 223, 226, 229, 232, 235, 238, 241, 244, 247]
Discarding 50 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 2215 ms to find 50 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 200/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 2 iterations and 2265 ms. Remains : 200/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Discarding 50 transitions out of 2600. Remains 2550
Net is quasi-live, checking if it is reversible to establish liveness.
[2026-05-23 10:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 240 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 268 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5914700789557928201.gal : 67 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8330742983075143226.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5914700789557928201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8330742983075143226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,1.10783,36056,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_1_0==0))&&((flag_0_1==1)&&(flag_1_1==0)))&&(((flag_0_2==1)&&(flag_1_2==0))&&((flag_0_3==1)&&(flag_1_3=...3182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_1_0==0))&&((flag_0_1==1)&&(flag_1_1==0)))&&(((flag_0...913
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2026-05-23 10:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 105 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-23 10:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13537829874331359948.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13537829874331359948.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13537829874331359948.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13537829874331359948.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13537829874331359948.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-23 10:18:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-23 10:18:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-23 10:18:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7200 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-23 10:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 603 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 71 ms.
[2026-05-23 10:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability655675426386487363.gal : 26 ms
[2026-05-23 10:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11099922931294987235.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability655675426386487363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11099922931294987235.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.549597,11564,103,10,1616,1350,2815,1338,26,1321,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((((u0.flag_0_0==1)&&(u0.flag_1_0==0))&&((u1.flag_0_1==1)&&(u1.flag_1_1==0)))&&(((u2.flag_0_2==1)&&(u2.flag_1_2==0))&&((u3.fla...3942
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((((u0.flag_0_0==1)&&(u0.flag_1_0==0))&&((u1.flag_0_1==1)&&(u1.flag_1_1==0))...4002
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.exit_0, u1.exit_1, u2.exit_2, u3.exit_3, u4.exit_4, u5.exit_5, u6.exit_6, u7.exit_7, u8.ex...794
(forward)formula 0,1,2.00065,54700,1,0,158212,1350,18844,76124,172,1321,204016
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query Liveness after proving 1 properties.
FORMULA Liveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK DECISION_DIAGRAMS BESTFIRST_WALK TOPOLOGICAL QUASI_LIVE_REVERSIBLE USE_NUPN
Total runtime 123559 ms.

BK_STOP 1779531501364

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ Liveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="Liveness"
export BK_TOOL="gold2025"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool gold2025"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-050, examination is Liveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r096-smll-177946996500174"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-050.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-050 execution
cd execution
if [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "Liveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "Liveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' Liveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME Liveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;