About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DES-PT-05a
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 16197.623 | 3600000.00 | 3189381.00 | 180032.10 | FTFTTFFTT??????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.r082-smll-177946993700346.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r082-smll-177946993700346
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K Mar 6 18:23 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K Mar 6 18:23 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Mar 6 18:23 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Mar 6 18:23 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 15 08:55 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Mar 15 08:55 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Mar 15 08:56 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Mar 15 08:56 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 6 18:23 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 162K Mar 6 18:23 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Mar 6 18:23 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Mar 6 18:23 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Mar 15 08:56 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Mar 15 08:56 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 3 18:30 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K Mar 3 18:30 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1779658463849
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-05a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202604301425
[2026-05-24 21:34:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2026-05-24 21:34:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 127 ms
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Transformed 135 places.
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Transformed 92 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 135 places and 92 transitions and 457 arcs in 312 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 27 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 14 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 135 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 135/135 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 135 /135 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12623295603403326656.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7192250439415304828.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12623295603403326656.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7192250439415304828.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 1 columns.
Culled 1 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 134 cols 390 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 52 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 59 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7192250439415304828.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 466 ms returned [32]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 529 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/135 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 584 ms. Remains : 134/135 places, 78/78 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6693999445622933101.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17467734180854732349.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6693999445622933101.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17467734180854732349.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 134 cols 390 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 52 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-17467734180854732349.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:34:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 401 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 8698 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 4/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 77/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38800ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38816ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39248 ms. Remains : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 134 places after structural reductions.
[2026-05-24 21:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 134 places (down from 102) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 84 to 71
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (896 resets) in 1917 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 5/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (197 resets) in 424 ms. (94 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (184 resets) in 281 ms. (141 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (182 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (224 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (180 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2026-05-24 21:35:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/34 variables, 12/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 16/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/78 variables, 22/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 44/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 44/122 variables, 22/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 44/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/126 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 4/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 77/203 variables, 126/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 9/212 variables, 8/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 8/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 326 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 662 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 14/25 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 14/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 52/77 variables, 26/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 52/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 45/122 variables, 22/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 45/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/126 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 4/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 77/203 variables, 126/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 9/212 variables, 8/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 8/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 4513 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5188ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 539 steps, including 2 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=269 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 699 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
Computed a total of 37 stabilizing places and 32 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:35:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 408 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 633 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 642 ms. Remains : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5276246336258698032.gal : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5900203057597432076.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5276246336258698032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5900203057597432076.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16124383712614778799.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16124383712614778799.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16124383712614778799.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16124383712614778799.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16124383712614778799.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8293521088421088759.gal : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:35:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12577991592652558481.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8293521088421088759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12577991592652558481.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,0.264574,11736,1366,208,20561,940,276,18870,101,2570,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(((i2.u2.p26==1)&&(i2.u11.p48==1)) U (A(((i0.u7.p43==1)&&(i0.u9.p45==1)) U ((i5.u16.p60==1)&&(i5.u24.p77==1))) * (!((AG(((i1.u0.p22==1...442
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((E(!((!((E(!(((i5.u16.p60==1)&&(i5.u24.p77==1))) U (!(((i0.u7.p43==1)&&(i0.u9.p45==1))) * !...1481
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t37, t38, t71, u12.t30, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t16, i0.t75, i0.t69, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9...318
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 22 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-15294669667104437878.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2348795920325804552.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:36:14] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-15294669667104437878.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2348795920325804552.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 133 cols 386 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 51 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:36:14] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2348795920325804552.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:36:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:36:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:36:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 377 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:36:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3549 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 76/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 33583ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33585ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33985 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9205953257563324303.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:36:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11434493097094964252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9205953257563324303.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11434493097094964252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11271357232701372076.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11271357232701372076.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11271357232701372076.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11271357232701372076.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11271357232701372076.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18111455894426967775.gal : 9 ms
[2026-05-24 21:37:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9731552605457909399.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18111455894426967775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9731552605457909399.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.622361,16668,1446,207,29114,954,302,43419,96,2852,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG((((!(EG(((((i1.u9.p42==1)&&(i0.u11.p47==1))&&((i2.u12.p49==1)&&(i1.u9.p42==1)))&&((i0.u11.p47==1)&&(i2.u12.p49==1))))) * (i1.u9.p42=...627
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((!(EG(((((i1.u9.p42==1)&&(i0.u11.p47==1))&&((i2.u12.p49==1)&&(i1.u9.p42==1)))&&((i0....721
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t70, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t75, i0.u13.t30, i1.t74, i1....335
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7659839022428582757.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10983909241738085127.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-7659839022428582757.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10983909241738085127.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 134 cols 390 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 52 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-10983909241738085127.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 364 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 637 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:37:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 6969 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 4/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 77/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 37002ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37004ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37658 ms. Remains : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16082188480274071153.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15030657833942382985.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16082188480274071153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15030657833942382985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14708821214169546408.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14708821214169546408.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14708821214169546408.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14708821214169546408.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14708821214169546408.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3462519989759857622.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13223697310956584362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3462519989759857622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13223697310956584362.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,0.303904,11948,1454,205,20946,926,286,20448,99,2506,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AX((i2.u0.p22==1)) * ((i14.u16.p58==0)||(i14.u47.p127==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((i2.u0.p22==1)))) * ((i14.u16.p58==0)||(i14.u47.p127==0)))))))] != FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t37, t38, t71, u13.t30, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t21, i0.u2.t25,...331
(forward)formula 0,1,1.33689,43440,1,0,103181,2401,1555,120964,728,9295,133255
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9415124853118850778.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8996054208080902556.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9415124853118850778.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8996054208080902556.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 133 cols 386 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 51 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-8996054208080902556.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 308 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:38:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 76/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 34928ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34930ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35406 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11493196978394133980.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability431836747387377566.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11493196978394133980.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability431836747387377566.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:40:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:40:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12799864126202176985.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12799864126202176985.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12799864126202176985.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12799864126202176985.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12799864126202176985.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10080028369958645313.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:40:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18006567046814211859.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10080028369958645313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18006567046814211859.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.607046,17316,1525,205,29766,943,301,48552,96,2793,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(E(AX(((i9.u21.p68==1)&&(i9.u29.p85==1))) U ((i1.u9.p43==1)&&(i1.u10.p45==1)))) * AF(EG(((((i0.u2.p26==1)&&(i0.u12.p48==1))||((i12.i...531
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U EG(E(((i12.i2.u45.p119==1)&&(i12.i2.u47.p129==1)) U ((i6.u25.p76==1)&&(i6.u33.p...1941
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t21, i0.u2.t25, i1.t74, i1.t68, i1.t0...335
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-11362043966495577826.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15911493119912265817.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-11362043966495577826.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15911493119912265817.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 134 cols 390 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 52 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15911493119912265817.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 264 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 8865 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 133/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 16/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 34/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 8/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 4/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 78/212 variables, 134/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 77/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 134/134 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38891ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38892ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39365 ms. Remains : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2952219311668067622.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6503755792722163011.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2952219311668067622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6503755792722163011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9315786116561705214.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9315786116561705214.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9315786116561705214.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9315786116561705214.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9315786116561705214.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1824756180215305458.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2123372620482265248.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1824756180215305458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2123372620482265248.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,0.309925,12080,1426,209,21233,1004,291,19951,105,2782,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EX((((u13.p1==0)||(u13.p53==0))||(u13.p55==0))) + ((AG(((i2.u7.p43==1)&&(i2.u9.p45==1))) + (((u12.p13==1)&&(u12.p50==1))&&((i14.u...502
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EX((((u13.p1==0)||(u13.p53==0))||(u13.p55==0))) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u7.p43=...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t37, t38, t71, u12.t30, u13.t11, u46.t5, u46.t16, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t21, i0.u2.t25,...331
(forward)formula 0,0,10.8024,289864,1,0,608449,2829,1639,800478,789,11620,710795
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8049979939571911556.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2790232895974104425.kers'
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8049979939571911556.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2790232895974104425.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 133 cols 386 entries
Finished phase 1 with 24 SingleSign rule and 51 generalized
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 0 ms
Computed 58 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2790232895974104425.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 337 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:41:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 34/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/210 variables, 133/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 76/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 34945ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34947ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35290 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6356660066758226335.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12850927530139868009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6356660066758226335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12850927530139868009.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16919905242324957510.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16919905242324957510.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16919905242324957510.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16919905242324957510.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16919905242324957510.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12340325088949534789.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:42:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2267797078799867769.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12340325088949534789.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2267797078799867769.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.39204,17680,3116,207,39972,907,300,28281,96,2700,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(((E((((u14.p4==1)&&(u14.p53==1))&&(u14.p55==1)) U ((i11.u28.p82==1)&&(i11.u36.p98==1))) * (((i2.u2.p17==1)&&(i2.u2.p25==1))||(((u...583
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(((((u14.p4==1)&&(u14.p53==1))&&(u14.p55==1))||((i4.i2.u46.p123==1)&&(i4.i2.u47.p12...848
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t74, i0.t68, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.t70, i1.u0.t10, i...332
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 252 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 407 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 415 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4074666063822798781.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:43:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5939850522473024078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4074666063822798781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5939850522473024078.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13208016443293131579.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13208016443293131579.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13208016443293131579.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13208016443293131579.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13208016443293131579.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13373734841029614129.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8475952643524434564.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13373734841029614129.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8475952643524434564.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.498123,17600,3067,207,39527,941,294,29123,98,2840,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((EF(((i5.u16.p60!=1)||(i5.u24.p77!=1))) + AX(((u47.p9!=1)||(u47.p130!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((i5.u16.p60!=1)||(i5.u24.p77!=1))) + !(EX(!(((u47.p9!=1)||(u47.p130!=1))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t16, i0.t70, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t75, i0.u12.t30, i1.t74, i1....332
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,3.65794,133856,1,0,415119,2702,1894,325064,754,11670,622247
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 333 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 341 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16477468063071293172.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11915701275513981450.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16477468063071293172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11915701275513981450.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15693279605072960467.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15693279605072960467.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15693279605072960467.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15693279605072960467.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15693279605072960467.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13369037932839554508.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7314733575946750963.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13369037932839554508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7314733575946750963.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.440396,17868,3107,205,39660,896,294,29777,95,2415,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EG((EX(((i5.i1.u3.p29==0)||(i5.i1.u44.p114==0))) * !(A(((i5.i1.u43.p118==1)&&(i5.i2.u45.p120==1)) U ((i0.u2.p20==1)&&(i0.u2.p25==1)...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(EX(((i5.i1.u3.p29==0)||(i5.i1.u44.p114==0))) * !(!((E(!(((i0.u2.p20==1)&&(i0.u2.p25==...305
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, t70, u13.t30, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t21, i0.u2.t25, i1.u0.t...326
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 17 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:45:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:45:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:45:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 360 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability819422694730296839.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9154340780928933614.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability819422694730296839.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9154340780928933614.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10963723430987996619.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10963723430987996619.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10963723430987996619.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10963723430987996619.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10963723430987996619.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11858036676062168107.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:45:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1453335491029204736.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11858036676062168107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1453335491029204736.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.387241,16868,1530,165,29441,822,314,42916,97,2245,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((!(A(((i4.u14.p54==1)&&(i13.i2.u47.p126==1)) U ((i8.u30.p86==1)&&(i8.u38.p102==1)))) * ((i9.u31.p88==0)||(i9.u39.p104==0)))) + (EG...437
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((!(!((E(!(((i8.u30.p86==1)&&(i8.u38.p102==1))) U (!(((i4.u14.p54==1)&&(i13.i2.u47...879
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, t70, u12.t30, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t74, i0.t68, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0.t10, i1.u...328
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 347 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 351 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7786752139391141581.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6381383935415877985.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7786752139391141581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6381383935415877985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3558643566066826429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3558643566066826429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3558643566066826429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3558643566066826429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3558643566066826429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8703821458210348331.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18368040932844594235.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8703821458210348331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18368040932844594235.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.378603,15912,1432,205,26688,964,291,44268,97,2857,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((i0.u6.p37==0) + EX(AF((((i0.u13.p11==1)&&(i0.u13.p50==1))&&((i12.i1.u4.p31==1)&&(i12.i1.u47.p125==1))))))) * (EG((((AF((i2.u2.p26==...559
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U ((i0.u6.p37==0) + EX(!(EG(!((((i0.u13.p11==1)&&(i0.u13.p50==1))&&((i12.i1.u4.p31==1)&&(i...784
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t70, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t75, i0.u13.t30, i1.t74, i1....335
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 215 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 361 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3299601031394793355.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18305269564287456555.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3299601031394793355.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18305269564287456555.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14455719577393044583.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14455719577393044583.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14455719577393044583.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14455719577393044583.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14455719577393044583.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16931970284573724774.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14886652383320285526.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16931970284573724774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14886652383320285526.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.406228,15572,1433,205,25892,956,293,42920,100,2845,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((EX((((i9.u26.p80==1)&&(i9.u34.p96==1)) + AX(((i7.u24.p76==1)&&(i7.u32.p92==1))))) * AF((((i12.i0.u43.p116==0)||(u47.p131==0)) * E(...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((EX((((i9.u26.p80==1)&&(i9.u34.p96==1)) + !(EX(!(((i7.u24.p76==1)&&(i7.u32.p92==1)))))...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t16, i0.t70, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t75, i0.u12.t30, i1.t74, i1....335
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 434 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12772964623104800417.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10457877414201581539.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12772964623104800417.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10457877414201581539.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10310222628151312404.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10310222628151312404.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10310222628151312404.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10310222628151312404.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10310222628151312404.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15153798936639656631.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:48:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10442027341286462257.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15153798936639656631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10442027341286462257.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.426012,16348,1699,205,27780,913,295,48972,95,2560,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((E((((!(AX(((i10.u21.p68==1)&&(i10.u29.p85==1)))) * (i13.i1.u46.p123==1)) * (i13.i1.u47.p129==1)) + EG((((i0.u1.p24==1)&&(i0.u10.p44==...581
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(E((((!(!(EX(!(((i10.u21.p68==1)&&(i10.u29.p85==1)))))) * (i13.i1.u46.p123==1)) * (i13.i1....1428
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, t70, u13.t30, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t74, i0.t68, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0....329
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 553 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 561 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11998205553753993346.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13543606817441549.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11998205553753993346.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13543606817441549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5597782870346015218.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5597782870346015218.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5597782870346015218.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5597782870346015218.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5597782870346015218.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14549441994210819521.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18364836809820736913.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14549441994210819521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18364836809820736913.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,1.0334,29120,3260,167,45203,850,309,139786,96,2484,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((i3.u14.p54==1)&&(i12.i1.u47.p126==1))) + EX((((AF(((i10.u23.p72==1)&&(i10.u31.p89==1))) * A((EX(((i12.i0.u3.p29==1)&&(i12.i0.u44.p1...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX((((!(EG(!(((i10.u23.p72==1)&&(i10.u31.p89==1))))) * !((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i10.u23.p72==1)&&(...780
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t70, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t75, i0.u12.t30, i1.t74, i1.t68, i1.t...334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:50:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 398 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 401 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10801160748303746069.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12231496078364925276.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10801160748303746069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12231496078364925276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11212598077343157132.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11212598077343157132.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11212598077343157132.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11212598077343157132.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11212598077343157132.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4747313009057224578.gal : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7931728184802614369.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4747313009057224578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7931728184802614369.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,0.956597,29608,3317,167,47340,820,317,136651,96,2435,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((i6.u21.p66==1)&&(i6.u29.p83==1))) + AF((EG((((i12.i2.u4.p31==0)||(i12.i2.u48.p125==0))&&((i2.u2.p26==0)||(i2.u12.p48==0)))) + ((((i...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(((i6.u21.p66==1)&&(i6.u29.p83==1))))))),!((EG((((i12.i2.u4.p31==0)||(i12.i2.u48.p125==0))...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, u49.t5, u49.t16, i0.t74, i0.t68, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.t70, i1.u0.t10, i1.u6.t75,...334
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 78/78 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 133 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 133 /134 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 377 ms. Remains : 133/134 places, 77/78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8682639624314910764.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15267558653524098824.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8682639624314910764.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15267558653524098824.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18340147004613465545.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18340147004613465545.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340147004613465545.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18340147004613465545.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340147004613465545.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17348077140073116639.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 21:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability702995885841793980.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17348077140073116639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability702995885841793980.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97025e+11,1.082,28396,3317,167,43594,845,323,135477,97,2124,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((A(!(EG(((i0.u2.p17==1)&&(i0.u2.p25==1)))) U E(EG((((i2.u5.p33==1)&&(i2.u8.p43==1))&&(i2.u10.p45==1))) U AX((((i4.u15.p1==1)&&(i4.u14...435
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!((E(!(E(EG((((i2.u5.p33==1)&&(i2.u8.p43==1))&&(i2.u10.p45==1))) U !(EX(!((((i4.u15.p1==1)&&(i4.u...786
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t37, t38, t70, u13.t30, u49.t5, u49.t16, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t21, i0.u2.t25, i1.u0.t10, i1.u6...328
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15103246320715406230.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15103246320715406230.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15103246320715406230.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15103246320715406230.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15103246320715406230.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2333340812271959280.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-24 21:52:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14096856745364367911.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2333340812271959280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14096856745364367911.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,0.203867,11032,1302,170,18519,859,289,17020,100,2307,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(((i2.u2.p26==1)&&(i2.u11.p48==1)) U (A(((i0.u7.p43==1)&&(i0.u9.p45==1)) U ((i9.u17.p60==1)&&(i9.u25.p77==1))) * (!((AG(((i1.u0.p22==1...451
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((E(!((!((E(!(((i9.u17.p60==1)&&(i9.u25.p77==1))) U (!(((i0.u7.p43==1)&&(i0.u9.p45==1))) * !...1508
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t37, t38, t71, u12.t30, u48.t5, u48.t16, i0.t75, i0.t69, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0.t...317
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,187.704,2426780,1,0,6.23662e+06,2846,937,5.85971e+06,308,19178,1186667
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(AG((((!(EG(((((i0.u7.p42==1)&&(i1.u10.p47==1))&&((i2.u11.p49==1)&&(i0.u7.p42==1)))&&((i1.u10.p47==1)&&(i2.u11.p49==1))))) * (i0.u7.p42=...619
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((!(EG(((((i0.u7.p42==1)&&(i1.u10.p47==1))&&((i2.u11.p49==1)&&(i0.u7.p42==1)))&&((i1....713
(forward)formula 1,0,215.72,2426780,1,0,6.23662e+06,2846,1229,5.85971e+06,327,19178,2913444
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: A((EX(E(AX(((i6.u21.p68==1)&&(i6.u29.p85==1))) U ((i0.u7.p43==1)&&(i0.u9.p45==1)))) * AF(EG(((((i2.u2.p26==1)&&(i2.u11.p48==1))||((i13.u3...512
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U EG(E(((i14.u45.p119==1)&&(i14.u47.p129==1)) U ((i9.u25.p76==1)&&(i9.u33.p92==1)...1862
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,677.144,3567468,1,0,9.13081e+06,2846,920,9.84873e+06,288,26554,3875049
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((!(A(((E((((i4.u13.p4==1)&&(i4.u13.p53==1))&&(i4.u14.p55==1)) U ((i11.u28.p82==1)&&(i11.u36.p98==1))) * (((i2.u2.p17==1)&&(i2.u2.p25==...596
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(((((i4.u13.p4==1)&&(i4.u13.p53==1))&&(i4.u14.p55==1))||((i14.u46.p123==1)&&(i14.u4...871
(forward)formula 3,0,701.972,3567468,1,0,9.13081e+06,2846,984,9.84873e+06,295,26554,5183674
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(EF(EG((EX(((i13.u3.p29==0)||(i13.u44.p114==0))) * !(A(((i13.u43.p118==1)&&(i14.u45.p120==1)) U ((i2.u2.p20==1)&&(i2.u2.p25==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(EX(((i13.u3.p29==0)||(i13.u44.p114==0))) * !(!((E(!(((i2.u2.p20==1)&&(i2.u2.p25==1)))...297
(forward)formula 4,1,731.114,3797336,1,0,9.67143e+06,2846,1359,9.84873e+06,347,26554,7023680
FORMULA DES-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: AG((AF((!(A(((i4.u14.p54==1)&&(i14.u47.p126==1)) U ((i7.u30.p86==1)&&(i7.u38.p102==1)))) * ((i12.u31.p88==0)||(i12.u39.p104==0)))) + (EG(...418
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((!(!((E(!(((i7.u30.p86==1)&&(i7.u38.p102==1))) U (!(((i4.u14.p54==1)&&(i14.u47.p1...859
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5311136815134499474.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-24 22:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14858241927940556881.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5311136815134499474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14858241927940556881.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,53.7567,1573892,211996,42,4.47308e+06,256,266,3.17475e+06,38,454,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((!(A(((u21.p54==1)&&(u56.p126==1)) U ((u37.p86==1)&&(u45.p102==1)))) * ((u38.p88==0)||(u46.p104==0)))) + (EG(((AF(((u9.p31==1)&&(u...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((!(!((E(!(((u37.p86==1)&&(u45.p102==1))) U (!(((u21.p54==1)&&(u56.p126==1))) * !(...754
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t11, t18, t25, t26, t37, t38, t46, t69, t71, t75, u5.t10, u6.t9, u7.t8, u12.t76, i49....273
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 22:30:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 435 ms
[2026-05-24 22:30:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2026-05-24 22:30:58] [INFO ] Transformed 134 places.
[2026-05-24 22:30:58] [INFO ] Transformed 78 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2026-05-24 22:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13870209953304055854.gal : 11 ms
[2026-05-24 22:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2305988138545681734.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13870209953304055854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2305988138545681734.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30998e+11,31.0165,616328,2,712640,5,2.71729e+06,6,0,615,2.47342e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202604301425.jar
+ VERSION=202604301425
+ echo 'Running Version 202604301425'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r082-smll-177946993700346"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-05a.tgz
mv DES-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;
