Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.r082-smll-177946993600281.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool itstools
Input is Dekker-PT-100, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r082-smll-177946993600281
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 6.4M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Mar 4 18:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Mar 4 18:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Mar 4 18:55 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Mar 4 18:55 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Mar 3 18:30 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 15 08:53 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Mar 15 08:53 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Mar 15 08:53 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Mar 15 08:53 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Mar 4 18:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K Mar 4 18:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Mar 4 18:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Mar 4 18:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 15 08:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 15 08:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 3 18:30 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9M Mar 3 18:30 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1779638816208

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-100
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202604301425
[2026-05-24 16:06:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2026-05-24 16:06:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-24 16:07:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 1136 ms
[2026-05-24 16:07:00] [INFO ] Transformed 500 places.
[2026-05-24 16:07:00] [INFO ] Transformed 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:07:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2026-05-24 16:07:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 500 places and 10200 transitions and 80200 arcs in 1480 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 35 ms.
Support contains 78 out of 500 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 500/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 569 ms. Remains 500 /500 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:07:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-845040308435619833.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-14895262118524300195.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:07:01] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-845040308435619833.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-14895262118524300195.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 200 columns.
Culled 200 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:07:01] [INFO ] Computed 300 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 300 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-14895262118524300195.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:07:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 15852 ms returned [200, 203, 206, 209, 212, 215, 218, 221, 224, 227, 230, 233, 239, 242, 248, 251, 257, 263, 266, 269, 272, 275, 278, 281, 284, 287, 290, 293, 296, 299, 302, 305, 308, 311, 314, 317, 320, 326, 329, 332, 335, 341, 344, 347, 350, 353, 356, 359, 362, 365, 368, 374, 377, 380, 386, 389, 392, 395, 398, 404, 407, 410, 413, 419, 422, 428, 431, 434, 437, 440, 443, 446, 449, 455, 458, 467, 470, 473, 476, 479, 482, 485, 488, 491, 494, 497]
Discarding 86 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 15938 ms to find 86 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 414/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 193 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 16735 ms. Remains : 414/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 199 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:07:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10527833350109605172.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5802850420852781832.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:07:17] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10527833350109605172.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5802850420852781832.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 114 columns.
Culled 114 columns in 1 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:07:17] [INFO ] Computed 214 invariants in 3 ms
Computed 214 P flows in 4 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-5802850420852781832.kers
Total runtime 5 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:07:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4612 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4615 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 10100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:07:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:07:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 400/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10100 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 41587ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41771ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46758 ms. Remains : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 414 places after structural reductions.
[2026-05-24 16:08:05] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2026-05-24 16:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 877 ms
[2026-05-24 16:08:05] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2026-05-24 16:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 413 ms
[2026-05-24 16:08:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 414 places (down from 78) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 44 to 43
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 4820 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 9/43 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 193 ms. (206 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 351 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 200 ms. (199 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2026-05-24 16:08:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:08:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:08:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 32/49 variables, 18/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 32/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
SMT process timed out in 5095ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 15 out of 414 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1155 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1161 ms. Remains : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1925 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 254 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 294 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 252 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 268 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 247 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 344 ms. (115 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 307 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 308 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2026-05-24 16:08:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:08:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:08:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/40 variables, 15/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 26/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 8/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 9/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/53 variables, 3/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 3/56 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 52/108 variables, 56/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 174/282 variables, 100/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 445/727 variables, 271/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 271/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 87/899 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 10/909 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/909 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 87/814 variables, 87/996 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 87/1083 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 87/1170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 814/814 variables, and 1170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 5309 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/40 variables, 15/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 26/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 28/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 9/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/53 variables, 3/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 3/56 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 52/108 variables, 56/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 174/282 variables, 100/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 445/727 variables, 271/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 271/819 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 87/906 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 10/916 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 7/923 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 20/943 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 20/963 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 20/983 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 10/993 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/993 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 87/814 variables, 87/1080 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 87/1167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 87/1254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 814/814 variables, and 1254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 19080 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24442ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 9373 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 414 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 503 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 504 ms. Remains : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1671 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 259 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 236 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 175538 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 175538 steps, saw 161891 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 16:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:08:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/10 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 3/19 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 192/227 variables, 100/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 491/718 variables, 299/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 299/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 96/846 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 11/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 0/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 96/814 variables, 96/953 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 96/1049 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 96/1145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 814/814 variables, and 1145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1495 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/10 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 3/19 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 192/227 variables, 100/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 491/718 variables, 299/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 299/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 96/846 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 11/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 2/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 1/860 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/718 variables, 0/860 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 96/814 variables, 96/956 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 96/1052 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 96/1148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 1/1149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 1/1150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 1/1151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 1/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 814/814 variables, and 1152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 4455 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5982ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 2495 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 414 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 513 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 513 ms. Remains : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1810 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 200 ms. (199 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 283911 steps, run timeout after 3029 ms. (steps per millisecond=93 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 283911 steps, saw 260625 distinct states, run finished after 3030 ms. (steps per millisecond=93 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 16:09:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:09:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/9 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 8/17 variables, 9/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 196/213 variables, 100/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 503/716 variables, 307/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 307/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 98/836 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 13/849 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 0/849 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 98/814 variables, 98/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 98/1045 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 98/1143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 814/814 variables, and 1143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1002 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/9 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 8/17 variables, 9/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 196/213 variables, 100/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 503/716 variables, 307/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 307/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 98/836 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 13/849 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 1/850 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/716 variables, 0/850 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 98/814 variables, 98/948 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 98/1046 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 98/1144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/1144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/1144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 814/814 variables, and 1144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1040 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 414/414 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 414/414 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1244 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 414 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 487 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 487 ms. Remains : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 464 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:09:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:09:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4853 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4874 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 725 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 6066 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1608 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 299263 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=99 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 299263 steps, saw 274762 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=99 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 16:09:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2120217984384232216.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15235223773003807205.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:09:20] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2120217984384232216.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15235223773003807205.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 101 columns.
Culled 101 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:09:20] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 201 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15235223773003807205.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:09:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/9 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 8/17 variables, 9/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 196/213 variables, 100/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 490/703 variables, 294/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 294/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 98/810 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 0/810 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 98/801 variables, 98/908 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 98/1006 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 98/1104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 0/1104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/801 variables, 0/1104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 801/801 variables, and 1104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1069 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 401/401 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 401/401 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/9 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 8/17 variables, 9/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 196/213 variables, 100/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 490/703 variables, 294/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 294/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 98/810 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 1/811 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 0/811 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 98/801 variables, 98/909 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 98/1007 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 98/1105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/801 variables, 0/1105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/801 variables, 0/1105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 801/801 variables, and 1105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1108 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 401/401 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 401/401 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2204ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1383 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 456 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 456 ms. Remains : 401/401 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 475 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:09:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:09:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:09:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 2849 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 2857 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 10100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:09:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:09:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:09:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 400/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10100 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 39457ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39559ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42942 ms. Remains : 401/401 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2026-05-24 16:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 474 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 373 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 948 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4207538333409829009.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8133644264469376239.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:10:10] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4207538333409829009.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-8133644264469376239.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 114 columns.
Culled 114 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 214 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 214 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-8133644264469376239.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:10:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4320 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4334 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 921 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6204 ms. Remains : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 241 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 286 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 401 ms
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1738 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2026-05-24 16:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 342 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8125079773241284228.gal : 185 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5133469332974299475.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8125079773241284228.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5133469332974299475.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 314716 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 314716 steps, saw 288899 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties seen :0
[2026-05-24 16:10:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-13162276654711247100.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13398790170367315332.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:10:21] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-13162276654711247100.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-13398790170367315332.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 100 columns.
Culled 100 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 200 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 200 P flows in 4 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-13398790170367315332.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:10:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5133469332974299475.prop.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 198/206 variables, 100/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 495/701 variables, 297/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 297/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 99/803 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 0/803 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 99/800 variables, 99/902 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 99/1001 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 99/1100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 0/1100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/800 variables, 0/1100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 800/800 variables, and 1100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 781 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 400/400 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, State Equation: 400/400 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 198/206 variables, 100/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 495/701 variables, 297/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 297/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 99/803 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 1/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 0/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 99/800 variables, 99/903 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 99/1002 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 99/1101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 0/1101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/800 variables, 0/1101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 800/800 variables, and 1101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 747 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 400/400 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, State Equation: 400/400 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1560ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 2 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARIKH_WALK
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 16 ms.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 700 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8028903691321949567.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7496396765201243735.kers'
[2026-05-24 16:10:23] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8028903691321949567.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7496396765201243735.kers]
Culling duplicate invariants (modulo rational): removing 114 columns.
Culled 114 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 300 cols 800 entries
Finished phase 1 with 200 SingleSign rule and 0 generalized
[2026-05-24 16:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 214 invariants in 3 ms
Computed 214 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7496396765201243735.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4729 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4739 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 590 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6029 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 264 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 295 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 320 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 285 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10276747242497727533.gal : 75 ms
[2026-05-24 16:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17996672335501865581.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10276747242497727533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17996672335501865581.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.73235,133176,2,1595,5,241482,6,0,11807,68708,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 276 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 307 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11688414284774385238.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11688414284774385238.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11688414284774385238.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11688414284774385238.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11688414284774385238.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:11:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:11:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:11:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:11:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 937 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 443 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11310883695458405435.gal : 63 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6930719756763320074.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11310883695458405435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6930719756763320074.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.15263,39252,205,15,2882,5188,10620,2211,36,5121,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((u23.flag_1_23==1)&&(u99.p0_41==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((u23.flag_1_23==1)&&(u99.p0_41==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
(forward)formula 0,1,17.3757,372680,1,0,1.20457e+06,5188,68787,538209,226,5121,1458093
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 96 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:11:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:11:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4500 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 329, 360, 386, 389]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4508 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 404/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 102 ms. Remains 404 /404 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4709 ms. Remains : 404/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 310 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 469 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 344 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 327 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17269539316039001692.gal : 49 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16182855732964380567.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17269539316039001692.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16182855732964380567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.12936,133472,2,1615,5,245546,6,0,11819,69564,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 291 ms
[2026-05-24 16:11:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 397 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4339571443771317728.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4339571443771317728.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4339571443771317728.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4339571443771317728.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4339571443771317728.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:12:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:12:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:12:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29598 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 639 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 219 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:12:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10022229170553891017.gal : 45 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8065676875185218129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10022229170553891017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8065676875185218129.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.07806,40840,214,18,3291,5194,10639,2739,45,5217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(AX((u43.flag_0_43==1))) + AX(((u100.p0_72==0)&&(u15.p3_15==0)))) + ((EG((i67.u99.p0_67==1)) * EX(((i99.u101.p0_84==0)&&(u24.p3_24...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EX(!((u43.flag_0_43==1)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((u100.p0_72==0)&...446
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1251
(forward)formula 0,1,17.3269,372268,1,0,1.20606e+06,5194,68161,540655,266,5217,1460604
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 100 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:12:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:12:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:12:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 3506 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 3518 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 165 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3784 ms. Remains : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 363 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 385 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 266 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 273 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2114585627557027204.gal : 47 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12305674638886809888.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2114585627557027204.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12305674638886809888.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.2492,133216,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:12:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 405 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 430 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15533962255688602248.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15533962255688602248.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15533962255688602248.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15533962255688602248.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15533962255688602248.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:12:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:12:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:12:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 474 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 157 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:12:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3115192165014036731.gal : 45 ms
[2026-05-24 16:12:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14476128015402814789.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3115192165014036731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14476128015402814789.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.45802,39864,203,10,3266,5175,10615,2690,26,5099,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((A(AX(FALSE) U AX(FALSE)) * (((u3.flag_1_3==0)&&(u75.p1_75==1)) + (EG((u72.p3_72==1)) * AX(EG((u52.flag_0_52==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !((E(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))) U (!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))) * !(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))) + EG(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))))) ...385
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,21.9824,411492,1,0,1.20691e+06,5175,69690,541739,169,5099,1463005
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 90 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:13:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:13:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4857 ms returned [231, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4874 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 403/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 155 ms. Remains 403 /403 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5119 ms. Remains : 403/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:13:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 366 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 320 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:13:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 475 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 317 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6258684971914352394.gal : 50 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8184589273583582850.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6258684971914352394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8184589273583582850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.34697,133392,2,1605,5,242538,6,0,11815,68954,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:13:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 344 ms
[2026-05-24 16:13:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:13:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 413 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1589447290656003359.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1589447290656003359.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1589447290656003359.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1589447290656003359.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1589447290656003359.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:13:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:13:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:14:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:14:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 571 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 127 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:14:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10612272081604159915.gal : 31 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13097270497877052310.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10612272081604159915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13097270497877052310.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.09829,41276,205,15,2980,5189,10624,2315,41,5133,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!((E((((u87.flag_1_88==0)||(u0.p1_0==1))||(u24.p1_25==1)) U (u42.flag_0_43==1)) * ((((u71.p0_72==1)||(u96.p3_97!=1))||((u43.flag_0_4...437
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!((E((((u87.flag_1_88==0)||(u0.p1_0==1))||(u24.p1_25==1)) U (u42.flag_0_43==1)) * ((((u71.p...604
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
(forward)formula 0,0,17.3079,372720,1,0,1.20732e+06,5189,67878,542038,271,5133,1462067
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 95 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:14:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:14:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:14:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4794 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4805 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 165 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5066 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 398 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 352 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 348 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 264 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10017872714080879476.gal : 59 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4034484289413534702.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10017872714080879476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4034484289413534702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.20801,133276,2,1597,5,242230,6,0,11807,68859,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 257 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 449 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11571966951623005948.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11571966951623005948.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11571966951623005948.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11571966951623005948.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11571966951623005948.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:14:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:14:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:14:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:14:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 493 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 123 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:14:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12790190943909665069.gal : 29 ms
[2026-05-24 16:14:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12504063270666996648.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12790190943909665069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12504063270666996648.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.15642,41192,205,15,2883,5189,10620,2215,36,5128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((u36.p3_36==1) U AF((EF((u71.p3_71==1)) * AX((u78.p3_78==0))))) * AG((EF(!(A((u75.p0_75==1) U (u17.flag_1_17==1)))) + EX(!(E(((u16.p1_...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!((E(TRUE U (u71.p3_71==1)) * !(EX(!((u78.p3_78==0)))))))))) * !((u36.p3_36==1))),!((E...532
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,22.101,430624,1,0,1.21216e+06,5189,71001,549477,240,5128,1476166
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 574 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:15:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:15:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:15:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 3997 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4013 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 402/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 763 ms. Remains 402 /402 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5351 ms. Remains : 402/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 248 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 258 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:15:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 372 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 389 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12256105352456228374.gal : 46 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11653159713433423208.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12256105352456228374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11653159713433423208.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.41586,133348,2,1603,5,243842,6,0,11811,69189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:15:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 273 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:15:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 477 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6092279606717756459.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6092279606717756459.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6092279606717756459.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6092279606717756459.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6092279606717756459.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:15:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:15:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:15:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:15:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 576 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 125 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:15:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11581713535512400911.gal : 30 ms
[2026-05-24 16:15:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3264504868310603975.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11581713535512400911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3264504868310603975.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.19545,41620,214,18,2901,5194,10635,2442,40,5199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((u88.p0_88==0)||(u53.flag_1_53==1)) U (AF(((i87.u100.p0_87!=1)&&(u89.flag_1_89==1))) * !((EF(!(EF((u49.p1_49==0)))) * A(!(A(((u12.p3_1...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,((u88.p0_88==0)||(u53.flag_1_53==1))) * !(EG(!(((i87.u100.p0_87!=1)&&(u89.flag_1_89==1)))))) * !(E...672
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,21.2701,411156,1,0,1.20524e+06,5194,69885,539413,240,5199,1459813
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 95 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:16:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:16:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4955 ms returned [224, 231, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4966 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 163 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5224 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 401 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 283 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 317 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 314 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10123182089187244545.gal : 79 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5043861994329054132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10123182089187244545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5043861994329054132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.45943,133272,2,1595,5,241229,6,0,11807,68662,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 326 ms
[2026-05-24 16:16:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 415 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph633430632665344849.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph633430632665344849.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph633430632665344849.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph633430632665344849.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph633430632665344849.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 426 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 134 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8477643049741111621.gal : 33 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3191254712057484332.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8477643049741111621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3191254712057484332.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,4.99294,40068,205,15,3273,5189,10620,2704,36,5129,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(((AX(((u91.p1_91==0)&&(u36.flag_1_36==1))) * (u4.p3_4==0)) * (u18.p0_18==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!(((u91.p1_91==0)&&(u36.flag_1_36==1))))) * (u4.p3_4==0)) * (u18.p0_18==1))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
(forward)formula 0,0,18.5229,391208,1,0,1.20646e+06,5189,68890,541020,228,5129,1461147
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 539 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:17:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:17:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:17:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 3099 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 3106 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 508 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4154 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:17:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 270 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 294 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:17:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 447 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 261 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7750511165479513325.gal : 49 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14434725799246752832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7750511165479513325.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14434725799246752832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.57614,133280,2,1597,5,242006,6,0,11807,68817,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 293 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 320 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18258142532974401789.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18258142532974401789.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18258142532974401789.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18258142532974401789.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18258142532974401789.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:17:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:17:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:17:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:17:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 496 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 139 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:17:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10822770618045644194.gal : 38 ms
[2026-05-24 16:17:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6849137823159712877.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10822770618045644194.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6849137823159712877.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.61583,41404,212,13,2991,5180,10630,2327,30,5200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF(((i61.u100.p0_61==0)||(u83.p3_83==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((i61.u100.p0_61==0)||(u83.p3_83==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
(forward)formula 0,1,17.9386,372252,1,0,1.20461e+06,5180,68994,538252,171,5200,1457930
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 633 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:18:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:18:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5081 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5098 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 819 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6551 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 261 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 291 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 512 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 312 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8931608684812983782.gal : 49 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15812847793160583259.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8931608684812983782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15812847793160583259.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.5582,133272,2,1595,5,241537,6,0,11807,68718,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p0_46==0)||(p1_98==1))||(flag_1_10==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p0_46==0)||(p1_98==1))||(flag_1_10==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 9800/0/400
(forward)formula 0,1,23.3058,245200,1,0,8,1.25469e+06,19,2,99572,440130,8
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 96 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:18:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:18:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4946 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4956 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 167 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5220 ms. Remains : 401/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 383 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 414 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:18:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 278 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 274 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality480423123608792707.gal : 45 ms
[2026-05-24 16:18:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8407680704845455560.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality480423123608792707.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8407680704845455560.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.76701,133284,2,1597,5,242230,6,0,11807,68859,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 260 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 369 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17348785995846157105.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17348785995846157105.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17348785995846157105.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17348785995846157105.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17348785995846157105.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:19:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:19:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:19:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:19:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 564 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 123 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:19:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15818814596890984266.gal : 25 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18112619149129331921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15818814596890984266.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18112619149129331921.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.15385,40168,212,13,2893,5180,10630,2229,30,5142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AG((i99.u100.p0_75==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i99.u100.p0_75==0)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,23.5375,428372,1,0,1.20647e+06,5180,71078,540730,182,5142,1463675
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 96 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:19:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:19:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 3048 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 3055 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 97 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3249 ms. Remains : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 226 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 295 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 291 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 260 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8847971870250443707.gal : 51 ms
[2026-05-24 16:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3449327086440349816.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8847971870250443707.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3449327086440349816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.50035,133216,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 330 ms
[2026-05-24 16:20:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 443 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18255755341882600820.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18255755341882600820.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18255755341882600820.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18255755341882600820.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18255755341882600820.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:20:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:20:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:20:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:20:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 423 ms
[2026-05-24 16:20:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 122 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:20:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2265099664699777153.gal : 32 ms
[2026-05-24 16:20:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15966688515708356723.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2265099664699777153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15966688515708356723.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,4.93581,40824,203,10,3170,5175,10615,2493,26,5096,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(E(A((u29.flag_1_29==1) U (u22.flag_0_22==1)) U EG((u24.flag_1_24==0))) U !(AX((u51.p1_51==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(!(EX(!((u51.p1_51==0))))))) * !(E(!((E(!((u22.flag_0_22==1)) U (!((u29.flag_1_29==1)) * !(...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,22.5138,413168,1,0,1.21302e+06,5175,70626,549895,173,5096,1477984
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 667 ms. Remains 414 /414 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:20:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2026-05-24 16:20:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-24 16:20:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4761 ms returned [224, 231, 238, 243, 286, 297, 320, 329, 342, 353, 360, 379, 386, 389]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4777 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 692 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6137 ms. Remains : 400/414 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 287 ms
[2026-05-24 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 406 ms
[2026-05-24 16:20:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:20:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 302 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 272 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality150024422015057511.gal : 50 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9832364255133843293.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality150024422015057511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9832364255133843293.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.90099,133212,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-24 16:21:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 366 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-24 16:21:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 434 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph880441959307697848.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph880441959307697848.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph880441959307697848.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph880441959307697848.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph880441959307697848.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-24 16:21:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-24 16:21:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-24 16:21:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-24 16:21:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 392 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 121 ms.
[2026-05-24 16:21:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16544468577302733879.gal : 30 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8640577023572719890.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16544468577302733879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8640577023572719890.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.21106,39744,203,10,2974,5175,10615,2396,26,5096,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((u57.p1_57==1) * A((((u31.flag_0_31==0)||(u43.p1_43==1))||(u21.p3_21==1)) U (u83.flag_1_83==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (u57.p1_57==1)) * !(EG(!((u83.flag_1_83==1))))) * !(E(!((u83.flag_1_83==1)) U (!((((u31.fl...239
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,20.9945,409472,1,0,1.20715e+06,5175,69786,541878,171,5096,1462047
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2026-05-24 16:21:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 298 ms
[2026-05-24 16:21:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 285 ms
Total runtime 895682 ms.

BK_STOP 1779639714495

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202604301425.jar
+ VERSION=202604301425
+ echo 'Running Version 202604301425'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-100, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r082-smll-177946993600281"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-100.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-100 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;