About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Anderson-PT-07
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 3978.571 | 1829571.00 | 1948535.00 | 342.30 | FFFTFFFFFTFTFFFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/sdalzilio/mcc2026-input.r002-oct2-177944366000170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 extended_l2=off compression_type=zlib size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/sdalzilio/mcc2026-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5973
Executing tool itstools
Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-oct2-177944366000170
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 916K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Mar 4 18:02 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Mar 4 18:02 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Mar 4 18:01 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Mar 4 18:01 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Mar 15 07:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Mar 15 07:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Mar 15 07:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Mar 15 07:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Mar 4 18:02 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 144K Mar 4 18:02 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Mar 4 18:02 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Mar 4 18:02 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 15 07:03 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 15 07:03 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Mar 3 18:30 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 3 18:30 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 461K Mar 3 18:30 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1779462261566
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202604301425
[2026-05-22 15:04:22] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2026-05-22 15:04:22] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 122 ms
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Transformed 309 places.
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Transformed 917 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 309 places and 917 transitions and 3500 arcs in 227 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 89 out of 309 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 917/917 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 271 transition count 843
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 271 transition count 843
Applied a total of 76 rules in 78 ms. Remains 271 /309 variables (removed 38) and now considering 843/917 (removed 74) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2812114708973173634.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17014471528642890918.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2812114708973173634.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17014471528642890918.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 843 rows 271 cols 3176 entries
Finished phase 1 with 137 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-17014471528642890918.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 427 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:04:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:04:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:04:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1350 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1816 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 836 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:04:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:04:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 18/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/1114 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved in 30046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/271 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 836/836 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 38/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 16/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/1114 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved in 30058 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/271 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/836 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60875ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 836 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60902ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/309 places, 843/917 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62879 ms. Remains : 271/309 places, 843/917 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 271 /271 variables (removed 0) and now considering 843/843 (removed 0) transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:05:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:05:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:05:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:05:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 896 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1094 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Skipped dead transition search.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1107 ms. Remains : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 271 places after structural reductions.
[2026-05-22 15:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2026-05-22 15:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2026-05-22 15:05:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 843 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2382 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 37/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 29/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 26/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 19/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 16/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
[2026-05-22 15:05:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:05:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 206/238 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/271 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 843/1114 variables, 271/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1114 variables, 42/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1114 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/1114 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1114/1114 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved in 3143 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/15 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 211/236 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 35/271 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 843/1114 variables, 271/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1114 variables, 42/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1114 variables, 14/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1114 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1114/1114 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved in 5026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/15 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8193ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 25 out of 271 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 802
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 230 transition count 802
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 201 transition count 509
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 201 transition count 509
Applied a total of 140 rules in 105 ms. Remains 201 /271 variables (removed 70) and now considering 509/843 (removed 334) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 106 ms. Remains : 201/271 places, 509/843 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 345 ms. (115 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 12/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 6/8 properties
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-16513086636781100809.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7011688442331489123.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:05:37] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-16513086636781100809.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7011688442331489123.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 509 rows 201 cols 1936 entries
Finished phase 1 with 67 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:05:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7011688442331489123.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:05:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 100/109 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/119 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 46/165 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 35/200 variables, 9/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 509/710 variables, 201/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 42/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/710 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 710/710 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 1690 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 100/109 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/119 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 46/165 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 35/200 variables, 9/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 509/710 variables, 201/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 42/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 6/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/710 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 710/710 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 1827 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3555ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 1505 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 201 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 509/509 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 508
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 200 transition count 508
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 188 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 188 transition count 352
Applied a total of 26 rules in 25 ms. Remains 188 /201 variables (removed 13) and now considering 352/509 (removed 157) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 188/201 places, 352/509 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 72 ms. (547 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12170174581066170370.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17726257570473925379.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:05:42] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-12170174581066170370.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-17726257570473925379.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 352 rows 188 cols 1310 entries
Finished phase 1 with 54 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:05:42] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-17726257570473925379.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:05:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 155/161 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/181 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/188 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 352/540 variables, 188/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 42/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/540 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 540/540 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 985 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 155/161 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/181 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/188 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 352/540 variables, 188/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 42/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 4/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/540 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 540/540 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 892 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1911ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 447 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 188 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 186 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 186 transition count 326
Applied a total of 4 rules in 15 ms. Remains 186 /188 variables (removed 2) and now considering 326/352 (removed 26) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 186/188 places, 326/352 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10689254906141403381.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-16864513811454148608.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:05:45] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10689254906141403381.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-16864513811454148608.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 326 rows 186 cols 1206 entries
Finished phase 1 with 52 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:05:45] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-16864513811454148608.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:05:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 147/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/178 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/186 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 326/512 variables, 186/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 42/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 389 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 147/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/178 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/186 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 326/512 variables, 186/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 42/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 512/512 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 436 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 846ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 110 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 186 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 186/186 places, 326/326 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 185 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 185 transition count 313
Applied a total of 2 rules in 17 ms. Remains 185 /186 variables (removed 1) and now considering 313/326 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 185/186 places, 313/326 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 191663 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 631 ms. (steps per millisecond=303 )
Probabilistic random walk after 191663 steps, saw 118855 distinct states, run finished after 635 ms. (steps per millisecond=301 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 843 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 86 rules in 6 ms. Remains 228 /271 variables (removed 43) and now considering 368/843 (removed 475) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8450410607650787729.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2840250657546731416.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-8450410607650787729.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2840250657546731416.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols 1290 entries
Finished phase 1 with 94 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2840250657546731416.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:05:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:05:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 778 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1002 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 361 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:05:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:05:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 6/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 368/596 variables, 228/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 42/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 596/596 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 228/228 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 361/361 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60121ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 361 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60123ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/271 places, 368/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61136 ms. Remains : 228/271 places, 368/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13469209075930679223.gal : 9 ms
[2026-05-22 15:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3698578196062713248.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13469209075930679223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3698578196062713248.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,25.6334,707008,2,109309,5,2.03506e+06,6,0,1283,1.22746e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16078063251860614857.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16078063251860614857.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16078063251860614857.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16078063251860614857.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16078063251860614857.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 533 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 55 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2596429076008988277.gal : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12684794148987769426.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2596429076008988277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12684794148987769426.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,3.69367,113000,8625,2903,200211,28090,908,165201,412,312683,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(E(!(((i0.i1.u5.next_9==1)&&(i6.u37.ncs_2_0==1))) U !(((i0.i1.u5.next_10==1)&&(i8.u49.ncs_5_6==1))))) * EG(EX(((i2.u0.slot_F.T.F.F.F....302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(EG(E(!(((i0.i1.u5.next_9==1)&&(i6.u37.ncs_2_0==1))) U !(((i0.i1.u5.next_10==1)&&(i8.u49.ncs_5_6==1)...411
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t330, t331, t332, t333, t334, t338, t339, t340, t341, t34...396
(forward)formula 0,0,17.4376,484136,1,0,562996,415916,4667,878610,2283,2.83464e+06,2509918
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 238 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 238 transition count 474
Applied a total of 66 rules in 14 ms. Remains 238 /271 variables (removed 33) and now considering 474/843 (removed 369) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5923127053925861260.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2639238142190129201.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5923127053925861260.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2639238142190129201.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 474 rows 238 cols 1710 entries
Finished phase 1 with 104 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2639238142190129201.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 225 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/271 places, 474/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 237 /237 variables (removed 0) and now considering 474/474 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 242 ms. Remains : 237/271 places, 474/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 474 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16548478236157871568.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4863722941526181776.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16548478236157871568.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4863722941526181776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.44865e+07,28.5761,779308,2,125167,5,2.13128e+06,6,0,1425,2.15339e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9386625585744627956.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9386625585744627956.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9386625585744627956.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9386625585744627956.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9386625585744627956.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 835 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 73 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14585378899496485493.gal : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8941598526602887373.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14585378899496485493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8941598526602887373.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.44865e+07,6.79937,180232,11618,518,350087,5205,1232,288180,160,25635,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i1.i0.u3.next_6==1)&&(i7.u66.ncs_1_6==1)) U (!((EF(((i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i0.u0.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((i1.i0.u4.next_8==1)&&(i9.u85.ncs_3_3=...779
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((E(TRUE U ((i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i0.u0.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((i1.i0.u4.next_8==1)&&(i9.u85.ncs_3_3=...2535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t26, t30, t31, t32, t33, t43, t44, t45, t57, t71, t76, t88, t99, t100, t111, t123, t130,...1084
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 229 transition count 381
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 229 transition count 381
Applied a total of 84 rules in 17 ms. Remains 229 /271 variables (removed 42) and now considering 381/843 (removed 462) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9627098232725722464.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1017320610114825559.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9627098232725722464.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1017320610114825559.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 381 rows 229 cols 1342 entries
Finished phase 1 with 95 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 5 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 5 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-1017320610114825559.kers
Total runtime 6 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 303 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 317 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/271 places, 381/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 228 /228 variables (removed 0) and now considering 381/381 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 336 ms. Remains : 228/271 places, 381/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 381 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1553674272255767653.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14245904774934179285.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1553674272255767653.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14245904774934179285.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9606e+07,13.9073,419144,2,105421,5,1.29417e+06,6,0,1296,1.20016e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4401063088714610243.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4401063088714610243.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4401063088714610243.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4401063088714610243.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4401063088714610243.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 672 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11557409294067463612.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15406207684464759220.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11557409294067463612.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15406207684464759220.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9606e+07,5.26655,127564,12786,27,275068,319,1003,178252,38,511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(EG(((((i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i0.u81.ncs_0_6==1))||((i0.u1.next_3==1)&&(i0.u26.ncs_0_5==1)))||((((i0.u2.next_4==1)&&(i0.u81.ncs_0_6==1)...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(((((i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i0.u81.ncs_0_6==1))||((i0.u1.next_3==1)&&(i0.u26.ncs_0_5==1...305
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t332, t333, t334, t335, t336, t337, t338, t339, t340, t341, t342, t343, t344, t345, t346, t34...465
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 230 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 230 transition count 394
Applied a total of 82 rules in 17 ms. Remains 230 /271 variables (removed 41) and now considering 394/843 (removed 449) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-18014012528362633664.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-12454153886038155677.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:09:37] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-18014012528362633664.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-12454153886038155677.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 230 cols 1394 entries
Finished phase 1 with 96 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:09:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-12454153886038155677.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:09:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 308 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/271 places, 394/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 394/394 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 339 ms. Remains : 229/271 places, 394/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17248811768017421396.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:09:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9632443823480187568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17248811768017421396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9632443823480187568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10706e+07,11.4437,325044,2,77396,5,944271,6,0,1313,799499,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2674679500215048046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2674679500215048046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2674679500215048046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2674679500215048046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2674679500215048046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 708 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10596329977722475409.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9164219439874083149.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10596329977722475409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9164219439874083149.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10706e+07,2.1061,69776,9219,27,141125,192,1027,101536,37,313,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(EX(E(((i0.i0.u2.next_4==1)&&(i3.u14.ncs_2_0==1)) U ((i0.i1.u6.next_12==1)&&(i6.u79.ncs_3_6==1))))) U EF((AX(!(((i0.i1.u5.next_10==1)...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(!(((i0.i1.u5.next_10==1)&&(i6.u77.ncs_3_3==1)))))) * EX((((i0.i0.u3.next_6==1)...706
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t345, t346, t349, t350, t351, t352, t353, t354, t355, t356, t357, t358, t359, t360, t361, t36...465
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 231 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 231 transition count 383
Applied a total of 80 rules in 12 ms. Remains 231 /271 variables (removed 40) and now considering 383/843 (removed 460) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6677885220715583478.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11194502123177900836.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6677885220715583478.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11194502123177900836.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 231 cols 1346 entries
Finished phase 1 with 97 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 5 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 6 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-11194502123177900836.kers
Total runtime 7 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 324 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 327 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 230/271 places, 383/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 230 /230 variables (removed 0) and now considering 383/383 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 230/271 places, 383/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 383 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability930741756144838135.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-22 15:10:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13549052480085054153.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability930741756144838135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13549052480085054153.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.15165e+07,16.7396,518108,2,126423,5,1.48341e+06,6,0,1306,1.63145e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14507129393326106107.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14507129393326106107.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14507129393326106107.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14507129393326106107.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14507129393326106107.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 663 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12677382938887542303.gal : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14294374541188503609.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12677382938887542303.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14294374541188503609.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.15165e+07,10.8693,267332,13893,27,526801,237,991,462893,39,519,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX((AX(((i1.u2.next_6==1)&&(i2.u83.ncs_1_6==1))) * (i3.u39.p1_2_8==0))) * EG((((i7.i1.u59.p1_6_4==0)&&((i0.u0.next_1==0)||(i5.u54.nc...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX((!(EX(!(((i1.u2.next_6==1)&&(i2.u83.ncs_1_6==1))))) * (i3.u39.p1_2_8==0))) * EG((((i7.i...351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t67, t70, t71, t117, t118, t119, t122, t123, t124, t125, t126, t152, t153, t166, t167, t...851
(forward)formula 0,0,22.11,452152,1,0,777858,247,4439,891330,170,1130,4992579
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 237 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 237 transition count 473
Applied a total of 68 rules in 19 ms. Remains 237 /271 variables (removed 34) and now considering 473/843 (removed 370) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-13932269666597527299.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15369725037262437432.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:11:31] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-13932269666597527299.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15369725037262437432.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 473 rows 237 cols 1708 entries
Finished phase 1 with 103 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:11:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15369725037262437432.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:11:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:11:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:11:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:11:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 873 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1069 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 466 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:11:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:11:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 237/710 variables, and 49 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/237 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 466/466 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 32/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 237/710 variables, and 49 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/237 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/466 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60169ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 466 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60171ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/271 places, 473/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61262 ms. Remains : 237/271 places, 473/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 473 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7151551041554231849.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18132839316122416299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7151551041554231849.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18132839316122416299.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17355157776024945321.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17355157776024945321.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17355157776024945321.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17355157776024945321.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17355157776024945321.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 807 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6260761810051764382.gal : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:13:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2607270360494617879.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6260761810051764382.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2607270360494617879.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.2929e+07,19.3958,305520,7706,9693,305757,85233,1032,935393,572,1.47782e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 801
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 229 transition count 801
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 186 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 186 transition count 326
Applied a total of 170 rules in 39 ms. Remains 186 /271 variables (removed 85) and now considering 326/843 (removed 517) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9329726895269201961.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7537745284030800890.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:13:32] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9329726895269201961.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-7537745284030800890.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 326 rows 186 cols 1206 entries
Finished phase 1 with 52 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:13:32] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-7537745284030800890.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:13:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:13:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:13:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:13:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 646 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 847 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2026-05-22 15:13:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 319 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:13:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:13:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 5/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 186/512 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 319/319 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 25/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 186/512 variables, and 43 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/319 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60131ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 319 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/271 places, 326/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61048 ms. Remains : 186/271 places, 326/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 326 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14412639983180762915.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14995536957941312134.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14412639983180762915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14995536957941312134.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,726672,16.2878,483296,2,81148,5,1.22032e+06,6,0,1073,726882,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15945349011301644306.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15945349011301644306.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15945349011301644306.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15945349011301644306.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15945349011301644306.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 467 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 80 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8287519709885436228.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14967258875475557441.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8287519709885436228.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14967258875475557441.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,726672,5.00478,141336,7293,1496,225015,20126,954,447087,408,193214,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((i2.u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(i3.u15.cs_2_6==1))) * AG(A(A(((i1.u6.next_11==1)&&(i0.i1.u7.ncs_3_5==1)) U !(((i0.i1.u7.next_12==1)&...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i2.u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(i3.u15.cs_2_6==1)))))] = FALSE * (([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,...682
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,0,13.1736,299932,1,0,402571,85079,3270,1.56732e+06,1815,627166,1009245
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 230 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 230 transition count 394
Applied a total of 82 rules in 17 ms. Remains 230 /271 variables (removed 41) and now considering 394/843 (removed 449) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5744585193943244358.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5780132196081300139.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-5744585193943244358.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5780132196081300139.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 230 cols 1394 entries
Finished phase 1 with 96 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 6 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-5780132196081300139.kers
Total runtime 6 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 309 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/271 places, 394/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 394/394 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 329 ms. Remains : 229/271 places, 394/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18221747823618794240.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9486816917962958272.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18221747823618794240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9486816917962958272.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10706e+07,14.6013,419176,2,106463,5,1.26275e+06,6,0,1313,1.23759e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3299145358495055019.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3299145358495055019.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3299145358495055019.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3299145358495055019.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3299145358495055019.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 692 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15272850905979570948.gal : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:15:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7048026987046572242.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15272850905979570948.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7048026987046572242.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10706e+07,6.30147,182572,13303,27,368734,222,973,266781,38,371,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((i0.u5.next_11==1)&&(i2.u30.ncs_6_1==1))||((i1.u3.next_8==1)&&(i9.u54.ncs_5_1==1)))) + (AG(AX(AX(((i1.u4.next_10==1)&&(i1.u35.ncs_0...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!((((i0.u5.next_11==1)&&(i2.u30.ncs_6_1==1))||((i1.u3.next_8==1)&&(i9.u54.ncs_5_1==...449
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t345, t346, t347, t348, t349, t350, t351, t353, t354, t355, t356, t357, t358, t359, t360, t36...459
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 803
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 231 transition count 803
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 187 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 187 transition count 303
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 186 transition count 302
Applied a total of 170 rules in 47 ms. Remains 186 /271 variables (removed 85) and now considering 302/843 (removed 541) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9103520588335397933.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5621898676922403516.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:16:17] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-9103520588335397933.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-5621898676922403516.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 186 cols 1106 entries
Finished phase 1 with 52 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:16:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 5 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-5621898676922403516.kers
Total runtime 5 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 242 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 249 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/271 places, 302/843 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 185 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 151 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 144 transition count 261
Applied a total of 82 rules in 14 ms. Remains 144 /185 variables (removed 41) and now considering 261/302 (removed 41) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10961570601105201463.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6120730787397501172.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10961570601105201463.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6120730787397501172.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 144 cols 926 entries
Finished phase 1 with 60 SingleSign rule and 68 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 16 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-6120730787397501172.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 327 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 492 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 144/271 places, 261/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 803 ms. Remains : 144/271 places, 261/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4345910586527553192.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13430900299089550878.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4345910586527553192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13430900299089550878.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,510064,3.3232,115400,2,37773,5,317455,6,0,840,238415,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(A(((slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(p2_5_1==1)) U ((next_8==1)&&(ncs_1_3==1))))) U (p1_6_9==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p1_6_9==1))))) * !(E(!((p1_6_9==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((next_8==1)&&(ncs_1_3==1))) U (!((...301
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t164, t165, t166, t167, t168, t170, t172, t173, t174, t176, t177, t178, t179, t180, t182, t18...456
(forward)formula 0,0,29.8299,772992,1,0,565,3.58205e+06,560,274,7080,1.63109e+06,556
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 801
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 229 transition count 801
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 186 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 186 transition count 326
Applied a total of 170 rules in 49 ms. Remains 186 /271 variables (removed 85) and now considering 326/843 (removed 517) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-689103501059491752.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11596127866267994959.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:16:48] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-689103501059491752.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11596127866267994959.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 326 rows 186 cols 1206 entries
Finished phase 1 with 52 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:16:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 3 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-11596127866267994959.kers
Total runtime 4 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:16:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 253 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/271 places, 326/843 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 185 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 151 transition count 287
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 146 transition count 287
Applied a total of 78 rules in 9 ms. Remains 146 /185 variables (removed 39) and now considering 287/326 (removed 39) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2255478371994732658.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-9300679796334662536.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:16:48] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2255478371994732658.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-9300679796334662536.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 287 rows 146 cols 1030 entries
Finished phase 1 with 62 SingleSign rule and 68 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:16:48] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 16 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-9300679796334662536.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 356 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 525 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 146/271 places, 287/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 838 ms. Remains : 146/271 places, 287/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7828973102255204176.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-22 15:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9638196877250135094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7828973102255204176.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9638196877250135094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,538952,4.84697,154960,2,39995,5,429932,6,0,874,304765,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(!(A(((((next_4==1)&&(ncs_1_1==1))||((slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(p3_0_1==1)))||((next_11==1)&&(ncs_2_4==1))) U !((((next_10==1)&&(p1_6...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!((((next_10==1)&&(p1_6_6==1))||((next_6==1)&&(ncs_0_1==1))))) U (!(((((next_4==1)&...397
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t188, t189, t190, t191, t192, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t201, t202, t204, t205, t207, t20...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13107965745516700430.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13107965745516700430.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13107965745516700430.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13107965745516700430.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13107965745516700430.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 498 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 66 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10447390275097872845.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13298620652768360212.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10447390275097872845.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13298620652768360212.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,538952,4.08472,85716,4278,177,119853,907,816,410565,124,3072,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(!(A(((((i1.i0.u3.next_4==1)&&(i5.u25.ncs_1_1==1))||((i3.i0.u35.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(i4.u23.p3_0_1==1)))||((i1.i0.u6.next_11==1)...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!((((i1.i0.u6.next_10==1)&&(i0.u21.p1_6_6==1))||((i1.i1.u4.next_6==1)&&(i4.u23.ncs_...542
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t188, t189, t190, t191, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t201, t202, t204, t207, t208, t209, t21...480
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,28.3896,427492,1,0,612657,6553,3802,1.8694e+06,446,67871,1948631
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 801
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 229 transition count 801
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 186 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 186 transition count 326
Applied a total of 170 rules in 16 ms. Remains 186 /271 variables (removed 85) and now considering 326/843 (removed 517) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2979905800094568248.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11647993305930717191.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-2979905800094568248.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-11647993305930717191.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 326 rows 186 cols 1206 entries
Finished phase 1 with 52 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-11647993305930717191.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 205 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/271 places, 326/843 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 185 transition count 293
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 152 transition count 286
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 145 transition count 286
Applied a total of 80 rules in 15 ms. Remains 145 /185 variables (removed 40) and now considering 286/326 (removed 40) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10961449863578161585.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1636231459038949813.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10961449863578161585.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-1636231459038949813.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 286 rows 145 cols 1028 entries
Finished phase 1 with 61 SingleSign rule and 68 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 16 P flows in 1 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-1636231459038949813.kers
Total runtime 1 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 285 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 385 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 145/271 places, 286/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 623 ms. Remains : 145/271 places, 286/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 286 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6668849410833693037.gal : 1 ms
[2026-05-22 15:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6288590549473774284.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6668849410833693037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6288590549473774284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,538064,3.08343,107152,2,37356,5,316273,6,0,869,208593,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(((next_8==1)&&(ncs_0_2==1)))) U AG(E((A(((slot_F.F.F.F.T.F.F==1)&&(p3_6_4==1)) U ((next_6==1)&&(ncs_0_0==1))) * EF(((next_2==1)&&(...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(((next_8==1)&&(ncs_0_2==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(E((!((E(!(((next_6==1)&&(ncs_0_0==1))) U (!...371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t187, t190, t191, t192, t193, t194, t196, t197, t198, t199, t200, t202, t203, t204, t205, t20...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:18:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:18:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2358343111205626623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2358343111205626623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2358343111205626623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2358343111205626623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2358343111205626623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 459 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3027232507173158426.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11748345393215405931.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3027232507173158426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11748345393215405931.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,538064,2.59893,76660,5720,278,137433,2110,790,206450,161,33078,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(((i2.u6.next_8==1)&&(i3.u5.ncs_0_2==1)))) U AG(E((A(((i6.u1.slot_F.F.F.F.T.F.F==1)&&(i1.u32.p3_6_4==1)) U ((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(i3....269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(((i2.u6.next_8==1)&&(i3.u5.ncs_0_2==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(E((!((E(!(((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(...458
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t187, t190, t191, t192, t194, t196, t197, t198, t199, t200, t202, t203, t204, t205, t206, t20...462
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,11.6411,286168,1,0,528176,33938,3623,751131,647,184228,1709755
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 234 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 234 transition count 434
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 234 /271 variables (removed 37) and now considering 434/843 (removed 409) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-11526367293938754841.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6562327118324573787.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:18:30] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-11526367293938754841.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-6562327118324573787.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 234 cols 1552 entries
Finished phase 1 with 100 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:18:30] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 7 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-6562327118324573787.kers
Total runtime 8 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 325 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 327 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/271 places, 434/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 434/434 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 233/271 places, 434/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8796427738306563979.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:18:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3908847092729508056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8796427738306563979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3908847092729508056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.70573e+07,27.4933,678412,2,89027,5,1.76714e+06,6,0,1369,1.49166e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5369525418874914036.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5369525418874914036.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5369525418874914036.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5369525418874914036.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5369525418874914036.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 825 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8048598405863474771.gal : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11521936919077117756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8048598405863474771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11521936919077117756.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.70573e+07,9.64853,223472,11153,28,413373,192,1181,352614,40,360,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!(AX(E(AX(((i1.i0.u4.next_11==1)&&(i8.u77.ncs_4_6==1))) U A(((i6.i1.u67.slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(i6.i1.u74.p3_4_3==1)) U ((i0.i0.u1....640
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(((!(!(EX(!(E(!(EX(!(((i1.i0.u4.next_11==1)&&(i8.u77.ncs_4_6==1))))) U !((E(!(((i0.i0.u1.next_4...820
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, t28, t41, t42, t93, t106, t107, t132, t145, t146, t184, t185, t205, t206, t207, t20...635
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 271 transition count 802
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 230 transition count 802
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 189 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 189 transition count 341
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 188 transition count 340
Applied a total of 166 rules in 19 ms. Remains 188 /271 variables (removed 83) and now considering 340/843 (removed 503) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10196816279208968701.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2632433830501744792.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-10196816279208968701.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-2632433830501744792.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 188 cols 1260 entries
Finished phase 1 with 54 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-2632433830501744792.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 229 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/271 places, 340/843 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 187 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 142 transition count 295
Applied a total of 90 rules in 9 ms. Remains 142 /187 variables (removed 45) and now considering 295/340 (removed 45) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4075585088010283367.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10497906905562628183.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4075585088010283367.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-10497906905562628183.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 142 cols 1072 entries
Finished phase 1 with 58 SingleSign rule and 68 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 16 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-10497906905562628183.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:19:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 479 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 142/271 places, 295/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 880 ms. Remains : 142/271 places, 295/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17031749237122288297.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:19:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10421070916689746122.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17031749237122288297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10421070916689746122.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,655480,6.5954,189568,2,41624,5,530476,6,0,866,371804,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((next_9==1)&&(ncs_1_3==1))) * AG(EF((((AG((p1_2_8==0)) * ((next_3==0)||(ncs_6_5==0))) * (((next_4==0)||(ncs_4_0==0))&&(next_9==1))) ...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((next_9==1)&&(ncs_1_3==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((!(E(TRUE U !((p...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t200, t201, t202, t204, t205, t206, t207, t208, t209, t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t21...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5845527424667078441.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5845527424667078441.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5845527424667078441.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5845527424667078441.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5845527424667078441.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 500 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 73 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16345403796078918704.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:20:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4525055365781706002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16345403796078918704.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4525055365781706002.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,655480,1.39456,52336,5430,203,94598,701,766,80908,169,3335,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((i2.u6.next_9==1)&&(i6.u33.ncs_1_3==1))) * AG(EF((((AG((i5.u21.p1_2_8==0)) * ((i2.u4.next_3==0)||(i8.u31.ncs_6_5==0))) * (((i4.u5.ne...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i2.u6.next_9==1)&&(i6.u33.ncs_1_3==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((!(...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t200, t201, t202, t204, t205, t207, t208, t209, t211, t212, t214, t215, t216, t217, t218, t21...447
(forward)formula 0,0,8.38541,243100,1,0,464128,7770,3079,443701,571,61308,2042211
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 231 transition count 407
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 231 transition count 407
Applied a total of 80 rules in 5 ms. Remains 231 /271 variables (removed 40) and now considering 407/843 (removed 436) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17260114800653868302.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-3971948506578126404.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:20:11] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-17260114800653868302.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-3971948506578126404.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 407 rows 231 cols 1446 entries
Finished phase 1 with 97 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:20:11] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-3971948506578126404.kers
Total runtime 2 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:20:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 242 ms returned []
[2026-05-22 15:20:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:20:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2026-05-22 15:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 912 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:20:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2026-05-22 15:20:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 407/638 variables, 231/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/638 variables, 42/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Timeout of Z3 solver reached")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 638/638 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 23/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 407/638 variables, 231/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/638 variables, 42/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/638 variables, 400/714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 638/638 variables, and 714 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60158ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60159ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/271 places, 407/843 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61322 ms. Remains : 231/271 places, 407/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 407 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17845974150753645493.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6175882486896724481.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17845974150753645493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6175882486896724481.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14888026477979122069.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14888026477979122069.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14888026477979122069.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14888026477979122069.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14888026477979122069.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 631 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12432970747145093841.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10531822597146743482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12432970747145093841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10531822597146743482.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.26651e+07,5.94244,164412,7289,4291,320421,11032,915,298245,505,11541,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(((EG(((i2.i1.u6.next_12==1)&&(i7.u42.ncs_2_4==1))) * EG(((i2.i0.u2.next_4==1)&&(i8.u45.ncs_3_3==1)))) + !(((((i2.i0.u2.next_4==1)&&...477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((!(((EG(((i2.i1.u6.next_12==1)&&(i7.u42.ncs_2_4==1))) * EG(((i2.i0.u2.next_4==1)&&(i8.u45.ncs_3_3=...661
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t366, t367, t368, t371, t374, t375, t376, t381, t382, t383, t385, t388, t390, t392, t395, t39...333
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 86 rules in 22 ms. Remains 228 /271 variables (removed 43) and now considering 368/843 (removed 475) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4876750903705516435.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15398275857263990317.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:22:12] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-4876750903705516435.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-15398275857263990317.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols 1290 entries
Finished phase 1 with 94 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:22:12] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-15398275857263990317.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:22:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 347 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/271 places, 368/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 227/271 places, 368/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12615002388722713550.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8978040977794266685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12615002388722713550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8978040977794266685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,12.0836,341660,2,103101,5,1.04693e+06,6,0,1279,992680,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2828012073399157206.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2828012073399157206.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2828012073399157206.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2828012073399157206.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2828012073399157206.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 623 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7178738980133895598.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9554633242430046973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7178738980133895598.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9554633242430046973.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,3.40172,95884,8765,27,205385,175,1041,171553,36,327,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((E(((i0.i0.u2.next_5==1)&&(i0.i2.u32.ncs_0_0==1)) U ((i0.i0.u5.next_12==1)&&(i0.i0.u63.p1_6_6==1))) + (i0.i0.u2.next_6==0)) + ((i1...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(((i1.u92.ncs_4_6==0)||((i0.i1.u1.next_3==1)&&(i0.i2.u36.ncs_0_4==1))))) * !((i0.i0.u...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t329, t330, t331, t332, t333, t33...462
(forward)formula 0,0,17.7955,440168,1,0,819840,249,6116,1.01356e+06,183,1109,3886983
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 843/843 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 227 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 227 transition count 355
Applied a total of 88 rules in 15 ms. Remains 227 /271 variables (removed 44) and now considering 355/843 (removed 488) transitions.
Running PetriSpot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.petrispot.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/petri64' '--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6337075858698754717.kers' '--Pflows' '--basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-12133895314712122072.kers'
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Running PetriSpot with arguments : [--loadKERS=/tmp/petrispot-input-6337075858698754717.kers, --Pflows, --basisKERS=/tmp/petrispot-output-12133895314712122072.kers]
Culled 0 columns in 0 ms.
// Phase 1: matrix 355 rows 227 cols 1238 entries
Finished phase 1 with 93 SingleSign rule and 117 generalized
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Computed 17 P flows in 2 ms.
Exported basis to /tmp/petrispot-output-12133895314712122072.kers
Total runtime 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 391 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 407 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/271 places, 355/843 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 226 /226 variables (removed 0) and now considering 355/355 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 425 ms. Remains : 226/271 places, 355/843 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 355 transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3615182744914580337.gal : 2 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14388220947587096721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3615182744914580337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14388220947587096721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,13.6301,357884,2,100058,5,1.11312e+06,6,0,1262,1.0851e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12864098577346194632.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12864098577346194632.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12864098577346194632.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12864098577346194632.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12864098577346194632.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 580 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16410385610762318975.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10573636356652490765.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16410385610762318975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10573636356652490765.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,5.80954,167476,18276,27,382910,263,909,218494,37,480,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX((AX(((i0.u3.next_7==0)||(i1.u90.ncs_3_6==0))) * ((i0.u0.next_2==0)||(i0.u31.ncs_0_6==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX((!(EX(!(((i0.u3.next_7==0)||(i1.u90.ncs_3_6==0))))) * ((i0.u0.next_2==0)||(i0.u31.ncs_0_6==0)))))]...164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t306, t307, t308, t309, t310, t311, t312, t313, t314, t315, t316, t317, t318, t319, t320, t32...459
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17444048120600917983.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17444048120600917983.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17444048120600917983.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17444048120600917983.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17444048120600917983.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1088 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 649 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12801035463984456760.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:24:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5367456279326306512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12801035463984456760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5367456279326306512.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.67158e+08,373.092,2905128,32263,10417,5.00269e+06,196515,1053,5.82775e+06,932,4.62101e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i2.u4.next_6==1)&&(i4.u10.ncs_1_6==1)) U (!((EF(((i6.u1.next_1==1)&&(i1.u7.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((i1.u6.next_8==1)&&(i2.u4.ncs_3_3==1)))) ...724
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((E(TRUE U ((i6.u1.next_1==1)&&(i1.u7.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((i1.u6.next_8==1)&&(i2.u4.ncs_3_3==1))...2352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t17, t19, t28, t29, t35, t39, t40, t46, t47, t62, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, t96, t97, t98,...1771
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1026 redundant transitions.
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 376 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16667754241857960136.gal : 3 ms
[2026-05-22 15:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12235152907611272574.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16667754241857960136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12235152907611272574.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202604301425/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.67158e+08,17.323,321188,10193,4506,465810,6729,680,715623,540,257036,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((u8.next_6==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_6==1)) U (!((EF(((u8.next_1==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((u8.next_8==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))) * !((((((!(AF(((u8....642
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((E(TRUE U ((u8.next_1==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_5==1))) + ((u8.next_8==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))) * !((((((...2120
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t23, t24, t27, t28, t34, t35, t46, t58, t70, t107, t118, t119, t124, t125, t139, t1...1058
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,59.8513,868624,1,0,1.02702e+06,592692,3202,1.37261e+06,2290,3.35983e+06,5186811
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(AX(EG(((((u8.next_1==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_6==1))||((u8.next_3==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_5==1)))||((((u8.next_4==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_6==1))&&((u8.next_11==1)&&...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(((((u8.next_1==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_6==1))||((u8.next_3==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_5==1)))||((((u8.ne...270
(forward)formula 1,0,61.8084,905116,1,0,1.07956e+06,595396,3245,1.42574e+06,2296,3.36897e+06,5487698
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: A(EF(EX(E(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_0==1)) U ((u8.next_12==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_6==1))))) U EF((AX(!(((u8.next_10==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))) * EX(...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(!(((u8.next_10==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))))) * EX((((u8.next_6==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_2==1...596
(forward)formula 2,1,92.8042,1388068,1,0,1.77876e+06,597579,3269,2.41759e+06,2299,3.38661e+06,9011290
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(EG(A(EF(((u5.p1_1_9==1)||((u8.next_12==1)&&(u6.p1_2_6==1)))) U (((u8.next_4==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_5==1)) * ((EG(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_2=...726
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,EG(!((E(!((((u8.next_4==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_5==1)) * ((EG(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_2==1))) + ((u8.next...1433
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,0,104.827,1652876,1,0,2.13492e+06,607871,3463,2.94972e+06,2354,3.41331e+06,11043173
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (AF((((u8.next_11==1)&&(u3.ncs_6_1==1))||((u8.next_8==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_1==1)))) + (AG(AX(AX(((u8.next_10==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_3==1))))) * AF(((EX(...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!((((u8.next_11==1)&&(u3.ncs_6_1==1))||((u8.next_8==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_1==1)))))))),TRUE...401
(forward)formula 4,0,118.652,1952616,1,0,2.54738e+06,613932,3920,3.66134e+06,2426,3.49133e+06,13125389
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: E((((!(AX(E(AX(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_6==1))) U A(((u9.slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(u1.p3_4_3==1)) U ((u8.next_4==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_0==1))))...516
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(((!(!(EX(!(E(!(EX(!(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_6==1))))) U !((E(!(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_...676
(forward)formula 5,1,121.721,2045260,1,0,2.61363e+06,630823,4024,3.74224e+06,2427,3.54089e+06,13530503
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(((!(((EG(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_4==1))) * EG(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))) + !(((((u8.next_4==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_4==1))||((u9.slo...407
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((!(((EG(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_4==1))) * EG(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_3==1)))) + !(((((u8.ne...591
(forward)formula 6,0,151.272,2202172,1,0,2.85035e+06,632486,2105,4.1218e+06,1476,3.54786e+06,2545577
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EG(EX((AX(((u8.next_7==0)||(u7.ncs_3_6==0))) * ((u8.next_2==0)||(u4.ncs_0_6==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX((!(EX(!(((u8.next_7==0)||(u7.ncs_3_6==0))))) * ((u8.next_2==0)||(u4.ncs_0_6==0)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 7,1,161.096,2202172,1,0,2.85035e+06,632486,2865,4.1218e+06,1711,3.54786e+06,5084885
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Total runtime 1828257 ms.
BK_STOP 1779464091137
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202604301425.jar
+ VERSION=202604301425
+ echo 'Running Version 202604301425'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5973"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-oct2-177944366000170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-07.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;
