Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r254-tall-174931339500234.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339500234
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Jun 6 08:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Jun 6 08:58 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Jun 6 08:57 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K Jun 6 08:57 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Jun 6 11:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Jun 6 11:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Jun 6 11:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 11:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 5 20:08 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Jun 6 08:59 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Jun 6 08:59 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Jun 6 11:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Jun 6 11:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19 Jun 5 20:08 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K Jun 5 20:08 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749345978171

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 59 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Transformed 56 places.
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Transformed 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 56 places and 93 transitions and 506 arcs in 148 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 44 out of 56 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 46 transition count 93
Applied a total of 10 rules in 15 ms. Remains 46 /56 variables (removed 10) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2966 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3654 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6730ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6744ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/56 places, 93/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7060 ms. Remains : 46/56 places, 93/93 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 71 to 68
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1514 resets) in 1659 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 12/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (589 resets) in 299 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (530 resets) in 285 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (548 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (285 resets) in 169 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (528 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (690 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (747 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (621 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (704 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (694 resets) in 201 ms. (198 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (751 resets) in 211 ms. (188 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (4444 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/40 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/127 variables, 40/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 16/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 0 unsolved in 196 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 16/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 211ms problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 12 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 46 places (down from 41) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 220 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 317 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3211 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5921ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5922ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6241 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10918527634042988141.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14671499700712998311.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10918527634042988141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14671499700712998311.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.051468,5536,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EF(((pl_cops_n2>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n2>=1))) + EG(EF((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_here_n2<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n8<1))))) + A...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!(((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n9>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n9>=1))||(((pl_start_cops>=1)...723
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,1,0.269686,14880,1,0,222,52587,211,82,2543,40253,252
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2641 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5930ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5931ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6081 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4573231826261187273.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8933851384286513240.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4573231826261187273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8933851384286513240.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.044016,5592,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(AF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n2>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(!((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n2>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,0,0.23617,14936,1,0,253,52400,209,96,2531,43813,283
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2589 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3296 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5917ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5918ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6031 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17421904906055005436.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9803565872996691843.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17421904906055005436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9803565872996691843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.043239,5584,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EF((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n8<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n8<1))) * (((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n10<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n10<1)...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n8<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n8<1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init...599
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,1,0.122353,9168,1,0,195,21313,219,61,2579,15162,207
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 92
Applied a total of 2 rules in 17 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 92/93 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 92/137 variables, 45/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 22/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 10/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 2652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/137 variables, 45/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 22/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 89/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 3884 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6563ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 92/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6729 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 92/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3192138411030334920.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11811256457340764097.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3192138411030334920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11811256457340764097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,510,0.050449,5952,2,552,5,6666,6,0,275,8507,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n2>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1)) U !(EF(AG((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>=1))...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n2>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ...248
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t17, t18, t20, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, t29, t30,...404
(forward)formula 0,1,0.165641,10432,1,0,189,26045,214,61,2500,24358,205
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:26:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2681 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3310 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6017ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6018ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6134 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6714912612533536352.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability762178241397137974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6714912612533536352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability762178241397137974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.04461,5580,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(EG(((AG((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n4>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n8>=1))) + !((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n4...417
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1))&&(pl_incoming_cops_n5>=1)))))) * !(E(!((((p...654
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.455373,23448,1,0,402,94075,225,206,2606,84188,471
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 46 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 44 transition count 91
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 44 /46 variables (removed 2) and now considering 91/93 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 91/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 91/91 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 91/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12633983814912162615.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12632976011157343125.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12633983814912162615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12632976011157343125.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,420,0.048863,5992,2,445,5,5920,6,0,266,7871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n8>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n8>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n8>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n8>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/39
(forward)formula 0,0,0.119662,8552,1,0,8,18179,20,4,1729,15410,8
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2623 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5924ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5925ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6054 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17650325700003841275.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17936074333368435619.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17650325700003841275.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17936074333368435619.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.043041,5584,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n10>=1))&&((pl_incoming_cops_n10>=1)&&(!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n5>=1))&&((pl_robber...535
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((E((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>=1))&&(pl_robber_here_n9>=1)) U ((pl_co...1216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.396769,20916,1,0,402,80496,229,233,2561,75690,474
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2689 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3266 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5980ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5981ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6122 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14102690968105131703.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9541343113445974054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14102690968105131703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9541343113445974054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.046712,5588,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,1,0.114157,8020,1,0,188,18025,207,59,2559,14183,194
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2668 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3328 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6024ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6024ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6142 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10888220050264625567.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13311419298513671610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10888220050264625567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13311419298513671610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.04351,5580,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AX((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n4>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n9>=1))) * (pl_robber_here_n3>=1)) * (pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1)) * (pl_robber_here_n3>=1)) * !(EX(!((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_r...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,0,0.108338,8396,1,0,192,18193,205,60,2523,13226,195
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2637 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3315 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5973ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5974ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6092 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14102480674147816754.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12441710222593660199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14102480674147816754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12441710222593660199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.043523,5584,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX(((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n4<1))||(pl_robber_here_n8<1))&&(((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n6<1))||(pl_robber_absent_...413
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG(!(EX(!(((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n4<1))||(pl_robber_here_n8<1))&&(((pl_start_c...666
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.378637,20480,1,0,323,75401,228,162,2721,69375,386
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5988ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6113 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13398824349552524638.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15007175113397208895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13398824349552524638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15007175113397208895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.04345,5580,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n5>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1))) * (AF((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n7>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent...676
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U (((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n5>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n5>=1))) * (!(EG(!((((pl_start_...1395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.443129,24752,1,0,370,100076,237,178,2707,85839,457
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3311 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5947ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5947ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6084 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17437780264373720710.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8569314671503106708.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17437780264373720710.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8569314671503106708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.043449,5588,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.044468,5588,1,0,6,5738,7,1,451,6367,1
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2646 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6024ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6024ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6248 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13656471983835969102.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10304201170163511177.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13656471983835969102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10304201170163511177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.045133,5588,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (((EX(AG((((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n4<1))||(pl_incoming_cops_n4<1)))) * AG(AF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n2>=...589
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(Init * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n4<1))||(pl_incoming_cops_n4<1))))))))] = F...766
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 56/0/37
(forward)formula 0,0,0.301982,16596,1,0,289,60655,227,121,2640,53139,336
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2677 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6111ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6201 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7618445209686699562.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17634483268745018124.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7618445209686699562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17634483268745018124.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.046811,5588,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((!(AX(((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n3>=1))&&(pl_robber_here_n10>=1))||((pl_cops_n5>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n5>=1))))) * !...1009
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!((!(!(EX(!(((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n3>=1))&&(pl_robber_here_n10>=1))||((pl_cops...1214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,0,0.237722,14164,1,0,218,49945,214,79,2580,36331,246
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-08 01:27:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2695 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/139 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 22/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3339 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6053ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6182 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 93/93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6783663649539959231.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8851103313862273448.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6783663649539959231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8851103313862273448.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,620,0.04375,5584,2,485,5,5738,6,0,280,6367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((AG(EF((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n4>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n4>=1)))) + EF((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n8<1))||(pl_robber_abs...480
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n4>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n4>=1)))))))] !=...828
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t28, t30, t31...405
(forward)formula 0,1,0.210895,13264,1,0,203,42006,209,67,2602,33340,223
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-08 01:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 100335 ms.

BK_STOP 1749346079726

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339500234"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001.tgz
mv CopsAndRobbers-PT-KFL010N005K002X001 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;