Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r254-tall-174931339400186.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339400186
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 640K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Jun 6 08:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Jun 6 08:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Jun 6 11:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Jun 6 11:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Jun 6 11:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 11:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 5 20:08 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 6 08:59 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K Jun 6 08:59 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Jun 6 11:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Jun 6 11:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11 Jun 5 20:08 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 126K Jun 5 20:08 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749338880969

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 63 ms
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Transformed 125 places.
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Transformed 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 125 places and 165 transitions and 768 arcs in 148 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 88 out of 125 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 165/165 transitions.
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 102 transition count 165
Applied a total of 23 rules in 16 ms. Remains 102 /125 variables (removed 23) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 13 ms
[2025-06-07 23:28:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 19966 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40146ms
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:28:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48508ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48509ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/125 places, 165/165 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88884 ms. Remains : 102/125 places, 165/165 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 23:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-07 23:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-07 23:29:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 1647 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 29/75 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 74 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 28/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 26/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 61 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 25/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 24/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 16/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 14/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 13/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (20 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 24/51 variables, 10/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 12/63 variables, 12/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 127/191 variables, 64/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 8/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 76/267 variables, 38/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 38/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved in 117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/17 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/38 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/58 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 181/267 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved in 100 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 228ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 47 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:29:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18429 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38477ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38477ms
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 721 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 791 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:30:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48329ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48331ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 87604 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6574952161944765683.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2470096090846299674.ctl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6574952161944765683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2470096090846299674.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.06166,69388,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((!(E((!(((pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + EF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n11>=1))&&(pl_robber_abse...1175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * (E(TRUE U (!(E((!(((pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + E(TRUE U (((pl_start_robbe...3346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9715133201328850355.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9715133201328850355.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9715133201328850355.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9715133201328850355.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9715133201328850355.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 173 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 41 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13211098957346286180.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:31:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15544508980570426237.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13211098957346286180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15544508980570426237.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,9.49477,263064,4922,1262,237252,32666,481,1.9572e+06,75,414660,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((!(E((!(((i7.u24.pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(i2.u23.pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + EF((((i0.u4.pl_start_robber>=1)&&(i4.u17.pl_robber_her...1451
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * (E(TRUE U (!(E((!(((i7.u24.pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(i2.u23.pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + E(TRUE U (((...4055
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t17, t22, t24, t25, t27, t30, t34, t35, t37, t39, t45, t47, t52...593
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 102 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 101 transition count 164
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 100 transition count 163
Applied a total of 4 rules in 20 ms. Remains 100 /102 variables (removed 2) and now considering 163/165 (removed 2) transitions.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-07 23:32:00] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/263 variables, 100/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 46/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 163/263 variables, 100/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 46/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 117/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 20023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40066ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:32:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:32:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1450 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1529 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:32:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:32:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/263 variables, 100/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 46/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 21618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 163/263 variables, 100/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 46/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 117/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51665ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51666ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/102 places, 163/165 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 93304 ms. Remains : 100/102 places, 163/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17992168376598851733.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17919725991630518318.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17992168376598851733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17919725991630518318.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.88777e+06,1.65319,56404,2,10681,5,235397,6,0,564,238316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((pl_init_cops>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((pl_init_cops>=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t10, t12, t13, t15, t17, t18, t20, t22, t23, t25, t27, t28, t30, t32, t33...649
(forward)formula 0,0,9.0433,252708,1,0,399,1.17314e+06,350,138,4721,1.04541e+06,398
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-07 23:33:43] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:33:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18548 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38602ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38603ms
[2025-06-07 23:34:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:34:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:34:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:34:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1052 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:34:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:34:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18277 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48313ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48314ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88043 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17741493906733119910.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5589526195935853589.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17741493906733119910.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5589526195935853589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.08919,69576,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(AG((AX(((pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1))) * EF(((pl_init_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n16>=1)))))) + (EF(AG(EX...348
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1))))) * E(TRUE...812
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15353955975053621818.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15353955975053621818.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15353955975053621818.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15353955975053621818.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15353955975053621818.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 166 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 47 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4125782290867194657.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11530039343595376305.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4125782290867194657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11530039343595376305.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,22.416,459364,3514,208,501176,9066,472,2.41913e+06,47,84145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(AG((AX(((i9.u29.pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(i9.u28.pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1))) * EF(((i2.u1.pl_init_robber>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.pl_robber_a...427
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((i9.u29.pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(i9.u28.pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1...967
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t12, t17, t19, t20, t25, t30, t32, t37, t40, t42, t47, t50, t52, t57, t62, t64, t65, ...679
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:36:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:36:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18343 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38376ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38376ms
[2025-06-07 23:36:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:36:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:36:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:36:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 663 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 722 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:36:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:36:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18523 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48558ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48559ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 87661 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1957200196425421071.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:37:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14554358698788717008.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1957200196425421071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14554358698788717008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.18609,69708,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n14>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n14>=1)) + ((AX(((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n5<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n...588
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n14>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n14>=1)) + ((!(EX(!(((((pl_start_cops<1...639
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
(forward)formula 0,0,16.9811,446384,1,0,440,2.01989e+06,361,176,4696,1.95203e+06,440
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:37:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:37:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18585 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38614ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38614ms
[2025-06-07 23:38:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:38:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:38:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:38:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:38:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1009 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1069 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:38:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:38:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18341 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48398ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48398ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88085 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17480457034531810148.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:39:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3848487639854358049.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17480457034531810148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3848487639854358049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,1.90619,69436,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(((((EG((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n3>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n4>=1))) + (AF((pl_init_cops<1)) * !(E(((pl_cops_n19>=1)&...724
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((EY(EY(Init)) * ((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n7<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n7<1))&&(((((pl_start_cops<1)|...1263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
(forward)formula 0,1,8.89012,268832,1,0,391,1.23148e+06,368,146,4711,989139,414
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:39:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:39:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18484 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38518ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38518ms
[2025-06-07 23:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:40:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:40:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:40:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:40:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:40:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18311 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48347ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48350ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88157 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12463106348399851924.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9961088250309592168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12463106348399851924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9961088250309592168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.06824,68056,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((pl_init_cops<1) + ((A(!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n9>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n9>=1))) U EF(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incomi...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((pl_init_cops<1) + ((!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1)))) U (!(!(...580
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8468504508155772866.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8468504508155772866.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8468504508155772866.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8468504508155772866.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8468504508155772866.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 163 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16070858262034828187.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability247222405399847956.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16070858262034828187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability247222405399847956.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,9.84466,200328,3762,780,218545,9133,440,1.03502e+06,65,99975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((i5.u0.pl_init_cops<1) + ((A(!((((i7.u2.pl_start_cops>=1)&&(i5.u13.pl_cops_n9>=1))&&(i4.u14.pl_robber_absent_n9>=1))) U EF(((i1.u7.p...447
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((i5.u0.pl_init_cops<1) + ((!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((i1.u7.pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(i1.u6.pl_incoming_cops...689
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t10, t12, t17, t20, t22, t27, t30, t32, t37, t39, t40, t42, t45, t47, t49, t50, t54, ...653
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:42:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:42:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18304 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38341ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38341ms
[2025-06-07 23:42:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:42:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:42:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:42:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:42:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 967 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1033 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:42:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:42:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18588 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48629ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48630ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88008 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2141939683194041733.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7061693981918177205.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2141939683194041733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7061693981918177205.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.06186,68576,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((EX((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n11>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n11>=1))) * EF(EG(((pl_cops_n23>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n23>=1)))))) + A(...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n15>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n15>=1)))))))...1110
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph823740511105610594.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph823740511105610594.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph823740511105610594.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph823740511105610594.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph823740511105610594.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 164 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12567015492719805249.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13284292577368368843.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12567015492719805249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13284292577368368843.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,15.3374,307240,2591,558,331787,23640,443,1.43064e+06,60,213926,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((EX((((i3.u3.pl_start_cops>=1)&&(i2.u17.pl_cops_n11>=1))&&(i2.u17.pl_robber_absent_n11>=1))) * EF(EG(((i3.u29.pl_cops_n23>=1)&&(i3.u2...448
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((((i3.u3.pl_start_cops>=1)&&(i6.u21.pl_cops_n15>=1))&&(i6.u21.pl_robber_...1328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t12, t14, t15, t19, t24, t25, t32, t37, t39, t40, t42, t44, t45, t52, t60, t62, t67, ...659
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:44:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:44:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38315ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38315ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:45:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:45:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:45:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:45:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18428 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48470ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48471ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88005 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5935119815508877368.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:45:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17094182841356722917.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5935119815508877368.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17094182841356722917.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.01439,68992,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n15>=1))&&(pl_incoming_cops_n15>=1))) U (EX(AG((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>=1))&&((pl_robber_here_n23>=1)&&(...1198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12244708823486329954.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12244708823486329954.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12244708823486329954.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12244708823486329954.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12244708823486329954.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12602556757818223827.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:46:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10478208217263417525.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12602556757818223827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10478208217263417525.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,19.0021,372316,3325,642,417900,20384,456,1.27137e+06,64,241725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((((i4.u3.pl_finalizing>=1)&&(i9.u22.pl_robber_absent_n15>=1))&&(i8.u20.pl_incoming_cops_n15>=1))) U (EX(AG((((i1.u4.pl_start_robber>...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((i1.u4.pl_start_robber>=1)&&(i3.u6.pl_robber_absent_n1>=1))&&((i3.u31.pl_rob...1455
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t12, t14, t15, t19, t27, t32, t35, t37, t42, t45, t47, t52, t55, t57, t62, t64, t65, ...624
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:46:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38090ms
[2025-06-07 23:47:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:47:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:47:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:47:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 793 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 865 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:47:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:47:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18168 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48204ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 87166 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10128019948176593122.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10585287258042894275.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10128019948176593122.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10585287258042894275.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.12563,69284,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((((pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + AG((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n16<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n16<1)))) * E...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((((pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((((pl_start_cops<1)||...598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13834994046726222832.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13834994046726222832.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13834994046726222832.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13834994046726222832.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13834994046726222832.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 172 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13340930345032399826.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14524431625406620903.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13340930345032399826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14524431625406620903.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,15.3326,346452,2512,303,410321,12802,484,1.3786e+06,54,123560,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((((i8.u25.pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(i8.u24.pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + AG((((i4.u2.pl_start_cops<1)||(i8.u24.pl_cops_n16<1))||(i8....448
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((((i8.u25.pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(i8.u24.pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((((i4.u...732
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t12, t14, t15, t20, t24, t25, t27, t29, t35, t37, t42, t47, t49, t50, t52, t57, t60, ...623
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:49:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:49:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18399 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38443ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 836 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 919 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:50:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18544 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48584ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48586ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 87952 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7881559924449053669.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11879434518557741469.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7881559924449053669.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11879434518557741469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.08705,69584,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AG(!(E((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n17>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n17>=1)) U ((pl_init_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n11>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n17>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n17>=1)) U ...220
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
(forward)formula 0,0,7.28288,186924,1,0,349,854106,355,127,4668,629079,348
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:51:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:51:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38547ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38547ms
[2025-06-07 23:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:51:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1303 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1376 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:51:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:51:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18461 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48492ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48493ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88419 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9627057480372080194.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:52:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2202740352940551387.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9627057480372080194.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2202740352940551387.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.19182,69756,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EX(AF((pl_init_cops>=1))) U AF(((pl_cops_n22>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n22>=1))))) * AF((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n10>=1))&...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((pl_cops_n22>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n22>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((pl_cops_n22>=1)&&(p...395
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 135/0/30
(forward)formula 0,0,18.0876,472916,1,0,26,2.16579e+06,20,3,3595,2.11567e+06,24
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:52:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:52:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18395 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38429ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38430ms
[2025-06-07 23:53:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 960 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1025 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:53:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 17951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 47989ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47990ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 87452 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:54:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1153782420509080113.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5899713689282715470.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1153782420509080113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5899713689282715470.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,1.99391,69284,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EG((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n13<1))) * ((EG(AF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n1...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n13<1)))))] = FA...437
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17992230182429477644.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17992230182429477644.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17992230182429477644.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17992230182429477644.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17992230182429477644.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 169 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10461720600275374895.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:54:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14464630050628690705.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10461720600275374895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14464630050628690705.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,19.4644,389388,2786,242,421824,12771,463,2.35501e+06,49,128583,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EG((((i1.u4.pl_start_robber<1)||(i7.u19.pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(i7.u20.pl_robber_absent_n13<1))) * ((EG(AF((((i1.u4.pl_start_robb...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG((((i1.u4.pl_start_robber<1)||(i7.u19.pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(i7.u20.pl_robber_abs...511
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t12, t15, t17, t22, t24, t25, t29, t37, t42, t47, t49, t50, t52, t57, t60, t62, t67, ...659
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:55:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:55:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18466 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38507ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38508ms
[2025-06-07 23:55:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:55:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:55:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:55:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:55:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:55:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:55:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48320ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48320ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88024 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17008586210628376038.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 23:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16469409581522126488.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17008586210628376038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16469409581522126488.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.08941,69000,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EF((((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n7<1))||((pl_incoming_cops_n7<1)||(((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n5>=1))&&(pl_robber_abse...652
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY(Init) * !(((((pl_cops_n9<1)||(pl_robber_here_n9<1))&&(((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n3<1))||(pl_...751
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4170441629113199006.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4170441629113199006.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4170441629113199006.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4170441629113199006.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4170441629113199006.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 163 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 56 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13913256625895936301.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:57:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11721875413006463078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13913256625895936301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11721875413006463078.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,6.31884,152932,2383,178,201548,7986,451,829557,47,63272,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EF((((i6.i0.u3.pl_finalizing<1)||(i3.u11.pl_robber_absent_n7<1))||((i3.u10.pl_incoming_cops_n7<1)||(((i8.u2.pl_start_cops>=1)&&(i2....825
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY(Init) * !(((((i4.u13.pl_cops_n9<1)||(i4.u13.pl_robber_here_n9<1))&&(((i6.i0.u3.pl_finalizing<1)||(i1.u7....924
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t10, t12, t17, t20, t22, t27, t30, t32, t37, t42, t45, t47, t52, t55, t57, t62, t64, ...699
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:57:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:57:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38413ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38413ms
[2025-06-07 23:58:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 23:58:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:58:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 23:58:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1277 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:58:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 23:58:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18337 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/102 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/267 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 46/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 119/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48372ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48373ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 88067 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 165/165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7190081816925165104.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17718058650882072062.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7190081816925165104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17718058650882072062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.14398,68612,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(AF((pl_init_cops>=1))) * ((AG(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1))) + (pl_cops_n15<1)) + ((pl_robber_here_n15<1) + (...438
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((pl_init_cops>=1))))))) * ((!(E(TRUE U !(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3...692
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7344625313469243556.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7344625313469243556.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7344625313469243556.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7344625313469243556.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7344625313469243556.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 167 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3254215185253107505.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 23:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2576709002964184533.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3254215185253107505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2576709002964184533.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,17.6838,391488,2834,535,469711,16413,475,1.40429e+06,65,153074,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(AF((i0.u0.pl_init_cops>=1))) * ((AG(((i2.u7.pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(i2.u6.pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1))) + (i7.u20.pl_cops_n15<1)) + ((...543
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i0.u0.pl_init_cops>=1))))))) * ((!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u7.pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(i2.u6.p...837
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t7, t12, t17, t20, t22, t27, t30, t32, t37, t39, t40, t44, t49, t50, t54, t55, t57, t...640
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16813980390302395868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16813980390302395868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16813980390302395868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16813980390302395868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16813980390302395868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 167 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 41 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4886907360333532996.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-08 00:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5844655184000296916.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4886907360333532996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5844655184000296916.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,19.0062,404076,4006,4126,343947,81170,474,2.08786e+06,106,1.87709e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((!(E((!(((i1.u21.pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(i7.u20.pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + EF((((i1.u4.pl_start_robber>=1)&&(i1.u15.pl_robber_her...1477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * (E(TRUE U (!(E((!(((i1.u21.pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(i7.u20.pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + E(TRUE U (((...4127
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t10, t14, t19, t20, t22, t27, t32, t35, t37, t42, t47, t49, t50, t52, t54, t55, t62, ...613
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-08 00:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-08 00:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16645456699981841896.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-08 00:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4859588825503771291.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16645456699981841896.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4859588825503771291.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03766e+07,2.13639,68600,2,13166,5,285473,6,0,574,299279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((!(E((!(((pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + EF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n11>=1))&&(pl_robber_abse...1175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * (E(TRUE U (!(E((!(((pl_robber_here_n16>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n16>=1))) + E(TRUE U (((pl_start_robbe...3346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t34...517
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,111.199,2206000,1,0,3312,1.40111e+07,55,2064,2663,8.02355e+06,495
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((EX(AG((AX(((pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1))) * EF(((pl_init_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n16>=1)))))) + (EF(AG(EX...348
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((pl_robber_here_n22>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n22>=1))))) * E(TRUE...812
(forward)formula 1,0,119.657,2206000,1,0,3312,1.40111e+07,74,2064,2739,8.02355e+06,2246
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((((pl_init_cops<1) + ((A(!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n9>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n9>=1))) U EF(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incomi...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((pl_init_cops<1) + ((!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1)))) U (!(!(...580
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,168.997,2456424,1,0,3312,1.59564e+07,18,2064,2357,1.02359e+07,95
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AX((EX((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n11>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n11>=1))) * EF(EG(((pl_cops_n23>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n23>=1)))))) + A(...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n15>=1))&&(pl_robber_absent_n15>=1)))))))...1110
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,187.601,2456424,1,0,3312,1.59564e+07,36,2064,2506,1.02359e+07,436
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(AX((((pl_finalizing>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n15>=1))&&(pl_incoming_cops_n15>=1))) U (EX(AG((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_absent_n1>=1))&&((pl_robber_here_n23>=1)&&(...1198
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 4,1,268.259,2703828,1,0,3312,1.77048e+07,28,2064,2269,1.06664e+07,1026
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AX(((((pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + AG((((pl_start_cops<1)||(pl_cops_n16<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n16<1)))) * E...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((((pl_robber_here_n17>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n17>=1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((((pl_start_cops<1)||...598
(forward)formula 5,1,308.925,2894936,1,0,3312,1.85537e+07,51,2064,2565,1.06664e+07,3020
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AX((EG((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n13<1))) * ((EG(AF((((pl_start_robber>=1)&&(pl_robber_here_n1...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG((((pl_start_robber<1)||(pl_robber_here_n12<1))||(pl_robber_absent_n13<1)))))] = FA...437
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 6,0,335.552,2980564,1,0,3312,1.89499e+07,20,2064,2500,1.09316e+07,1663
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AX(((EF((((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n7<1))||((pl_incoming_cops_n7<1)||(((pl_start_cops>=1)&&(pl_cops_n5>=1))&&(pl_robber_abse...652
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY(Init) * !(((((pl_cops_n9<1)||(pl_robber_here_n9<1))&&(((pl_finalizing<1)||(pl_robber_absent_n3<1))||(pl_...751
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 7,0,362.176,2980564,1,0,3312,1.89499e+07,38,2064,2579,1.09316e+07,3098
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((AX(AF((pl_init_cops>=1))) * ((AG(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3>=1))) + (pl_cops_n15<1)) + ((pl_robber_here_n15<1) + (...438
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((pl_init_cops>=1))))))) * ((!(E(TRUE U !(((pl_robber_here_n3>=1)&&(pl_incoming_cops_n3...692
(forward)formula 8,0,388.681,2980564,1,0,3820,1.89499e+07,67,2105,2608,1.09316e+07,5012
FORMULA CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004-CTLFireability-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2928667 ms.

BK_STOP 1749341810865

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339400186"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004.tgz
mv CopsAndRobbers-PT-CRL023X004 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;