Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r254-tall-174931339200057.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Champagne-PT-H06T1U, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339200057
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Jun 6 08:55 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K Jun 6 08:55 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Jun 6 11:37 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 11:37 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 11:38 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Jun 6 11:38 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 5 20:08 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 11:38 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 11:38 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7 Jun 5 20:08 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K Jun 5 20:08 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749319951766

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Champagne-PT-H06T1U
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 18:12:32] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 18:12:32] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 82 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Transformed 519 places.
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Transformed 668 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 519 places and 668 transitions and 1625 arcs in 177 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 119 out of 519 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 519/519 places, 668/668 transitions.
Discarding 84 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 84 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 435 transition count 584
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 435 transition count 584
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 399 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 399 transition count 548
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 381 transition count 530
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 381 transition count 530
Applied a total of 276 rules in 92 ms. Remains 381 /519 variables (removed 138) and now considering 530/668 (removed 138) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 530 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 335 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 322 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 691 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 529 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 530/911 variables, 381/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 911/911 variables, and 442 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved in 30111 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 529/529 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 41/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 530/911 variables, 381/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/911 variables, 529/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/911 variables, 13/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 911/911 variables, and 988 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 529/529 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60276ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 529 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60288ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 381/519 places, 530/668 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61090 ms. Remains : 381/519 places, 530/668 transitions.
Support contains 119 out of 381 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 18:13:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 530 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 381 places (down from 119) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (123 resets) in 1278 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 6/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (21 resets) in 199 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (10 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (10 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (11 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (10 resets) in 61 ms. (645 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-06-07 18:13:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 293/305 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 76/381 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 530/911 variables, 381/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/911 variables, 0/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/911 variables, 0/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 911/911 variables, and 401 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 364 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 293/305 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 76/381 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 530/911 variables, 381/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/911 variables, 4/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/911 variables, 0/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/911 variables, 0/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 911/911 variables, and 405 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 511 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 886ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 100 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 5 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 530 transitions.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 42 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 322 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 322 transition count 471
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 289 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 289 transition count 438
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 276 transition count 425
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 276 transition count 425
Applied a total of 210 rules in 47 ms. Remains 276 /381 variables (removed 105) and now considering 425/530 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 276 cols
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 436 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 424 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/276 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 425/701 variables, 276/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/701 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 701/701 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved in 28466 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 276/276 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 424/424 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/276 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 425/701 variables, 276/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 424/720 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 1/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 4/725 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 2/727 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 701/701 variables, and 727 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 276/276 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 424/424 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 58542ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58544ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 276/381 places, 425/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59042 ms. Remains : 276/381 places, 425/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 425 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10117155609815326255.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16506339568436815957.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10117155609815326255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16506339568436815957.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53346e+22,0.153951,8712,2,1481,5,22111,6,0,1531,17853,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(EX(TRUE)) * (p29==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p29==0)) * !(EX(!(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t63, t68, t83, t97, t107, t112, t127, t142, t156, t166, t171, t186, t201, ...291
(forward)formula 0,1,1.64956,61140,1,0,603,332537,866,350,9183,232796,861
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 325 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 325 transition count 474
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 295 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 295 transition count 444
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 283 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 283 transition count 432
Applied a total of 196 rules in 14 ms. Remains 283 /381 variables (removed 98) and now considering 432/530 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 283 cols
[2025-06-07 18:14:37] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 279 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/715 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 715/715 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 29772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 431/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 1/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 2/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 2/739 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 715/715 variables, and 739 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 59829ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59830ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60125 ms. Remains : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8399339216142159552.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17394664015076474852.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8399339216142159552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17394664015076474852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.53621e+22,0.181547,9816,2,1675,5,26818,6,0,1566,23495,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((p108!=0)&&(p493!=1)))) * EX(((AG(((EG((p321==0)) + (p57==0)) + (p464==0))) + AX((p141==1))) + (AG((p302==0)) + AG((p75==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((Init * E(TRUE U EG(((p108!=0)&&(p493!=1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EG((p321==0)) + (p57==0)) + (p464==0)))))...442
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t41, t55, t65, t70, t85, t99, t109, t110, t114, t125, t130, t134, t146, t160, t170, ...309
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11965449510254327883.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11965449510254327883.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11965449510254327883.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11965449510254327883.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11965449510254327883.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 332 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4505692937903845708.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4146358726305737866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4505692937903845708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4146358726305737866.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.53621e+22,0.146119,10696,1640,26,12013,501,717,16383,76,1052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((i4.u18.p108!=0)&&(i19.i0.u86.p493!=1)))) * EX(((AG(((EG((i13.i1.u59.p321==0)) + (i2.i1.u9.p57==0)) + (i18.u85.p464==0))) + AX((i...231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((Init * E(TRUE U EG(((i4.u18.p108!=0)&&(i19.i0.u86.p493!=1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EG((i13.i1.u59.p321==0)...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t65, t109, t125, t170, i0.u8.t283, i1.i1.t297, i2.i1.t268, i3.i1.t253, i4.t236, i6.i...415
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
(forward)formula 0,0,7.19779,217928,1,0,450439,611,4651,552091,416,1175,779714
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 382 edges and 381 vertex of which 153 / 381 are part of one of the 21 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 132 places
Ensure Unique test removed 140 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 140 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 248 transition count 321
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 180 transition count 287
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 164 transition count 285
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 162 transition count 285
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 133 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 4 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 133 transition count 256
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 128 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 128 transition count 233
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 128 transition count 228
Performed 51 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 77 transition count 177
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 373 place count 70 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 70 transition count 151
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 70 transition count 144
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 70 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 68 transition count 141
Applied a total of 390 rules in 56 ms. Remains 68 /381 variables (removed 313) and now considering 141/530 (removed 389) transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:16:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/68 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/143 variables, 68/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/144 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 1808 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/68 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/143 variables, 68/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 82/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/144 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 1654 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3473ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3473ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/381 places, 141/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3664 ms. Remains : 68/381 places, 141/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5577129851028699633.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality886100714686142029.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5577129851028699633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality886100714686142029.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.90468e+10,0.015912,4564,2,117,5,1189,6,0,395,675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(A((p58==0) U (EF((p52==0)) + ((p423==1)&&(p323==1)))) U (AG(EF((p501==1))) * !(AF((p94==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p501==1))))) * !(!(EG(!((p94==1)))))))) * !(!((E(!((E(T...777
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 139/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.076319,6484,1,0,15,13222,36,9,2003,9286,21
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 323 transition count 472
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 323 transition count 472
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 291 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 291 transition count 440
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 279 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 279 transition count 428
Applied a total of 204 rules in 42 ms. Remains 279 /381 variables (removed 102) and now considering 428/530 (removed 102) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 279 cols
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:16:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 427 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:16:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/279 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/279 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 428/707 variables, 279/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/707 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/707 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 707/707 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved in 28901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 279/279 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 427/427 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/279 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/279 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 428/707 variables, 279/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/707 variables, 427/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/707 variables, 1/727 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/707 variables, 1/728 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 1)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 1)
(s67 timeout
0)
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 707/707 variables, and 729 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 279/279 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 427/427 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 58966ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58967ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 279/381 places, 428/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59221 ms. Remains : 279/381 places, 428/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1984135019730205093.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4568150323178166419.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1984135019730205093.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4568150323178166419.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86509e+22,0.153091,9104,2,1521,5,23300,6,0,1546,19451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(EG(((p175==0)||(p147==1)))) * (p465==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p465==1)) * !(EX(!(EG(((p175==0)||(p147==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t63, t68, t83, t97, t107, t112, t127, t142, t156, t166, t171, t186, t202, ...303
(forward)formula 0,1,13.8982,453848,1,0,1456,2.68001e+06,879,780,9476,3.29283e+06,1754
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 326 transition count 475
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 326 transition count 475
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 295 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 295 transition count 444
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 285 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 285 transition count 434
Applied a total of 192 rules in 20 ms. Remains 285 /381 variables (removed 96) and now considering 434/530 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 285 cols
[2025-06-07 18:17:32] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:17:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 265 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:17:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 719/719 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 433/749 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 7/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 3/759 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 719/719 variables, and 760 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60076ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60077ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60363 ms. Remains : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11582940904877217494.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5443251683554407166.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11582940904877217494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5443251683554407166.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7917e+22,0.22847,12264,2,2210,5,41149,6,0,1576,35316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(A((A((p384==0) U ((p157==0)||(p128==1))) + (p185==0)) U !(((p37==0)||(p470==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((E(!(!(((p37==0)||(p470==1)))) U (!((!((E(!(((p157==0)||(p128==1))) U (!((p384==0)) * !(((p1...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t35, t40, t54, t64, t69, t79, t83, t99, t109, t114, t129, t139, t144, t158, t168, t1...331
(forward)formula 0,0,24.3977,756536,1,0,1638,4.30373e+06,901,867,9601,5.77655e+06,1924
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 323 transition count 472
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 323 transition count 472
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 289 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 289 transition count 438
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 276 transition count 425
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 276 transition count 425
Applied a total of 210 rules in 14 ms. Remains 276 /381 variables (removed 105) and now considering 425/530 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 276 cols
[2025-06-07 18:18:57] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:18:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:18:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 424 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:18:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/276 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 425/701 variables, 276/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/701 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 701/701 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 276/276 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 424/424 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/276 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 425/701 variables, 276/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 424/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 4/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 1/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 2/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 701/701 variables, and 733 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 276/276 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 424/424 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 276/381 places, 425/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60374 ms. Remains : 276/381 places, 425/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 425 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14473182303718315978.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4179388048535570373.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14473182303718315978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4179388048535570373.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5219e+22,0.203083,11260,2,1879,5,35175,6,0,1531,30691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EX(EF((p242==1)))) + AX((p367==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EX(EX(E(TRUE U (p242==1))))))) * !((p367==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t63, t68, t83, t93, t98, t108, t113, t128, t138, t143, t157, t165, t168, t...320
(forward)formula 0,1,8.30127,256820,1,0,685,1.448e+06,873,387,9551,1.34176e+06,960
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 332 transition count 481
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 332 transition count 481
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 308 transition count 457
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 308 transition count 457
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 298 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 298 transition count 447
Applied a total of 166 rules in 10 ms. Remains 298 /381 variables (removed 83) and now considering 447/530 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 447 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-07 18:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 446 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:20:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 447/745 variables, 298/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/745 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 745/745 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 446/446 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 447/745 variables, 298/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/745 variables, 446/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/745 variables, 1/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/745 variables, 2/767 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 745/745 variables, and 767 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 446/446 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 446 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/381 places, 447/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60305 ms. Remains : 298/381 places, 447/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 447 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3821071092757768612.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3536794945853416024.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3821071092757768612.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3536794945853416024.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.33715e+22,0.196924,10612,2,1807,5,29603,6,0,1641,26449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((E(((EX((p114==0)) + (p449==1)) + !(((p178==0)||(p127==1)))) U AG((p208!=1))) * (AG((p361==0)) + ((((p93==0)||(p379==1))||(p235==0))...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((E(((EX((p114==0)) + (p449==1)) + !(((p178==0)||(p127==1)))) U !(E(TRUE U !((p208!=1...736
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t41, t58, t68, t73, t88, t94, t104, t114, t119, t135, t151, t166, t176, t181, t197, ...321
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15870721201534432390.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15870721201534432390.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15870721201534432390.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15870721201534432390.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15870721201534432390.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 321 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1009466808390094221.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4306179863654884438.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1009466808390094221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4306179863654884438.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.33715e+22,0.180515,11264,1637,26,12492,680,768,17680,70,1686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((E(((EX((i5.i1.u21.p114==0)) + (i18.i1.u90.p449==1)) + !(((i8.i1.u36.p178==0)||(i5.i0.u20.p127==1)))) U AG((i6.u38.p208!=1))) * (AG(...425
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((E(((EX((i5.i1.u21.p114==0)) + (i18.i1.u90.p449==1)) + !(((i8.i1.u36.p178==0)||(i5.i...1054
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t68, t114, t176, t243, i1.u5.t313, i2.i1.t297, i3.i1.u14.t282, i4.i0.t265, i5.i0.t24...446
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
(forward)formula 0,1,5.34826,182272,1,0,389892,769,5176,457061,396,1686,641534
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 326 transition count 475
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 326 transition count 475
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 295 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 295 transition count 444
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 283 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 283 transition count 432
Applied a total of 196 rules in 10 ms. Remains 283 /381 variables (removed 98) and now considering 432/530 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 283 cols
[2025-06-07 18:21:41] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 715/715 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 431/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 7/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 1/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 3/748 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 1/749 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 715/715 variables, and 749 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60296 ms. Remains : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4595180288109453897.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5562001684088449548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4595180288109453897.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5562001684088449548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.5453e+22,0.219128,11732,2,1989,5,36422,6,0,1566,34792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(TRUE) * (EF((p61==1)) + ((EF(EX((p181==0))) * AX(((p478==1)&&(p265==1)))) * (AF(EG(((p81==0)||(p498==1)))) + EX((p320==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(TRUE)),TRUE) * (p61==1))] != FALSE + ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(TRUE)) * (E(TRUE U ...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t18, t31, t37, t42, t56, t66, t71, t81, t86, t100, t110, t111, t115, t127, t132, t142, t1...343
(forward)formula 0,1,2.42074,81728,1,0,619,454369,881,355,9763,338684,873
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 328 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 328 transition count 477
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 298 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 298 transition count 447
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 285 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 285 transition count 434
Applied a total of 192 rules in 10 ms. Remains 285 /381 variables (removed 96) and now considering 434/530 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 285 cols
[2025-06-07 18:22:44] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:22:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:22:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 5/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 719/719 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 5/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 433/743 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 2/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 6/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 1/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 719/719 variables, and 752 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60305 ms. Remains : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4079348411663270692.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 18:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality813527457047246547.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4079348411663270692.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality813527457047246547.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93178e+22,0.214335,11880,2,2048,5,37348,6,0,1576,34938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p289==0) + (!(((p51==0)||(p76==1))) * (((AG(AX((p406==0))) + EG(((p351==0)||(p280==1)))) + (EG(((p503==0)||(p431==1))) + (p465==0))) ...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(!(EX(!((p70==1))))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(!(EX(!((p70==...426
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t16, t36, t41, t55, t61, t67, t71, t73, t83, t88, t102, t106, t113, t118, t133, t143, t14...354
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4085593675948095694.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4085593675948095694.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4085593675948095694.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4085593675948095694.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4085593675948095694.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 311 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11043999442143401251.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13811240532719249584.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11043999442143401251.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13811240532719249584.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93178e+22,0.161097,11428,1646,26,12457,708,747,18722,68,1705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i12.i0.u60.p289==0) + (!(((i2.i1.u9.p51==0)||(i3.i1.u15.p76==1))) * (((AG(AX((i17.i1.u81.p406==0))) + EG(((i15.i1.u69.p351==0)||(i11....336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(!(EX(!((i3.i1.u10.p70==1))))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(!(E...569
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t67, t83, t113, t144, t175, t206, t281, i1.u5.t300, i2.i1.u9.t286, i3.i1.t269, i3.i1...514
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
(forward)formula 0,0,24.9594,593188,1,0,1.21468e+06,926,4961,1.25102e+06,386,2057,1279245
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 392 edges and 381 vertex of which 167 / 381 are part of one of the 19 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 148 places
Ensure Unique test removed 162 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 162 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 232 transition count 308
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 173 transition count 274
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 157 transition count 274
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 157 transition count 272
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 155 transition count 272
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 125 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 125 transition count 242
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 118 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 118 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 118 transition count 208
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 68 transition count 158
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 361 place count 61 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 61 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 61 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 59 transition count 123
Applied a total of 377 rules in 40 ms. Remains 59 /381 variables (removed 322) and now considering 123/530 (removed 407) transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 65 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:24:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/59 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/116 variables, 59/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/117 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 1139 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/59 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/116 variables, 59/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 68/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/117 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 1199 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2344ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2344ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/381 places, 123/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2473 ms. Remains : 59/381 places, 123/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14873443294813630120.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality837868453584595285.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14873443294813630120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality837868453584595285.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07139e+09,0.020308,4536,2,99,5,1035,6,0,343,554,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p216==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p216==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.044992,5048,1,0,9,7397,14,3,1523,4215,5
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 322 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 322 transition count 471
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 290 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 290 transition count 439
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 278 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 278 transition count 427
Applied a total of 206 rules in 15 ms. Remains 278 /381 variables (removed 103) and now considering 427/530 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 427 rows 278 cols
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:24:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:24:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 426 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:24:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/278 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 427/705 variables, 278/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/705 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 705/705 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved in 28696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 278/278 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 426/426 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/278 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 427/705 variables, 278/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 426/724 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 1/725 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 5/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 705/705 variables, and 730 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 278/278 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 426/426 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 58739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 426 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58740ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 278/381 places, 427/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58986 ms. Remains : 278/381 places, 427/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 427 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12168893384913785911.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11817689152930967761.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12168893384913785911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11817689152930967761.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.78028e+22,0.147449,8968,2,1510,5,22574,6,0,1541,18536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(EX(EF(((p40==0)&&(p427==1))))) + (EX(AX((p346==0))) * (p60==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U EX(E(TRUE U ((p40==0)&&(p427==1))))) + (EX(!(EX(!((p346==0))))) * (p60==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t59, t65, t70, t85, t99, t109, t114, t129, t144, t158, t168, t173, t188, t...296
(forward)formula 0,1,5.96148,190424,1,0,698,1.10256e+06,884,397,9819,949336,982
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 325 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 325 transition count 474
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 294 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 294 transition count 443
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 283 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 283 transition count 432
Applied a total of 196 rules in 22 ms. Remains 283 /381 variables (removed 98) and now considering 432/530 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 283 cols
[2025-06-07 18:25:47] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:25:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:25:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:25:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/715 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 715/715 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 29440 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/283 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 432/715 variables, 283/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 431/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 1/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/715 variables, 3/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 715/715 variables, and 738 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 283/283 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 59499ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59500ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59764 ms. Remains : 283/381 places, 432/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18071720235643942154.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16796302771489310993.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18071720235643942154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16796302771489310993.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.59185e+22,0.144528,8912,2,1521,5,22767,6,0,1566,18340,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(EF(((p221==1)&&(p409==1)))) * ((p29==0) + AX(A(((p86==0)||(p129==1)) U (p271==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * EG(E(TRUE U ((p221==1)&&(p409==1))))) * (p29==0))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) * EG(E(TRUE U ((p221==1...279
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t63, t67, t84, t98, t108, t113, t128, t143, t158, t168, t173, t188, t203, ...291
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.38145,262212,1,0,691,1.52532e+06,894,395,10288,1.30381e+06,983
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 382 edges and 381 vertex of which 155 / 381 are part of one of the 19 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 136 places
Ensure Unique test removed 148 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 148 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 244 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 186 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 170 transition count 285
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 166 transition count 285
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 166 transition count 283
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 164 transition count 283
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 136 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 136 transition count 255
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 129 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 129 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 129 transition count 219
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 79 transition count 169
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 73 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 73 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 73 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 71 transition count 140
Applied a total of 376 rules in 39 ms. Remains 71 /381 variables (removed 310) and now considering 140/530 (removed 390) transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 67 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 67 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 67 similar events)
[2025-06-07 18:26:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/71 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/143 variables, 71/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/144 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 1765 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/71 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/143 variables, 71/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 88/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/144 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2334 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4106ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4107ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/381 places, 140/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4269 ms. Remains : 71/381 places, 140/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3817410357529261976.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13761944423701044830.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3817410357529261976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13761944423701044830.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53055e+10,0.02112,4564,2,123,5,1332,6,0,406,725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(AG(((p425==0)||(p432==1)))) * AF((AF((p183==1)) + (p208!=1)))) U (AG((p87==0)) * EG(EF((p166==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p425==0)||(p432==1)))))) * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((p183==1)))) + (p208!=1))))))) * !(...209
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 138/0/2
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.471465,24152,1,0,99,86825,41,88,2119,162941,135
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 321 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 321 transition count 470
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 288 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 288 transition count 437
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 275 transition count 424
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 275 transition count 424
Applied a total of 212 rules in 20 ms. Remains 275 /381 variables (removed 106) and now considering 424/530 (removed 106) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 424 rows 275 cols
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:27:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 423 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/275 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 424/699 variables, 275/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/699 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/699 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 699/699 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 275/275 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 423/423 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/275 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 424/699 variables, 275/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/699 variables, 423/719 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/699 variables, 1/720 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/699 variables, 1/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 699/699 variables, and 721 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 275/275 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 423/423 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 423 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/381 places, 424/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60303 ms. Remains : 275/381 places, 424/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 424 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1652115908144974978.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1456790845361275062.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1652115908144974978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1456790845361275062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4164e+22,0.145444,8828,2,1489,5,22163,6,0,1526,18025,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((AG((p32==1)) * !(EX(AX(((p468==0)||(p126==1)))))) U AG(((p479==0)||(p481==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p479==0)||(p481==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p479==0)||(p481==1)))))) U (!...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t28, t35, t40, t54, t64, t69, t84, t98, t108, t113, t128, t143, t157, t167, t172, t187, t...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,11.5008,334084,1,0,787,1.88195e+06,882,446,10068,1.79117e+06,1095
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 326 transition count 475
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 326 transition count 475
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 296 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 296 transition count 445
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 285 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 285 transition count 434
Applied a total of 192 rules in 20 ms. Remains 285 /381 variables (removed 96) and now considering 434/530 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 285 cols
[2025-06-07 18:28:12] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:28:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:28:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 1.0)
(t1 1.0)
(t2 1.0)
(t3 1.0)
(t4 1.0)
(t5 1.0)
(t6 1.0)
(t7 0.0)
(t8 0.0)
(t9 0.0)
(t10 0.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 1.0)
(t19 1.0)
(t20 1.0)
(t21 1.0)
(t22 0.0)
(t23 0.0)
(t24 0.0)
(t25 0.0)
(t26 0.0)
(t27 0.0)
(t28 0.0)
(t29 0.0)
(t30 0.0)
(t31 0.0)
(t32 1.0)
(t33 1.0)
(t34 1.0)
(t35 0.0)
(t36 1.0)
(t37 1.0)
(t38 0.0)
(t39 0.0)
(t40 0.0)
(t41 0.0)
(t42 0.0)
(t43 0.0)
(t44 0.0)
(t45 0.0)
(t46 0.0)
(t47 0.0)
(t48 1.0)
(t49 1.0)
(t50 1.0)
(t51 1.0)
(t52 0.0)
(t53 0.0)
(t54 0.0)
(t55 0.0)
(t56 0.0)
(t57 0.0)
(t58 0.0)
(t59 0.0)
(t60 0.0)
(t61 timeout
0.0)
(t62 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 719/719 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 434/719 variables, 285/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 433/747 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 1/748 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 3/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/719 variables, 4/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 719/719 variables, and 755 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60335 ms. Remains : 285/381 places, 434/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3453832898759178253.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15785925619419658647.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3453832898759178253.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15785925619419658647.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91104e+22,0.225661,12260,2,2314,5,39606,6,0,1576,36407,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(E(!(EF(((p52==0)||(p490==1)))) U ((p190==0)||(p61==1))))) + (AG((AX(((p161==0)||(p40==1))) + (p504==1))) * EX((((p240==0)&&(p223==1...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(!(E(TRUE U ((p52==0)||(p490==1)))) U ((p190==0)||(p61==1))))))),TRUE) * !((p5...361
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t14, t35, t36, t41, t55, t65, t70, t80, t85, t99, t109, t114, t129, t139, t144, t158, t16...348
(forward)formula 0,1,9.42258,290404,1,0,724,1.63761e+06,898,408,9781,1.5456e+06,1002
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H06T1U-CTLCardinality-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 530/530 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 325 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 325 transition count 474
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 293 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 293 transition count 442
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 281 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 281 transition count 430
Applied a total of 200 rules in 11 ms. Remains 281 /381 variables (removed 100) and now considering 430/530 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 281 cols
[2025-06-07 18:29:22] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 18:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:29:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 429 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/281 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 430/711 variables, 281/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 711/711 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 429/429 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/281 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 430/711 variables, 281/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 429/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 1/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 0/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 711/711 variables, and 731 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 429/429 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 429 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 281/381 places, 430/530 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60316 ms. Remains : 281/381 places, 430/530 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 430 transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3374858163681726279.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality394178965253664560.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3374858163681726279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality394178965253664560.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.13542e+22,0.161681,9640,2,1587,5,25942,6,0,1556,22227,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(((p277==1)&&(p199==1)))) U A(A(AF((p207!=1)) U (AF((p350==1)) * (p195!=1))) U AF(AX(((p339==1)||(p170==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(((p277==1)&&(p199==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p339==1)||(p170==1)))))))))))) * !(E(...422
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t39, t53, t63, t68, t83, t97, t103, t109, t114, t129, t144, t148, t159, t169, t174, ...309
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3000220789556929103.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3000220789556929103.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3000220789556929103.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3000220789556929103.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3000220789556929103.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 319 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9391764152349876595.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:30:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5896890915145645984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9391764152349876595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5896890915145645984.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.13542e+22,0.137287,10368,1591,26,10933,563,660,15338,68,1218,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(((i11.u52.p277==1)&&(i8.i0.u36.p199==1)))) U A(A(AF((i8.i0.u32.p207!=1)) U (AF((i14.i1.u64.p350==1)) * (i8.i1.u35.p195!=1))) U AF(...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(((i11.u52.p277==1)&&(i8.i0.u36.p199==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((i0.i2.u62.p339==1)|...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t34, t63, t109, t169, i1.i1.t296, i2.i0.t282, i3.i0.u13.t267, i4.i0.t252, i5.i0.t237, i6....426
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8286529832599075095.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8286529832599075095.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8286529832599075095.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8286529832599075095.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8286529832599075095.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 304 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6592580407629046699.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 18:31:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15719958370507918221.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6592580407629046699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15719958370507918221.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01114e+25,0.327057,16128,2291,38,24813,841,938,35524,82,2669,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(((i11.i0.u80.p277==1)&&(i8.i1.u59.p199==1)))) U A(A(AF((i8.i1.u62.p207!=1)) U (AF((i14.i1.u98.p350==1)) * (i8.i0.u58.p195!=1))) U ...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(((i11.i0.u80.p277==1)&&(i8.i1.u59.p199==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((i5.i2.u96.p339==...576
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t44, t80, t178, t322, i0.i1.t386, i0.i1.t389, i0.i1.u7.t391, i1.i0.u14.t371, i2.i1.t347, ...1022
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 184 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 149 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6694804099511755320.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 18:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3803319765555772257.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6694804099511755320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3803319765555772257.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01114e+25,0.180824,12068,722,927,10829,4773,450,28526,325,30396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(((i1.i1.i0.i0.i0.u23.p277==1)&&(i1.i0.i0.u16.p199==1)))) U A(A(AF((i1.i0.i0.u16.p207!=1)) U (AF((i1.i1.i1.i0.i0.u29.p350==1)) * (i...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(((i1.i1.i0.i0.i0.u23.p277==1)&&(i1.i0.i0.u16.p199==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((i1.i1...659
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u9.t303, i0.u9.t307, i0.i0.t322, i0.i0.u8.t327, i0.i0.u8.t342, i0.i0.i0.u7.t347, i0.i0.i0....1518
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Champagne-PT-H06T1U"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Champagne-PT-H06T1U, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339200057"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Champagne-PT-H06T1U.tgz
mv Champagne-PT-H06T1U execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;