fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r254-tall-174931339100032
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Champagne-PT-H05T0R

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 62427.00 0.00 0.00 7.2080E+0018 ? 1 15 normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r254-tall-174931339100032.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Champagne-PT-H05T0R, examination is StateSpace
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339100032
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 6 08:55 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K Jun 6 08:55 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 11:35 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Jun 6 11:35 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Jun 6 11:35 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Jun 6 11:35 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 5 20:08 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K Jun 6 08:58 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 11:35 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 11:35 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7 Jun 5 20:08 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Jun 5 20:08 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

no data necessary for post analysis


=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749318607797

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=StateSpace
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Champagne-PT-H05T0R
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
StateSpace PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 17:50:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StateSpace, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 67 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Transformed 299 places.
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Transformed 386 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 299 places and 386 transitions and 966 arcs in 157 ms.
Starting structural reductions in STATESPACE mode, iteration 0 : 299/299 places, 386/386 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 26 ms returned []
Running 385 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 299 cols
[2025-06-07 17:50:09] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 26 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 298/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 15/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 6/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 386/685 variables, 299/643 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 685/685 variables, and 643 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 299/299 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 299/299 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 385/385 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 298/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 15/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 30/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 2/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 386/685 variables, 299/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/685 variables, 385/1030 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 110 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/685 variables, 20/1050 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 103 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/685 variables, 20/1070 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 123 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/685 variables, 20/1090 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 685/685 variables, and 1090 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 299/299 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 299/299 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 385/385 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 385 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60199ms
Finished structural reductions in STATESPACE mode , in 1 iterations and 60330 ms. Remains : 299/299 places, 386/386 transitions.
Final net has 299 places and 386 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2089601110527942474.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2089601110527942474.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2089601110527942474.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2089601110527942474.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2089601110527942474.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 209 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-06-07 17:51:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-07 17:51:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/StateSpace17994061006463365038.gal : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/StateSpace17994061006463365038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '--stats'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...220
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst\_mod\_flat,7.20799e+18,0.13211,9052,1066,54,9761,577,597,14453,64,1340,0
Total reachable state count : 7207989591476460264

Max variable value : 1
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_IN_PLACE 1 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Maximum sum along a path : 15
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_PER_MARKING 15 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Exact state count : 7207989591476460264
STATE_SPACE STATES 7207989591476460264 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Total runtime 61190 ms.

BK_STOP 1749318670224

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ StateSpace = StateSpace ]]
+ [[ -f modelMain.xml ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Champagne-PT-H05T0R"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StateSpace"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Champagne-PT-H05T0R, examination is StateSpace"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339100032"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Champagne-PT-H05T0R.tgz
mv Champagne-PT-H05T0R execution
cd execution
if [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StateSpace" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StateSpace.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StateSpace.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StateSpace"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;