Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r254-tall-174931339100001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Champagne-PT-H04T0R, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339100001
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 436K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Jun 6 08:57 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Jun 6 08:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Jun 6 08:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 6 13:11 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 13:11 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 13:11 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 13:11 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 5 20:08 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K Jun 6 08:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 6 13:11 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 13:11 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7 Jun 5 20:08 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 5 20:08 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K Jun 5 20:08 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749317705015

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Champagne-PT-H04T0R
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 63 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Transformed 219 places.
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Transformed 274 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 219 places and 274 transitions and 666 arcs in 158 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 80 out of 219 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 274/274 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 199 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 199 transition count 254
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 191 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 191 transition count 246
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 188 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 188 transition count 243
Applied a total of 62 rules in 45 ms. Remains 188 /219 variables (removed 31) and now considering 243/274 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 188 cols
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:35:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 500 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:35:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/431 variables, 188/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/431 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 431/431 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 17880 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 24/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 243/431 variables, 188/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 242/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 6/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 3/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 1/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 2/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 431/431 variables, and 478 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48019ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48031ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/219 places, 243/274 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48605 ms. Remains : 188/219 places, 243/274 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 188 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 17:35:55] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-07 17:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 17:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 188 places (down from 80) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (289 resets) in 1725 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 1/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (32 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-07 17:35:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 186/188 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 243/431 variables, 188/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/431 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 431/431 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 188/431 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 46 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 155ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 31 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 149 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 149 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 149 transition count 202
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 130 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 130 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 130 transition count 179
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 116 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 116 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 116 transition count 154
Applied a total of 151 rules in 18 ms. Remains 116 /188 variables (removed 72) and now considering 154/243 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 153 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:35:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 154/270 variables, 116/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 5928 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 154/270 variables, 116/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 153/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 13216 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 19157ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19158ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/188 places, 154/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19294 ms. Remains : 116/188 places, 154/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5003550934974850055.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6124228616432753713.ctl : 10 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5003550934974850055.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6124228616432753713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.27244e+10,0.073739,6248,2,839,5,10853,6,0,620,11050,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p135==1)) * ((AG(AX((p103==0))) + EX(!(E(((p147==0)||(p128==1)) U (p26==0))))) + AX(((p45==0) * (AX((p122==0)) + EX((p158==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (p135==1))))] = FALSE * ([(EY((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p103==0))))))) + EX(!(E(((p14...370
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t22, t23, t27, t32, t36, t42, t43, t47, t49, t54, t55, t56, t60, t65, t66, t70, t75, t80,...278
(forward)formula 0,1,2.01213,72136,1,0,415,388461,341,224,3734,396624,529
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 150 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 150 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 150 transition count 203
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 131 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 131 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 131 transition count 180
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 118 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 118 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 118 transition count 151
Applied a total of 149 rules in 17 ms. Remains 118 /188 variables (removed 70) and now considering 151/243 (removed 92) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-07 17:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 151/269 variables, 118/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 269/269 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 5248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 151/269 variables, 118/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 150/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 269/269 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 8664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13925ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13929ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/188 places, 151/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14062 ms. Remains : 118/188 places, 151/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5103227306309672952.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2090954098400020393.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5103227306309672952.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2090954098400020393.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.35398e+10,0.052068,5968,2,737,5,9696,6,0,625,9515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p209==1) * AF((E(((p140==0)||(p43==1)) U (p147==0)) + (p15==0))))) * AF(AG((AX(((p47==0)||(p198==1))) * ((p52==0)||(p115==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p209==1) * !(EG(!((E(((p140==0)||(p43==1)) U (p147==0)) + (p15==0)))))))))] = FALSE * [Fw...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t16, t26, t27, t31, t36, t40, t46, t47, t51, t56, t57, t60, t62, t67, t71, t81, t92, t100...275
(forward)formula 0,0,8.18808,253200,1,0,662,1.02e+06,331,408,3707,2.07025e+06,666
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 147 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 147 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 147 transition count 200
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 125 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 125 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 125 transition count 174
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 110 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 110 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 110 transition count 143
Applied a total of 166 rules in 8 ms. Remains 110 /188 variables (removed 78) and now considering 143/243 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-07 17:36:40] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/253 variables, 110/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 253/253 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 4533 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/253 variables, 110/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 142/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 253/253 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 9301 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13865ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13866ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/188 places, 143/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14046 ms. Remains : 110/188 places, 143/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2968924702479218075.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11459489176285535952.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2968924702479218075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11459489176285535952.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.36933e+10,0.056652,5808,2,680,5,9269,6,0,585,8932,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(((p38==0)||(p192==1)) U AX(!(AX(((p129==0)||(p83==1))))))) + EG(EX(AG((p62==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p62==0)))))))),((p38==0)||(p192==1))) * !(EX(!(!(!(EX(!(((p129==0)||(p83==1...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t13, t24, t25, t29, t34, t38, t43, t44, t48, t55, t59, t64, t67, t79, t84, t90, t95, t100...263
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 135/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,1.77157,70240,1,0,432,372392,325,230,3809,413632,527
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 187 edges and 188 vertex of which 39 / 188 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 33 places
Ensure Unique test removed 39 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 39 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 154 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 100 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 92 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 91 transition count 131
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 91 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 89 transition count 129
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 62 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 4 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 62 transition count 102
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 62 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 58 transition count 98
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 54 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 54 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 54 transition count 81
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 35 transition count 62
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 33 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 33 transition count 57
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 33 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 31 transition count 53
Applied a total of 260 rules in 57 ms. Remains 31 /188 variables (removed 157) and now considering 53/243 (removed 190) transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/60 variables, 31/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 60/61 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 345 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/60 variables, 31/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 28/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 60/61 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 424 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 776ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 776ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/188 places, 53/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 943 ms. Remains : 31/188 places, 53/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13875899474637293783.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7006154008958088174.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13875899474637293783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7006154008958088174.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 258 steps (16 resets) in 36 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 149 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 149 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 149 transition count 202
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 129 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 129 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 129 transition count 178
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 115 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 115 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 115 transition count 148
Applied a total of 155 rules in 9 ms. Remains 115 /188 variables (removed 73) and now considering 148/243 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 115 cols
[2025-06-07 17:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:36:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:36:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/263 variables, 115/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 5180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/263 variables, 115/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 147/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 6802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12001ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12016ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/188 places, 148/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12181 ms. Remains : 115/188 places, 148/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11999413214911796349.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality353525222147559611.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11999413214911796349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality353525222147559611.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.38767e+10,0.049766,5828,2,722,5,9516,6,0,610,8760,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(FALSE) + AG(AF((((E((p147==1) U (p42==1)) + (p198==0)) + (p134==1)) * ((p45==0)||(p103==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(FALSE))))),TRUE),!((((E((p147==1) U (p42==1)) + (p198==0)) + (p134==1)) * ((p45==0)|...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t15, t25, t26, t30, t35, t39, t45, t46, t49, t51, t57, t61, t66, t67, t71, t81, t87, t91,...273
(forward)formula 0,0,0.384433,20984,1,0,276,87986,326,143,3662,95047,353
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 152 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 152 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 152 transition count 205
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 133 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 133 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 133 transition count 182
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 120 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 120 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 120 transition count 153
Applied a total of 145 rules in 6 ms. Remains 120 /188 variables (removed 68) and now considering 153/243 (removed 90) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 153/273 variables, 120/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 273/273 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 6515 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 153/273 variables, 120/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 152/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 273/273 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 13819 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 20351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20351ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/188 places, 153/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20532 ms. Remains : 120/188 places, 153/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15844922119293626544.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17162137165828494472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15844922119293626544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17162137165828494472.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.14029e+10,0.064066,6516,2,1015,5,12274,6,0,635,11953,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((EX(((p142==1)&&((p74==0)||(p158==1)))) * (EX((p179==0)) + EG((p208==1)))) + EF(((((((p102==0)&&(p197==1)) + A((p5==0) U (p184==1)))...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((EX(((p142==1)&&((p74==0)||(p158==1)))) * (EX((p179==0)) + EG((p208==1)))) + E(TRUE U (((((...336
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t27, t29, t32, t35, t39, t42, t46, t53, t54, t58, t64, t67, t74, t78, t87, t89, t99, ...279
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,13.1034,371364,1,0,1870,2.11084e+06,357,941,3930,2.63195e+06,2088
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 152 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 152 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 152 transition count 206
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 133 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 133 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 133 transition count 183
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 119 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 119 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 119 transition count 155
Applied a total of 145 rules in 16 ms. Remains 119 /188 variables (removed 69) and now considering 155/243 (removed 88) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-07 17:37:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:37:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:37:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 155/274 variables, 119/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 5506 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 155/274 variables, 119/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 154/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 12739 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 18259ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18260ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/188 places, 155/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18398 ms. Remains : 119/188 places, 155/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3286099937737279310.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality704048025968308228.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3286099937737279310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality704048025968308228.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.31809e+10,0.06509,6548,2,830,5,12408,6,0,633,12732,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p39==1)) + (EG(((((p20==0)||(p27==1)) * EX((p66==0))) * !(E(((p186==0)||(p148==1)) U (p84==1))))) * !(A(E(!(E((p102==0) U ((p159==0)...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((EG(((((p20==0)||(p27==1)) * EX((p66==0))) * !(E(((p186==0)||(p148==1)) U (p84==1))))) * !(!((E(...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t23, t24, t28, t35, t38, t43, t47, t48, t49, t53, t59, t62, t69, t73, t78, t84, t90, t96,...280
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 147/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,8.77126,280040,1,0,1452,1.55e+06,367,829,4102,2.22209e+06,1509
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 153 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 153 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 153 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 138 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 138 transition count 191
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 128 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 128 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 128 transition count 176
Applied a total of 125 rules in 9 ms. Remains 128 /188 variables (removed 60) and now considering 176/243 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-07 17:38:10] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:38:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 175 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/304 variables, 128/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/304 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/304 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 6648 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/304 variables, 128/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 175/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/304 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/304 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 304/304 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 19078 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 25750ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25751ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/188 places, 176/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25894 ms. Remains : 128/188 places, 176/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17669407997336832383.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11443979096717746989.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17669407997336832383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11443979096717746989.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86918e+11,0.096179,6972,2,995,5,14233,6,0,690,14385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((E(!(((p169==1)&&(p48!=1))) U ((!((p162==1)&&((p110==0)||(p149==1))))||(p74==1))) + EF(((p79==0)||(p78==1)))) + (((p87==0)&&((p181==0...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(Init),!(((p169==1)&&(p48!=1)))) * ((!((p162==1)&&((p110==0)||(p149==1))))||(p74==1)))] != FALSE + [(...309
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 170/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.17085,8764,1,0,11,21654,16,1,1314,24223,5
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 148 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 148 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 148 transition count 201
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 126 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 126 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 126 transition count 175
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 109 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 109 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 109 transition count 140
Applied a total of 168 rules in 4 ms. Remains 109 /188 variables (removed 79) and now considering 140/243 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 139 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/249 variables, 109/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 4868 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/249 variables, 109/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 139/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 11726 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16604ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16604ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/188 places, 140/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16721 ms. Remains : 109/188 places, 140/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3432970700471542561.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13411800345234381547.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3432970700471542561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13411800345234381547.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.05688e+10,0.04576,5788,2,709,5,9085,6,0,578,8199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(AG(((p207==0)&&(p170==1))))) + (AX(EX(((p19==0)||(p182==1)))) * EG(AX(EF(EG((p1==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p207==0)&&(p170==1)))))))))))) * !(EX(((p19==0)||(p182==1)))))] =...288
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t10, t24, t25, t26, t29, t31, t36, t40, t45, t46, t50, t55, t56, t60, t65, t69, t79, t89,...272
(forward)formula 0,1,2.93776,102172,1,0,846,578200,311,430,3465,678328,1032
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 186 edges and 188 vertex of which 39 / 188 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 33 places
Ensure Unique test removed 39 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 39 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 154 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 101 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 94 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 92 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 91 transition count 131
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 91 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 90 transition count 130
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 63 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 5 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 63 transition count 103
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 63 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 58 transition count 98
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 53 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 53 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 53 transition count 76
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 34 transition count 57
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 32 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 32 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 32 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 30 transition count 48
Applied a total of 263 rules in 23 ms. Remains 30 /188 variables (removed 158) and now considering 48/243 (removed 195) transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:38:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/30 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/59 variables, 30/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/60 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 287 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/30 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/59 variables, 30/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 24/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 59/60 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 333 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 635ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 635ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/188 places, 48/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 766 ms. Remains : 30/188 places, 48/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 298 steps (14 resets) in 6 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality202015602623271064.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17888375107185961071.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality202015602623271064.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17888375107185961071.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17888375107185961071.prop.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 3 fixpoint passes
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 152 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 152 transition count 207
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 134 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 134 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 134 transition count 185
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 121 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 121 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 121 transition count 159
Applied a total of 140 rules in 4 ms. Remains 121 /188 variables (removed 67) and now considering 159/243 (removed 84) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:38:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/280 variables, 121/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/280 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 280/280 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 5932 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/280 variables, 121/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 158/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/280 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 280/280 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 10374 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16316ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16316ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/188 places, 159/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16455 ms. Remains : 121/188 places, 159/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7652435999098602496.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11032844734937598422.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7652435999098602496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11032844734937598422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.13543e+10,0.08022,6884,2,937,5,13676,6,0,645,14718,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(((AF((p66==1)) + (p175==0)) + ((p84==1)||(!((p133==0)||(p62==1)))))) U (((p19==0) * (!(AX(AX(((p171==0)||(p82==1))))) + EF((p189==0)...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,EG(((!(EG(!((p66==1)))) + (p175==0)) + ((p84==1)||(!((p133==0)||(p62==1))))))) * ((p19==0) * ...511
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t24, t25, t30, t36, t39, t43, t50, t53, t57, t60, t61, t65, t70, t75, t82, t83, t88, t94,...280
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 152/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,13.0573,372348,1,0,1444,1.78623e+06,371,947,4181,2.97978e+06,1711
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 149 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 149 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 149 transition count 202
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 129 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 129 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 129 transition count 178
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 114 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 114 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 114 transition count 148
Applied a total of 157 rules in 8 ms. Remains 114 /188 variables (removed 74) and now considering 148/243 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 114 cols
[2025-06-07 17:39:26] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:39:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 148/262 variables, 114/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 4342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 148/262 variables, 114/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 147/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 8997 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13347ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13348ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/188 places, 148/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13482 ms. Remains : 114/188 places, 148/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality558389804230339691.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2320796154466125641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality558389804230339691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2320796154466125641.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.0341e+10,0.049355,5576,2,673,5,7527,6,0,606,7187,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(!(EX(AF((p102==1)))) U !(((p124==0)||(p153==1)))) U EG(AG(EF(EG((p29==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(((p124==0)||(p153==1)))) U (!(!(EX(!(EG(!((p102==1))))))) * !(!(((p124==0)||(p153==1)))...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t22, t23, t27, t32, t36, t43, t44, t48, t53, t57, t60, t67, t71, t76, t81, t91, t101, t11...258
(forward)formula 0,0,7.69744,237524,1,0,1474,1.38456e+06,342,727,3625,1.63316e+06,1729
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 243/243 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 186 edges and 188 vertex of which 39 / 188 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 33 places
Ensure Unique test removed 39 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 39 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 154 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 101 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 94 transition count 135
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 94 transition count 133
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 92 transition count 133
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 64 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 64 transition count 105
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 64 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 59 transition count 100
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 54 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 54 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 54 transition count 78
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 36 transition count 60
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 34 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 34 transition count 55
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 34 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 32 transition count 51
Applied a total of 258 rules in 26 ms. Remains 32 /188 variables (removed 156) and now considering 51/243 (removed 192) transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 32 cols
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-07 17:39:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/32 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/64 variables, 32/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/65 variables, and 43 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/32 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/64 variables, 32/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 27/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/65 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 354 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 685ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 686ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/188 places, 51/243 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 783 ms. Remains : 32/188 places, 51/243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12230193166758940354.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality465915479800260163.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12230193166758940354.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality465915479800260163.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,69984,0.012336,4124,2,54,5,458,6,0,176,287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p174==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p174==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.034559,4892,1,0,33,5264,21,32,857,7086,39
FORMULA Champagne-PT-H04T0R-CTLCardinality-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 17:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 282840 ms.

BK_STOP 1749317989140

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Champagne-PT-H04T0R"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Champagne-PT-H04T0R, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r254-tall-174931339100001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Champagne-PT-H04T0R.tgz
mv Champagne-PT-H04T0R execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;