fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r226-smll-174903491100275
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for StigmergyElection-PT-09a

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 250489.00 0.00 0.00 FTFTFTTFTTFTTFFF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903491100275.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-09a, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903491100275
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 17M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 151K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17M May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749174255223

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-09a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 01:44:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 01:44:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 01:44:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 1627 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:19] [INFO ] Transformed 128 places.
[2025-06-06 01:44:20] [INFO ] Transformed 18490 transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:44:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 01:44:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 128 places and 18490 transitions and 329609 arcs in 2234 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 29 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 17295 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 17295 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 32 out of 128 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 1195/1195 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 117 transition count 1178
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 117 transition count 1178
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 114 transition count 1172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 114 transition count 1172
Applied a total of 28 rules in 105 ms. Remains 114 /128 variables (removed 14) and now considering 1172/1195 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:44:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1156 transitions (discarded 16 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1156 rows 114 cols
[2025-06-06 01:44:20] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 48 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1022 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:44:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1156 transitions (discarded 16 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:44:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:44:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 4877 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 5976 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1171 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:44:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1156 transitions (discarded 16 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:44:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:44:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 489 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 623 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 456 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 419 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 493 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 537 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 573 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 636 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 418 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 449 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 552 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 509 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 351 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 322 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 412 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 349 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 511 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 302 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 249 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 200 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 293 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 199 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 245 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 196 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 477 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 353 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 33402ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1171 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33456ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/128 places, 1172/1195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39597 ms. Remains : 114/128 places, 1172/1195 transitions.
Support contains 32 out of 114 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 347 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1172 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (14 resets) in 5711 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 1/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-06 01:45:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1156 transitions (discarded 16 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:45:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/72 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 42/114 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1155/1269 variables, 114/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1269 variables, 1065/1184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1269 variables, 0/1184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/1270 variables, 1/1185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1270 variables, 0/1185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/1270 variables, 0/1185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1270/1270 variables, and 1185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 811 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, ReadFeed: 1066/1066 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/72 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 420 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 330 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 314 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 338 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 324 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 318 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 284 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 216 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 398 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 480 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 410 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 318 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 327 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 281 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 241 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 6369ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 2 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 412 edges and 114 vertex of which 110 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.39 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 22 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 110 transition count 1137
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 101 transition count 1125
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 98 transition count 1125
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 98 transition count 1106
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 79 transition count 1106
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 65 transition count 1090
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 65 transition count 1090
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 55 transition count 1080
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 55 transition count 1080
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 1044
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 3 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 40 transition count 1026
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 40 transition count 1025
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 25 transition count 1010
Iterating global reduction 5 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 25 transition count 1010
Ensure Unique test removed 227 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 227 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 227 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 25 transition count 783
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 24 transition count 782
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 23 transition count 782
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 23 transition count 781
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 22 transition count 781
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 749 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 495 place count 6 transition count 23
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 512 place count 6 transition count 6
Applied a total of 512 rules in 734 ms. Remains 6 /114 variables (removed 108) and now considering 6/1172 (removed 1166) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 734 ms. Remains : 6/114 places, 6/1172 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 41 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 19 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(p0))&&(p1 U X((X(!p2) U ((p3&&X(!p2))||X(G(!p2))))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 108 transition count 1162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 1162
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 106 transition count 1158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 1158
Applied a total of 16 rules in 41 ms. Remains 106 /114 variables (removed 8) and now considering 1158/1172 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1146 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1146 rows 106 cols
[2025-06-06 01:45:10] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 475 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:45:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1146 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6083 ms returned [105]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 6576 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/114 places, 1158/1172 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 90 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 90 transition count 1143
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 82 transition count 1135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 1135
Applied a total of 46 rules in 36 ms. Remains 82 /105 variables (removed 23) and now considering 1135/1158 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1123 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1123 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 302 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1123 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1030 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:45:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1487 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/114 places, 1135/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8142 ms. Remains : 82/114 places, 1135/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 778 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p2), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, p2, p2, p2, p2, p2]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 9081 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 112 transition count 1137
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 78 transition count 1137
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 78 transition count 1124
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 65 transition count 1124
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 53 transition count 1107
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 53 transition count 1107
Ensure Unique test removed 63 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 63 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 53 transition count 1044
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 53 transition count 1041
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 50 transition count 1041
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 48 transition count 1037
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 48 transition count 1037
Ensure Unique test removed 192 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 192 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 192 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 48 transition count 845
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 39 transition count 836
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 39 transition count 828
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 729 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 729 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 729 rules applied. Total rules applied 1139 place count 39 transition count 99
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 1157 place count 30 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 1165 place count 22 transition count 82
Applied a total of 1165 rules in 487 ms. Remains 22 /114 variables (removed 92) and now considering 82/1172 (removed 1090) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 22 cols
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/22 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 71/93 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 32/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/94 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 94/94 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 9202 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/22 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/93 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 32/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 81/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/94 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 94/94 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 9628 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18983ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18986ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/114 places, 82/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19658 ms. Remains : 22/114 places, 82/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 241 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 142 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 457 steps (13 resets) in 11 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 121 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 22 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/22 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 71/93 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 32/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/94 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 94/94 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 8740 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/22 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/93 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 32/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 81/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/94 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 94/94 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 7410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16267ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16268ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16424 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 82/82 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 337 steps (4 resets) in 7 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 44 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 5 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 37363 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 114 transition count 1157
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 1157
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 90 transition count 1142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 90 transition count 1142
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 84 transition count 1133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 84 transition count 1133
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 84 transition count 1126
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 81 transition count 1123
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 81 transition count 1123
Ensure Unique test removed 56 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 56 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 81 transition count 1067
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 56 transition count 1042
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 45 transition count 1031
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 45 transition count 1031
Ensure Unique test removed 448 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 448 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 448 rules applied. Total rules applied 649 place count 45 transition count 583
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 655 place count 42 transition count 580
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 42 transition count 571
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 666 place count 41 transition count 570
Applied a total of 666 rules in 478 ms. Remains 41 /114 variables (removed 73) and now considering 570/1172 (removed 602) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 560 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 548 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:45:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1058 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:45:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 84 ms returned []
Running 569 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:45:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:45:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 548 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 143 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 171 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 184 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 228 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 313 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 328 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 348 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 338 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 274 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 289 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 138 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 131 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 161 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 193 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 169 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 225 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 209 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 288 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 241 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 206 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 244 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 203 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 129 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 13/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 273 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 283 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 233 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 198 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 138 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 41/601 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved in 30049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/548 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 569/39 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 136 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 130 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 256 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 210 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 204 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 168 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 131 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 18/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 559/600 variables, 41/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 547/674 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/601 variables, and 713 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved in 30063 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 547/548 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 569/39 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61252ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 569 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61257ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/114 places, 570/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63073 ms. Remains : 41/114 places, 570/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 53 steps with 5 reset in 6 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 63200 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((((p0 U X(p1))||G(p2)) U p3))'
Support contains 8 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 1160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 1160
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 105 transition count 1156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 1156
Applied a total of 18 rules in 15 ms. Remains 105 /114 variables (removed 9) and now considering 1156/1172 (removed 16) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1144 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1144 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-06 01:47:00] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 385 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1144 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 16452 ms returned [104]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 16843 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/114 places, 1156/1172 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 1140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 1140
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 81 transition count 1133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 81 transition count 1133
Applied a total of 46 rules in 16 ms. Remains 81 /104 variables (removed 23) and now considering 1133/1156 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1121 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1121 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 348 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1121 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1030 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1537 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/114 places, 1133/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 18412 ms. Remains : 81/114 places, 1133/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 369 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 664 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 430 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) p0 p2 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 179 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 20117 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 105 transition count 1157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 1157
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 102 transition count 1151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 1151
Applied a total of 24 rules in 16 ms. Remains 102 /114 variables (removed 12) and now considering 1151/1172 (removed 21) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1141 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1141 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-06 01:47:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 409 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1141 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 18627 ms returned [101]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 19045 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/114 places, 1151/1172 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 1134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 84 transition count 1134
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 77 transition count 1127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 77 transition count 1127
Applied a total of 48 rules in 15 ms. Remains 77 /101 variables (removed 24) and now considering 1127/1151 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1117 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1117 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 310 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1117 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1030 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1249 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1580 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/114 places, 1127/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 20658 ms. Remains : 77/114 places, 1127/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 251 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 231 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 275 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 21486 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G(F((!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 112 transition count 1137
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 78 transition count 1137
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 78 transition count 1126
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 67 transition count 1126
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 56 transition count 1109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 56 transition count 1109
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 56 transition count 1094
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 56 transition count 1092
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 54 transition count 1092
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 51 transition count 1086
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 51 transition count 1086
Ensure Unique test removed 112 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 112 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 51 transition count 974
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 41 transition count 964
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 41 transition count 955
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 885 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 885 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 885 rules applied. Total rules applied 1164 place count 41 transition count 70
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 1182 place count 32 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 1190 place count 24 transition count 53
Applied a total of 1190 rules in 364 ms. Remains 24 /114 variables (removed 90) and now considering 53/1172 (removed 1119) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 24 cols
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 14/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 9/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 43/67 variables, 24/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 68/68 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 6400 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 43/67 variables, 24/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 52/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 68/68 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 5356 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11788ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/114 places, 53/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12323 ms. Remains : 24/114 places, 53/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 208 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 244 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 192 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1794 resets) in 593 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 1/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (225 resets) in 295 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 43/67 variables, 24/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 68/68 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 73 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/68 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 1703 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1785ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p2 p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 447 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 3 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 53/53 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 01:47:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 14/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 9/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 43/67 variables, 24/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 68/68 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 5362 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 43/67 variables, 24/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 16/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 52/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 68/68 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 5512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10915ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10916ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11073 ms. Remains : 24/24 places, 53/53 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 137 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 105 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 264 steps (12 resets) in 5 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 239 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 148 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 165 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16601204809647472659
[2025-06-06 01:48:09] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:48:09] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 01:48:09] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:48:09] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 01:48:10] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:48:10] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 01:48:10] [INFO ] Built C files in 41ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16601204809647472659
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16601204809647472659;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 615 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16601204809647472659;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 78 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16601204809647472659;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9304808497105963917.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 109 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 28971 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(G(p0))||G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 1172/1172 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 106 transition count 1159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 1159
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 1153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 1153
Applied a total of 22 rules in 13 ms. Remains 103 /114 variables (removed 11) and now considering 1153/1172 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:48:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1143 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 103 cols
[2025-06-06 01:48:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 444 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:48:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1143 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1066 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 12893 ms returned [102]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 13343 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/114 places, 1153/1172 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 87 transition count 1138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 87 transition count 1138
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 79 transition count 1130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 79 transition count 1130
Applied a total of 46 rules in 13 ms. Remains 79 /102 variables (removed 23) and now considering 1130/1153 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1120 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1120 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1120 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 01:48:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1030 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 01:48:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 940 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 79/114 places, 1130/1172 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14598 ms. Remains : 79/114 places, 1130/1172 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 19 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyElection-PT-09a-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 14760 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 247870 ms.

BK_STOP 1749174505712

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-09a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-09a, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903491100275"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-09a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-09a execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;