Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490900209.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900209
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 712K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 193K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749142663895

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-05a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 16:57:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 16:57:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 229 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Transformed 450 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 450 transitions and 3637 arcs in 473 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 39 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 291 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 291 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 159/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 159/159 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 15 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-05 16:57:47] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 483 ms returned [71]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 555 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 159/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 159/159 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 616 ms. Remains : 71/72 places, 159/159 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 16:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:48] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 16:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 71 places (down from 51) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 49 to 47
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (193 resets) in 2314 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 1/47 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 241 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 15 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-05 16:57:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 27/29 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 27/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 29/215 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 259 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 314ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 11 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 57 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 57 transition count 140
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 48 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 48 transition count 126
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 43 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 43 transition count 121
Applied a total of 56 rules in 29 ms. Remains 43 /71 variables (removed 28) and now considering 121/159 (removed 38) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 16:57:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 114/157 variables, 43/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 65/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 12982 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 39/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 114/157 variables, 43/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 65/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 120/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 43437ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43444ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/71 places, 121/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43765 ms. Remains : 43/71 places, 121/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15280357105652815523.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17518959031344658481.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15280357105652815523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17518959031344658481.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3379,0.102466,5040,2,453,5,3040,6,0,287,1897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((p38==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t32, t36, t39, t41, t42,...285
(forward)formula 0,0,0.260994,7600,1,0,182,16844,252,57,2700,12864,242
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 60 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 60 transition count 145
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 53 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 136
Applied a total of 36 rules in 9 ms. Remains 53 /71 variables (removed 18) and now considering 136/159 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 16:58:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 19/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 126/179 variables, 53/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 65/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 15755 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 48/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/179 variables, 53/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 65/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 135/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 179/180 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 45914ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45918ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/71 places, 136/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46156 ms. Remains : 53/71 places, 136/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10797293926802950051.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17086634512099354780.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10797293926802950051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17086634512099354780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4384,0.057641,5132,2,747,5,4400,6,0,337,3575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((AG((p3==1)) * AF(((p44==1) + EX((p16==1)))))) + EG(EF((EF(((p48==0)&&(p25==1))) * AG((p1==0)))))) + EG((EX(((p35==0)||(p43==1))) + ...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p3==1))))) * !(EG(!(((p44==1) + EX((p16==1)))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,E(...367
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t26, t28,...336
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.541421,19136,1,0,296,76259,313,122,3202,62891,399
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 58 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 58 transition count 141
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 52 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 52 transition count 131
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 50 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 50 transition count 129
Applied a total of 42 rules in 9 ms. Remains 50 /71 variables (removed 21) and now considering 129/159 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 128 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 16:59:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/172 variables, 50/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 65/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 21778 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 50/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/172 variables, 50/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 65/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 128/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 172/173 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 51899ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51900ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/71 places, 129/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52057 ms. Remains : 50/71 places, 129/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 129 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality320514139754108863.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2440642450777100952.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality320514139754108863.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2440642450777100952.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4118,0.082587,5072,2,681,5,4092,6,0,323,2991,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p37==0) * ((p67!=1) + E(!(AF(((p44==0)||(p4==1)))) U !((EF((p42==1)) + (((p63==0)||(p52==1))&&((p56==0)||(p41==1)))))))) U AG((EX(EX(...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p37==0) * ((p67!=1) + E(!(!(EG(!(((p44==0)||(p4==1)))))) U !((E(TRUE U (p42==1)) + (((p63==0)||(p5...354
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t22, t23, t25, t26, t...328
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.438357,12496,1,0,236,36690,287,82,3078,29965,304
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 62 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 147
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 55 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 55 transition count 137
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 53 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 135
Applied a total of 36 rules in 10 ms. Remains 53 /71 variables (removed 18) and now considering 135/159 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 125 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 125 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 125 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:00:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 124/177 variables, 53/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 65/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/178 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 15066 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 38/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 124/177 variables, 53/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 65/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 134/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/178 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 45205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45207ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/71 places, 135/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45375 ms. Remains : 53/71 places, 135/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4840383156246484658.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10237338135941824939.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4840383156246484658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10237338135941824939.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4356,0.051557,5120,2,703,5,4244,6,0,333,2946,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((p3!=0)&&(p59!=1))) + (AG(((p64==1) + EX(((p57==0)||(p65==1))))) * EX(EX(A((p33==0) U (p36==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((p3!=0)&&(p59!=1))))),TRUE) * !((p64==1))) * !(EX(((p57==0)||(p65==1)))))] = FALSE * [((I...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t16, t17, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t31, t36, t38...317
(forward)formula 0,1,0.280045,11648,1,0,231,33743,292,83,2966,29103,306
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 62 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 145
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 55 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 55 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 53 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 131
Applied a total of 36 rules in 9 ms. Remains 53 /71 variables (removed 18) and now considering 131/159 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 130 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:00:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/175 variables, 53/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 65/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/176 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved in 16308 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 39/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/175 variables, 53/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 65/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 130/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 2/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/176 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 46414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 130 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46415ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/71 places, 131/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46603 ms. Remains : 53/71 places, 131/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13030417683154417926.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3788345088687930403.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13030417683154417926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3788345088687930403.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3976,0.051293,5216,2,665,5,4206,6,0,331,2680,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((EX(AX(((p65==0)||(p8==1)))) * AF(((p45==0)||(p7==1)))) * AG(((p23==0)||(p55==1))))) * EF(!(A(AG(((p31==0)||(p53==1))) U !(((p7==...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((EX(!(EX(!(((p65==0)||(p8==1)))))) * !(EG(!(((p45==0)||(p7==1)))))) * !...487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t23, t24, t25, t26, t28, t29, t31...317
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 112/0/19
(forward)formula 0,1,0.533594,15712,1,0,290,55586,295,122,3186,45784,411
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 70 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 51 transition count 139
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 51 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 41 transition count 129
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 33 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 33 transition count 117
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 29 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 29 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 29 transition count 94
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 50 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 50 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 29 transition count 44
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 24 transition count 39
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 24 transition count 39
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 24 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 19 transition count 33
Applied a total of 165 rules in 73 ms. Remains 19 /71 variables (removed 52) and now considering 33/159 (removed 126) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 27 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 27 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 27 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:01:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/45 variables, 19/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 1800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/45 variables, 19/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 24/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 983 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2789ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2790ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/71 places, 33/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2965 ms. Remains : 19/71 places, 33/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10276601320989390297.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13763759638526685748.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10276601320989390297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13763759638526685748.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,75,0.013393,3952,2,97,5,558,6,0,103,389,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AG((EF(((p24==0)||(p29==1))) + (p67==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((p24==0)||(p29==1))) + (p67==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t14, t26, t27, Intersection with reachable...225
(forward)formula 0,1,0.037119,4336,1,0,69,2351,88,32,742,2232,78
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 70 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 56 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 53 transition count 141
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 53 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 47 transition count 135
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 41 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 41 transition count 126
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 38 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 38 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 38 transition count 119
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 57 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 57 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 38 transition count 62
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 34 transition count 58
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 34 transition count 58
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 34 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 29 transition count 52
Applied a total of 138 rules in 57 ms. Remains 29 /71 variables (removed 42) and now considering 52/159 (removed 107) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:01:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/29 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/72 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 3159 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/29 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 24/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/72 variables, 29/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 37/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 2241 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5406ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5406ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/71 places, 52/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5575 ms. Remains : 29/71 places, 52/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3521074981912963900.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3818024198767790618.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3521074981912963900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3818024198767790618.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,356,0.02601,4132,2,202,5,1067,6,0,158,649,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((!(A((p9==1) U ((p15==0)||(p22==1)))) * (p29!=0)) * (E(((p9==0)||(p32==1)) U (p60==1)) + ((!(A(((p3==0)||(p35==1)) U (p4==1))) * (...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(!((E(!(((p15==0)||(p22==1))) U (!((p9==1)) * !(((p15==0)||(p22==1))))) + EG...366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t17, t21, t33, t36, t38, t39, t48, t51, Inte...248
(forward)formula 0,0,0.138774,6436,1,0,157,12262,145,85,1244,11101,199
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 70 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 140
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 41 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 32 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 32 transition count 116
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 28 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 28 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 93
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 47 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 47 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 28 transition count 46
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 23 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 19 transition count 37
Applied a total of 160 rules in 25 ms. Remains 19 /71 variables (removed 52) and now considering 37/159 (removed 122) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 36 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/49 variables, 19/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 7/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved in 2501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/49 variables, 19/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 7/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 36/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved in 1755 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4265ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4266ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/71 places, 37/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4388 ms. Remains : 19/71 places, 37/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15891446253147074211.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16999940977819397969.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15891446253147074211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16999940977819397969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,75,0.014093,3992,2,83,5,448,6,0,107,313,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((p68!=1)) * AF((p47==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG((p68!=1))) * !(EG(!((p47==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t22, t30, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.036856,4504,1,0,83,2155,95,38,804,2046,91
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 58 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 58 transition count 141
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 49 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 49 transition count 128
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 47 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 126
Applied a total of 48 rules in 8 ms. Remains 47 /71 variables (removed 24) and now considering 126/159 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 119 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 17:01:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 119 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 119 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:02:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 15/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 6/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 118/165 variables, 47/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 13489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 43/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 118/165 variables, 47/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 65/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 125/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 43621ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43622ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/71 places, 126/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43812 ms. Remains : 47/71 places, 126/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12209303829128722410.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6702916305798814275.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12209303829128722410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6702916305798814275.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4114,0.05509,5112,2,613,5,3757,6,0,305,2442,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EG(((p16==0)&&(p31==1)))) + !(A((p3==1) U EF((p36==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),((p16==0)&&(p31==1)))] != FALSE + ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U (p36==1)))) * !...259
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 121/5/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.180547,8824,1,0,18,21432,19,2,2136,12018,19
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 57 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 57 transition count 140
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 48 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 48 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 44 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 44 transition count 123
Applied a total of 54 rules in 7 ms. Remains 44 /71 variables (removed 27) and now considering 123/159 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 17:02:43] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:02:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 14/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 116/160 variables, 44/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 65/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 17060 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 41/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 116/160 variables, 44/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 65/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 122/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 47174ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47176ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/71 places, 123/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47306 ms. Remains : 44/71 places, 123/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4753760647577642552.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8719229927425748350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4753760647577642552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8719229927425748350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3890,0.084781,5052,2,545,5,3351,6,0,293,2379,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(EX(E(AX((p30==0)) U AG((p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),EX(E(!(EX(!((p30==0)))) U !(E(TRUE U !((p40==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t25, t26, t28, t31, t32,...315
(forward)formula 0,1,0.803027,18880,1,0,368,71666,272,185,2822,66811,432
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 70 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 50 transition count 138
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 50 transition count 128
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 40 transition count 128
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 32 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 32 transition count 116
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 28 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 28 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 93
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 47 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 47 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 28 transition count 46
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 23 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 18 transition count 36
Applied a total of 161 rules in 20 ms. Remains 18 /71 variables (removed 53) and now considering 36/159 (removed 123) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 30 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/47 variables, 18/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 40 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 1830 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 29/47 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 25/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 1387 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3222ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3224ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/71 places, 36/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3327 ms. Remains : 18/71 places, 36/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5210299656881881766.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12040057768603005200.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5210299656881881766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12040057768603005200.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,74,0.014698,3984,2,79,5,449,6,0,102,325,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p43==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p43==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.027603,4240,1,0,7,1198,19,2,622,820,8
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 60 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 60 transition count 143
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 54 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 54 transition count 133
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 50 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 50 transition count 129
Applied a total of 42 rules in 8 ms. Remains 50 /71 variables (removed 21) and now considering 129/159 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 128 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:03:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/172 variables, 50/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 65/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 19910 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 39/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/172 variables, 50/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 128/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 50050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/71 places, 129/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50249 ms. Remains : 50/71 places, 129/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 129 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10571342125975804102.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6686706238259315121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10571342125975804102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6686706238259315121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3896,0.095455,5580,2,693,5,5719,6,0,323,3704,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((EG(((p32!=0)&&(p44!=1))) + (A((p65==1) U (p51==1)) * (p41==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (EG(((p32!=0)&&(p44!=1))) + (!((E(!((p51==1)) U (!((p65==1)) * !((p51==1)))) + EG(!((p51...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30,...315
(forward)formula 0,1,0.582168,15948,1,0,260,52699,289,98,3206,40729,353
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 59 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 59 transition count 142
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 50 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 50 transition count 128
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 45 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 45 transition count 123
Applied a total of 52 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /71 variables (removed 26) and now considering 123/159 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 17:04:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 115/160 variables, 45/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 65/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 10494 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 36/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 115/160 variables, 45/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 65/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 122/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/161 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40610ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40611ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/71 places, 123/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40773 ms. Remains : 45/71 places, 123/159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7203883295791577613.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14234705282921912726.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7203883295791577613.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14234705282921912726.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3380,0.050923,5064,2,462,5,3027,6,0,294,1875,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(TRUE) * (p65==1)) U EF(!(EF((p50==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p50==1)))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p50==1))))) U (!((EX(TRUE) * (...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t32, t39, t40, t42, t43, t11...281
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.295898,10952,1,0,235,31802,268,95,2811,26943,332
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 440807 ms.

BK_STOP 1749143107654

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900209"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-05a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;