Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490900194.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900194
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 132K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749137669866

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 124 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Transformed 58 places.
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Transformed 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 58 places and 218 transitions and 1238 arcs in 317 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 110 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 35 out of 58 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 56 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 56 transition count 105
Applied a total of 4 rules in 39 ms. Remains 56 /58 variables (removed 2) and now considering 105/108 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 56 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:32] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 377 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 276 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 727 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 104 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:34:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 186 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 20/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 94/150 variables, 56/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 48/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 12320 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 24/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/150 variables, 56/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 48/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 104/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 15134 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 27648ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27669ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/58 places, 105/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28470 ms. Remains : 56/58 places, 105/108 transitions.
Support contains 35 out of 56 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 47 to 44
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (316 resets) in 2255 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 7/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (146 resets) in 483 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (377 resets) in 418 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (357 resets) in 270 ms. (147 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (152 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (154 resets) in 199 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (138 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (156 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/56 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/150 variables, 56/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 48/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved in 195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 56/151 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved in 61 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 286ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
Support contains 31 out of 56 places (down from 34) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 56 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 98
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 44 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 44 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 41 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 41 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 41 transition count 84
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 39 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 39 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 39 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 39 transition count 72
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 35 transition count 68
Applied a total of 53 rules in 62 ms. Remains 35 /56 variables (removed 21) and now considering 68/105 (removed 37) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:35:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/96 variables, 35/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 38/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 97/97 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 6059 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 22/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/96 variables, 35/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 38/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 67/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 97/97 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 8281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14408ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14409ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/56 places, 68/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14643 ms. Remains : 35/56 places, 68/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1382824939799600796.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8590201275355056124.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1382824939799600796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8590201275355056124.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,202,0.052595,4096,2,302,5,1261,6,0,200,796,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))) + (p15==1)) + AF((((p55==0)||(p57==0)) * A((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))) + (p15==1)) + !(EG(!((((p55==0)||(p57==0)) * !((E(...377
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t50, t52, t54, t57, t59, t61, t62, t63, Intersectio...241
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.164173,6400,1,0,159,9205,170,86,1503,8075,218
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 49 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 93
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 49 /56 variables (removed 7) and now considering 93/105 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:35:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 19/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/135 variables, 49/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 48/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 11389 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 30/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 86/135 variables, 49/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 48/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 92/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 19466 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 30935ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30936ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31160 ms. Remains : 49/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10359042159839559621.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16981868812891339832.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10359042159839559621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16981868812891339832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,951,0.03919,4720,2,478,5,2564,6,0,281,1912,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!(EX(EG((p19==1)))) U ((!(((!(((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))&&(p37==1))) * !(AX(((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p5...318
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((!(((!(((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))&&(p37==1))) * !(!(EX(!(((((p12==1)&&(p26=...986
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t25, t29, t30, ...293
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.234316,10224,1,0,202,27030,225,95,2129,24514,245
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 50 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 48 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 48 transition count 91
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 48 /56 variables (removed 8) and now considering 91/105 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:35:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 12/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 85/133 variables, 48/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 48/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 10476 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 33/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 85/133 variables, 48/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 48/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 90/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 18854 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 29377ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29378ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/56 places, 91/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29616 ms. Remains : 48/56 places, 91/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4366882710752236498.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1466232299134248840.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4366882710752236498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1466232299134248840.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,924,0.037718,4580,2,467,5,2579,6,0,276,1869,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(EG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))) * ((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))) + ((AX((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))))) * ((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p...359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t22, t26, t28, ...298
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.233324,10468,1,0,235,28953,217,113,2061,27413,280
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 54 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 47 transition count 97
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 47 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 36 transition count 86
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 26 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 26 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 26 transition count 71
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 23 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 23 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 23 transition count 59
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 23 transition count 55
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 19 transition count 51
Applied a total of 82 rules in 34 ms. Remains 19 /56 variables (removed 37) and now considering 51/105 (removed 54) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 15/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/64 variables, 19/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 25/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/65 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 65/65 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 3323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 21/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/64 variables, 19/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 25/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 47/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/65 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 65/65 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 3092 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6444ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/56 places, 51/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6590 ms. Remains : 19/56 places, 51/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16350865591769765827.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15577057108464937735.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16350865591769765827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15577057108464937735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,55,0.020199,4188,2,109,5,581,6,0,123,401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))) * EG(EF(((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)||(p54==0)))&&(p3==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG(!(EG(!((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))))))),E(TRUE U ((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t20, t22, t24, t26, Intersection with rea...231
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.06588,4828,1,0,120,3591,133,43,1080,3253,151
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 49 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 93
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 49 /56 variables (removed 7) and now considering 93/105 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:36:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 86/135 variables, 49/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 48/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 10342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 34/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/135 variables, 49/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 48/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 92/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 18047 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 28429ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28430ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28631 ms. Remains : 49/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5485887230963910585.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11395627813975476755.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5485887230963910585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11395627813975476755.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,951,0.058377,4708,2,545,5,2450,6,0,281,1911,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))) * A((((p1==1) + E((p9!=1) U !(AX(((p27==1)&&(p57==1)))))) * E(AX(EF((((p12==1)&&(p26==1...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U (((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))) * !(EG(!((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p...433
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t25, t27, t30, ...293
(forward)formula 0,1,0.606765,16100,1,0,299,65048,218,164,2078,55663,390
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 49 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 93
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 49 /56 variables (removed 7) and now considering 93/105 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned [48]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 41 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 41 transition count 86
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 37 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 37 transition count 82
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 37 /48 variables (removed 11) and now considering 82/93 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/56 places, 82/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 374 ms. Remains : 37/56 places, 82/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2917288791974602132.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3132338086139458416.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2917288791974602132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3132338086139458416.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,906,0.036439,4440,2,283,5,1608,6,0,224,1166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((p1==1)||(((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((p1==1)||(((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t28, t33, t34, t36,...279
(forward)formula 0,1,0.127673,6104,1,0,144,12069,174,53,1619,9192,164
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 53 transition count 100
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 53 /56 variables (removed 3) and now considering 100/105 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 5/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/144 variables, 53/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 48/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 11439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 29/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/144 variables, 53/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 48/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 99/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 14516 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 25995ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25996ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/56 places, 100/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26196 ms. Remains : 53/56 places, 100/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7449680709613306769.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12431180386283254676.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7449680709613306769.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12431180386283254676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,972,0.043212,4660,2,533,5,2578,6,0,300,2123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(!(((((p9!=1)&&(p35==1))&&(p57==1)) + AG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))))) U (((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)...766
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(E(!(((((p9!=1)&&(p35==1))&&(p57==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54=...2688
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t23, t24, t26, t27, t35, ...294
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/0/56
(forward)formula 0,1,0.73376,19712,1,0,361,80438,247,228,2335,85568,482
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 56 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 98
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 43 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 43 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 40 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 40 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 40 transition count 82
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 40 transition count 78
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 36 transition count 74
Applied a total of 45 rules in 23 ms. Remains 36 /56 variables (removed 20) and now considering 74/105 (removed 31) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 47 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:37:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 47 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 5/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/104 variables, 36/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 46/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 7018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, ReadFeed: 47/47 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 27/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/104 variables, 36/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 46/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 73/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 9442 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, ReadFeed: 47/47 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16500ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16500ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/56 places, 74/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16650 ms. Remains : 36/56 places, 74/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9890729522534189153.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7482730811005817632.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9890729522534189153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7482730811005817632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,224,0.040627,4400,2,341,5,1506,6,0,211,1011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((!(A(((!(((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1))))||((p46==1)&&(p57==1))) U ((((AG((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))) * ...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(!((E(!(((((!(E(TRUE U !((((p12==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p40==1)&&(p54==1)))))) * (p12==1)) * ((p26==1)&...714
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t56, t58, t60, t62, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t...267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.192272,6832,1,0,171,12276,182,79,1712,10061,215
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 48 transition count 90
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 48 /56 variables (removed 8) and now considering 90/105 (removed 15) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/56 places, 90/105 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 39 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 39 transition count 82
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 35 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 35 transition count 78
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 35 /47 variables (removed 12) and now considering 78/90 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/56 places, 78/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 412 ms. Remains : 35/56 places, 78/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability599600149039984559.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6188725744374259518.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability599600149039984559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6188725744374259518.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,714,0.033542,4380,2,252,5,1307,6,0,210,916,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG((p22==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((p22==1)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.045546,4508,1,0,10,1374,10,2,440,947,4
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 50 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 18 rules in 7 ms. Remains 47 /56 variables (removed 9) and now considering 89/105 (removed 16) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/56 places, 89/105 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 38 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 38 transition count 81
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 34 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 77
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 34 /46 variables (removed 12) and now considering 77/89 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 34 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 34/56 places, 77/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 368 ms. Remains : 34/56 places, 77/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17075636633833431452.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13453478383816306762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17075636633833431452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13453478383816306762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,714,0.033663,4376,2,237,5,1280,6,0,208,871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AF((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)||(p54==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)||(p54==0))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t29, t30, t32, t33, t69, t71, t73, t75,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,0.134647,6168,1,0,149,8872,175,65,1585,8425,186
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 50 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 48 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 48 transition count 91
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 48 /56 variables (removed 8) and now considering 91/105 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 285 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/56 places, 91/105 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 40 transition count 84
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 36 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 36 transition count 80
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 36 /47 variables (removed 11) and now considering 80/91 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/56 places, 80/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 446 ms. Remains : 36/56 places, 80/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6491313153337879427.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14349270271888745006.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6491313153337879427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14349270271888745006.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,842,0.03745,4408,2,278,5,1503,6,0,219,1006,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((p44==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p44==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t25, t26, t27, t32, t33, t35,...279
(forward)formula 0,0,0.122651,5944,1,0,142,9474,176,49,1618,7092,164
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 49 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 49 transition count 93
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 49 /56 variables (removed 7) and now considering 93/105 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned [48]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/56 places, 93/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 42 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 42 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 39 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 39 transition count 84
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 39 /48 variables (removed 9) and now considering 84/93 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/56 places, 84/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 393 ms. Remains : 39/56 places, 84/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8916319297649878331.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3131321303720438981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8916319297649878331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3131321303720438981.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,923,0.03958,4476,2,357,5,1861,6,0,234,1411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX(!(A((p45==1) U (p5==1)))) + EX(((((p14==1)||(p12==0))||((p26==0)||(p40==0)))||(p54==0)))) + ((p6==0) * AG(AX((((p12==0)||(p26==0)...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((p5==1)) U (!((p45==1)) * !((p5==1)))) + EG(!((p5==1))))))))) + EX(((((p14==1)||(...296
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t25, t26, t29, t32, t34, ...283
(forward)formula 0,1,0.248185,8828,1,0,191,24470,201,81,1794,20932,238
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 56/56 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 50 transition count 95
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 50 /56 variables (removed 6) and now considering 95/105 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/56 places, 95/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 43 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 43 transition count 89
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 39 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 39 transition count 85
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 39 /49 variables (removed 10) and now considering 85/95 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/56 places, 85/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 375 ms. Remains : 39/56 places, 85/105 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10726000145925306722.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5758357840100389151.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10726000145925306722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5758357840100389151.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,938,0.040161,4480,2,351,5,1879,6,0,235,1328,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((p47==1) + EX((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)||(p54==0))))) + AX(EF((p53==0)))) * (EG(((p20==0)&&(((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)...324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((p47==1) + EX((((p12==0)||(p26==0))||((p40==0)||(p54==0))))) + !(EX(!(E(TRUE U (p53==0)))...629
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t30, t31, t36,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.269636,9088,1,0,248,26662,198,98,1756,22177,311
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 191152 ms.

BK_STOP 1749137863592

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-04a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;