fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r226-smll-174903490900193
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for StigmergyElection-PT-04a

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 54264.00 0.00 0.00 FFTFTTTFFTTTTTFF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490900193.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900193
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 132K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749137604553

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 164 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Transformed 58 places.
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Transformed 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 58 places and 218 transitions and 1238 arcs in 387 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 33 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 110 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 45 out of 58 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-05 15:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 611 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:33:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 20/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 95/153 variables, 58/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 48/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/154 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 13343 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 26/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/153 variables, 58/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 48/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 107/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 154/154 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 15048 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 28618ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28640ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29315 ms. Remains : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 58 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 58 places (down from 45) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 44 to 42
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (302 resets) in 2423 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 2/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (381 resets) in 307 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 399 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 37/43 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 43/154 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 104 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 111ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 48 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 48 transition count 91
Applied a total of 20 rules in 11 ms. Remains 48 /58 variables (removed 10) and now considering 91/108 (removed 17) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/58 places, 91/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 40 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 37 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 37 transition count 81
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /47 variables (removed 10) and now considering 81/91 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/58 places, 81/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 311 ms. Remains : 37/58 places, 81/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14317524135710820274.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12106222637711697100.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14317524135710820274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12106222637711697100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,843,0.038971,4396,2,305,5,1664,6,0,224,1302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(AX(AF(((p16==0)||(p28==1)))))) + EG(A((p24==1) U (p12!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EG(!((E(!((p12!=1)) U (!((p24==1)) * !((p12!=1)))) + EG(!((p12!=1))))))))) * !(EG(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t26, t27, t29, t32, t36,...279
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.216597,8236,1,0,215,23602,198,95,1724,19726,255
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 56 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 44 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 42 transition count 93
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 42 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 36 transition count 87
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 32 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 32 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 30 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 30 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 30 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 17 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 17 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 30 transition count 57
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 30 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 29 transition count 56
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 27 transition count 54
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 27 transition count 54
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 27 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 24 transition count 50
Applied a total of 85 rules in 73 ms. Remains 24 /58 variables (removed 34) and now considering 50/108 (removed 58) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 43 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 24 cols
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 43 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 43 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:33:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 12/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 42/66 variables, 24/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 67/67 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 3363 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 42/66 variables, 24/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 49/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 67/67 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 2783 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6179ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6180ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/58 places, 50/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6355 ms. Remains : 24/58 places, 50/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13839127483321223008.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11344109310203339097.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13839127483321223008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11344109310203339097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,91,0.021007,4216,2,127,5,695,6,0,136,528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((EG((p1==1)) + EF(((p5==0)&&(p33==1)))) + ((p1==0)||(p27==1))) + (((p32==1)&&(p52==0))&&(p34==1)))) * EF((p8==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((EG((p1==1)) + E(TRUE U ((p5==0)&&(p33==1)))) + ((p1==0)||(p27==1))) + (((p32==1)&&(p52==0))&&(p...217
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t15, t18, t33, t35, t37, Intersection with reachab...227
(forward)formula 0,1,0.074582,5240,1,0,115,5501,127,57,1045,5337,159
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 54 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 52 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 52 transition count 97
Applied a total of 12 rules in 9 ms. Remains 52 /58 variables (removed 6) and now considering 97/108 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:05] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/58 places, 97/108 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 47 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 47 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 44 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 44 transition count 90
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 44 /51 variables (removed 7) and now considering 90/97 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/58 places, 90/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 432 ms. Remains : 44/58 places, 90/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6780587180852867586.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6708077756675395148.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6780587180852867586.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6708077756675395148.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,953,0.043421,4400,2,432,5,1965,6,0,254,1635,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((EF(EG((p36==1))) + (p21==0)) + ((p22==1) + ((AX(((p19==0)||(p10==1))) * (p7==0)) * (p49==0)))) + ((EG((p34==0)) * AG((p34==0))) + (...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(p36==1))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (p21==0))] != FALSE) + ([(EY(Init) * (p22==1))] ...365
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 88/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.135283,6448,1,0,16,11334,20,2,1429,6657,19
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 53 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 50 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 50 transition count 94
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 50 /58 variables (removed 8) and now considering 94/108 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/58 places, 94/108 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 46 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 46 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 44 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 44 transition count 89
Applied a total of 10 rules in 7 ms. Remains 44 /49 variables (removed 5) and now considering 89/94 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 435 ms. Remains : 44/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9456549709970122022.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7310927951569224356.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9456549709970122022.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7310927951569224356.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,938,0.047081,4400,2,385,5,2092,6,0,256,1496,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(((EG(A(((p19==0)||(p9==1)) U (p40==1))) + E((p7==0) U (p22==1))) + EX(((p19==0)||(p35==1)))) U (p27==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((EG(!((E(!((p40==1)) U (!(((p19==0)||(p9==1))) * !((p40==1)))) + EG(!((p40==1)))))) + E((p7==0...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t28, t29, t33, t35,...284
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.397459,11568,1,0,287,44615,215,135,1966,35706,376
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 51 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 96
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 51 /58 variables (removed 7) and now considering 96/108 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 193 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/58 places, 96/108 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 45 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 45 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 42 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 42 transition count 88
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /50 variables (removed 8) and now considering 88/96 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/58 places, 88/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 438 ms. Remains : 42/58 places, 88/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13476229341298086304.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4341301349496404562.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13476229341298086304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4341301349496404562.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,939,0.041975,4400,2,429,5,1928,6,0,248,1578,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((p39==0)&&(p20==1)) + (AG(((p26==0)&&(p16==1))) * (EG((p34==1)) + ((p49==0)&&(p44==1)))))) + !(A(!(EF((p22==1))) U ((p52==1) * A(EX...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!(((p52==1) * !((E(!(((p12==0)||(p44==1))) U (!(EX(((p44==0)||(p26==1)))) * !(((p12...1153
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t25, t...297
(forward)formula 0,1,0.391346,10928,1,0,225,34215,212,90,1882,31885,262
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 47 /58 variables (removed 11) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 40 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 40 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 37 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 37 transition count 80
Applied a total of 18 rules in 7 ms. Remains 37 /46 variables (removed 9) and now considering 80/89 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/58 places, 80/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 398 ms. Remains : 37/58 places, 80/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16490645055334908239.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4643882520805994132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16490645055334908239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4643882520805994132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,780,0.034574,4416,2,275,5,1574,6,0,223,1097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AX((p21==1)) + AG((p55==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EX(!((p21==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((p55==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t27, t33, t35, t36,...274
(forward)formula 0,1,0.136051,6336,1,0,153,10721,184,56,1647,9399,184
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 47 /58 variables (removed 11) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 202 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 39 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 39 transition count 82
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 36 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 36 transition count 79
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 36 /46 variables (removed 10) and now considering 79/89 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/58 places, 79/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 424 ms. Remains : 36/58 places, 79/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8360069239086883289.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17130199665924293244.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8360069239086883289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17130199665924293244.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,716,0.034946,4412,2,246,5,1351,6,0,218,895,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(((p11==0)||(p51==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(((p11==0)||(p51==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t26, t32, t34, t35, t71, t73, t75, t77,...254
(forward)formula 0,1,0.126051,5948,1,0,138,9040,174,51,1611,7993,173
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 47 /58 variables (removed 11) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 38 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 38 transition count 81
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 34 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 77
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 34 /46 variables (removed 12) and now considering 77/89 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 34 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 34/58 places, 77/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 402 ms. Remains : 34/58 places, 77/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11849690013979848790.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16787999307225223467.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11849690013979848790.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16787999307225223467.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,714,0.033391,4376,2,237,5,1280,6,0,208,871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.040169,4376,1,0,6,1386,7,1,370,871,1
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /58 variables (removed 11) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/58 places, 89/108 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 38 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 38 transition count 81
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 34 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 77
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /46 variables (removed 12) and now considering 77/89 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 34 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 34/58 places, 77/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 409 ms. Remains : 34/58 places, 77/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2419182219273689659.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17185426606490607582.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2419182219273689659.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17185426606490607582.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,714,0.031885,4368,2,237,5,1280,6,0,208,871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.033598,4368,1,0,6,1280,7,1,308,871,1
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 53 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 51 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 96
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 51 /58 variables (removed 7) and now considering 96/108 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/58 places, 96/108 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 44 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 44 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 42 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 42 transition count 88
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 42 /50 variables (removed 8) and now considering 88/96 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/58 places, 88/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 407 ms. Remains : 42/58 places, 88/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3463352137087242781.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2887369913405127011.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3463352137087242781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2887369913405127011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,940,0.041538,4384,2,389,5,2017,6,0,247,1420,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EX((p14==1))) * EG((AG((p33==0)) + ((((p20==1)||(p40==0))||(p38==1)) * EG((p22==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX((p14==1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((p33==0)))) + ((((p20==1)||(p40==0))||(p38...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t29, t34, t35,...284
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.296368,9888,1,0,227,31583,204,103,1915,26147,276
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 56 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 46 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 45 transition count 96
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 45 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 40 transition count 91
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 33 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 33 transition count 80
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 30 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 30 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 30 transition count 71
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 22 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 22 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 30 transition count 49
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 30 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 29 transition count 48
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 26 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 23 transition count 42
Applied a total of 89 rules in 34 ms. Remains 23 /58 variables (removed 35) and now considering 42/108 (removed 66) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 23 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 37/60 variables, 23/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 2723 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/60 variables, 23/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 41/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 2369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5113ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/58 places, 42/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5261 ms. Remains : 23/58 places, 42/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13456462622778627266.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15542470145661891954.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13456462622778627266.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15542470145661891954.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,77,0.015557,4132,2,93,5,509,6,0,129,312,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((AG((p55!=0)) * ((!(EF((p9==1))) + (p48==0)) + (p32==1))) U EG(EF(((p45==0)||(p54==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(E(TRUE U !((p55!=0)))) * ((!(E(TRUE U (p9==1))) + (p48==0)) + (p32==1))) U EG(E(TRUE ...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t16, t19, t27, t31, t39, Intersection with reac...230
(forward)formula 0,1,0.062628,4900,1,0,103,4381,111,48,907,4181,137
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 56 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 42 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 41 transition count 92
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 41 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 33 transition count 84
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 26 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 26 transition count 73
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 22 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 22 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 22 transition count 50
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 22 transition count 34
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 18 transition count 30
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 18 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 14 transition count 26
Applied a total of 113 rules in 26 ms. Remains 14 /58 variables (removed 44) and now considering 26/108 (removed 82) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 14 cols
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:34:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 7/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 21/35 variables, 14/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/36 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 1212 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/35 variables, 14/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/36 variables, and 46 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 586 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1803ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1804ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/58 places, 26/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1937 ms. Remains : 14/58 places, 26/108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality275989860932797747.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14512748949211035723.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality275989860932797747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14512748949211035723.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25,0.010682,3936,2,55,5,323,6,0,78,223,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p38==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabl...206
(forward)formula 0,0,0.024255,4064,1,0,55,1204,73,24,581,1121,65
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 51559 ms.

BK_STOP 1749137658817

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900193"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-04a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;