About the Execution of ITS-Tools for StigmergyElection-PT-03a
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 68707.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TTTTTTFFTTTFFTTF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490900177.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900177
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 132K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749135752799
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-03a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 126 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Transformed 44 places.
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Transformed 118 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 15:02:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 44 places and 118 transitions and 467 arcs in 361 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 51 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 44 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 346 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 652 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:02:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 11/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 44/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 27/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 108/108 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 7164 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 44/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 27/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 72/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 108/108 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 6796 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14116ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14846 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 44 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:51] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-05 15:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 15:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 44 places (down from 44) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 80 to 73
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (546 resets) in 1796 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 4/73 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (120 resets) in 503 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (115 resets) in 351 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (92 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (85 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 33/44 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/108 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved in 332 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 340ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 36 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 36 transition count 59
Applied a total of 16 rules in 14 ms. Remains 36 /44 variables (removed 8) and now considering 59/73 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned [35]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/44 places, 59/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 30 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 30 transition count 54
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 28 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 28 transition count 52
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 28 /35 variables (removed 7) and now considering 52/59 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 28 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/44 places, 52/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 287 ms. Remains : 28/44 places, 52/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15195532193022176356.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1001589809421524963.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15195532193022176356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1001589809421524963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,160,0.033389,4144,2,158,5,811,6,0,160,527,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((p27==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * (p27==0))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.034941,4272,1,0,8,811,8,1,217,527,2
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 37 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 61/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 32 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 57
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 30 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 30 transition count 55
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 30 /36 variables (removed 6) and now considering 55/61 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 30/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 289 ms. Remains : 30/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5986755344742463800.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14573159196447945872.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5986755344742463800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14573159196447945872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,192,0.017251,4064,2,184,5,946,6,0,171,649,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(AX(((p17==0)||(p11==1)))) * AX((E((p9==0) U (p18==1)) * AX((p20==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)) * !(((p17==0)||(p11==1))))] = FALSE * ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E((p9==0) U (p18==1))))] = ...207
(forward)formula 0,0,0.019407,4320,1,0,10,946,9,2,243,649,4
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 42 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 42 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 41 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 41 transition count 71
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 41 /43 variables (removed 2) and now considering 71/73 (removed 2) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/44 places, 71/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 41/44 places, 71/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2783561610528717914.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6254827734845522131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2783561610528717914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6254827734845522131.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,225,0.020581,4164,2,225,5,947,6,0,222,646,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(EG((((p9==0) * AX(((p41==0)||(p4==1)))) + E(((p17==1)&&((p26==0)||(p1==1))) U (((p34==0)||(p19==1))&&(p14==1)))))) * AF(((AX(AX(((p5...313
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG((((p9==0) * !(EX(!(((p41==0)||(p4==1)))))) + E(((p17==1)&&((p26==0)||(p1==1))) U (((p34==0)|...436
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t19, t20, t22, t23, t32, t33, t42, t62, t65, t68, Inters...246
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.126232,6596,1,0,160,13264,183,89,1473,12370,210
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 37 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 61/73 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 33 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 33 transition count 58
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 31 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 31 transition count 56
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 31 /36 variables (removed 5) and now considering 56/61 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 52 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 52 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 31/44 places, 56/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 31/44 places, 56/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12247191499185399737.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11907872151597759800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12247191499185399737.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11907872151597759800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,200,0.020879,4076,2,223,5,974,6,0,176,730,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF(AG((p23==1))) + (p6==0)) + (p17==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p23==1))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (p6==0))] != FALSE) + [(EY(Init) * (...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t21, t25, t27, t28, t50, t52,...259
(forward)formula 0,1,0.085574,5740,1,0,121,7189,133,46,1115,6262,134
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 38 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 38 transition count 63
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 38 /44 variables (removed 6) and now considering 63/73 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:02:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 57/95 variables, 38/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 27/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 96/96 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 6590 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 16/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/95 variables, 38/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 27/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 62/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 96/96 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 6947 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 13572ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13573ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/44 places, 63/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13744 ms. Remains : 38/44 places, 63/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6210319338496875030.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10623804277118484700.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6210319338496875030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10623804277118484700.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,219,0.023118,4268,2,266,5,1359,6,0,208,952,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(!(AF(((A(((p43==0)||(p0==1)) U (p25==0)) + (p0==0)) + (p12==1))))) U AF(E(((p0==0)||(p39==1)) U ((!(AX((p40==0))) * AX(((p39==0)||(p...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(E(((p0==0)||(p39==1)) U ((!(!(EX(!((p40==0))))) * !(EX(!(((p39==0)||(p28==1)))))) * (((p...614
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t21, t23, t26, t27, t29, t56, t59,...259
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.114063,6700,1,0,152,11982,175,78,1396,11347,199
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 42 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/73 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/44 places, 70/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 39 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 38 transition count 67
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 38 /41 variables (removed 3) and now considering 67/70 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 326 ms. Remains : 38/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2104367116817408120.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10453795525476435542.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2104367116817408120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10453795525476435542.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,223,0.024642,4128,2,281,5,1169,6,0,210,930,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG((p34==0)) * EF(AG(EX((p7!=0))))) * (EX(AG(E(((p19==0)&&((p5==0)||(p22==1))) U EG(((p17==0)||(p20==1)))))) + EX((((AG((p5==0)) * (p21...256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p34==0)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(EX((p7!=0))))))))] = FALSE) * [((...502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t30, t32, t36, t59, t61,...259
(forward)formula 0,0,0.133237,6816,1,0,143,13294,158,67,1322,12380,174
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 66
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 37 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 60
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 60/73 (removed 13) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 60/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 32 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 56
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 31 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 31 transition count 55
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 31 /36 variables (removed 5) and now considering 55/60 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 50 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 50 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 31/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 292 ms. Remains : 31/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14949550327976891396.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9827239963878267559.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14949550327976891396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9827239963878267559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,177,0.019703,4064,2,165,5,733,6,0,172,520,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(((EX((p24==0)) + (p18==1)) + ((p14==0) + (AX((p27==1)) * (EF(((p36==0)&&(p14==1))) + (p35==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EX((p24==0)) + (p18==1)) + ((p14==0) + (!(EX(!((p27==1)))) * (E(TRUE U ((p36==0)&&(p...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t25, t49, t51, t53, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,0.067041,5344,1,0,111,5669,131,51,1109,4708,128
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 66
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 38 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 38 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 38 /44 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/73 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned [37]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/44 places, 62/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 33 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 33 transition count 58
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 31 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 31 transition count 56
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 31 /37 variables (removed 6) and now considering 56/62 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 31/44 places, 56/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 31/44 places, 56/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4815421125943920199.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6350194293205272058.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4815421125943920199.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6350194293205272058.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199,0.019925,4064,2,207,5,928,6,0,173,696,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX((p38==1)) * ((p42==0)||(p21==1))) * ((AF((p0==1)) + AX((p36==0))) + ((p39==1)||(p30==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX((p38==1)) * ((p42==0)||(p21==1))) * ((!(EG(!((p0==1)))) + !(EX(!((p36==0))))) + ((p39==1)||(p3...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t20, t21, t23, t29, t31, t50, t52, t54,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,0.097822,5728,1,0,164,8215,138,85,1076,9852,171
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 44 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 38 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 38 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 37 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 64
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 35 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 34 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 34 transition count 61
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 34 transition count 58
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 33 transition count 57
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 31 transition count 55
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 31 transition count 55
Applied a total of 32 rules in 58 ms. Remains 31 /44 variables (removed 13) and now considering 55/73 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned [30]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 52
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 27 transition count 43
Applied a total of 15 rules in 11 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 43/55 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 27 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/44 places, 43/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 27/44 places, 43/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11957715289636667203.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5017591902731022551.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11957715289636667203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5017591902731022551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,90,0.015576,3984,2,161,5,667,6,0,145,481,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((p38==0)||(p35==1)))) * A(((p5==0)||(p17==1)) U !((((EF((p19==1)) * AG(((p31==0)||(p27==1)))) + (p28==0)) + (p23==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p38==0)||(p35==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!((((E(TRUE U (p19==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p31...435
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t13, t25, t30, t32, t33, t34, t36, t41, Intersection with reacha...228
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107511,6288,1,0,171,11996,117,120,951,11546,250
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /44 variables (removed 4) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 40 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/100 variables, 40/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 27/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/101 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 5808 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 16/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 60/100 variables, 40/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 27/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 66/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/101 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 10040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 15881ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15885ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16029 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12963405774334154814.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality370732859060366800.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12963405774334154814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality370732859060366800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,225,0.028454,4248,2,341,5,1392,6,0,219,1029,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AG((EF((p41==1)) * ((p19==1)||(p32==0)))) + ((!(E((p15==1) U (((p18==0)||(p10==1))&&(p14==1)))) * ((p41==0) + ((EG((p21==0)) * (p25==0...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p41==1)) * ((p19==1)||(p32==0)))))) + ((!(E((p15==1) U (((p18==0)||(p10==1)...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, t23, t29, t30, t32, t59, t61, ...258
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.15989,7448,1,0,156,15042,172,81,1472,13181,210
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 42 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 41 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 67
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /44 variables (removed 3) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 38 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 37 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 37 transition count 64
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 37 /40 variables (removed 3) and now considering 64/67 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 37/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5603603956472435205.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13307232042922619205.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5603603956472435205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13307232042922619205.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,219,0.020632,4112,2,238,5,1065,6,0,201,768,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p37==1) + A(EG((p36!=1)) U ((((p3==1)||(p7==0))||(p22==1)) * !(EX((p29==1)))))) + !(E(((!((p8==0)||(p28==1)))&&(((p35==0)||(p16==1)...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p37==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((p3==1)||(p7==0))||(p22==1)) * !(EX((...445
(forward)formula 0,1,0.021885,4368,1,0,6,1065,8,1,204,768,1
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 39 /44 variables (removed 5) and now considering 65/73 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 15:03:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/98 variables, 39/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 27/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 99/99 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 4846 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/98 variables, 39/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 27/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 64/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/99 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 9333 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14208ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14210ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/44 places, 65/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14359 ms. Remains : 39/44 places, 65/73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16766297859302952120.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1463751600191041709.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16766297859302952120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1463751600191041709.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,222,0.03298,4304,2,286,5,1433,6,0,214,1013,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(A(!(((p29==0)||(p31==1))) U A((p42==1) U ((p21==0)||(p10==1)))))) * A(A((AF((p12==0)) + ((EF((p7==1)) + (p39!=1)) * AF(((p6==0)||(...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((E(!(!((E(!(((p21==0)||(p10==1))) U (!((p42==1)) * !(((p21==0)||(p10==1))))) + EG(!(((p21==...966
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t25, t28, t29, t31, t58,...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.213029,8016,1,0,178,19363,199,96,1454,17891,235
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 15:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 66106 ms.
BK_STOP 1749135821506
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-03a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490900177"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-03a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-03a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;