Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490700083.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-07a, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490700083
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 5.8M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4M May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749082126730

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-07a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 00:08:49] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 00:08:49] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 00:08:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 861 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:50] [INFO ] Transformed 292 places.
[2025-06-05 00:08:50] [INFO ] Transformed 7108 transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:08:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 00:08:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 292 places and 7108 transitions and 108222 arcs in 1227 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 19 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 6218 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 6218 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 17 out of 292 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 292/292 places, 890/890 transitions.
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 231 transition count 821
Iterating global reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 231 transition count 821
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 231 transition count 813
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 203 transition count 778
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 203 transition count 778
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 203 transition count 773
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 198 transition count 768
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 198 transition count 768
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 193 transition count 763
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 193 transition count 763
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 188 transition count 758
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 188 transition count 758
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 185 transition count 755
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 185 transition count 755
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 185 transition count 752
Applied a total of 230 rules in 165 ms. Remains 185 /292 variables (removed 107) and now considering 752/890 (removed 138) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:08:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 743 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 743 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-05 00:08:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 43 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 946 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:08:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 743 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 593 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 5461 ms returned [184]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 6462 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/292 places, 752/890 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 163 transition count 731
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 163 transition count 731
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 163 transition count 723
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 157 transition count 717
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 157 transition count 717
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 153 transition count 713
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 153 transition count 713
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 149 transition count 709
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 149 transition count 709
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 145 transition count 705
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 145 transition count 705
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 141 transition count 701
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 141 transition count 701
Applied a total of 94 rules in 44 ms. Remains 141 /184 variables (removed 43) and now considering 701/752 (removed 51) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 692 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 692 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 692 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:08:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:08:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 548 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 724 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 141/292 places, 701/890 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7428 ms. Remains : 141/292 places, 701/890 transitions.
Support contains 17 out of 141 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 00:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 120 ms
[2025-06-05 00:08:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 701 transitions.
Support contains 14 out of 141 places (down from 17) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (11 resets) in 4496 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 140 transition count 639
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 79 transition count 630
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 77 transition count 628
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 77 transition count 619
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 68 transition count 619
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 66 transition count 616
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 66 transition count 616
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 66 transition count 613
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 66 transition count 612
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 65 transition count 612
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 11 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 34 transition count 570
Ensure Unique test removed 260 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 260 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 260 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 34 transition count 310
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 30 transition count 306
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 30 transition count 302
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 263 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 263 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 263 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 30 transition count 39
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 775 place count 22 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 778 place count 19 transition count 28
Applied a total of 778 rules in 167 ms. Remains 19 /141 variables (removed 122) and now considering 28/701 (removed 673) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 00:09:00] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:09:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 69 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 13/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 19/38 variables, 19/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 7/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 39/39 variables, and 77 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 3106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 48/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 19/38 variables, 19/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 7/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 27/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 39/39 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 1171 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4322ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4332ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/141 places, 28/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4617 ms. Remains : 19/141 places, 28/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 242 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 3 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 4951 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0 U p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 57 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 57 transitions
Performed 57 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 57
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 140 transition count 643
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 83 transition count 635
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 81 transition count 633
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 81 transition count 623
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 71 transition count 623
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 69 transition count 620
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 69 transition count 620
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 69 transition count 617
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 69 transition count 616
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 68 transition count 616
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 11 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 37 transition count 574
Ensure Unique test removed 260 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 260 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 260 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 37 transition count 314
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 33 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 33 transition count 306
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 263 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 263 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 263 rules applied. Total rules applied 752 place count 33 transition count 43
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 768 place count 25 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 770 place count 23 transition count 33
Applied a total of 770 rules in 162 ms. Remains 23 /141 variables (removed 118) and now considering 33/701 (removed 668) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 23 cols
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 31 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:09:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 11/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 9/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 3951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 9/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 31/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 2259 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6240ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6241ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/141 places, 33/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6541 ms. Remains : 23/141 places, 33/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 287 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 191 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Detected a total of 4/23 stabilizing places and 4/33 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (OR p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR p1 p0)), (X (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 544 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 5 to 4
RANDOM walk for 58 steps (6 resets) in 8 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (OR p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR p1 p0)), (X (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 778 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 33/33 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 33/33 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 31 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 11/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 9/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 3683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 9/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 31/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 1714 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5425ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5535 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 33/33 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Detected a total of 4/23 stabilizing places and 4/33 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR p0 p1)), (X (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 685 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 5 to 4
RANDOM walk for 80 steps (10 resets) in 5 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR p0 p1)), (X (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 741 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 196 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 242 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin637213376210889948
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 33 transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 33 transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 33 transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-05 00:09:22] [INFO ] Built C files in 33ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin637213376210889948
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin637213376210889948;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 459 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin637213376210889948;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 59 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin637213376210889948;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4096519509522016240.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 134 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 17371 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 687
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 128 transition count 687
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 128 transition count 684
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 119 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 119 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 119 transition count 674
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 112 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 112 transition count 667
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 106 transition count 661
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 106 transition count 661
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 106 transition count 659
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 103 transition count 656
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 103 transition count 656
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 102 transition count 655
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 102 transition count 655
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 102 transition count 654
Applied a total of 85 rules in 26 ms. Remains 102 /141 variables (removed 39) and now considering 654/701 (removed 47) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 645 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 462 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 684 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 653 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:09:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 236 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 229 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 272 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 276 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 227 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 222 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 219 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 263 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 193 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 202 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 206 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 193 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 193 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 239 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 197 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 289 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 194 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 195 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 206 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 224 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 294 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 194 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 153 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 234 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 190 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 119 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 181 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 181 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 144 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 200 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/747 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved in 30044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 653/134 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 77/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/747 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 519/134 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61783ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61821ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/141 places, 654/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62536 ms. Remains : 102/141 places, 654/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 199 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 186 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 98 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 95 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 27765 steps (7 resets) in 698 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 88 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 654/654 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 654/654 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 421 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 610 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 653 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:10:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 302 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 293 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 294 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 278 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 229 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 223 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 211 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 174 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 141 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 219 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 216 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 213 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 247 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 197 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 239 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 179 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 184 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 180 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 164 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 192 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 185 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 193 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 281 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 330 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 247 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 192 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 187 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 31048ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31052ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31670 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 654/654 transitions.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (18 resets) in 1204 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 889 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=30 )
Probabilistic random walk after 889 steps, saw 782 distinct states, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=23 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 139 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 180 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 111 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 218 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 654/654 transitions.
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 102 transition count 654
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 102 transition count 662
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 102 transition count 662
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 86 transition count 646
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 86 transition count 646
Performed 41 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 16 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 86 transition count 655
Ensure Unique test removed 279 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 279 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 279 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 86 transition count 376
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 411 place count 60 transition count 350
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 60 transition count 350
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 271 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 271 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 271 rules applied. Total rules applied 708 place count 60 transition count 79
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 716 place count 60 transition count 79
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 732 place count 44 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 748 place count 44 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 748 rules in 142 ms. Remains 44 /102 variables (removed 58) and now considering 63/654 (removed 591) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 54/98 variables, 44/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 9/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 99/99 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved in 7069 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/44 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 50/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/98 variables, 44/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 9/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 29/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/99 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved in 5704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/62 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12791ms problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 33 dead transitions in 12792ms
Found 33 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 33 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 33 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/102 places, 30/654 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 171 edges and 44 vertex of which 20 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 24 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 24 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 20 /44 variables (removed 24) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 20/102 places, 30/654 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 12982 ms. Remains : 20/102 places, 30/654 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7390866925080080894
[2025-06-05 00:11:14] [INFO ] Built C files in 20ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7390866925080080894
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7390866925080080894;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2816 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7390866925080080894;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 60 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7390866925080080894;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7496185674112110947.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 1 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 654/654 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 654/654 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 645 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 644 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 830 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 653 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 645 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:11:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 334 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 342 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 340 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 344 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 283 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 228 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 286 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 281 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 235 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 229 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 183 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 233 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 228 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 229 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 206 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 298 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 242 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 234 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 162 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 191 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 275 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 343 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 189 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 179 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 220 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 182 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 151 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 143 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 233 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 198 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/747 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 653/134 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 74/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 155 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 116 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 116 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 18/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/747 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 519/134 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61130ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 653 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61134ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61971 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 654/654 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin10399494627683579809
[2025-06-05 00:12:31] [INFO ] Built C files in 19ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin10399494627683579809
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10399494627683579809;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2794 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10399494627683579809;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10399494627683579809;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16483618784235931038.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 00:12:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL11664601768505863989.gal : 28 ms
[2025-06-05 00:12:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7665824161619305442.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL11664601768505863989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut7216632527172089449.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL7665824161619305442.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL7665824161619305442.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut7216632527172089449.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, t31, t35,...473
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 00:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7927510357294581908.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7952254181352512926.ltl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7927510357294581908.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7952254181352512926.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(G("(p49!=1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXF!"(p49!=1)"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, t31, t35,...473
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7130788651693834629.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7130788651693834629.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7130788651693834629.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7130788651693834629.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7130788651693834629.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4143 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 394 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 146 ms.
[2025-06-05 00:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14108904689292147391.gal : 51 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17906414092635283975.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14108904689292147391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL17906414092635283975.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(G("(i4.u7.p49!=1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXF!"(i4.u7.p49!=1)"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t11, t13, t18, t21, t26, t29, t31, t35, t41, t684, t686, t688, t690, t692, t694, t696, t6...640
6 unique states visited
6 strongly connected components in search stack
6 transitions explored
6 items max in DFS search stack
433 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,4.40893,106516,1,0,75189,479,15525,132163,244,1684,1452338
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 239850 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 127 transition count 686
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 127 transition count 686
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 127 transition count 683
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 118 transition count 674
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 118 transition count 674
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 118 transition count 672
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 111 transition count 665
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 111 transition count 665
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 105 transition count 659
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 105 transition count 659
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 105 transition count 657
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 102 transition count 654
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 102 transition count 654
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 101 transition count 653
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 101 transition count 653
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 101 transition count 652
Applied a total of 88 rules in 48 ms. Remains 101 /141 variables (removed 40) and now considering 652/701 (removed 49) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:13:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 643 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 643 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-05 00:13:22] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 383 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:13:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 643 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:13:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 811 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 651 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:13:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 643 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:13:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:13:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 343 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 341 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 281 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 275 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 377 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 432 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 369 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 288 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 416 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 318 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 326 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 268 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 248 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 303 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 251 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 240 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 196 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 180 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 184 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 207 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 216 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 368 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 351 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 343 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 292 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 213 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 232 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 273 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 206 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 178 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 159 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 144 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 344 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 232 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 185 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 110 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 345 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 140 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 31748ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 651 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31751ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/141 places, 652/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33000 ms. Remains : 101/141 places, 652/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 33159 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(F(!p0))||(F(!p0)&&X(X(X(X(p1))))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 129 transition count 688
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 129 transition count 688
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 129 transition count 685
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 121 transition count 677
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 121 transition count 677
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 121 transition count 675
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 116 transition count 670
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 116 transition count 670
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 112 transition count 666
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 112 transition count 666
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 112 transition count 665
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 110 transition count 663
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 110 transition count 663
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 109 transition count 662
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 109 transition count 662
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 109 transition count 661
Applied a total of 71 rules in 68 ms. Remains 109 /141 variables (removed 32) and now considering 661/701 (removed 40) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 652 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 652 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 652 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:13:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:13:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 718 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 962 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 660 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:13:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 652 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:13:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:13:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 257 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 233 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 228 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 248 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 240 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 190 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 284 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 243 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 145 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 235 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 292 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 247 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 217 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 196 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 229 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 290 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 296 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 177 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 244 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 170 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 176 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 145 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 212 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 116 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 154 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 244 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 275 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 137 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 236 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 255 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 31315ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 660 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31319ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/141 places, 661/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32354 ms. Remains : 109/141 places, 661/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 654 ms :[p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 356 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 365 ms.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Detected a total of 8/109 stabilizing places and 8/661 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 123 ms. Reduced automaton from 12 states, 17 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 324 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (14 resets) in 1538 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 00:14:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 652 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:14:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:14:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 359 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 395 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 357 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 345 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 320 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 377 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 296 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 311 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 328 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 401 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 308 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 760/761 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 4183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4347ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT p1))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 22 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 39196 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0) U (!p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 141 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 701/701 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 127 transition count 686
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 127 transition count 686
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 127 transition count 683
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 117 transition count 673
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 117 transition count 673
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 117 transition count 671
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 110 transition count 664
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 110 transition count 664
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 104 transition count 658
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 104 transition count 658
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 104 transition count 656
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 101 transition count 653
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 101 transition count 653
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 100 transition count 652
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 100 transition count 652
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 100 transition count 651
Applied a total of 90 rules in 38 ms. Remains 100 /141 variables (removed 41) and now considering 651/701 (removed 50) transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 642 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 642 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 642 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 00:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 602 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 767 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 00:14:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 642 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:14:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 329 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 355 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 336 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 341 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 362 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 348 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 353 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 447 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 319 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 282 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 334 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 341 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 345 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 361 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 339 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 291 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 429 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 379 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 431 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 340 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 197 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 196 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 310 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 290 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 338 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 347 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 291 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 239 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 156 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 282 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 237 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 237 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 195 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 278 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 193 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 213 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 194 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 31425ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31436ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/141 places, 651/701 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32251 ms. Remains : 100/141 places, 651/701 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 258 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24946 reset in 162 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25001 reset in 171 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 169 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 20 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 363 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (18 resets) in 1184 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 642 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 517 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 329 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 273 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 316 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 305 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 297 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 288 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 333 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 235 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 238 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 235 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 208 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 641/741 variables, 100/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/741 variables, 516/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/741 variables, 0/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/742 variables, 1/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/742 variables, 0/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/742 variables, 0/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 742/742 variables, and 629 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 3673 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 517/517 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 323 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 282 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 240 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 288 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 286 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 232 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 205 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 207 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 180 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 290 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 238 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 200 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 237 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 202 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 00:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 187 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 8703ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 2 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 651/651 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 322 edges and 100 vertex of which 99 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 99 transition count 601
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 66 transition count 585
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 58 transition count 585
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 50 transition count 577
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 50 transition count 577
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 43 transition count 570
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 43 transition count 570
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 501 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 6 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 22 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 31 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 6 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 5 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 4 transition count 5
Applied a total of 239 rules in 41 ms. Remains 4 /100 variables (removed 96) and now considering 5/651 (removed 646) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 4/100 places, 5/651 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4458 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1951 resets) in 22 ms. (1739 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 4 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 9 steps, saw 4 distinct states, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 4 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 9 steps, saw 4 distinct states, run finished after 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=9 ) properties seen :0
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 281 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 20 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property StigmergyCommit-PT-07a-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 42870 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 388790 ms.

BK_STOP 1749082518163

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-07a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-07a, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490700083"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-07a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-07a execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;