Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490600034.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490600034
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 227K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749056627914

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 17:03:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 17:03:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 248 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Transformed 184 places.
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Transformed 592 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 184 places and 592 transitions and 4011 arcs in 581 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 291 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 291 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 301/301 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 149 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 149 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 149 transition count 259
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 140 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 140 transition count 250
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 140 transition count 247
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 139 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 139 transition count 246
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 138 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 138 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 137 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 137 transition count 244
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 136 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 136 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 136 transition count 242
Applied a total of 103 rules in 120 ms. Remains 136 /184 variables (removed 48) and now considering 242/301 (removed 59) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 235 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 486 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 235 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 551 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1090 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 235 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 217 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 163 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 234/370 variables, 136/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 119/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/371 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, ReadFeed: 119/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 53/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 234/370 variables, 136/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 119/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 241/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/371 variables, and 553 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, ReadFeed: 119/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60522ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60550ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/184 places, 242/301 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61793 ms. Remains : 136/184 places, 242/301 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 136 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 101 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 36 to 30
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (51 resets) in 2061 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 6/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (29 resets) in 222 ms. (179 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (20 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 144 ms. (275 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (52 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 235 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 124/136 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 234/370 variables, 136/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 119/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/371 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/371 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 371/371 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved in 939 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, ReadFeed: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/371 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 63 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/136 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1068ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
Support contains 29 out of 136 places (down from 30) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 33 stabilizing places and 32 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 134 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 64 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 60 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 57 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 56 transition count 144
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 56 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 42 transition count 130
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 30 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 30 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 30 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 29 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 29 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 29 transition count 77
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 29 transition count 72
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 24 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 23 transition count 66
Applied a total of 280 rules in 88 ms. Remains 23 /136 variables (removed 113) and now considering 66/242 (removed 176) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 23 cols
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/82 variables, 23/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 35/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 4/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 3/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 83/83 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 5575 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 32/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/82 variables, 23/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 35/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 61/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 83/83 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 5318 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10943ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10944ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/136 places, 66/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11126 ms. Remains : 23/136 places, 66/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5808319298419038895.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12035669001042351638.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5808319298419038895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12035669001042351638.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,75,0.056159,4464,2,151,5,829,6,0,153,548,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)) + (((p173==1)||((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)...242
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)) + (((p173==1)||((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t23, t25, t26, t28, t30, t32, t34...255
(forward)formula 0,1,0.13025,5360,1,0,152,5845,158,61,1455,5826,181
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 124 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 124 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 124 transition count 223
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 119 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 119 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 119 transition count 216
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 116 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 116 transition count 213
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 113 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 113 transition count 210
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 110 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 110 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 110 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 109 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 109 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 109 transition count 203
Applied a total of 61 rules in 30 ms. Remains 109 /136 variables (removed 27) and now considering 203/242 (removed 39) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 197 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 197 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 310 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 434 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 202 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 197 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:05:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 196/305 variables, 109/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 108/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 306/306 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 49/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 196/305 variables, 109/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 108/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 202/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 305/306 variables, and 478 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 108/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60220ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/136 places, 203/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60686 ms. Remains : 109/136 places, 203/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 203 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12579170397032130821.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3916332178027766110.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12579170397032130821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3916332178027766110.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25644,0.297912,8904,2,2040,5,15403,6,0,631,9464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((A(EF((((E(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)) U ((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) ...600
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((EY(Init) * !((!(!((E(!((!(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) * E(TRUE U ((((...1866
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t22, t23, t25, ...350
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,3.5492,85592,1,0,565,346476,450,320,5146,265114,849
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 136 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 131 transition count 232
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 131 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 100 transition count 201
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 90 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 90 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 90 transition count 185
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 85 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 85 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 85 transition count 175
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 84 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 84 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 84 transition count 170
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 78 transition count 164
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 74 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 74 transition count 160
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 70 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 70 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 70 transition count 153
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 69 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 69 transition count 152
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 69 transition count 147
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 64 transition count 142
Applied a total of 168 rules in 60 ms. Remains 64 /136 variables (removed 72) and now considering 142/242 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-04 17:06:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:06:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:06:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 96 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:06:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 96 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 135/199 variables, 64/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 95/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 3/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 21860 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 135/199 variables, 64/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 95/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 141/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 51979ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51980ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/136 places, 142/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52281 ms. Remains : 64/136 places, 142/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3082751492554549256.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12221995352083439815.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3082751492554549256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12221995352083439815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1931,0.132624,6076,2,1052,5,5348,6,0,390,3708,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p38==1) U (A((((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))||((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&((p174==1)...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(p38==1)) * !((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p78==1)))))) U (!((((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)...419
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t20, t30, t33, t34, t109, t111, ...309
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 139/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.740929,20796,1,0,302,59743,321,115,3371,48276,421
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 124 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 124 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 224
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 119 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 119 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 119 transition count 218
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 115 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 115 transition count 214
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 111 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 111 transition count 210
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 107 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 107 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 107 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 106 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 106 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 106 transition count 201
Applied a total of 67 rules in 21 ms. Remains 106 /136 variables (removed 30) and now considering 201/242 (removed 41) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 106 cols
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 107 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:07:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 107 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 18/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 193/299 variables, 106/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 106/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 5/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/300 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 300/300 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 48/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 193/299 variables, 106/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 106/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 200/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 299/300 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 106/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60189ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/136 places, 201/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60554 ms. Remains : 106/136 places, 201/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13675017198291549729.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7891619220549568216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13675017198291549729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7891619220549568216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25721,0.260124,8632,2,1992,5,13656,6,0,616,8278,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(((((!(((p137==1)||((p46==1)&&(p183==1)))&&(p29!=1)))&&(p30==1))&&((p66==1)&&(p102==1))) * (((p138==1)&&(p174==1)) * (EF((p109==1)) +...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,EX(((((!(((p137==1)||((p46==1)&&(p183==1)))&&(p29!=1)))&&(p30==1))&&((p66==1)&&(p102==1))) * (((...454
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t26, t27, ...345
(forward)formula 0,1,2.14566,57928,1,0,349,187563,436,161,5101,141385,535
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 136 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 131 transition count 232
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 131 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 98 transition count 199
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 85 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 85 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 85 transition count 178
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 78 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 78 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 78 transition count 154
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 77 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 77 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 77 transition count 137
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 71 transition count 131
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 66 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 66 transition count 126
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 62 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 62 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 62 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 61 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 61 transition count 118
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 61 transition count 113
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 56 transition count 108
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 56 transition count 108
Applied a total of 212 rules in 47 ms. Remains 56 /136 variables (removed 80) and now considering 108/242 (removed 134) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 56 cols
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 73 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:08:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 73 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 10/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/157 variables, 56/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 72/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 12124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 31/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/157 variables, 56/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 72/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 107/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 20087 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 32239ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32240ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/136 places, 108/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32493 ms. Remains : 56/136 places, 108/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11935230285094223224.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12168314490231432149.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11935230285094223224.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12168314490231432149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1550,0.059222,5220,2,937,5,4017,6,0,324,2715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AF(((p63==0)||(p183==0))) * ((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(((p63==0)||(p183==0))))) * ((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0...185
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t21, t22, t23, t72, t74, t76, t78, t80, t82, t86, t89, t9...257
(forward)formula 0,1,0.422703,16228,1,0,179,47577,238,78,2621,34560,269
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 134 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 60 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 143
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 41 transition count 129
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 28 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 28 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 28 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 27 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 27 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 27 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 27 transition count 69
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 22 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 21 transition count 63
Applied a total of 285 rules in 28 ms. Remains 21 /136 variables (removed 115) and now considering 63/242 (removed 179) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:08:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4955 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 30/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 58/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4660 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9648ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9772 ms. Remains : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability965360538392519936.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1287583567649418633.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability965360538392519936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1287583567649418633.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,73,0.029061,4412,2,144,5,802,6,0,142,526,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) * AG(((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((p30==0)||...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t22, t24, t26, t28, t30, In...250
(forward)formula 0,0,0.113104,5436,1,0,153,6275,151,55,1408,5753,198
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 122 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 122 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 122 transition count 220
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 116 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 116 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 116 transition count 212
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 112 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 208
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 108 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 108 transition count 204
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 105 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 105 transition count 201
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 105 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 104 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 104 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 104 transition count 197
Applied a total of 71 rules in 18 ms. Remains 104 /136 variables (removed 32) and now considering 197/242 (removed 45) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 191 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 191 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 107 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 416 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 191 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 107 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 19/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 190/294 variables, 104/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 106/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/295 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 1.0)
(t1 0.0)
(t2 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t3 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t4 0.0)
(t5 1.0)
(t6 0.0)
(t7 1.0)
(t8 1.0)
(t9 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t10 1.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t13 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t14 0.0)
(t15 1.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t18 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t19 0.0)
(t20 1.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t23 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(t24 0.0)
(t25 1.0)
(t26 1.0)
(t27 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t28 1.0)
(t29 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t30 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t31 1.0)
(t32 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t33 1.0)
(t34 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(t35 1.0)
(t36 1.0)
(t37 0.0)
(t38 1.0)
(t39 1.0)
(t40 1.0)
(t41 1.0)
(t42 1.0)
(t43 1.0)
(t44 1.0)
(t45 1.0)
(t46 0.0)
(t47 0.0)
(t48 0.0)
(t49 1.0)
(t50 1.0)
(t51 0.0)
(t52 1.0)
(t53 1.0)
(t54 1.0)
(t55 1.0)
(t56 1.0)
(t57 1.0)
(t58 1.0)
(t59 1.0)
(t60 1.0)
(t61 1.0)
(t62 1.0)
(t63 1.0)
(t64 1.0)
(t65 1.0)
(t66 1.0)
(t67 0.0)
(t68 1.0)
(t69 0.0)
(t70 0.0)
(t71 1.0)
(t72 1.0)
(t73 1.0)
(t74 0.0)
(t75 1.0)
(t76 1.0)
(t77 1.0)
(t78 0.0)
(t79 0.0)
(t80 0.0)
(t81 1.0)
(t82 1.0)
(t83 1.0)
(t84 0.0)
(t85 0.0)
(t86 0.0)
(t87 1.0)
(t88 1.0)
(t89 1.0)
(t90 1.0)
(t91 0.0)
(t92 1.0)
(t93 1.0)
(t94 1.0)
(t95 0.0)
(t96 0.0)
(t97 0.0)
(t98 0.0)
(t99 1.0)
(t100 1.0)
(t101 1.0)
(t102 0.0)
(t103 1.0)
(t104 1.0)
(t105 1.0)
(t106 0.0)
(t107 0.0)
(t108 0.0)
(t109 1.0)
(t110 1.0)
(t111 1.0)
(t112 0.0)
(t113 1.0)
(t114 1.0)
(t115 1.0)
(t116 0.0)
(t117 0.0)
(t118 0.0)
(t119 0.0)
(t120 0.0)
(t121 0.0)
(t122 0.0)
(t123 (/ 1.0 4.0))
(t124 0.0)
(t125 0.0)
(t126 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 295/295 variables, and 262 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 49/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 190/294 variables, 104/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 106/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 196/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/295 variables, and 458 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 106/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60153ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/136 places, 197/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60588 ms. Remains : 104/136 places, 197/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7478255417970190198.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14587413728564666493.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7478255417970190198.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14587413728564666493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25559,0.196036,7300,2,1248,5,9625,6,0,605,6129,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)) * AF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))))) * E...389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)) * !(EG(!(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p...669
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, ...345
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.6753,59792,1,0,490,282376,430,214,4804,191908,710
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 123 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 123 transition count 224
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 123 transition count 221
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 118 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 118 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 118 transition count 214
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 115 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 115 transition count 211
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 112 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 208
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 109 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 109 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 109 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 108 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 108 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 108 transition count 201
Applied a total of 63 rules in 12 ms. Remains 108 /136 variables (removed 28) and now considering 201/242 (removed 41) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 195 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 108 cols
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 195 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 195 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 4/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 194/302 variables, 108/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 108/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 302/303 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, ReadFeed: 108/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 49/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 194/302 variables, 108/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 108/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 200/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 302/303 variables, and 471 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, ReadFeed: 108/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60097ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/136 places, 201/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60379 ms. Remains : 108/136 places, 201/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2755394369910411006.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2586354260162403433.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2755394369910411006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2586354260162403433.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25563,0.18359,7492,2,1317,5,10065,6,0,625,6302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((EX(EX(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)))) + ((p95==1)&&(p183==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (EX(EX(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)))) + ((p95==1)&...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, ...345
(forward)formula 0,0,1.36421,36756,1,0,297,145547,417,143,4679,94293,452
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 80 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 80 transitions
Performed 80 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 80
Iterating post reduction 0 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 134 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 54 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 49 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 45 transition count 130
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 45 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 35 transition count 120
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 30 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 30 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 30 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 29 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 29 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 29 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 28 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 35 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 35 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 28 transition count 41
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 23 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 18 transition count 31
Applied a total of 316 rules in 17 ms. Remains 18 /136 variables (removed 118) and now considering 31/242 (removed 211) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 26 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 26 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 26 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 15/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/43 variables, 18/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 1772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 21/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/43 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 24/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 981 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2760ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2760ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/136 places, 31/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2855 ms. Remains : 18/136 places, 31/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9265917365181388308.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5609617133705607125.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9265917365181388308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5609617133705607125.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44,0.011261,4016,2,75,5,408,6,0,98,281,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p51==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p51==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t15, t16, t25, t28, Intersection with reac...230
(forward)formula 0,1,0.029995,4272,1,0,68,1852,81,31,684,1863,74
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 134 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 60 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 143
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 41 transition count 129
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 28 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 28 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 28 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 27 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 27 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 27 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 27 transition count 69
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 22 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 21 transition count 63
Applied a total of 285 rules in 33 ms. Remains 21 /136 variables (removed 115) and now considering 63/242 (removed 179) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 5208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 30/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 58/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4717 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9968ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9968ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10106 ms. Remains : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15487388917429192548.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2526739844513455514.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15487388917429192548.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2526739844513455514.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,73,0.030676,4412,2,144,5,802,6,0,142,526,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/0/47
(forward)formula 0,0,0.064188,4668,1,0,12,2847,20,1,1082,2019,12
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 125 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 125 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 125 transition count 225
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 121 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 121 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 121 transition count 220
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 118 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 118 transition count 217
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 115 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 115 transition count 214
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 112 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 112 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 111 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 111 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 111 transition count 207
Applied a total of 57 rules in 27 ms. Remains 111 /136 variables (removed 25) and now considering 207/242 (removed 35) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 206 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:11:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 4/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 5/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 199/310 variables, 111/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 108/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/311 variables, and 272 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 206/206 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 50/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/310 variables, 111/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 108/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 206/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 1/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 310/311 variables, and 478 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 108/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 206/206 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60130ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 206 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/136 places, 207/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60474 ms. Remains : 111/136 places, 207/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 207 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14269262712761356887.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1575393459380902512.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14269262712761356887.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1575393459380902512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25752,0.189609,7892,2,1592,5,11079,6,0,642,6683,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AG((((p109==1)&&(p146==1)) * ((AG(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) + AG(((p131==1)&&(p183==1)))) * ((((...240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p109==1)&&(p146==1)) * ((!(E(TRUE U !(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p...327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, t26, ...350
(forward)formula 0,0,1.45827,40048,1,0,314,109080,435,130,4939,89280,459
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 122 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 122 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 122 transition count 220
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 116 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 116 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 116 transition count 212
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 113 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 113 transition count 209
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 110 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 110 transition count 206
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 107 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 107 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 107 transition count 200
Applied a total of 65 rules in 12 ms. Remains 107 /136 variables (removed 29) and now considering 200/242 (removed 42) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 107 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 108 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 325 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 199 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 108 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 17/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 7/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 193/300 variables, 107/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 107/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/301 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30096ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/136 places, 200/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30437 ms. Remains : 107/136 places, 200/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1677836819179730186.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8801921233548383785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1677836819179730186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8801921233548383785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25562,0.29804,9012,2,2384,5,14237,6,0,620,9819,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((EF(((AX(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) + ((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))...378
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1)))))...450
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, ...345
(forward)formula 0,0,2.32359,61524,1,0,309,213175,418,150,4853,141040,464
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 122 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 122 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 122 transition count 220
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 116 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 116 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 116 transition count 212
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 112 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 208
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 108 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 108 transition count 204
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 104 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 104 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 104 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 103 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 103 transition count 196
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 103 transition count 195
Applied a total of 74 rules in 17 ms. Remains 103 /136 variables (removed 33) and now considering 195/242 (removed 47) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 189 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 103 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 189 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 106 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 368 ms returned [102]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 465 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/136 places, 195/242 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 88 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 88 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 88 transition count 176
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 83 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 83 transition count 171
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 78 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 78 transition count 166
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 73 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 73 transition count 161
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 68 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 68 transition count 156
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 64 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 64 transition count 152
Applied a total of 81 rules in 16 ms. Remains 64 /102 variables (removed 38) and now considering 152/195 (removed 43) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 146 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 146 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/136 places, 152/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 631 ms. Remains : 64/136 places, 152/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12123426638019629643.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6625957913093591565.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12123426638019629643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6625957913093591565.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24744,0.072667,5512,2,677,5,4669,6,0,402,3603,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(EG(((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))||(p174==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 69/0/83
(forward)formula 0,1,0.532229,14728,1,0,41,40388,19,2,2675,34469,41
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 122 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 122 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 122 transition count 220
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 117 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 117 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 117 transition count 214
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 113 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 113 transition count 210
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 109 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 109 transition count 206
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 105 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 105 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 105 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 104 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 104 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 104 transition count 197
Applied a total of 72 rules in 17 ms. Remains 104 /136 variables (removed 32) and now considering 197/242 (removed 45) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 191 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 191 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 106 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 443 ms returned [103]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 589 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/136 places, 197/242 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 90 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 90 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 90 transition count 179
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 85 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 85 transition count 174
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 80 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 169
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 75 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 75 transition count 164
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 70 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 70 transition count 159
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 66 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 66 transition count 155
Applied a total of 79 rules in 10 ms. Remains 66 /103 variables (removed 37) and now considering 155/197 (removed 42) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 149 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 149 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/136 places, 155/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 752 ms. Remains : 66/136 places, 155/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14523523938822367220.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15862579962780076211.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14523523938822367220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15862579962780076211.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25256,0.080685,5684,2,764,5,6230,6,0,413,4020,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(E((EF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) + ((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) U...366
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E((E(TRUE U ((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))&&(p174==1))) + ((((p30==1)&...438
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30,...366
(forward)formula 0,0,0.625248,16948,1,0,253,55299,329,101,3587,39696,364
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 136/136 places, 242/242 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 134 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 60 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 143
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 55 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 41 transition count 129
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 28 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 28 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 28 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 27 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 27 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 27 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 27 transition count 69
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 22 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 21 transition count 63
Applied a total of 285 rules in 18 ms. Remains 21 /136 variables (removed 115) and now considering 63/242 (removed 179) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:12:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 5172 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/21 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 30/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 56/77 variables, 21/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 35/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 58/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4526 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9731ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9732ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9848 ms. Remains : 21/136 places, 63/242 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 20 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14581945766064405125.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13742348026603935491.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14581945766064405125.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13742348026603935491.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 545996 ms.

BK_STOP 1749057176574

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490600034"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-04a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;