Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490600033.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490600033
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 227K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749056605857

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 283 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Transformed 184 places.
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Transformed 592 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 17:03:28] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 184 places and 592 transitions and 4011 arcs in 505 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 291 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 291 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 90 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 301/301 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 167 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 167 transition count 283
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 167 transition count 281
Applied a total of 36 rules in 44 ms. Remains 167 /184 variables (removed 17) and now considering 281/301 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 267 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 267 rows 167 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 47 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 558 ms returned [166]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 609 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/184 places, 281/301 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 164 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 164 transition count 279
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 162 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 162 transition count 277
Applied a total of 8 rules in 24 ms. Remains 162 /166 variables (removed 4) and now considering 277/281 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 162 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:03:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 339 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 513 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 162/184 places, 277/301 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1213 ms. Remains : 162/184 places, 277/301 transitions.
Support contains 90 out of 162 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 102 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 277 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 162 places (down from 90) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (41 resets) in 3540 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 8/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 323 ms. (123 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 348 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-04 17:03:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:03:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 134/162 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 262/424 variables, 162/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 65/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/425 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/425 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 162/162 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 136/162 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 188 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 202 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 225 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 188 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 184 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 193 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/425 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 0 unsolved in 2859 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/162 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/8 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3717ms problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 8 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 277 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 29 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 104 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 104 transitions
Performed 104 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 104
Iterating post reduction 0 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 161 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 57 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 54 transition count 146
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 54 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 44 transition count 136
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 35 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 35 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 35 transition count 121
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 280 place count 31 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 31 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 30 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 30 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 31 transition count 83
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 27 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 27 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 35 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 35 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 27 transition count 40
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 22 transition count 35
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 22 transition count 35
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 22 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 17 transition count 29
Applied a total of 379 rules in 78 ms. Remains 17 /162 variables (removed 145) and now considering 29/277 (removed 248) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/17 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 17/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/40 variables, 17/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/41 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 41/41 variables, and 40 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/17 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 21/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/40 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 21/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/41 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 41/41 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2757ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2759ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/162 places, 29/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2965 ms. Remains : 17/162 places, 29/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 135 steps (22 resets) in 9 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9458187965862315081.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10326466300576295044.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9458187965862315081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10326466300576295044.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 162 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 103 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 76 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 75 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 69 transition count 167
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 69 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 58 transition count 156
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 51 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 51 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 51 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 48 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 48 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 48 transition count 123
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 39 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 39 transition count 109
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 50 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 50 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 39 transition count 59
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 34 transition count 54
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 34 transition count 54
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 34 transition count 52
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 34 transition count 51
Applied a total of 354 rules in 64 ms. Remains 34 /162 variables (removed 128) and now considering 51/277 (removed 226) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 34 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:03:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 19/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 43/77 variables, 34/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4555 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 25/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/77 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 12/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 50/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4092 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8698ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8701ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/162 places, 51/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8898 ms. Remains : 34/162 places, 51/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10992845516856575120.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15466256290796496550.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10992845516856575120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15466256290796496550.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,90,0.042978,3992,2,185,5,1288,6,0,175,670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p80==0)||(p91==1)) U ((AF(EG((p95==1))) + AF(!(AG(((p116==0)||(p36==1)))))) + ((!((p12==0)||(p123==1)))||(((p142==1)&&(p27!=1))&&((p2...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EG(!(EG((p95==1))))) + !(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p116==0)||(p36==1)))))))))) + ((!((p12==0)||...586
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t5, t6, t7, t9, t12, t26, t31, t32, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, Intersection w...238
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.132466,5784,1,0,123,8714,133,68,1306,7634,165
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 129 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 129 transition count 235
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 111 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 111 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 111 transition count 209
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 100 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 100 transition count 198
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 94 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 94 transition count 192
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 90 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 90 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 90 transition count 187
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 88 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 88 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 88 transition count 184
Applied a total of 161 rules in 53 ms. Remains 88 /162 variables (removed 74) and now considering 184/277 (removed 93) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:03:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 282 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:03:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:03:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:03:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 3/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 174/262 variables, 88/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 65/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 41/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 174/262 variables, 88/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 65/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 183/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 383 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60344ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60348ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/162 places, 184/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60686 ms. Remains : 88/162 places, 184/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3186704327146520904.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11468563869644620974.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3186704327146520904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11468563869644620974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25657,0.127581,6304,2,1084,5,7790,6,0,523,5490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG(((p78==0)||(p142==1)))) * (AF(AX((((p44==0)||((p99==0)&&(p5==1)))&&((p112==1)||(p163==1))))) + EX((((AF((p14==1)) + ((p8==0)&&(p85...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EG(((p78==0)||(p142==1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((Init * !(EX((((!(EG(!((p14==1)))) + ((p8==0)&&(p85==...293
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t20, t21, t25, t26, t28, t29, t31, t36,...393
(forward)formula 0,1,0.973056,24576,1,0,314,80929,398,122,4193,69125,426
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 129 transition count 241
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 129 transition count 237
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 109 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 109 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 109 transition count 206
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 97 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 97 transition count 194
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 88 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 88 transition count 185
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 80 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 80 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 80 transition count 175
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 75 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 75 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 75 transition count 168
Applied a total of 190 rules in 18 ms. Remains 75 /162 variables (removed 87) and now considering 168/277 (removed 109) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:04:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 14/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 6/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 159/234 variables, 75/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 65/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 25636 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 44/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/234 variables, 75/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 65/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 167/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 55747ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55752ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55933 ms. Remains : 75/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12351713028454160585.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11821463499599319224.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12351713028454160585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11821463499599319224.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25645,0.075525,5532,2,875,5,5230,6,0,458,3964,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(A(EG((p53==0)) U AX((p44==1)))) + EX(EF(EG(((p136==0)||(p173==1)))))) U ((p77==1)||(p114==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EG(!((E(!(!(EX(!((p44==1))))) U (!(EG((p53==0))) * !(!(EX(!((p44==1))))))) + EG(!(!(EX(!((p44==1)))...241
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, t31, ...381
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.42264,41216,1,0,429,197871,372,248,4072,179776,602
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 129 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 129 transition count 237
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 110 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 110 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 110 transition count 208
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 98 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 98 transition count 196
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 89 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 89 transition count 187
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 81 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 81 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 81 transition count 176
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 76 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 76 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 76 transition count 169
Applied a total of 186 rules in 12 ms. Remains 76 /162 variables (removed 86) and now considering 169/277 (removed 108) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:05:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 15/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 161/237 variables, 76/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 65/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)timeout

org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 44/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 161/237 variables, 76/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 65/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 168/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 5/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 237/238 variables, and 362 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60130ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60131ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/162 places, 169/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60307 ms. Remains : 76/162 places, 169/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8489719651075363318.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7504264197888705166.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8489719651075363318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7504264197888705166.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25392,0.086324,6048,2,893,5,6510,6,0,464,4624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((p78==0)) * AF(((((((p69==0)||(p78==1))||(p82==1)) * EG((p154!=0))) + ((p44==0)&&(p111==1))) + (EG(((p64==0)&&(p46==1))) * (p112==1))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX((p78==0))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((((((p69==0)||(p78==1))||(p82==1)) * EG((p154!=0))) + ((p44=...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t20, t21, t23, t25, t26, t28, t31,...392
(forward)formula 0,0,1.00117,29652,1,0,388,96828,364,190,3796,102582,480
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 131 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 131 transition count 241
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 131 transition count 236
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 114 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 114 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 114 transition count 210
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 105 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 105 transition count 201
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 99 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 99 transition count 195
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 94 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 94 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 94 transition count 188
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 92 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 92 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 92 transition count 184
Applied a total of 154 rules in 17 ms. Remains 92 /162 variables (removed 70) and now considering 184/277 (removed 93) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 178 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 92 cols
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 178 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 178 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:06:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 177/269 variables, 92/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 65/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 38/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 177/269 variables, 92/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 65/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 183/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 269/270 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60143ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60144ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/162 places, 184/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60438 ms. Remains : 92/162 places, 184/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8877890475976599139.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16255240190719685314.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8877890475976599139.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16255240190719685314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25027,0.113453,6640,2,1032,5,8409,6,0,546,5617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((p175==1) * EX(((p139==0)&&(p84==1)))) + EG(((p43==0) * EF(((p168==0)||(p81==1))))))) * AG(EF(AG(((p119!=1)&&(p31!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(((p43==0) * E(TRUE U ((p168==0)||(p81==1))))))) * !((p175==1)))] = FALSE * [((EY(Init) * !(...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t29, t31,...348
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.24254,33648,1,0,352,132426,396,156,4519,102260,521
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 129 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 129 transition count 234
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 110 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 110 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 110 transition count 206
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 99 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 99 transition count 195
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 90 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 90 transition count 186
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 82 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 82 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 82 transition count 176
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 77 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 77 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 77 transition count 169
Applied a total of 184 rules in 18 ms. Remains 77 /162 variables (removed 85) and now considering 169/277 (removed 108) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 163 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 163 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 163 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:07:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 17/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 162/239 variables, 77/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 65/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 3/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 42/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/239 variables, 77/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 65/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 168/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 239/240 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60146ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60148ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/162 places, 169/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60405 ms. Remains : 77/162 places, 169/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9421662400038691414.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1828462527457671065.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9421662400038691414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1828462527457671065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25203,0.159828,6436,2,1022,5,8086,6,0,471,5599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EF(AX((((p95==0)||(p85==1))&&(p147==1)))) U (EG(AF(((p119==0)||(p3==1)))) + (p11==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,!((EG(!(EG(!(((p119==0)||(p3==1)))))) + (p11==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((p95==0)||(p85==1))&&(p...311
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, ...393
(forward)formula 0,0,0.844975,21900,1,0,282,66123,363,97,3889,57483,381
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 127 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 127 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 127 transition count 232
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 106 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 106 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 106 transition count 200
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 93 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 93 transition count 187
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 84 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 84 transition count 178
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 77 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 77 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 77 transition count 168
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 74 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 74 transition count 165
Applied a total of 191 rules in 13 ms. Remains 74 /162 variables (removed 88) and now considering 165/277 (removed 112) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:08:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 11/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/232 variables, 74/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 65/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 26867 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 41/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/232 variables, 74/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 65/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 164/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 232/233 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 56975ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56976ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/162 places, 165/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57175 ms. Remains : 74/162 places, 165/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9333746673308517640.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8333972169983102209.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9333746673308517640.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8333972169983102209.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24754,0.135481,5652,2,754,5,5048,6,0,455,3823,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(((p4!=1) + (EX(TRUE) * AF((p47==1))))) U AG(((p15==0)||(p134==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p15==0)||(p134==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p15==0)||(p134==1)))))) U (!(E...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t51, t54, t55, t57, t60,...353
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.994094,21868,1,0,289,68538,360,114,3857,58791,416
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 102 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 102 transitions
Performed 102 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 102
Iterating post reduction 0 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 161 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 102 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 59 transition count 151
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 56 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 55 transition count 147
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 55 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 45 transition count 137
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 36 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 36 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 36 transition count 122
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 278 place count 32 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 32 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 30 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 30 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 32 transition count 84
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 28 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 28 transition count 77
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 35 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 35 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 28 transition count 42
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 23 transition count 37
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 23 transition count 37
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 23 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 23 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 18 transition count 30
Applied a total of 379 rules in 47 ms. Remains 18 /162 variables (removed 144) and now considering 30/277 (removed 247) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:09:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 4/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 24/42 variables, 18/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/43 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 43/43 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1393 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/18 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 22/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 24/42 variables, 18/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 21/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/43 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 43/43 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 603 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2001ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2001ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/162 places, 30/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2132 ms. Remains : 18/162 places, 30/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16873319493103788998.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11527023003023560924.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16873319493103788998.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11527023003023560924.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44,0.007787,4044,2,80,5,457,6,0,97,304,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p46==0)&&(p92==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p46==0)&&(p92==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 26/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.015162,4172,1,0,7,1301,20,2,563,934,8
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 126 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 126 transition count 236
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 126 transition count 231
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 105 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 105 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 105 transition count 198
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 94 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 94 transition count 187
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 87 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 87 transition count 180
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 81 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 81 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 81 transition count 172
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 180 place count 78 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 78 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 78 transition count 168
Applied a total of 184 rules in 10 ms. Remains 78 /162 variables (removed 84) and now considering 168/277 (removed 109) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 78 cols
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:09:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:09:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:09:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:09:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 5/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 161/239 variables, 78/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 65/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 26044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 38/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 161/239 variables, 78/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 65/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 167/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 239/240 variables, and 352 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 56134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56135ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56300 ms. Remains : 78/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5707925475730140728.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7207807318710417359.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5707925475730140728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7207807318710417359.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24758,0.116272,6048,2,875,5,6889,6,0,474,4640,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(EF((p139==1))) U !(((p138==0)||(p61==1)))) U !((EX(TRUE) + (p124==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((EX(TRUE) + (p124==0))))))) * !(E(!(!((EX(TRUE) + (p124==0)))) U (!(E(EX(E(TRUE U (p139==1)))...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t41, t48, t55, t58, t59,...331
(forward)formula 0,0,0.9433,25340,1,0,327,89602,359,140,4091,73795,450
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 127 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 127 transition count 238
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 127 transition count 234
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 106 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 106 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 106 transition count 202
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 94 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 94 transition count 190
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 86 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 86 transition count 182
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 79 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 79 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 79 transition count 172
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 76 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 76 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 76 transition count 168
Applied a total of 188 rules in 9 ms. Remains 76 /162 variables (removed 86) and now considering 168/277 (removed 109) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 161 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 161 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 161 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:10:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 17/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 160/236 variables, 76/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 65/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 237/237 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 48/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 160/236 variables, 76/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 65/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 167/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/237 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60102ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60104ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60276 ms. Remains : 76/162 places, 168/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12540871445694074821.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4396328307669952703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12540871445694074821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4396328307669952703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25584,0.061477,5408,2,868,5,4985,6,0,465,3876,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG((((p177==0)||(p111==1))&&((p25==0)||(p93==1)))) * AX((AG((p93!=0)) * (p5==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * !((((p177==0)||(p111==1))&&((p25==0)||(p93==1)))))] = FALSE * ([(FwdU(EY(FwdU(In...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.081792,5664,1,0,9,5861,9,2,834,4283,2
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 128 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 128 transition count 238
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 128 transition count 235
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 107 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 107 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 107 transition count 204
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 94 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 94 transition count 191
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 85 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 85 transition count 182
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 77 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 77 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 77 transition count 171
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 73 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 73 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 73 transition count 165
Applied a total of 192 rules in 11 ms. Remains 73 /162 variables (removed 89) and now considering 165/277 (removed 112) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 159 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:11:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 14/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/231 variables, 73/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 65/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 5/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/232 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 28580 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 39/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/231 variables, 73/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 65/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 164/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/232 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 58678ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58679ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/162 places, 165/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58854 ms. Remains : 73/162 places, 165/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6294353207147880359.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3283547937202588741.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6294353207147880359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3283547937202588741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25008,0.104,6408,2,928,5,7971,6,0,451,5374,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((EG(((p136==0)||(p86==1))) * EX(TRUE)) * E((p178==1) U (p79==1))) + (p57==1))) + AF((p117==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!((((EG(((p136==0)||(p86==1))) * EX(TRUE)) * E((p178==1) U (p79==1))) + (p57==1))))))),!((p...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, t30, t31,...384
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 163/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.662182,22088,1,0,284,65707,360,102,3914,58998,388
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 277/277 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 126 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 126 transition count 236
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 126 transition count 232
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 105 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 105 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 105 transition count 200
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 92 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 92 transition count 187
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 83 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 83 transition count 178
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 75 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 75 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 75 transition count 167
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 71 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 71 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 71 transition count 161
Applied a total of 198 rules in 8 ms. Remains 71 /162 variables (removed 91) and now considering 161/277 (removed 116) transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 155 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 155 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 155 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 17:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 12/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 154/225 variables, 71/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 65/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 22187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 35/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 154/225 variables, 71/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 65/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 160/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 225/226 variables, and 335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 52274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52275ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/162 places, 161/277 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52444 ms. Remains : 71/162 places, 161/277 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10432288891261685583.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1047438168326149353.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10432288891261685583.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1047438168326149353.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24751,0.08512,5248,2,679,5,4185,6,0,439,2838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((AX((p158==0)) * AG(((p176==0)&&(p93==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((!(EX(!((p158==0)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p176==0)&&(p93==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t31, t32, t55, t60, t64,...342
(forward)formula 0,0,0.397531,11264,1,0,225,31585,339,89,3579,25224,330
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 17:13:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 17:13:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Total runtime 614840 ms.

BK_STOP 1749057223254

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490600033"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-04a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;