Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490500018.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-03a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490500018
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 576K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749051101883

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-03a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 185 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Transformed 148 places.
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Transformed 332 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 148 places and 332 transitions and 1538 arcs in 397 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 32 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 110 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 148 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 129 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 129 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 129 transition count 202
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 123 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 123 transition count 196
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 123 transition count 195
Applied a total of 52 rules in 67 ms. Remains 123 /148 variables (removed 25) and now considering 195/222 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:31:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 396 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 80 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 342 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 790 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:31:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 80 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 192 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 19/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/306 variables, 123/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 79/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/307 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 307/307 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 28128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 21/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/306 variables, 123/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 79/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 194/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 1/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 307/307 variables, and 424 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 58348ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58373ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/148 places, 195/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59267 ms. Remains : 123/148 places, 195/222 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 123 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 57 to 54
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (77 resets) in 2758 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 10/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (96 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 164 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (32 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (83 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (27 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (40 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (45 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (40 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (39 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
[2025-06-04 15:32:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:32:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:32:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 80 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 103/123 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 183/306 variables, 123/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 79/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/307 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 307/307 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved in 430 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 109/123 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/307 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 0 unsolved in 260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/10 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 736ms problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 10 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Computed a total of 26 stabilizing places and 25 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 123 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 117 transition count 187
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 117 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 89 transition count 159
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 75 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 75 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 75 transition count 140
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 66 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 66 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 66 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 60 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 60 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 60 transition count 102
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 52 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 52 transition count 90
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 46 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 46 transition count 84
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 41 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 41 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 41 transition count 78
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 37 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 37 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 37 transition count 69
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 33 transition count 65
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 33 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 33 transition count 64
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 33 transition count 63
Applied a total of 222 rules in 115 ms. Remains 33 /123 variables (removed 90) and now considering 63/195 (removed 132) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 33 cols
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:32:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 16/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 4/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/91 variables, 33/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 41/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 3935 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 21/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 58/91 variables, 33/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 62/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 7273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11241ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11242ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/123 places, 63/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11554 ms. Remains : 33/123 places, 63/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16736270056207478930.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14428968557849616469.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16736270056207478930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14428968557849616469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,347,0.038821,4180,2,253,5,1628,6,0,188,1152,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((EF(((p92==0)||(p147==0))) * AG((p57==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((p92==0)||(p147==0))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p57==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t11, t12, t13, t16, t17, t40, t46, t47, t49, t50, t51, t52, Intersec...244
(forward)formula 0,1,0.168075,7508,1,0,141,15863,148,63,1470,15258,193
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 121 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 57 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 54 transition count 113
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 54 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 43 transition count 102
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 27 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 27 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 27 transition count 75
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 23 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 23 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 23 transition count 52
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 22 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 22 transition count 50
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 22 transition count 46
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 18 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 17 transition count 41
Applied a total of 249 rules in 29 ms. Remains 17 /123 variables (removed 106) and now considering 41/195 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/17 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 35/52 variables, 17/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 18/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/53 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 2205 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/17 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/52 variables, 17/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 18/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 37/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 53/53 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 1928 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4151ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4152ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/123 places, 41/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4254 ms. Remains : 17/123 places, 41/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5835092867514707223.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6770734825934645845.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5835092867514707223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6770734825934645845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39,0.016787,4096,2,97,5,500,6,0,105,325,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((AG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))) + (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))))) + (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102=...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, Intersection with rea...231
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.053096,4608,1,0,106,3112,111,48,845,2981,126
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 121 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 65 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 62 transition count 118
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 56 transition count 115
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 56 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 45 transition count 104
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 31 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 31 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 31 transition count 80
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 27 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 27 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 27 transition count 57
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 26 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 26 transition count 55
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 26 transition count 51
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 22 transition count 47
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 22 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 21 transition count 46
Applied a total of 242 rules in 38 ms. Remains 21 /123 variables (removed 102) and now considering 46/195 (removed 149) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:33:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/21 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 13/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 38/59 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 60/60 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2670 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/21 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 15/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/59 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 42/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 60/60 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5441ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5441ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/123 places, 46/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5578 ms. Remains : 21/123 places, 46/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4167664317839445435.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4972677201338139977.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4167664317839445435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4972677201338139977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41,0.01963,4196,2,102,5,488,6,0,120,326,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((A((p8==1) U (p125==1)) + (p80==1)) + (!(A((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) U (p65==1))) * (((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p10...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!((E(!((p125==1)) U (!((p8==1)) * !((p125==1)))) + EG(!((p125==1))))) + (p80==1)) + (!(!((E(!((p65=...311
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t7, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, t28, Intersection with reachable at ea...219
(forward)formula 0,0,0.059136,4836,1,0,109,3168,127,53,943,3160,139
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 105 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 105 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 105 transition count 169
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 96 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 96 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 96 transition count 154
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 93 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 93 transition count 151
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 90 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 90 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 90 transition count 147
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 88 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 88 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 88 transition count 143
Applied a total of 79 rules in 36 ms. Remains 88 /123 variables (removed 35) and now considering 143/195 (removed 52) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 320 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:33:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 137/225 variables, 88/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 67/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 23607 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 31/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 137/225 variables, 88/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 67/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 142/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/226 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53673ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53674ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/123 places, 143/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54032 ms. Remains : 88/123 places, 143/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10679297494654120653.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7474770167389097225.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10679297494654120653.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7474770167389097225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3926,0.091311,5360,2,920,5,4912,6,0,488,3642,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AF((((p124==0)||(p147==0))&&((p4==0)||(p147==0)))) * (p133==1)) * (p147==1))) + EG(AX((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0))...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0))))))))),!(((!(EG(!((((p124==0)||(p147==0)...219
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, ...314
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.97289,27244,1,0,444,102534,317,263,3294,100774,548
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 106 transition count 170
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 97 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 97 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 97 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 94 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 91 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 89 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 89 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 89 transition count 144
Applied a total of 77 rules in 11 ms. Remains 89 /123 variables (removed 34) and now considering 144/195 (removed 51) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 89 cols
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 7/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 138/227 variables, 89/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 67/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/228 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/228 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 18768 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 34/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/227 variables, 89/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 67/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 143/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/228 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/228 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 48817ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48819ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/123 places, 144/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49159 ms. Remains : 89/123 places, 144/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5554216228797321432.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1367074810173902081.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5554216228797321432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1367074810173902081.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3927,0.106521,5460,2,923,5,4957,6,0,493,3754,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) * (A(AG((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))) U EF((p123==1))) + EX(((p143==...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p123==1)))))) * !(E(!(...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, ...315
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.779709,22516,1,0,258,74194,313,126,3421,59635,376
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 106 transition count 170
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 97 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 97 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 97 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 94 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 91 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 89 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 89 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 89 transition count 145
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 88 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 88 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 88 transition count 143
Applied a total of 79 rules in 12 ms. Remains 88 /123 variables (removed 35) and now considering 143/195 (removed 52) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:34:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 137/225 variables, 88/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 67/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 17569 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 30/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 137/225 variables, 88/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 67/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 142/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/226 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 47611ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47611ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/123 places, 143/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47842 ms. Remains : 88/123 places, 143/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2493116174007063082.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9420638657534250962.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2493116174007063082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9420638657534250962.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3926,0.06329,5440,2,805,5,4579,6,0,488,3370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((E(((p104==1)||(!((p4==1)&&(p147==1)))) U AX(AF((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))))) + A(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102=...413
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX((E(((p104==1)||(!((p4==1)&&(p147==1)))) U !(EX(!(!(EG(!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p...646
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, ...309
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.21771,35320,1,0,448,170959,333,221,3401,133391,648
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 106 transition count 171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 97 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 97 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 97 transition count 157
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 93 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 93 transition count 153
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 89 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 89 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 89 transition count 148
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 86 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 86 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 86 transition count 143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 85 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 85 transition count 142
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 85 transition count 141
Applied a total of 86 rules in 9 ms. Remains 85 /123 variables (removed 38) and now considering 141/195 (removed 54) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 240 ms returned [84]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 327 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/123 places, 141/195 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 74 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 74 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 74 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 70 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 70 transition count 123
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 66 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 66 transition count 119
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 62 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 62 transition count 115
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 58 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 58 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 55 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 55 transition count 108
Applied a total of 62 rules in 11 ms. Remains 55 /84 variables (removed 29) and now considering 108/141 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 55/123 places, 108/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 473 ms. Remains : 55/123 places, 108/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17954300580411143517.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7528691353708815369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17954300580411143517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7528691353708815369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3912,0.046612,4580,2,376,5,2014,6,0,322,1541,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((p37==0) * AG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))))) * EX(AG(AF((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * EX(((p37==0) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t24, t27, t28, t42, t45, t46,...323
(forward)formula 0,0,0.352692,10468,1,0,215,29714,238,88,2267,26679,290
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 107 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 107 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 107 transition count 172
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 99 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 99 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 99 transition count 160
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 95 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 95 transition count 156
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 91 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 91 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 151
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 88 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 88 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 88 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 87 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 87 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 87 transition count 144
Applied a total of 81 rules in 13 ms. Remains 87 /123 variables (removed 36) and now considering 144/195 (removed 51) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 315 ms returned [86]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 416 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/123 places, 144/195 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 76 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 76 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 76 transition count 130
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 72 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 72 transition count 126
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 68 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 68 transition count 122
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 64 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 64 transition count 118
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 60 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 60 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 57 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 57 transition count 111
Applied a total of 62 rules in 6 ms. Remains 57 /86 variables (removed 29) and now considering 111/144 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/123 places, 111/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 560 ms. Remains : 57/123 places, 111/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17606962714695187005.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12769253995385654963.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17606962714695187005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12769253995385654963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3914,0.042663,4624,2,372,5,2021,6,0,333,1434,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EG(((!(E((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))))) * (p77==0)) * (p9==0))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EG(((!(E((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(...205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t26, t42, t45, t46,...330
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.459698,14480,1,0,336,60020,248,163,2327,52579,400
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 105 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 105 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 105 transition count 169
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 95 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 95 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 95 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 92 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 92 transition count 150
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 89 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 89 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 89 transition count 146
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 87 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 87 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 87 transition count 142
Applied a total of 81 rules in 7 ms. Remains 87 /123 variables (removed 36) and now considering 142/195 (removed 53) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:35:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:35:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:35:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:35:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 7/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 136/223 variables, 87/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 66/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/224 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 224/224 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 18963 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, ReadFeed: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 31/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 136/223 variables, 87/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 66/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 141/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 224/224 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, ReadFeed: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 49008ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49009ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/123 places, 142/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49301 ms. Remains : 87/123 places, 142/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6358004568449234970.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7264077275218476054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6358004568449234970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7264077275218476054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3925,0.104593,5548,2,922,5,4790,6,0,483,3582,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EX(((p43==1)&&(p147==1))) U AF((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))))) + E(EF((p125==1)) U !(EG(EF(((p67==1)&&(p147==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,EX(((p43==1)&&(p147==1)))) * !(EG(!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))))))] != FALSE + ...240
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, ...309
(forward)formula 0,1,0.882202,22524,1,0,353,83708,306,151,3137,66223,486
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 107 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 107 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 107 transition count 172
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 99 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 99 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 99 transition count 159
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 96 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 96 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 93 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 93 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 93 transition count 152
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 91 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 91 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 90 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 90 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 90 transition count 147
Applied a total of 75 rules in 11 ms. Remains 90 /123 variables (removed 33) and now considering 147/195 (removed 48) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 141 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 141 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 141 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:36:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 7/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 140/230 variables, 90/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 67/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 231/231 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 22633 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 30/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 140/230 variables, 90/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 67/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 146/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/231 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 52677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52678ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/123 places, 147/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52956 ms. Remains : 90/123 places, 147/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6982388851984267245.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability340052073867797527.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6982388851984267245.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability340052073867797527.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3980,0.067405,5356,2,859,5,4469,6,0,499,3265,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((AX((p73==0)) + EG(((p52==0)||(p147==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(((p52==0)||(p147==0)))))) * !((p73==0)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t23, t25, t27, t29, ...309
(forward)formula 0,1,0.4866,16492,1,0,249,48863,311,116,3196,42979,352
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 106 transition count 170
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 97 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 97 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 97 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 94 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 88 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 88 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 88 transition count 144
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 87 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 87 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 87 transition count 142
Applied a total of 81 rules in 19 ms. Remains 87 /123 variables (removed 36) and now considering 142/195 (removed 53) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 317 ms returned [86]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 447 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/123 places, 142/195 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 75 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 75 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 75 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 71 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 71 transition count 123
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 67 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 67 transition count 119
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 63 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 63 transition count 115
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 59 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 59 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 56 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 56 transition count 108
Applied a total of 64 rules in 10 ms. Remains 56 /86 variables (removed 30) and now considering 108/142 (removed 34) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 56 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:28] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/123 places, 108/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 619 ms. Remains : 56/123 places, 108/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4392730329046559912.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9263790766300651906.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4392730329046559912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9263790766300651906.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3724,0.045673,4588,2,328,5,1765,6,0,327,1280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E((p29==1) U !(AF((EG((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))) * EG((p17==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E((p29==1) U !(!(EG(!((EG((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))) * EG((p17==1))))))))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t40, t43, t44, t46, t49, t50, t52, t55,...304
(forward)formula 0,1,0.248681,8556,1,0,186,18715,241,72,2166,18230,256
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 106 transition count 171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 97 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 97 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 97 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 94 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 94 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 91 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 91 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 89 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 89 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 89 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 88 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 88 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 88 transition count 144
Applied a total of 78 rules in 19 ms. Remains 88 /123 variables (removed 35) and now considering 144/195 (removed 51) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 334 ms returned [87]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/123 places, 144/195 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 76 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 76 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 76 transition count 129
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 72 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 72 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 68 transition count 121
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 64 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 64 transition count 117
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 60 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 60 transition count 113
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 57 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 57 transition count 110
Applied a total of 64 rules in 17 ms. Remains 57 /87 variables (removed 30) and now considering 110/144 (removed 34) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/123 places, 110/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 612 ms. Remains : 57/123 places, 110/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15589735682520296200.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14703770702038321515.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15589735682520296200.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14703770702038321515.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3725,0.044131,4612,2,340,5,1874,6,0,333,1327,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(EX((p129==0))) * (((EF(((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) + AF((p89==1)))) + (p30==0)) + ((p66==0)||(p102==0))) + (p1...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(EX((p129==0)))))] = FALSE * [((((EY(Init) * !((p138==0))) * !(((p66==0)||(p102==0)))) * !((p3...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t40, t44, t45, t47, t50, t51, t53, t56,...310
(forward)formula 0,1,0.360341,10884,1,0,227,31261,250,97,2330,28679,308
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 121 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 63 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 61 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 57 transition count 117
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 56 transition count 116
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 56 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 45 transition count 105
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 29 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 29 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 29 transition count 78
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 25 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 25 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 25 transition count 55
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 24 transition count 54
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 24 transition count 53
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 24 transition count 49
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 20 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 19 transition count 44
Applied a total of 244 rules in 36 ms. Remains 19 /123 variables (removed 104) and now considering 44/195 (removed 151) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 17/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/57 variables, 19/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 18/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/58 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2644 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/57 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 18/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 40/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/58 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2590 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5249ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5249ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/123 places, 44/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5373 ms. Remains : 19/123 places, 44/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability743189674194819880.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8534817516290312990.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability743189674194819880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8534817516290312990.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41,0.038278,4156,2,101,5,461,6,0,116,324,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((EF((p91!=1)) * !(E((p101==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(E(TRUE U (p91!=1)) * !(E((p101==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))))))] ...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t11, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, t28, Intersection wit...236
(forward)formula 0,1,0.069121,4540,1,0,98,2652,114,37,880,2447,113
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 107 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 107 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 107 transition count 173
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 97 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 97 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 97 transition count 157
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 93 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 93 transition count 153
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 89 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 89 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 89 transition count 148
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 86 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 86 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 86 transition count 143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 85 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 85 transition count 142
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 85 transition count 141
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 85 /123 variables (removed 38) and now considering 141/195 (removed 54) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-04 15:37:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:37:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 135/220 variables, 85/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 64/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 23859 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 33/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 135/220 variables, 85/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 64/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 140/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53897ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53898ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/123 places, 141/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54190 ms. Remains : 85/123 places, 141/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2239099140778077233.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16401858113041064162.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2239099140778077233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16401858113041064162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3923,0.09179,5352,2,751,5,4204,6,0,474,3291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AG((EG((p129==1)) + (((A((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1))) U ((p79==1)&&(p147==1))) * (p30==1)) * ((p66==1)&&(p102==1)))...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p101==1))))))) + !(EX(!((p93!=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!((!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U ...582
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, ...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.950786,25412,1,0,371,105910,331,221,3315,100958,503
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 105 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 105 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 105 transition count 169
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 95 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 95 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 95 transition count 153
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 87 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 87 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 87 transition count 144
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 84 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 84 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 84 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 83 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 83 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 83 transition count 137
Applied a total of 90 rules in 12 ms. Remains 83 /123 variables (removed 40) and now considering 137/195 (removed 58) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/123 places, 137/195 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 71 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 71 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 71 transition count 122
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 67 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 67 transition count 118
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 63 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 63 transition count 114
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 59 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 55 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 55 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 52 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 52 transition count 103
Applied a total of 64 rules in 7 ms. Remains 52 /82 variables (removed 30) and now considering 103/137 (removed 34) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/123 places, 103/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 463 ms. Remains : 52/123 places, 103/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5657519448218622563.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability133752502035849911.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5657519448218622563.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability133752502035849911.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3720,0.041273,4508,2,329,5,1740,6,0,306,1269,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||((p102==0)||(p138==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t38, t41, t42, t44, t47, t48, t50, t53,...296
(forward)formula 0,0,0.373941,12316,1,0,307,48078,222,119,2094,39994,400
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 106 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 106 transition count 171
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 98 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 98 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 98 transition count 159
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 94 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 91 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 88 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 88 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 88 transition count 147
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 87 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 87 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 87 transition count 145
Applied a total of 81 rules in 8 ms. Remains 87 /123 variables (removed 36) and now considering 145/195 (removed 50) transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 15:38:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 138/225 variables, 87/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 65/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 23843 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 29/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 138/225 variables, 87/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 65/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 144/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/226 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, ReadFeed: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53895ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53896ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/123 places, 145/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54139 ms. Remains : 87/123 places, 145/195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 145 transitions.
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1745474664358217957.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9933002328135989033.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1745474664358217957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9933002328135989033.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3985,0.071543,5444,2,873,5,4424,6,0,485,3460,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!((((p4==1)&&(p147==1)) + EX((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p138==1)))))) * !((AG((p1==1)) * EF((p110==1)))))) U AF(!(E(!(E(((p...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(E(!(E(((p115==1)&&(p147==1)) U (p137==1))) U E((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p13...633
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t23, t24, t29, ...314
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,1.16038,34516,1,0,398,156445,328,244,3386,147417,545
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 15:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 15:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 463117 ms.

BK_STOP 1749051567451

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-03a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-03a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490500018"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-03a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-03a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;