Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r226-smll-174903490500002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-02a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490500002
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 128K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749048799004

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-02a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 14:53:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 14:53:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 147 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Transformed 204 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 204 transitions and 693 arcs in 396 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 33 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 58 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 146
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 98 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 98 transition count 144
Applied a total of 29 rules in 61 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 144/159 (removed 15) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-04 14:53:22] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 452 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 298 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 823 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:53:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 134/232 variables, 98/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 52/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 20783 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 134/232 variables, 98/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 52/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 143/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 22653 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 43602ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43625ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/112 places, 144/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44573 ms. Remains : 98/112 places, 144/159 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 144 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 62 to 59
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (139 resets) in 1661 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 3/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (58 resets) in 244 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (27 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 89/98 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/233 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 210 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 226ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 144 transitions.
Computed a total of 21 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 84 transition count 125
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 77 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 74 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 68 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 66 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 66 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 100
Applied a total of 72 rules in 23 ms. Remains 66 /98 variables (removed 32) and now considering 100/144 (removed 44) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:54:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 94/160 variables, 66/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 39/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 10388 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/160 variables, 66/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 39/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 99/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 22422 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 32834ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32835ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/98 places, 100/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33052 ms. Remains : 66/98 places, 100/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9714516070841801386.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability770869733125773613.ctl : 10 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9714516070841801386.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability770869733125773613.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,647,0.056492,4340,2,440,5,2205,6,0,357,1594,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(!(((EX((p77==1)) + (p11!=1)) + (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p77==1))))) U EG((E((p29==1) U (p101==1)) * EX((((p30==1)&&(p66=...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(EG((E((p29==1) U (p101==1)) * EX((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))))) U (!(!(((EX((p77==1)...480
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t21, t23, t25, t33, t39, t43, t49,...275
(forward)formula 0,1,0.313239,10100,1,0,219,26133,241,135,2205,27256,302
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 127
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 78 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 77 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 77 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 76 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 76 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 75 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 75 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 74 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 74 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 111
Applied a total of 53 rules in 40 ms. Remains 74 /98 variables (removed 24) and now considering 111/144 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:54:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 105/179 variables, 74/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 43/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 12584 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 105/179 variables, 74/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 43/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 110/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 180/180 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 17368 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 29988ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29991ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/98 places, 111/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30324 ms. Remains : 74/98 places, 111/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8959734147195253701.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3444198369510400522.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8959734147195253701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3444198369510400522.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,655,0.058045,4772,2,542,5,2625,6,0,400,2064,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(AX((A((p104==1) U (p1==1)) + (p60!=1)))) * !(EX((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))))) U AX((AX((A((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)) ...282
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((!((E(!((p1==1)) U (!((p104==1)) * !((p1==1)))) + EG(!((p1==1))))) + (p60!=1)))))))) ...545
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t20, t23, t25, t35, t41, t48, t55, ...278
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.430988,12196,1,0,262,36239,275,174,2480,37310,396
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 84 transition count 126
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 79 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 118
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 77 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 75 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 73 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 71 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 71 transition count 108
Applied a total of 61 rules in 26 ms. Remains 71 /98 variables (removed 27) and now considering 108/144 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 253 ms returned [70]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 108/144 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 64 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 64 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 62 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 62 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 60 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 60 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 58 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 58 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 56 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 56 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 55 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 55 transition count 90
Applied a total of 33 rules in 10 ms. Remains 55 /70 variables (removed 15) and now considering 90/108 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 55/98 places, 90/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 513 ms. Remains : 55/98 places, 90/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15572037826137129229.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15495906348678558080.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15572037826137129229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15495906348678558080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,641,0.036121,4260,2,312,5,1463,6,0,304,1106,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p77==1) U ((A((((!(((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))||(((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&((p102==1)&&(p96==1))))&&(!(((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102=...274
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU(Init,(p77==1)) * ((p66==1)&&(p102==1))) * (p30==1)) * !(EG(!((!(EX(!((p74==1)))) + !((E(!((p1==1)) U ...595
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, t26, t40, t41, t42, t47, t48, t50,...284
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.373006,11556,1,0,276,40818,221,171,1875,38690,348
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 84 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 78 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 76 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 76 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 74 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 72 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 72 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 71 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 71 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 71 transition count 106
Applied a total of 61 rules in 17 ms. Remains 71 /98 variables (removed 27) and now considering 106/144 (removed 38) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 255 ms returned [70]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 347 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 106/144 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 63 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 63 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 60 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 60 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 57 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 57 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 54 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 54 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 51 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 51 transition count 84
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 49 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 49 transition count 82
Applied a total of 45 rules in 17 ms. Remains 49 /70 variables (removed 21) and now considering 82/106 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/98 places, 82/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 516 ms. Remains : 49/98 places, 82/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2174441275905790398.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12159710905512463955.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2174441275905790398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12159710905512463955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,626,0.02995,4212,2,278,5,1306,6,0,273,906,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(((EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||(p102==0))) * (!(E((p58==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))) + EX((p65==0)))) * ((p77==1)||(((p30=...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(((EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||(p102==0))) * (!(E((p58==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))) ...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t21, t22, t36, t39, t40, t42, t45, t46, t51,...284
(forward)formula 0,0,0.288586,9844,1,0,262,36022,187,119,1597,28167,341
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 127
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 79 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 119
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 76 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 76 transition count 116
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 73 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 73 transition count 113
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 70 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 69 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 107
Applied a total of 63 rules in 17 ms. Remains 69 /98 variables (removed 29) and now considering 107/144 (removed 37) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:55:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/170 variables, 69/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 42/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 12954 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 19/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 101/170 variables, 69/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 42/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 106/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 16064 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 29054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/98 places, 107/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29304 ms. Remains : 69/98 places, 107/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability414006121494607134.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2209620704534431742.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability414006121494607134.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2209620704534431742.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,652,0.055034,4620,2,466,5,2452,6,0,376,1837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p68==1) U E(((EX((((p46==1)&&(p111==1))||(p101==1))) + !((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))) + (A((p78==1) U (p108==1)) + E(EF(((p109=...315
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((FwdU(FwdU(Init,(p68==1)),((EX((((p46==1)&&(p111==1))||(p101==1))) + !((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))...1033
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t20, t23, t27, t28, t36, t42,...283
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 105/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.516462,14988,1,0,363,57011,262,169,2459,48208,525
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 85 transition count 127
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 80 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 80 transition count 120
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 77 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 75 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 73 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 73 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 72 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 72 transition count 110
Applied a total of 59 rules in 10 ms. Remains 72 /98 variables (removed 26) and now considering 110/144 (removed 34) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:55:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 109 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:55:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:55:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:55:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 15/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 102/174 variables, 72/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 41/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/175 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 12404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 18/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/174 variables, 72/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 41/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 109/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/175 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 14269 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 26694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26695ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/98 places, 110/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26929 ms. Remains : 72/98 places, 110/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability601405121980684180.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2767891522928677661.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability601405121980684180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2767891522928677661.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,656,0.034042,4624,2,512,5,2357,6,0,387,1862,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||(p102==0))) * (AX((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))) + E((((EX(A(((p25==1)&&(p111==1)) U (p80==1))) + EX((((p3...343
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((((p30==0)||(p66==0))||(p102==0)))))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(E((((EX(!((E(!((p80==1)) U (!(((p2...478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t30, t38, t46, t51, t57,...273
(forward)formula 0,0,0.282883,13200,1,0,258,42926,263,154,2422,43377,364
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 84 transition count 125
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 79 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 77 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 75 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 74 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 74 transition count 111
Applied a total of 54 rules in 10 ms. Remains 74 /98 variables (removed 24) and now considering 111/144 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:56:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 16/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/179 variables, 74/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 43/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 12394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 105/179 variables, 74/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 43/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 110/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 180/180 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 16402 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 28819ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28820ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/98 places, 111/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29064 ms. Remains : 74/98 places, 111/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13269795381671737728.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5558920647580276659.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13269795381671737728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5558920647580276659.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,657,0.058661,4640,2,504,5,2535,6,0,400,1988,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p105==1)&&(p111==1)) U ((p62!=1) * (((p22==1) + EG(((A((p101==1) U (p78==1)) + (p2==1)) + (p73==1)))) + EX(AG(((p43==1)&&(p111==1))))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,((p105==1)&&(p111==1))) * (p62!=1)) * (p22==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG((FwdU(Init,((p105==1)&&(p111==1...383
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/29/30
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t25, t27, t35, t44, t49,...284
(forward)formula 0,0,0.343105,10656,1,0,195,25941,265,103,2500,24579,279
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 82 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 82 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 122
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 74 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 74 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 103
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 95
Applied a total of 78 rules in 10 ms. Remains 63 /98 variables (removed 35) and now considering 95/144 (removed 49) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:56:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/153 variables, 63/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 39/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/154 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 9514 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/153 variables, 63/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 39/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 94/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 154/154 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 15103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 24643ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24644ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/98 places, 95/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24898 ms. Remains : 63/98 places, 95/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16090597854848488778.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18414361642512009484.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16090597854848488778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18414361642512009484.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,628,0.048627,4652,2,420,5,2203,6,0,341,1772,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AF(((!(E((p65==1) U (p34==1))) * (p43==1)) * (p111==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EG(!(((!(E((p65==1) U (p34==1))) * (p43==1)) * (p111==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t18, t20, t22, t30, t36, t40, t46, ...268
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.314707,9900,1,0,215,23980,219,128,2116,25637,275
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 84 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 78 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 76 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 76 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 75 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 74 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 73 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 73 transition count 109
Applied a total of 56 rules in 17 ms. Remains 73 /98 variables (removed 25) and now considering 109/144 (removed 35) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 281 ms returned [72]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/98 places, 109/144 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 65 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 65 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 65 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 62 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 62 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 59 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 59 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 56 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 56 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 53 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 53 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 52 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 52 transition count 86
Applied a total of 43 rules in 5 ms. Remains 52 /72 variables (removed 20) and now considering 86/109 (removed 23) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/98 places, 86/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 543 ms. Remains : 52/98 places, 86/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10568784102935631236.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12458869371690654087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10568784102935631236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12458869371690654087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,629,0.034475,4236,2,325,5,1526,6,0,289,1249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(AG(((AG((p72==1)) + (p58==1)) + (p5==1)))) + ((A(AG(((p5==1)||(p91==1))) U AG(!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))))) * (p30==1)) *...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !((p72==1)))) + (p58==1)) + (p5==1))))))] != FALSE + [((((Fwd...447
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t22, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t48,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.225814,8716,1,0,180,21472,203,89,1847,19611,249
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 82 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 82 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 122
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 74 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 74 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 103
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 95
Applied a total of 78 rules in 10 ms. Remains 63 /98 variables (removed 35) and now considering 95/144 (removed 49) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/98 places, 95/144 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 54 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 54 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 54 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 51 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 51 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 48 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 48 transition count 78
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 45 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 45 transition count 75
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 42 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 42 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 40 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 40 transition count 70
Applied a total of 47 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /62 variables (removed 22) and now considering 70/95 (removed 25) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 66 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 40 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 66 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/98 places, 70/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 392 ms. Remains : 40/98 places, 70/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2836677380677453833.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14520859019495451270.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2836677380677453833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14520859019495451270.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,572,0.02313,4180,2,228,5,1110,6,0,226,841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(A(!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))) U (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))) * (!(!((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)))) * !...277
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/27
(forward)formula 0,0,0.097324,5844,1,0,29,9137,20,2,1116,8182,29
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 90 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 90 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 90 transition count 134
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 85 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 85 transition count 128
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 83 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 83 transition count 126
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 81 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 81 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 79 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 79 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 77 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 118
Applied a total of 45 rules in 6 ms. Remains 77 /98 variables (removed 21) and now considering 118/144 (removed 26) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:57:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 13/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 110/187 variables, 77/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 43/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 188/188 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 12553 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 14/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 110/187 variables, 77/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 43/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 117/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 188/188 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 16221 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 28796ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28797ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/98 places, 118/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29053 ms. Remains : 77/98 places, 118/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12915804608892962983.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5124143660205867215.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12915804608892962983.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5124143660205867215.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,661,0.051336,4716,2,521,5,2465,6,0,415,1709,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p10==1)&&(p111==1))) * A(((((p8==1) + AF((p104!=1))) * ((((((p108==1)||((p97==1)&&(p111==1))) * EX((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1)...474
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U ((p10==1)&&(p111==1)))) * !(EG(!(!((E(!(((EX((p77==1)) + E((((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))...2123
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t19, t20, t21, t24, t28, t38, t45, t51, t59, t107...286
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.492512,13292,1,0,221,41948,279,129,2647,37863,339
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 144/144 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 85 transition count 126
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 80 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 80 transition count 118
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 78 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 76 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 76 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 74 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 74 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 72 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 72 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 108
Applied a total of 58 rules in 15 ms. Remains 72 /98 variables (removed 26) and now considering 108/144 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 14:57:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 102/174 variables, 72/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 43/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/175 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 12462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 19/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/174 variables, 72/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 43/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 107/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 14:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/175 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 18283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 30763ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30763ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/98 places, 108/144 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31045 ms. Remains : 72/98 places, 108/144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6421828592260990037.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7471755187700569079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6421828592260990037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7471755187700569079.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,653,0.036807,4624,2,488,5,2567,6,0,389,2079,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((p41==0))) * EX(A(((A((p101==1) U ((p50==1)&&(p111==1))) + (((p30==1)&&(p66==1))&&(p102==1))) + ((p71==1)&&(p111==1))) U ((EX(((p8...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((p41==0))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EX(!((E(!(((EX(((p88==1)&&(p111==1))) * (p49!=1)) * (((...625
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t25, t28, t36, t42, t47, ...283
(forward)formula 0,0,0.203873,10512,1,0,187,25232,248,98,2399,23088,268
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 14:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 14:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 287213 ms.

BK_STOP 1749049089111

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-02a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-02a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r226-smll-174903490500002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-02a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-02a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;