fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r217-tall-174902002400067
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-020B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 34225.00 0.00 0.00 T normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r217-tall-174902002400067.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-020B, examination is QuasiLiveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400067
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 664K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 244K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749073382741

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=QuasiLiveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-020B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
QuasiLiveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, QuasiLiveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 125 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Transformed 803 places.
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Transformed 903 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 803 places and 903 transitions and 2880 arcs in 249 ms.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 803/803 places, 903/903 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 81 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 81 transitions
Performed 81 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 81
Iterating post reduction 0 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 803 transition count 822
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 722 transition count 822
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 722 transition count 722
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 622 transition count 722
Performed 320 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 320
Deduced a syphon composed of 320 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 320 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 640 rules applied. Total rules applied 1002 place count 302 transition count 402
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Applied a total of 1002 rules in 138 ms. Remains 302 /803 variables (removed 501) and now considering 402/903 (removed 501) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 402 rows 302 cols
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 81 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 434 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 386 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 860 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 401 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 301/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/302 variables, 81/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 227 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 225 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 234 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 188 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 20/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30201ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30226ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 302/803 places, 402/903 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 31253 ms. Remains : 302/803 places, 402/903 transitions.
Discarding 120 transitions out of 402. Remains 282
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (144 resets) in 2037 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/281 properties
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8510142580409173079.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11366687892970455383.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8510142580409173079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11366687892970455383.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 282 properties.
FORMULA QuasiLiveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Total runtime 32672 ms.

BK_STOP 1749073416966

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ QuasiLiveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-020B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="QuasiLiveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-020B, examination is QuasiLiveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400067"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-020B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-020B execution
cd execution
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "QuasiLiveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' QuasiLiveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;