About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-020A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 64024.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | T | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r217-tall-174902002400062.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-020A, examination is QuasiLiveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400062
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749073365458
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=QuasiLiveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-020A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
QuasiLiveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 21:42:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, QuasiLiveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-04 21:42:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Transformed 283 places.
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Transformed 383 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 283 places and 383 transitions and 1840 arcs in 214 ms.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 283/283 places, 383/383 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 282 transition count 382
Applied a total of 2 rules in 40 ms. Remains 282 /283 variables (removed 1) and now considering 382/383 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 382 rows 282 cols
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Computed 81 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 486 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 491 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1025 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 381 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 281/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/282 variables, 81/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 20/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 11/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 282/664 variables, and 497 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 282/282 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 81/81 constraints, State Equation: 0/282 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 381/381 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 281/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/282 variables, 81/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 134/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 3/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 382/664 variables, 282/784 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 381/1165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 664/664 variables, and 1168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 282/282 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 81/81 constraints, State Equation: 282/282 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 381/381 constraints, Known Traps: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60240ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 381 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60256ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 282/283 places, 382/383 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 61346 ms. Remains : 282/283 places, 382/383 transitions.
Discarding 120 transitions out of 382. Remains 262
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 115 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11947013697960365893.gal : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14757627153610568775.prop : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11947013697960365893.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14757627153610568775.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14757627153610568775.prop.
Reachability property qltransition_276 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_121 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,259 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :3 after 5
Reachability property qltransition_270 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_124 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,257 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :5 after 8
Reachability property qltransition_132 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,256 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :8 after 11
Reachability property qltransition_262 is true.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (144 resets) in 3251 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/261 properties
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
Reachability property qltransition_140 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,254 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :11 after 14
Reachability property qltransition_254 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,253 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :14 after 17
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 262 properties.
FORMULA QuasiLiveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK DECISION_DIAGRAMS COLLATERAL_PROCESSING TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Total runtime 62581 ms.
BK_STOP 1749073429482
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ QuasiLiveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-020A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="QuasiLiveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-020A, examination is QuasiLiveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400062"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-020A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-020A execution
cd execution
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "QuasiLiveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;