About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-010A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 63378.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | T | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r217-tall-174902002400052.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is QuasiLiveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400052
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749073335460
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=QuasiLiveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-010A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
QuasiLiveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, QuasiLiveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 79 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Transformed 143 places.
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Transformed 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 143 places and 193 transitions and 920 arcs in 187 ms.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 29 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 338 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 324 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 704 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 15/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 9/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 5/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 192/334 variables, 142/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 8/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 1/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 1/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 9/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 4/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 2/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 6/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 1/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 20/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 5/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 0.0)
(t1 0.0)
(t2 3.0)
(t3 2.0)
(t4 2.0)
(t5 0.0)
(t6 0.0)
(t7 1.0)
(t8 1.0)
(t9 0.0)
(t10 1.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 1.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 2.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 0.0)
(t19 1.0)
(t20 1.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 1.0)
(t23 0.0)
(t24 0.0)
(t25 0.0)
(t26 1.0)
(t27 0.0)
(t28 2.0)
(t29 0.0)
(t30 timeout
0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 453 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 126/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 192/334 variables, 142/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 191/649 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 2/651 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 1/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 652 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60153ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 192/193 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 60912 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 192/193 transitions.
Discarding 60 transitions out of 192. Remains 132
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
RANDOM walk for 32294 steps (225 resets) in 1283 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 0/131 properties
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4786332809133994079.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11511459511562350679.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4786332809133994079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11511459511562350679.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 132 properties.
FORMULA QuasiLiveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Total runtime 61920 ms.
BK_STOP 1749073398838
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ QuasiLiveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-010A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="QuasiLiveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is QuasiLiveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002400052"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-010A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-010A execution
cd execution
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "QuasiLiveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;