About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-004B
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 39739.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | T | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r217-tall-174902002300037.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004B, examination is QuasiLiveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002300037
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 576K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 171K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749073300540
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=QuasiLiveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
QuasiLiveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 21:41:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, QuasiLiveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-04 21:41:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 68 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 163 places.
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 183 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 163 places and 183 transitions and 576 arcs in 191 ms.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 163/163 places, 183/183 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 163 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 146 transition count 166
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 146 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 126 transition count 146
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 62 transition count 82
Applied a total of 202 rules in 68 ms. Remains 62 /163 variables (removed 101) and now considering 82/183 (removed 101) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 428 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 61/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 17/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 4/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 82/144 variables, 62/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 12/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 9/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 144/144 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 7047 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 61/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 51/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 7/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 82/144 variables, 62/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 81/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 45 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 144/144 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 37152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37162ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 62/163 places, 82/183 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 37683 ms. Remains : 62/163 places, 82/183 transitions.
Discarding 24 transitions out of 82. Remains 58
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
RANDOM walk for 7236 steps (113 resets) in 321 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 0/57 properties
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13169756061328403004.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11209464839298336934.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13169756061328403004.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11209464839298336934.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 58 properties.
FORMULA QuasiLiveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Total runtime 38248 ms.
BK_STOP 1749073340279
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ QuasiLiveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="QuasiLiveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004B, examination is QuasiLiveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r217-tall-174902002300037"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "QuasiLiveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;