Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994900722.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is SmartHome-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900722
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 116K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749246609796

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SmartHome-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 21:50:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Transformed 213 places.
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Transformed 245 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 213 places and 245 transitions and 557 arcs in 154 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 18 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 196 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 196/196 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 173 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 173 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 173 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 172 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 172 transition count 201
Applied a total of 50 rules in 34 ms. Remains 172 /196 variables (removed 24) and now considering 201/227 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 380 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:50:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 131 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 201/373 variables, 172/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 11642 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 11/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 201/373 variables, 172/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 200/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 4/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 2/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 1/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 2/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 1/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/373 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41730ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41748ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/196 places, 201/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42180 ms. Remains : 172/196 places, 201/227 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 172 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 21:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 172 places (down from 94) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (274 resets) in 1391 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 5/78 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (50 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (57 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (53 resets) in 136 ms. (291 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (50 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
[2025-06-06 21:50:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 136/141 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/172 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/373 variables, 172/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 396 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 74/77 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 95/172 variables, 7/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 201/373 variables, 172/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/373 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 242 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 643ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 75 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 172 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 166 edges and 172 vertex of which 71 / 172 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 66 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 88 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 88 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 106 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 66 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 64
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 61
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 44 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 44 transition count 46
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 44 transition count 43
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 28 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 82 edges and 28 vertex of which 26 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 26 transition count 19
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 26 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 21 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 20 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 6 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 17 transition count 9
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 13 transition count 9
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 13 transition count 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 10 transition count 6
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 8 transition count 5
Applied a total of 205 rules in 25 ms. Remains 8 /172 variables (removed 164) and now considering 5/201 (removed 196) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 8/172 places, 5/201 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 12 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
Computed a total of 26 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 144 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 144 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 144 transition count 171
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 133 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 133 transition count 160
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 125 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 125 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 125 transition count 151
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 122 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 122 transition count 148
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 121 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 121 transition count 147
Applied a total of 105 rules in 23 ms. Remains 121 /172 variables (removed 51) and now considering 147/201 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:50:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 147/268 variables, 121/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 5338 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 147/268 variables, 121/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 146/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 20573 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 25930ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25930ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/172 places, 147/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26072 ms. Remains : 121/172 places, 147/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10418374784525093312.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12090210968316315449.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10418374784525093312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12090210968316315449.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0911e+08,0.184595,11552,2,2207,5,35842,6,0,633,34761,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((EX(EG((p38!=1))) * !(EG(((p172!=1)||(p148==1))))) * (EG(A((p9==1) U (p10==1))) * EG(((p209==1)&&(p212==1))))) * (((p88==1) + A(((p65...265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((EX(EG((p38!=1))) * !(EG(((p172!=1)||(p148==1))))) * (EG(!((E(!((p10==1)) U (!((p9==1)) * !((p10==...479
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t9, t12, t33, t35, t66, t86, t104, t110, t124, t125, t126, Intersection with reachab...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,21.7911,742940,1,0,2141,4.72922e+06,373,1108,3959,4.73939e+06,2426
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 139 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 139 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 139 transition count 165
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 128 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 128 transition count 154
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 118 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 118 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 118 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 114 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 114 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 113 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 113 transition count 138
Applied a total of 122 rules in 12 ms. Remains 113 /172 variables (removed 59) and now considering 138/201 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-06 21:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:51:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 137 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/251 variables, 113/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved in 4638 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/251 variables, 113/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 137/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved in 7632 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12281ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12281ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/172 places, 138/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12411 ms. Remains : 113/172 places, 138/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11948015486143510828.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1625609339076202571.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11948015486143510828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1625609339076202571.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85312e+08,0.093505,7984,2,1561,5,18910,6,0,592,17579,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(EX(((p141==1) + !(A((p196==1) U (p15==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((p141==1) + !(!((E(!((p15==1)) U (!((p196==1)) * !((p15==1)))) + EG(!((p15==1)))))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t11, t31, t63, t83, t103, t118, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...201
(forward)formula 0,0,3.77867,131696,1,0,525,809886,308,300,3334,786633,668
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 146 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 146 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 146 transition count 172
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 139 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 139 transition count 165
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 133 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 133 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 132 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 132 transition count 158
Applied a total of 83 rules in 15 ms. Remains 132 /172 variables (removed 40) and now considering 158/201 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-06 21:51:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:51:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:51:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:51:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/290 variables, 132/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 6177 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/290 variables, 132/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 157/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 4/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 290/290 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 14246 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 20436ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20437ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/172 places, 158/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20574 ms. Remains : 132/172 places, 158/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5323908383826704653.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8732210506864282705.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5323908383826704653.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8732210506864282705.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.72242e+08,0.192204,12572,2,3027,5,40829,6,0,688,35880,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((!(E((p131==1) U (p45==1))) * (p74==0)) * ((p96==0)&&(p192==1))))) * (E(((EF((p152!=1)) + ((!((p15==1)||((p2==1)&&(p73==1))))&&(p...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E((p131==1) U (p45==1))) * (p74==0)) * ((p96==0)&&(p192==1)))))))),((E...563
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t10, t11, t14, t41, t77, t101, t122, t138, Intersection with reachable at each step ...213
(forward)formula 0,0,16.3195,529828,1,0,953,3.64029e+06,373,520,4047,2.89682e+06,1145
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 142 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 142 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 142 transition count 168
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 132 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 132 transition count 158
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 123 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 123 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 123 transition count 148
Applied a total of 102 rules in 17 ms. Remains 123 /172 variables (removed 49) and now considering 148/201 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-06 21:52:36] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:52:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/271 variables, 123/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 5289 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/271 variables, 123/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 147/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 14332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 19633ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19634ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/172 places, 148/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19766 ms. Remains : 123/172 places, 148/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13828060081336069187.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16884702351832202065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13828060081336069187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16884702351832202065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27147e+08,0.11468,9248,2,2406,5,24719,6,0,642,23215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((!((EG((p46==1)) * (p153!=1))) + (A(((p87==1)||(p93==1)) U (p63!=1)) * ((p164!=1)||(((p151==1)&&(p211==1))&&(p41==1))))) U !(((EF((p7...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E((!((EG((p46==1)) * (p153!=1))) + (!((E(!((p63!=1)) U (!(((p87==1)||(p93==1))) * !((p63!=1)))) + EG...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t9, t12, t36, t69, t91, t92, t112, t113, t128, Intersection with reachable at each s...217
(forward)formula 0,1,2.35256,87312,1,0,311,504879,346,189,3990,411268,463
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 140 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 140 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 140 transition count 166
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 129 transition count 155
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 122 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 122 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 122 transition count 147
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 120 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 120 transition count 145
Applied a total of 108 rules in 14 ms. Remains 120 /172 variables (removed 52) and now considering 145/201 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-06 21:52:58] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:52:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:52:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 145/265 variables, 120/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 5138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 145/265 variables, 120/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 144/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 4/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 9845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14997ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14997ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/172 places, 145/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15137 ms. Remains : 120/172 places, 145/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 145 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2681095862870074934.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability483217402359393336.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2681095862870074934.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability483217402359393336.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.03883e+08,0.100935,8460,2,1812,5,21367,6,0,627,19180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(AF((!(AF((p148==1))) + (p50==1)))) U E(!(((!((p154==1)||(p156==1)))&&(p119==1))) U A(((EF(((p65==1)||(p178==1))) + (p143==1)) + (p40...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(((!((p154==1)||(p156==1)))&&(p119==1))) U !((E(!((p32==1)) U (!(((E(TRUE U ((p65==1)||(p178...642
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t12, t35, t36, t68, t88, t109, t110, t125, Intersection with reachable at each step ...213
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,21.8619,610944,1,0,1736,4.06125e+06,342,962,3908,3.96368e+06,1887
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 172 vertex of which 62 / 172 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 57 places
Ensure Unique test removed 72 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 72 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 114 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 70 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 66 transition count 75
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 66 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 62 transition count 71
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 47 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 47 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 47 transition count 53
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 33 transition count 39
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 33 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 32 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 30 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 14 edges and 29 vertex of which 2 / 29 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 28 transition count 30
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 28 transition count 28
Applied a total of 185 rules in 25 ms. Remains 28 /172 variables (removed 144) and now considering 28/201 (removed 173) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 28 cols
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 15 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/28 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/51 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/52 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/28 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/51 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 15/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/52 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 411ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 411ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/172 places, 28/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 510 ms. Remains : 28/172 places, 28/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16945831334349765598.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14841925223571350070.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16945831334349765598.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14841925223571350070.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4160,0.015677,4092,2,239,5,1658,6,0,138,1339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((AF((p170==0)) * EF((p113==1))) * AF((p79==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((!(EG(!((p170==0)))) * E(TRUE U (p113==1))) * !(EG(!((p79==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
(forward)formula 0,1,0.053117,6140,1,0,62,12705,88,37,821,10327,94
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 164 edges and 172 vertex of which 66 / 172 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 61 places
Ensure Unique test removed 76 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 76 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 110 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 69 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 65 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 64 transition count 73
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 64 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 61 transition count 70
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 44 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 44 transition count 53
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 44 transition count 50
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 30 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 30 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 28 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 26 transition count 26
Applied a total of 181 rules in 24 ms. Remains 26 /172 variables (removed 146) and now considering 26/201 (removed 175) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 26 cols
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 13 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/47 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/48 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 158 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/47 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 13/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/48 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 338ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 338ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/172 places, 26/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 429 ms. Remains : 26/172 places, 26/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4861538158414746385.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1757965966449310653.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4861538158414746385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1757965966449310653.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2592,0.007015,3932,2,102,5,440,6,0,128,334,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p141==1)&&(p62==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p141==1)&&(p62==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.029251,4956,1,0,40,5810,20,36,637,7461,43
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 146 edges and 172 vertex of which 30 / 172 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 26 places
Ensure Unique test removed 33 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 33 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 145 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 94 transition count 102
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 86 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 80 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 79 transition count 93
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 79 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 72 transition count 86
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 55 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 5 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 55 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 55 transition count 64
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 41 transition count 50
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 41 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 40 transition count 43
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 40 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 38 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 37 transition count 41
Applied a total of 234 rules in 23 ms. Remains 37 /172 variables (removed 135) and now considering 41/201 (removed 160) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/37 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/74 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 74/75 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/37 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/74 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 29/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 74/75 variables, and 77 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 576 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1043ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/172 places, 41/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1134 ms. Remains : 37/172 places, 41/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11326560427375009387.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14147048522083626437.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11326560427375009387.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14147048522083626437.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,29664,0.015916,4084,2,327,5,1565,6,0,187,1118,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(((p136==1) * !(((EF((p106==1)) * AG((p175==1))) * ((p98==1)&&(p151==1)))))) U EF(EG(((p168==1)||((p143==1)&&(p72==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((p136==1) * !(((E(TRUE U (p106==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p175==1))))) * ((p98==1)&...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :...164
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 34/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.054182,6132,1,0,60,10800,116,37,1230,9259,102
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 144 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 144 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 144 transition count 170
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 136 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 136 transition count 162
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 129 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 129 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 129 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 127 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 127 transition count 152
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 126 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 126 transition count 151
Applied a total of 96 rules in 14 ms. Remains 126 /172 variables (removed 46) and now considering 151/201 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 151/277 variables, 126/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/277 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 277/277 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 5690 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 151/277 variables, 126/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 150/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 3/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/277 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 277/277 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 10158 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 15858ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15859ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/172 places, 151/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15987 ms. Remains : 126/172 places, 151/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11987472018376211038.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11919555034464298446.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11987472018376211038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11919555034464298446.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.64023e+08,0.126017,10156,2,2538,5,28995,6,0,657,24738,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((((!(AX((p183==1))) * ((EX((p91==1)) + (p54==1)) + (p78==1))) * !(((p96==1)||(p52==1)))) + !(A(((p34==1)&&(p184==1)) U ((p64==1)||(p...257
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!((((!(!(EX(!((p183==1))))) * ((EX((p91==1)) + (p54==1)) + (p78==1))) * !(((p96==1)||(p52==1)))) + ...424
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t15, t35, t39, t71, t95, t131, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (de...200
(forward)formula 0,0,10.6238,365212,1,0,782,2.28825e+06,358,496,3881,2.26119e+06,1083
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 139 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 139 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 139 transition count 165
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 127 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 127 transition count 153
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 117 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 117 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 117 transition count 142
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 113 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 113 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 112 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 112 transition count 137
Applied a total of 124 rules in 16 ms. Remains 112 /172 variables (removed 60) and now considering 137/201 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-06 21:54:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 136 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/249 variables, 112/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 4648 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/249 variables, 112/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 136/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 9575 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14233ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14234ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/172 places, 137/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14366 ms. Remains : 112/172 places, 137/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5603410812239124405.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability719259466665516142.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5603410812239124405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability719259466665516142.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76705e+08,0.094724,7848,2,1490,5,18519,6,0,587,16755,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX((p34==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p34==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t11, t31, t63, t83, t117, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroy...195
(forward)formula 0,0,1.07209,49208,1,0,195,256833,299,131,3641,193239,320
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 141 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 141 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 141 transition count 167
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 129 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 129 transition count 155
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 119 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 119 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 119 transition count 144
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 115 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 115 transition count 140
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 114 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 114 transition count 139
Applied a total of 120 rules in 8 ms. Remains 114 /172 variables (removed 58) and now considering 139/201 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 114 cols
[2025-06-06 21:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:54:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 138 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 139/253 variables, 114/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 253/253 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 4647 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 139/253 variables, 114/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 138/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 253/253 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 10130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14789ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/172 places, 139/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14911 ms. Remains : 114/172 places, 139/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10080464039970132206.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16485775944954271628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10080464039970132206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16485775944954271628.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00892e+08,0.100144,8116,2,1633,5,19372,6,0,597,17722,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E(!(EX((p103==1))) U ((EF((p133==1)) + EG((p197==1))) * A(((p119==1)||(p11==1)) U EG((p58==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EX((p103==1)))) * (E(TRUE U (p133==1)) + EG((p197==1)))) * !(EG(!(EG((p58==1)))))) * !(E(!(E...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t9, t11, t31, t63, t65, t84, t119, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled....204
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,11.9856,345612,1,0,838,1.69818e+06,324,564,3721,2.506e+06,956
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 143 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 143 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 143 transition count 169
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 134 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 134 transition count 160
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 127 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 127 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 127 transition count 152
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 126 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 126 transition count 151
Applied a total of 96 rules in 9 ms. Remains 126 /172 variables (removed 46) and now considering 151/201 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-06 21:54:47] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:54:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:54:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 151/277 variables, 126/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/277 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 277/277 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 6005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 151/277 variables, 126/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 150/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/277 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 277/277 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 16543 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 22560ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22560ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/172 places, 151/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22674 ms. Remains : 126/172 places, 151/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11443386744136669681.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9275408712089393414.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11443386744136669681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9275408712089393414.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46703e+08,0.139615,10412,2,2608,5,30647,6,0,657,25704,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EG(!(((p167==1)||(p105==1)))) U ((((p156==1) + ((EX((p146==1)) * !(((p14==1)&&(p67==1)))) * (p129==1))) * (p2==1)) * (p73==1))) + AG((...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(EG(!(((p167==1)||(p105==1)))) U ((((p156==1) + ((EX((p146==1)) * !(((p14==1)&&(p67==1)))) * (...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t12, t37, t40, t77, t97, t131, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (de...200
(forward)formula 0,1,5.75488,196356,1,0,623,1.24151e+06,337,355,3660,1.15469e+06,763
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 139 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 139 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 139 transition count 165
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 128 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 128 transition count 154
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 118 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 118 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 118 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 114 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 114 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 113 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 113 transition count 138
Applied a total of 122 rules in 13 ms. Remains 113 /172 variables (removed 59) and now considering 138/201 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-06 21:55:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:55:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 137 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/251 variables, 113/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved in 4701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/251 variables, 113/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 137/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved in 7758 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12466ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12466ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/172 places, 138/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12593 ms. Remains : 113/172 places, 138/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16065464184481851605.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9076732215276735398.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16065464184481851605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9076732215276735398.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85312e+08,0.092134,7984,2,1561,5,18910,6,0,592,17579,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((A(EF((p32!=1)) U AG(!(((p2==1)&&(p104==1))))) + AF(AX((p37==1)))) + EG(EX((((p2==1)&&(p183==1))||(p13==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p2==1)&&(p104==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p2==1)&&(p104==1))))...364
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t11, t31, t63, t83, t103, t118, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...201
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,1.17337,52488,1,0,220,278023,316,150,3688,213082,359
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 141 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 141 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 141 transition count 167
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 130 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 130 transition count 156
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 121 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 121 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 121 transition count 146
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 118 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 118 transition count 143
Applied a total of 112 rules in 4 ms. Remains 118 /172 variables (removed 54) and now considering 143/201 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-06 21:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:55:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/261 variables, 118/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/261 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 261/261 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 4955 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/261 variables, 118/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 142/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 4/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/261 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 261/261 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 9280 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14241ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14242ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/172 places, 143/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14361 ms. Remains : 118/172 places, 143/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9114139577566232037.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4373834733210209537.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9114139577566232037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4373834733210209537.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.90305e+08,0.1073,8324,2,1570,5,19531,6,0,617,18695,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p42==1) U (EX(!(AG((p72==1)))) + !(AF(AG((p152==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,(p42==1))),TRUE) * !((p72==1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(p42==1)),!(!(E(TRUE U !((p152=...174
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 137/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.166092,8964,1,0,11,22127,17,2,1207,21510,7
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 201/201 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 139 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 139 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 139 transition count 165
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 127 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 127 transition count 153
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 117 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 117 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 117 transition count 142
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 113 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 113 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 112 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 112 transition count 137
Applied a total of 124 rules in 12 ms. Remains 112 /172 variables (removed 60) and now considering 137/201 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 136 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/249 variables, 112/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 4582 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/249 variables, 112/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 136/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 9561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14151ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14151ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/172 places, 137/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14272 ms. Remains : 112/172 places, 137/201 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11371363527629905920.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2550109808417337313.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11371363527629905920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2550109808417337313.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76705e+08,0.090381,7844,2,1490,5,18519,6,0,587,16755,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((E(!(EX(!(((p183==1)&&(p193==1))))) U EF(AG((p73==1)))) * EF((p86==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(!(EX(!(((p183==1)&&(p193==1))))) U E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p73==1))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init)...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t9, t11, t31, t63, t83, t117, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroy...195
(forward)formula 0,0,0.594589,28700,1,0,174,118571,302,118,3474,100385,293
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-06 21:55:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:55:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 348302 ms.

BK_STOP 1749246959345

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SmartHome-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SmartHome-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900722"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SmartHome-PT-05.tgz
mv SmartHome-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;