Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994900714.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is SmartHome-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900714
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 146K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749246051014

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SmartHome-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 54 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Transformed 139 places.
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Transformed 159 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 139 places and 159 transitions and 361 arcs in 136 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 19 transitions.
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 58 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 105 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 104 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 104 transition count 122
Applied a total of 36 rules in 21 ms. Remains 104 /122 variables (removed 18) and now considering 122/140 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/226 variables, 104/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 4487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/226 variables, 104/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 121/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 4/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/226 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 12213 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 16751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16763ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/122 places, 122/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17108 ms. Remains : 104/122 places, 122/140 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 104 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:09] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 21:41:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 104 places (down from 58) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (411 resets) in 1386 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 8/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (103 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (111 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (100 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (94 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 6/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (59 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (78 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 122/226 variables, 104/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 226/226 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved in 94 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 72/76 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/104 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/226 variables, 104/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/226 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/226 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/6 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 222ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 92 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=92 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 6 ms.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 14 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 84 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 84 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 81 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 79 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 79 transition count 94
Applied a total of 53 rules in 18 ms. Remains 79 /104 variables (removed 25) and now considering 94/122 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/173 variables, 79/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 2294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/173 variables, 79/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 93/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 4876 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7179ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7181ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/104 places, 94/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7278 ms. Remains : 79/104 places, 94/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9770081019852041137.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10369536125458376391.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9770081019852041137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10369536125458376391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,379301,0.037269,4996,2,659,5,5519,6,0,412,4513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((p15!=1) U ((AF((((p70==1)&&(p104==1))||(p115==1))) * !(AG(((p83==1)&&(p137==1))))) * (!(AG((p96==1))) + AX((p136==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p15!=1) U ((!(EG(!((((p70==1)&&(p104==1))||(p115==1))))) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((p83==1)&&(p...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t11, t32, t80, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,0,0.971467,48064,1,0,564,297544,226,307,2402,250453,679
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 90 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 90 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 87 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 87 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 85 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 85 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 84 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 84 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 83 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 83 transition count 99
Applied a total of 44 rules in 21 ms. Remains 83 /104 variables (removed 21) and now considering 99/122 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 99/182 variables, 83/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 2462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 99/182 variables, 83/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 98/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 6585 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/104 places, 99/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9184 ms. Remains : 83/104 places, 99/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13644702767317309085.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12281466695257767992.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13644702767317309085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12281466695257767992.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,613426,0.050236,6148,2,911,5,10990,6,0,433,9298,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG(A((p8==1) U (p6==1))) * A((p38==1) U !((((p83==1)&&(p129==1))||(p24==1))))) * ((p104==1)&&(p127==1))) * ((p83==0) + AX(FALSE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG(!((E(!((p6==1)) U (!((p8==1)) * !((p6==1)))) + EG(!((p6==1)))))) * !((E(!(!((((p83==1...643
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t11, t32, t61, t83, t84, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.20219,56320,1,0,424,350796,242,237,2542,310600,530
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 78 edges and 104 vertex of which 23 / 104 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 7 ms
Free SCC test removed 22 places
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 82 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 57 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 54 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 52 transition count 61
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 52 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 47 transition count 56
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 38 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 38 transition count 47
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 38 transition count 43
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 37 transition count 42
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 28 transition count 33
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 28 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 27 transition count 30
Applied a total of 121 rules in 32 ms. Remains 27 /104 variables (removed 77) and now considering 30/122 (removed 92) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 27 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/56 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/57 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 57/57 variables, and 43 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/56 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 29/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/57 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 57/57 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 810 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 1566ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1568ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/104 places, 30/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1675 ms. Remains : 27/104 places, 30/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3746745413095063685.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4088925944023521454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3746745413095063685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4088925944023521454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1683,0.006901,3900,2,135,5,716,6,0,139,561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((p2==1)&&(p115==1))) U A(AG(AF(((p36==1)&&(p120==1)))) U ((p1!=1) * ((EG((p82==1)) + (p96==1)) + (p115==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(((p2==1)&&(p115==1)))) * !(EG(!(((p1!=1) * ((EG((p82==1)) + (p96==1)) + (p115==1))))))) * !(E(!((...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t5, t26, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inters...176
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/0/9
(forward)formula 0,0,0.097012,8764,1,0,250,27665,109,143,997,33026,288
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 89 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 89 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 89 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 86 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 86 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 85 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 85 transition count 100
Applied a total of 41 rules in 5 ms. Remains 85 /104 variables (removed 19) and now considering 100/122 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/185 variables, 85/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/185 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 185/185 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 2538 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/185 variables, 85/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 99/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/185 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 185/185 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 4962 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7509ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7509ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/104 places, 100/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7614 ms. Remains : 85/104 places, 100/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability278400335388201110.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15256342411165290238.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability278400335388201110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15256342411165290238.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,398633,0.039321,5644,2,998,5,8047,6,0,442,7245,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((p36==1) + AF(EX((p104==0)))) + AF(((p59==0)&&(p38==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p36==1) + !(EG(!(EX((p104==0)))))))),!(((p59==0)&&(p38==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t11, t34, t36, t66, t86, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...193
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.30287,17548,1,0,157,58015,233,101,2561,66628,234
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 93 edges and 104 vertex of which 38 / 104 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 35 places
Ensure Unique test removed 44 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 44 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 68 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 49 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 46 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 43 transition count 49
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 43 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 39 transition count 45
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 33 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 33 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 33 transition count 36
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 23 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 23 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 22 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 20 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 19 transition count 20
Applied a total of 105 rules in 9 ms. Remains 19 /104 variables (removed 85) and now considering 20/122 (removed 102) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 11 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/19 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 17/36 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/37 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 149 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/19 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 17/36 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 11/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/37 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 109 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 262ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 262ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/104 places, 20/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 19/104 places, 20/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11781087155506979203.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8048515850258654480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11781087155506979203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8048515850258654480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,200,0.004826,3804,2,56,5,290,6,0,96,197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((p42==1)) * (p30==0)) * (p17==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (p42==1)) * (p30==0)) * (p17==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
(forward)formula 0,1,0.012588,4060,1,0,43,1702,64,23,551,1346,51
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 83 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 95
Applied a total of 51 rules in 6 ms. Remains 80 /104 variables (removed 24) and now considering 95/122 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2376 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 94/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 5329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7712ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/104 places, 95/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7799 ms. Remains : 80/104 places, 95/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8514489159308069329.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16319843614069537145.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8514489159308069329.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16319843614069537145.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,342405,0.030403,5184,2,565,5,5865,6,0,417,5433,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AG((p85==0)) + EG(EX((p92==0)))) + ((p127==1)||(p27==0))) + ((p115==1) * AF(((p109==1)||(p87==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((p85==0)))) + EG(EX((p92==0)))) + ((p127==1)||(p27==0))))) * !((p115==1))...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t35, t81, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.186043,13248,1,0,158,46943,232,104,2543,39750,243
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 91 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 91 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 87 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 87 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 86 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 86 transition count 102
Applied a total of 38 rules in 4 ms. Remains 86 /104 variables (removed 18) and now considering 102/122 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 86 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/188 variables, 86/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 188/188 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 2646 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/188 variables, 86/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 101/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 3/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 188/188 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 4951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 7609ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7609ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/104 places, 102/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7704 ms. Remains : 86/104 places, 102/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability264074812746395274.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11040837286092638144.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability264074812746395274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11040837286092638144.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,697001,0.060406,6452,2,809,5,11822,6,0,448,10908,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((EG((p125==1)) + ((AG((p93==1)) * (p62==1)) * (p101==1)))) U !((EX(AF(E((p13==1) U (p38==1)))) + (p6!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (EG((p125==1)) + ((!(E(TRUE U !((p93==1)))) * (p62==1)) * (p101==1))))) * !((p6!=1))) * !(...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t36, t65, t86, t87, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...193
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.57919,109332,1,0,641,574127,252,433,2715,708645,736
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 93 edges and 104 vertex of which 35 / 104 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 32 places
Ensure Unique test removed 40 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 40 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 71 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 48 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 46 transition count 54
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 46 transition count 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 43 transition count 51
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 35 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 35 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 35 transition count 40
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 24 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 24 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 22 transition count 24
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 22 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 20 transition count 22
Applied a total of 110 rules in 20 ms. Remains 20 /104 variables (removed 84) and now considering 22/122 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 14 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 19/39 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 39/40 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 19/39 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 14/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 39/40 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 144 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 279ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 279ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/104 places, 22/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 359 ms. Remains : 20/104 places, 22/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15896606507516286686.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14185531506480803785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15896606507516286686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14185531506480803785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,252,0.009148,3824,2,83,5,493,6,0,102,404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(AG((p109==1)))) + AG(((p100==0)&&(p106==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p109==1)))))))),TRUE) * !(((p100==0)&&(p106==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.017952,4080,1,0,11,1405,25,5,523,945,10
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 84 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 84 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 83 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 82 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 82 transition count 97
Applied a total of 47 rules in 5 ms. Remains 82 /104 variables (removed 22) and now considering 97/122 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 97/179 variables, 82/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 179/179 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 2545 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 97/179 variables, 82/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 96/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 179/179 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 4984 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7536ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7536ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/104 places, 97/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7627 ms. Remains : 82/104 places, 97/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6639774476455417701.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13733616403749474199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6639774476455417701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13733616403749474199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,388591,0.042522,5728,2,857,5,7994,6,0,427,7648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((p115==1) + EG(!(A((p57==1) U (p40==1)))))) * A((p79==1) U A(EX((p94==1)) U EF(((p130==1)||((p26==1)&&(p115==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX(((p115==1) + EG(!(!((E(!((p40==1)) U (!((p57==1)) * !((p40==1)))) + EG(!((p40==1)))))))))) * !(EG(...743
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t33, t35, t63, t83, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.63812,69972,1,0,539,437900,240,370,2610,411847,675
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 82 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 82 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 95
Applied a total of 51 rules in 3 ms. Remains 80 /104 variables (removed 24) and now considering 95/122 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-06 21:42:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:42:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2353 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 94/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 6750 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9110ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/104 places, 95/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9203 ms. Remains : 80/104 places, 95/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8313841582236641824.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7640731731022705635.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8313841582236641824.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7640731731022705635.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,356855,0.041247,5692,2,711,5,8079,6,0,417,7644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(AX(FALSE))) U ((p61==1) + ((AX(AX(A((p7==1) U (p107==1)))) * EX(AG((p9==1)))) * AG((p41==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))))) * (p61==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))))) * ...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t32, t61, t81, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rev...187
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.36453,60704,1,0,345,243718,218,247,2413,415016,449
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 88 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 83 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 79 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 79 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 78 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 78 transition count 93
Applied a total of 55 rules in 9 ms. Remains 78 /104 variables (removed 26) and now considering 93/122 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 78 cols
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/171 variables, 78/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/171 variables, 78/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 92/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 4187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 6681ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6682ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/104 places, 93/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6776 ms. Remains : 78/104 places, 93/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18142103218543305342.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4662898671715992999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18142103218543305342.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4662898671715992999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,468605,0.033149,5280,2,687,5,6612,6,0,407,6262,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(((p122!=1)||(p79==0)))) + EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX(TRUE))),!(EX(((p122!=1)||(p79==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t11, t31, t34, t79, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed...191
(forward)formula 0,1,0.179927,12448,1,0,132,33908,208,84,2250,37816,203
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 122/122 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 87 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 87 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 87 transition count 102
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 82 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 82 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 79 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 79 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 78 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 78 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 77 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 77 transition count 92
Applied a total of 57 rules in 4 ms. Remains 77 /104 variables (removed 27) and now considering 92/122 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 169/169 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2222 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 91/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 169/169 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 4392 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6620ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6620ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/104 places, 92/122 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6713 ms. Remains : 77/104 places, 92/122 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6332351697485167572.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8180857221974659237.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6332351697485167572.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8180857221974659237.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,353585,0.035722,5004,2,493,5,4838,6,0,402,4850,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(((EG((p15==1)) + (p2!=1)) + ((p36!=1) + EG((p19==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(p15==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (p2!=1))] != FALSE) + ([(FwdU(EY(Init)...233
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107397,8332,1,0,13,23222,20,3,1960,12712,15
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-06 21:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Total runtime 99920 ms.

BK_STOP 1749246152173

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SmartHome-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SmartHome-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900714"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SmartHome-PT-04.tgz
mv SmartHome-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;