Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994900713.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is SmartHome-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900713
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 146K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749245961868

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SmartHome-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 56 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Transformed 139 places.
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Transformed 159 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 139 places and 159 transitions and 361 arcs in 140 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 19 transitions.
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 50 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 108 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 108 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 108 transition count 125
Applied a total of 29 rules in 24 ms. Remains 108 /122 variables (removed 14) and now considering 125/140 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 108 cols
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 322 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/233 variables, 108/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 4503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/233 variables, 108/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 124/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 9659 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 14221ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14230ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/122 places, 125/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14592 ms. Remains : 108/122 places, 125/140 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 108 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:37] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Support contains 41 out of 108 places (down from 50) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 38374 steps (428 resets) in 746 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 0/31 properties
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Computed a total of 16 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 93 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 93 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 88 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 84 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 95
Applied a total of 58 rules in 15 ms. Remains 80 /108 variables (removed 28) and now considering 95/125 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2335 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 94/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 4502 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6847ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6849ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/108 places, 95/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6959 ms. Remains : 80/108 places, 95/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7287114153730346787.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7399555268144523819.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7287114153730346787.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7399555268144523819.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,414015,0.040711,4940,2,532,5,5516,6,0,417,5249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((EX((p55==0)) * ((p91==0)||(p93==1)))) + (p98==0)) + (AX(((p64==0)&&(p100==1))) * AF(EX((p98==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((EX((p55==0)) * ((p91==0)||(p93==1)))) + (p98==0))))) * !(((p64==0)&&(p100==1))))...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t34, t81, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.178264,11980,1,0,142,37641,217,91,2297,36128,215
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 96 edges and 108 vertex of which 33 / 108 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 30 places
Ensure Unique test removed 37 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 37 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 77 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 49 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 47 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 44 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 43 transition count 50
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 43 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 40 transition count 47
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 33 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 33 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 33 transition count 39
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 24 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 24 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 22 transition count 24
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 22 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 20 transition count 22
Applied a total of 121 rules in 27 ms. Remains 20 /108 variables (removed 88) and now considering 22/125 (removed 103) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 57 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 13 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 20 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:39:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 19/39 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 39/40 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 19/39 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 13/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 39/40 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 177 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 350ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 351ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/108 places, 22/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 440 ms. Remains : 20/108 places, 22/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9811545893913430593.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5419191702441913587.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9811545893913430593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5419191702441913587.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,360,0.004036,3824,2,67,5,413,6,0,102,280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((p107==0)||(p76==1))||(p56!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p107==0)||(p76==1))||(p56!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.008712,4080,1,0,9,1797,15,3,465,961,5
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 92 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 92 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 92 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 88 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 84 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 98
Applied a total of 52 rules in 14 ms. Remains 83 /108 variables (removed 25) and now considering 98/125 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 98/181 variables, 83/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 181/181 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 2587 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 98/181 variables, 83/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 97/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 181/181 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 5220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7822ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7822ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/108 places, 98/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7930 ms. Remains : 83/108 places, 98/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4570310449733697389.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12244837170467643796.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4570310449733697389.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12244837170467643796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,330013,0.033763,5360,2,733,5,6654,6,0,432,5667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((p116==0)) + AX(((p1==0)||(p85==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!((p116==0))))))) * !(((p1==0)||(p85==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t14, t34, t38, t84, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rev...187
(forward)formula 0,1,0.163143,11760,1,0,131,32995,215,88,2383,29523,205
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 91 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 91 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 91 transition count 106
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 87 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 87 transition count 102
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 95
Applied a total of 58 rules in 10 ms. Remains 80 /108 variables (removed 28) and now considering 95/125 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 175/175 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/175 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 94/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/175 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 175/175 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 3868 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6270ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6271ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/108 places, 95/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6384 ms. Remains : 80/108 places, 95/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1832689657732437747.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16922687733785261413.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1832689657732437747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16922687733785261413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,386045,0.042521,5180,2,733,5,5991,6,0,417,5731,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E(AX(((p0!=1)&&(p80!=1))) U AG(!(((p23==0)||(p74==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!(EX(!(((p0!=1)&&(p80!=1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(((p23==0)||(p74==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t30, t32, t58, t81, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
(forward)formula 0,1,0.20841,13628,1,0,126,40373,211,82,2290,41127,200
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 90 edges and 108 vertex of which 25 / 108 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 22 places
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 26 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 85 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 55 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 52 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 50 transition count 60
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 50 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 46 transition count 56
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 41 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 41 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 41 transition count 50
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 32 transition count 40
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 32 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 30 transition count 35
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 30 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 28 transition count 33
Applied a total of 121 rules in 19 ms. Remains 28 /108 variables (removed 80) and now considering 33/125 (removed 92) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 28 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 21:40:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/28 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/59 variables, and 40 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/28 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 28/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/59 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 849ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 850ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/108 places, 33/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 951 ms. Remains : 28/108 places, 33/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14210132296928958535.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13815219054302148889.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14210132296928958535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13815219054302148889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1062,0.006498,4008,2,134,5,641,6,0,144,516,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(!((((p57==0)||(p71==1)) * (AF((p9==0)) + (p101==1)))) U AF(!((((p76==0)||(p10==1))&&(p59==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!((((p57==0)||(p71==1)) * (!(EG(!((p9==0)))) + (p101==1)))) U !(EG(!(!((((p76==0)||(p10=...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.02832,5032,1,0,69,5976,96,46,800,7393,107
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 91 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 91 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 91 transition count 106
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 85 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 85 transition count 100
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 78 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 78 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 77 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 92
Applied a total of 64 rules in 6 ms. Remains 77 /108 variables (removed 31) and now considering 92/125 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 169/169 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 91/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 169/169 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 4477 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6679ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6679ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/108 places, 92/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6772 ms. Remains : 77/108 places, 92/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6059477522676355470.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1923770638542626443.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6059477522676355470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1923770638542626443.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,348645,0.029215,5000,2,498,5,4909,6,0,402,4931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((p69==0) U !(AX(((p95==0)||(p106==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p69==0) U !(!(EX(!(((p95==0)||(p106==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t31, t78, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,0,0.448923,25744,1,0,372,146314,205,208,2151,123552,450
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 92 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 92 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 92 transition count 107
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 86 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 86 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 78 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 78 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 77 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 92
Applied a total of 64 rules in 9 ms. Remains 77 /108 variables (removed 31) and now considering 92/125 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 169/169 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/169 variables, 77/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 91/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 169/169 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 3555 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5828ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5829ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/108 places, 92/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5936 ms. Remains : 77/108 places, 92/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7238871816266556417.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14261284708480577637.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7238871816266556417.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14261284708480577637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,354981,0.029011,5008,2,494,5,4900,6,0,402,4846,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((AX((p92==1)) + !(E((p22==1) U (p131==0)))) + ((p8==1)&&((p91==0)||(p115==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!((p92==1)))) + !(E((p22==1) U (p131==0)))) + ((p8==1)&&((p91==0)||(p115==...172
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t31, t78, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.240075,15564,1,0,144,65847,212,97,2270,51238,226
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 101 edges and 108 vertex of which 47 / 108 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 44 places
Ensure Unique test removed 54 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 54 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 64 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 42 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 40 transition count 45
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 40 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 37 transition count 42
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 31 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 31 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 31 transition count 35
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 20 transition count 23
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 20 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 18 transition count 18
Applied a total of 99 rules in 6 ms. Remains 18 /108 variables (removed 90) and now considering 18/125 (removed 107) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 15/33 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/34 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 34/34 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 15/33 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 17/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/34 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 34/34 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 445ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/108 places, 18/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 513 ms. Remains : 18/108 places, 18/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14818792843548226384.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality571077779226480656.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14818792843548226384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality571077779226480656.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145,0.004756,3916,2,58,5,322,6,0,89,211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AF((p71==1)) + (p0==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p71==1)))) + (p0==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.010979,4172,1,0,15,1472,25,7,459,1114,13
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 95 edges and 108 vertex of which 42 / 108 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 39 places
Ensure Unique test removed 48 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 68 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 48 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 45 transition count 52
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 45 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 40 transition count 47
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 35 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 35 transition count 42
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 35 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 34 transition count 39
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 25 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 25 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 24 transition count 26
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 24 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 22 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 21 transition count 23
Applied a total of 99 rules in 13 ms. Remains 21 /108 variables (removed 87) and now considering 23/125 (removed 102) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 21 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 21 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 13 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 21 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/41 variables, 21/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/41 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 41/42 variables, and 26 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/41 variables, 21/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 13/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/41 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 41/42 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 276ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 277ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/108 places, 23/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 366 ms. Remains : 21/108 places, 23/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 23 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4799117767125528342.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5551723603573630549.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4799117767125528342.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5551723603573630549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,432,0.007397,3840,2,78,5,388,6,0,107,286,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((p96==0)&&(p103==1))&&(p16==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p96==0)&&(p103==1))&&(p16==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/12/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.013673,4096,1,0,8,1509,19,2,526,883,8
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 92 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 92 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 92 transition count 107
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 87 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 87 transition count 102
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 80 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 79 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 94
Applied a total of 60 rules in 8 ms. Remains 79 /108 variables (removed 29) and now considering 94/125 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 486 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/173 variables, 79/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 2244 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/173 variables, 79/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 93/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 3972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6222ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6223ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/108 places, 94/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6758 ms. Remains : 79/108 places, 94/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8396124757301167219.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17247949316175119161.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8396124757301167219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17247949316175119161.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,392195,0.027306,5036,2,521,5,4943,6,0,412,4863,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(EG(((p67==0)&&(p14==1))))) + AG(((p58==0)&&(p36==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG(((p67==0)&&(p14==1))))))))),TRUE) * !(((p58==0)&&(p36==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t30, t80, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.307371,19036,1,0,189,91445,217,123,2394,72255,313
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 100 edges and 108 vertex of which 47 / 108 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 44 places
Ensure Unique test removed 54 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 54 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 63 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 41 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 39 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 38 transition count 43
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 38 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 35 transition count 40
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 30 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 30 transition count 35
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 30 transition count 34
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 21 transition count 24
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 21 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 20 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 18 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 17 transition count 18
Applied a total of 96 rules in 15 ms. Remains 17 /108 variables (removed 91) and now considering 18/125 (removed 107) transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/17 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/32 variables, 17/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/32 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 32/33 variables, and 22 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/17 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/32 variables, 17/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 9/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/32 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 32/33 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 91 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 227ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 227ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/108 places, 18/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 298 ms. Remains : 17/108 places, 18/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 110 steps (14 resets) in 5 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5227879088115546914.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9425988967950104734.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5227879088115546914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9425988967950104734.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 90 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 90 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 90 transition count 105
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 84 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 99
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 79 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 76 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 75 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 75 transition count 90
Applied a total of 68 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /108 variables (removed 33) and now considering 90/125 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/165 variables, 75/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 2054 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/165 variables, 75/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 89/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 4019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6079ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/108 places, 90/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6171 ms. Remains : 75/108 places, 90/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13780955023023138865.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3697586611650062936.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13780955023023138865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3697586611650062936.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,312005,0.02642,4972,2,493,5,4841,6,0,392,4790,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.027797,4972,1,0,6,4841,7,1,476,4790,1
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 92 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 92 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 92 transition count 108
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 88 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 88 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 85 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 85 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 83 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 83 transition count 99
Applied a total of 51 rules in 2 ms. Remains 83 /108 variables (removed 25) and now considering 99/125 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-06 21:40:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 99/182 variables, 83/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 2582 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 99/182 variables, 83/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 98/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 5021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7613ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7614ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/108 places, 99/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7694 ms. Remains : 83/108 places, 99/125 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3209576704539867537.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14380882527427832042.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3209576704539867537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14380882527427832042.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,548660,0.033102,5120,2,594,5,5684,6,0,433,5454,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG((p15==0)) + (p85==1)) + (A(!(AG(((p64==0)||(p4==1)))) U (p17!=0)) + AG(EX((p80==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !((p15==0)))) + (p85==1)) + (!((E(!((p17!=0)) U (!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p64==0)||(p4==1)))...239
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t30, t34, t35, t83, t84, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (des...197
(forward)formula 0,0,1.78728,79608,1,0,685,490449,236,396,2515,463791,775
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-06 21:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 21:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 76505 ms.

BK_STOP 1749246039592

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SmartHome-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SmartHome-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994900713"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SmartHome-PT-04.tgz
mv SmartHome-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;