Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000268.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000268
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749104899078

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Transformed 503 places.
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Transformed 503 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 503 places and 503 transitions and 1186 arcs in 200 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 25 out of 503 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 503/503 transitions.
Discarding 102 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 102 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 401 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 0 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 401 transition count 401
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 400 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 400 transition count 400
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 399 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 399 transition count 399
Applied a total of 208 rules in 99 ms. Remains 399 /503 variables (removed 104) and now considering 399/503 (removed 104) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 399 rows 399 cols
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 372 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:28:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 268 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 672 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 398 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:28:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/399 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 17/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 5/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 798/798 variables, and 463 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 399/399 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 398/398 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/399 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 18/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 398/856 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/876 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/896 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/916 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 798/798 variables, and 923 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 399/399 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 398/398 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 399/503 places, 399/503 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60931 ms. Remains : 399/503 places, 399/503 transitions.
Support contains 25 out of 399 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 06:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 399 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 1633 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 2/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 55/59 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 340/399 variables, 37/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 3/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 2/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 0/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/798 variables, 0/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 798/798 variables, and 445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 399/399 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 35/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 362/399 variables, 39/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 5/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 8/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 1/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 2/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 10/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 0/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/798 variables, 0/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 798/798 variables, and 466 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 1627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 399/399 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 2254ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 71 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 399 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 291 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 290 transition count 290
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 290 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 215 transition count 215
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 373 place count 210 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 210 transition count 210
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 210 transition count 206
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 206 transition count 206
Performed 92 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 92 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 92 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 184 rules applied. Total rules applied 570 place count 114 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 113 transition count 112
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -26
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 85 transition count 138
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 85 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 84 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 83 transition count 136
Applied a total of 632 rules in 71 ms. Remains 83 /399 variables (removed 316) and now considering 136/399 (removed 263) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 71 ms. Remains : 83/399 places, 136/399 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7358 steps (1 resets) in 156 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
Computed a total of 119 stabilizing places and 119 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(p0)||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 16 rules in 17 ms. Remains 391 /399 variables (removed 8) and now considering 391/399 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:29:25] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:29:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 249 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:29:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 903 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60071ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/399 places, 391/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60456 ms. Remains : 391/399 places, 391/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 325 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 45 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01 finished in 60842 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&(F(p1)||G(p2))))'
Support contains 3 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 106 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 106 transitions
Performed 106 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 106
Iterating post reduction 0 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 398 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 106 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 292 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 290
Performed 73 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 73 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 217
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 217 transition count 217
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 211 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 211 transition count 211
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 211 transition count 205
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 205 transition count 205
Performed 86 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 86 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 558 place count 119 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 119 transition count 118
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 118 transition count 117
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 619 place count 89 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 87 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 86 transition count 143
Applied a total of 622 rules in 53 ms. Remains 86 /399 variables (removed 313) and now considering 143/399 (removed 256) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 86 cols
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 138 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 06:30:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 142/228 variables, 86/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 4/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/229 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 5153 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 142/228 variables, 86/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 4/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 138/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/229 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 4130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 9327ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9328ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/399 places, 143/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9532 ms. Remains : 86/399 places, 143/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03 finished in 9731 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 398 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 290 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 289
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 214
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 214 transition count 214
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 374 place count 208 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 208 transition count 208
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 208 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 202 transition count 202
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 87 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 115 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 85 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 83 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 82 transition count 139
Applied a total of 630 rules in 45 ms. Remains 82 /399 variables (removed 317) and now considering 139/399 (removed 260) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 06:30:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 8/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/221 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 2637 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 8/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 134/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/221 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 5655 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8314ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8315ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8520 ms. Remains : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04 finished in 8583 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U p1))'
Support contains 2 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 106 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 106 transitions
Performed 106 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 106
Iterating post reduction 0 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 398 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 106 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 292 transition count 292
Performed 76 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 76 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 292 transition count 216
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 216 transition count 216
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 369 place count 211 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 211 transition count 211
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 211 transition count 206
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 206 transition count 206
Performed 89 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 178 rules applied. Total rules applied 562 place count 117 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 563 place count 117 transition count 116
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 565 place count 116 transition count 115
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 87 transition count 143
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 87 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 85 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 84 transition count 141
Applied a total of 627 rules in 37 ms. Remains 84 /399 variables (removed 315) and now considering 141/399 (removed 258) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 136 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 06:30:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/224 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/224 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 224/225 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 3824 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/224 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 136/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/224 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 224/225 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 5222 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 9074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9074ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/399 places, 141/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9273 ms. Remains : 84/399 places, 141/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05 finished in 9374 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(p0))&&(X(p1)||F(p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 392 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 392 transition count 392
Applied a total of 14 rules in 16 ms. Remains 392 /399 variables (removed 7) and now considering 392/399 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 392 rows 392 cols
[2025-06-05 06:30:53] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:30:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 236 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 391 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 784/784 variables, and 447 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 391/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 148 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 155 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/897 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60073ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/399 places, 392/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60452 ms. Remains : 392/399 places, 392/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 253 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1458 steps with 1 reset in 16 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06 finished in 60738 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 109 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 109 transitions
Performed 109 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 109
Iterating post reduction 0 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 398 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 289
Performed 74 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 74 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 215 transition count 215
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 209 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 209
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 204 transition count 204
Performed 90 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 90 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 90 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 180 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 114 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 113 transition count 112
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -27
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 85 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 83 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 82 transition count 137
Applied a total of 630 rules in 29 ms. Remains 82 /399 variables (removed 317) and now considering 137/399 (removed 262) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 137/219 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 2841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 137/219 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 135/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 3044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5914ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5914ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/399 places, 137/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6105 ms. Remains : 82/399 places, 137/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15 reset in 278 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 19 steps with 0 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08 finished in 6444 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((p0||X(X(G(!p0))))) U X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 392 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 392 transition count 392
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 392 /399 variables (removed 7) and now considering 392/399 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 392 rows 392 cols
[2025-06-05 06:32:00] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 391 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:32:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 2/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 784/784 variables, and 448 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 391/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/897 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60062ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/399 places, 392/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60402 ms. Remains : 392/399 places, 392/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 331 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), false, (NOT p1), p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), true, (AND p0 p1), false, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 886 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09 finished in 60763 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 107 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 107 transitions
Performed 107 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 107
Iterating post reduction 0 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 398 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 107 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 291 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 290
Performed 74 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 74 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 216
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 216 transition count 216
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 370 place count 210 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 210 transition count 210
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 210 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 204 transition count 204
Performed 88 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 88 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 116 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 565 place count 116 transition count 115
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -26
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 87 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 85 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 84 transition count 138
Applied a total of 626 rules in 31 ms. Remains 84 /399 variables (removed 315) and now considering 138/399 (removed 261) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 133 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 06:33:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/221 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/222 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 3260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/221 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 133/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/222 variables, and 262 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 5017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8305ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/399 places, 138/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8495 ms. Remains : 84/399 places, 138/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10 finished in 8654 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 398 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 290 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 289
Performed 74 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 74 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 215 transition count 215
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 209 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 209
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 203 transition count 203
Performed 88 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 88 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 115 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 85 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 83 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 82 transition count 139
Applied a total of 630 rules in 34 ms. Remains 82 /399 variables (removed 317) and now considering 139/399 (removed 260) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/221 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 2890 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 135/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/221 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 3023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5940ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5941ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6129 ms. Remains : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 171 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12 finished in 6228 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U (p1&&G(F(p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 398 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 290 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 289
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 289 transition count 214
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 214 transition count 214
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 210 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 210 transition count 210
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 210 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 207 transition count 207
Performed 91 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 91 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 182 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 116 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 565 place count 116 transition count 115
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -25
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 87 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 85 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 84 transition count 137
Applied a total of 626 rules in 30 ms. Remains 84 /399 variables (removed 315) and now considering 137/399 (removed 262) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 137/221 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 2917 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 137/221 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 135/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 3106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6043ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/399 places, 137/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6221 ms. Remains : 84/399 places, 137/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13 finished in 6352 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 399/399 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 398 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 290
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 290 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 215 transition count 215
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 209 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 209
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 209 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 203 transition count 203
Performed 88 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 88 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 115 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 85 transition count 141
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 85 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 83 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 82 transition count 139
Applied a total of 631 rules in 29 ms. Remains 82 /399 variables (removed 317) and now considering 139/399 (removed 260) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:33:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/221 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 2823 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 135/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/221 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 3096 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5937ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5939ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6124 ms. Remains : 82/399 places, 139/399 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 156 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14 finished in 6183 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 308720 ms.

BK_STOP 1749105209011

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000268"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;