fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r212-tall-174901994000267
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVt-PT-010B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 426996.00 0.00 0.00 FFTTFFFTTFFTFFTF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000267.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000267
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749104460970

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Transformed 503 places.
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Transformed 503 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 503 places and 503 transitions and 1186 arcs in 178 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 15 out of 503 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 503/503 transitions.
Discarding 106 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 106 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 397 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 397 transition count 397
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 396 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 396 transition count 396
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 395 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 395 transition count 395
Applied a total of 216 rules in 109 ms. Remains 395 /503 variables (removed 108) and now considering 395/503 (removed 108) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 395 rows 395 cols
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 304 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 585 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 394 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:21:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/395 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 395/790 variables, 395/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 6/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 1/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 790/790 variables, and 455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 395/395 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 394/394 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/395 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 395/790 variables, 395/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 394/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 20/863 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 20/883 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 20/903 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 790/790 variables, and 915 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 395/395 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 394/394 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60117ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60129ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 395/503 places, 395/503 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60843 ms. Remains : 395/503 places, 395/503 transitions.
Support contains 15 out of 395 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 395 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 10186 steps (2 resets) in 203 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 0/9 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 119 stabilizing places and 119 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 395 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 395/395 places, 395/395 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 109 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 109 transitions
Performed 109 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 109
Iterating post reduction 0 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 394 transition count 285
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 285 transition count 285
Performed 77 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 77 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 285 transition count 208
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 208 transition count 208
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 376 place count 204 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 204 transition count 204
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 204 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 202 transition count 202
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 87 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 558 place count 115 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 115 transition count 114
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 114 transition count 113
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -28
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 619 place count 85 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 83 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 82 transition count 139
Applied a total of 622 rules in 68 ms. Remains 82 /395 variables (removed 313) and now considering 139/395 (removed 256) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/221 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 3562 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/220 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 134/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/221 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 3551 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7145ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7146ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/395 places, 139/395 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7401 ms. Remains : 82/395 places, 139/395 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 7629 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U X(X(X(!p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 395 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 395/395 places, 395/395 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 8 rules in 24 ms. Remains 391 /395 variables (removed 4) and now considering 391/395 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:22:11] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 1)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 1)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 1)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 1)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 1)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 1)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 1)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 1)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 1)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 1)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 1)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 1)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 0)
(s234 0)
(s235 0)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 0)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 1)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 0)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 0)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 0)
(s260 0)
(s261 0)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 1)
(s265 0)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 timeout
0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 903 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/395 places, 391/395 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60378 ms. Remains : 391/395 places, 391/395 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 400 ms :[p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 278 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 147 ms.
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 15 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 312 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 30077 steps (6 resets) in 139 ms. (214 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 146 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 342 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 393 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 391 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 391/391 places, 391/391 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 391 /391 variables (removed 0) and now considering 391/391 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:23:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 302 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 901 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60065ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60374 ms. Remains : 391/391 places, 391/391 transitions.
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 95 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 312 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (10 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4646 steps (0 resets) in 38 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 152 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 313 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 336 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 315 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 115 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 129 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, true, false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 315 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 391 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 391/391 places, 391/391 transitions.
Performed 106 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 391 transition count 391
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 391 transition count 431
Deduced a syphon composed of 148 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 391 transition count 431
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 263 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 391 transition count 431
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 391 transition count 430
Discarding 77 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 77 rule applications. Total rules 341 place count 314 transition count 353
Deduced a syphon composed of 186 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 314 transition count 353
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 187 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 314 transition count 353
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 421 place count 312 transition count 351
Deduced a syphon composed of 185 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 312 transition count 351
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -268
Deduced a syphon composed of 223 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 312 transition count 619
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 499 place count 274 transition count 543
Deduced a syphon composed of 185 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 537 place count 274 transition count 543
Deduced a syphon composed of 185 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 274 transition count 540
Deduced a syphon composed of 185 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 540 rules in 96 ms. Remains 274 /391 variables (removed 117) and now considering 540/391 (removed -149) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned []
Running 539 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 540 rows 274 cols
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 167 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 539 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/274 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 539 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD329 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD368 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD369 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD370 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD371 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD374 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD375 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD382 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD383 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD384 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD389 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD390 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD391 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD392 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD395 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD396 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD397 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD398 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD399 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD400 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD401 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD402 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD403 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD404 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD405 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD406 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD407 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD408 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD414 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD415 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD416 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD417 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD418 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD423 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD424 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD425 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD426 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD431 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD432 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD433 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD434 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD437 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD438 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD439 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD440 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD441 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD442 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD443 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD444 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD445 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD451 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD452 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD453 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD454 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD455 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD456 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD457 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD458 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD459 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD460 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD465 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD466 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD467 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD468 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD473 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD474 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD475 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD476 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD479 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD480 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD481 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD482 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD483 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD484 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD485 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD486 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD487 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD488 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD493 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD494 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD495 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD496 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD497 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD498 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD499 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD500 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD501 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD502 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD507 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD508 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD509 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD510 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD515 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD516 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD519 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD520 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD521 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD522 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD523 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD524 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD529 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD530 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD535 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 195 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD274 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD275 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD276 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD279 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD283 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD284 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD286 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD289 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD290 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD291 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD292 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD293 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD294 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD295 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD296 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD301 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD302 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD303 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD305 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD306 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD307 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD308 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD311 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD312 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD313 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD314 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD315 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD317 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD319 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD320 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD325 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD333 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD341 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 392 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD525 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD526 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD531 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD532 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 539/813 variables, 274/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/813 variables, 166/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/813 variables, 0/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/814 variables, 1/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/814 variables, 0/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 814/814 variables, and 524 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved in 17803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, ReadFeed: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 539/539 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 186/274 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 42/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 539/813 variables, 274/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/813 variables, 166/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/813 variables, 141/664 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/813 variables, 1/665 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 813/814 variables, and 665 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, ReadFeed: 166/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/539 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48005ms problems are : Problem set: 398 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 398 dead transitions in 48007ms
Found 398 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 398 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 398 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 274/391 places, 142/391 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 486 edges and 274 vertex of which 89 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 185 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 185 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 89 /274 variables (removed 185) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/391 places, 142/391 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 48147 ms. Remains : 89/391 places, 142/391 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6055087291451175896
[2025-06-05 06:25:04] [INFO ] Built C files in 26ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6055087291451175896
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6055087291451175896;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 646 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6055087291451175896;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6055087291451175896;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8705496342720158248.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 176 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 174409 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 395 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 395/395 places, 395/395 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 8 rules in 31 ms. Remains 391 /395 variables (removed 4) and now considering 391/395 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:25:05] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:25:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 296 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 1/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60060ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/395 places, 391/395 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60389 ms. Remains : 391/395 places, 391/395 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 149 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 146 ms.
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Computed a total of 118 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Detected a total of 118/391 stabilizing places and 118/391 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 15 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 60825 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 395 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 395/395 places, 395/395 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 392 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 392 transition count 392
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 392 /395 variables (removed 3) and now considering 392/395 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 392 rows 392 cols
[2025-06-05 06:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 207 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 391 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:26:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 1/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 784/784 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 391/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/855 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 172 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 214 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 210 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 220 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/895 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 784/784 variables, and 905 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/395 places, 392/395 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60394 ms. Remains : 392/395 places, 392/395 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 81419 steps with 0 reset in 153 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 60719 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 395 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 395/395 places, 395/395 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 393 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 393 transition count 393
Applied a total of 4 rules in 14 ms. Remains 393 /395 variables (removed 2) and now considering 393/395 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 393 cols
[2025-06-05 06:27:07] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:27:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 220 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 392 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:27:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 1/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 (/ 1.0 4.0))
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 1.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 0/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 786/786 variables, and 447 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 392/839 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/879 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/899 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 786/786 variables, and 907 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 393/395 places, 393/395 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60387 ms. Remains : 393/395 places, 393/395 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 404 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-010B-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 60499 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 425758 ms.

BK_STOP 1749104887966

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000267"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;