Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000266.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000266
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749103614202

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Transformed 503 places.
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Transformed 503 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 503 places and 503 transitions and 1186 arcs in 172 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 108 out of 503 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 503/503 transitions.
Discarding 75 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 75 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 428 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 428 transition count 428
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 427 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 427 transition count 427
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 426 transition count 426
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 426 transition count 426
Applied a total of 154 rules in 99 ms. Remains 426 /503 variables (removed 77) and now considering 426/503 (removed 77) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 426 rows 426 cols
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 293 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:06:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 255 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 577 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 425 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:06:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/426 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 426/852 variables, 426/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30105ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30116ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 426/503 places, 426/503 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30812 ms. Remains : 426/503 places, 426/503 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 426 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1627 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 3/75 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (274 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-05 06:07:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/146 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 280/426 variables, 30/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 426/852 variables, 426/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/852 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 852/852 variables, and 467 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 426/426 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/146 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 280/426 variables, 30/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 7/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 426/852 variables, 426/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 3/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 13/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 1/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 2/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 1/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/852 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/852 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 852/852 variables, and 494 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 3165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 426/426 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3431ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 288 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 426 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 101 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 101 transitions
Performed 101 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 101
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 426 transition count 325
Reduce places removed 101 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 325 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 322 transition count 322
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 322 transition count 261
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 261 transition count 261
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 234 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 234 transition count 234
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 234 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 215 transition count 215
Performed 86 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 86 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 594 place count 129 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 595 place count 129 transition count 128
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 128 transition count 127
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -18
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 645 place count 104 transition count 145
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 646 place count 104 transition count 144
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 104 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 102 transition count 142
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 651 place count 102 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 101 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 653 place count 100 transition count 140
Applied a total of 653 rules in 72 ms. Remains 100 /426 variables (removed 326) and now considering 140/426 (removed 286) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 100/426 places, 140/426 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (16 resets) in 411 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/16 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 33/49 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 67/116 variables, 28/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 35/153 variables, 16/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 5/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/156 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 21/177 variables, 10/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 21/198 variables, 8/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 5/203 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 27/230 variables, 13/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 2/232 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 8/240 variables, 4/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/16 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 33/49 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 67/116 variables, 28/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 35/153 variables, 16/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 5/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 3/156 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 3/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 21/177 variables, 10/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 4/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 21/198 variables, 8/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 5/203 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 27/230 variables, 13/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 2/232 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 8/240 variables, 4/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 321ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 140/140 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 100 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 138
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 133
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 93 transition count 133
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 91 transition count 131
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 87 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 86 transition count 137
Applied a total of 27 rules in 13 ms. Remains 86 /100 variables (removed 14) and now considering 137/140 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 86/100 places, 137/140 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (11 resets) in 229 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1900579 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=633 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1900579 steps, saw 575234 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=632 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 86 cols
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/16 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/51 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 69/120 variables, 28/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 14/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 5/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 32/152 variables, 14/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 7/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 22/174 variables, 8/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 4/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 22/196 variables, 8/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 19/215 variables, 8/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 8/223 variables, 4/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/16 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/51 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 69/120 variables, 28/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 14/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 5/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 32/152 variables, 14/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 7/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 22/174 variables, 8/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 4/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 22/196 variables, 8/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 19/215 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 4/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 8/223 variables, 4/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 158 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 86 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 137/137 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 86 /86 variables (removed 0) and now considering 137/137 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 86/86 places, 137/137 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 137/137 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 86 /86 variables (removed 0) and now considering 137/137 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 133 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/223 variables, 86/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 3539 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/223 variables, 86/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 133/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 5008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8575ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8576ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8736 ms. Remains : 86/86 places, 137/137 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 36 edges and 86 vertex of which 4 / 86 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 270 edges and 84 vertex of which 82 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 33 edges and 80 vertex of which 4 / 80 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 78 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 32 edges and 76 vertex of which 6 / 76 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 73 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 7 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 30 edges and 70 vertex of which 8 / 70 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 66 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 26 edges and 62 vertex of which 8 / 62 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 58 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 22 edges and 54 vertex of which 6 / 54 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 51 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 6 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 19 edges and 48 vertex of which 6 / 48 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 45 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 7 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 14 edges and 43 vertex of which 2 / 43 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 6 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 42 transition count 60
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 42 transition count 57
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 40 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 40 transition count 54
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 38 transition count 53
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 38 transition count 52
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 38 transition count 49
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 38 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 37 transition count 48
Applied a total of 117 rules in 22 ms. Remains 37 /86 variables (removed 49) and now considering 48/137 (removed 89) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 20ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 6ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 63ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 16ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 3ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] After 48ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 141 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:07:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
Computed a total of 128 stabilizing places and 128 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 394 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 394 transition count 394
Applied a total of 64 rules in 10 ms. Remains 394 /426 variables (removed 32) and now considering 394/426 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 394 cols
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 300 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 393 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 14/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 788/788 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 16/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 393/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/865 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/885 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 15/900 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 788/788 variables, and 900 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 394/426 places, 394/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60373 ms. Remains : 394/426 places, 394/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8319715242850978154.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15378253411182737822.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8319715242850978154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15378253411182737822.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.53538e+35,20.7137,565012,2,8660,5,1.35392e+06,6,0,1972,4.47799e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(A(EG((p306==1)) U AF((p303==1))) U (EX(((p143==1)||(p297==1))) + (p241!=1))) * (EX(AX((p430==0))) + (p255==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((EX(((p143==1)||(p297==1))) + (p241!=1))) U (!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p303==1))))) U (!(EG((p306==1))...367
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...683
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4553612957149629760.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4553612957149629760.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4553612957149629760.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4553612957149629760.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4553612957149629760.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11901728642343400104.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12160225278626852870.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11901728642343400104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12160225278626852870.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.53538e+35,1.90583,58240,1301,38,90913,1138,614,269395,52,4181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(A(EG((i9.u93.p306==1)) U AF((i9.u92.p303==1))) U (EX(((i3.u44.p143==1)||(i9.u92.p297==1))) + (i7.u74.p241!=1))) * (EX(AX((i15.u132....187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((EX(((i3.u44.p143==1)||(i9.u92.p297==1))) + (i7.u74.p241!=1))) U (!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i9.u92.p30...474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t355, t357, t361, t364, t366, t370, t372, i0.t344, i0.t341, i0.t337, i0.t328, i0.t323, i0.u4....1154
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 393 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 393 transition count 393
Applied a total of 66 rules in 11 ms. Remains 393 /426 variables (removed 33) and now considering 393/426 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 393 cols
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 237 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 350 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 392 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 2/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 786/786 variables, and 448 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 392/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 13/890 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 786/786 variables, and 902 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 393/426 places, 393/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60417 ms. Remains : 393/426 places, 393/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9350293631668670498.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8133889400148774373.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9350293631668670498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8133889400148774373.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.95996e+35,13.0161,365384,2,7279,5,945887,6,0,1967,2.7842e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((EX((p485==0)) + (!(E((p483==1) U (p125==1))) * (p308==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((EX((p485==0)) + (!(E((p483==1) U (p125==1))) * (p308==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t17, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, ...670
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1557663248972478841.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1557663248972478841.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1557663248972478841.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1557663248972478841.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1557663248972478841.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18047175512047630167.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10487525519215005284.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18047175512047630167.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10487525519215005284.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.95996e+35,1.15241,43448,976,38,73038,616,611,192069,47,1654,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((EX((i18.u151.p485==0)) + (!(E((i18.u150.p483==1) U (i3.u40.p125==1))) * (i12.u96.p308==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((EX((i18.u151.p485==0)) + (!(E((i18.u150.p483==1) U (i3.u40.p125==1))) * (i12.u96.p308==1)))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t354, t356, t358, t360, t363, t367, t369, t371, i0.t343, i0.t340, i0.t327, i0.t322, i0.u4.t35...1137
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 392 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 392 transition count 392
Applied a total of 68 rules in 9 ms. Remains 392 /426 variables (removed 34) and now considering 392/426 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 392 rows 392 cols
[2025-06-05 06:11:45] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:11:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 327 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 391 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:11:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 2/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 784/784 variables, and 453 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 391/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 14/891 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 784/784 variables, and 900 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/426 places, 392/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60393 ms. Remains : 392/426 places, 392/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 392 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14532003497799090592.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3194330785468714485.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14532003497799090592.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3194330785468714485.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.98322e+35,13.2654,385112,2,9406,5,971405,6,0,1962,2.95914e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(((p107==1)&&(p192==1)))) * AF(AX(((p415==1)&&(p383==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((p107==1)&&(p192==1))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((p415==1)&&(p383==1))))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...682
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4341311856759924253.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4341311856759924253.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4341311856759924253.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4341311856759924253.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4341311856759924253.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4810219320505578117.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3893773400505981541.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4810219320505578117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3893773400505981541.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.98322e+35,0.530613,23116,753,38,33471,741,590,83102,49,1992,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(((i0.i3.u32.p107==1)&&(i7.u61.p192==1)))) * AF(AX(((i18.i1.u128.p415==1)&&(i16.i2.u121.p383==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i0.i3.u32.p107==1)&&(i7.u61.p192==1))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((i18.i...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t353, t355, t357, t359, t362, t364, t366, t368, t370, i0.i1.t307, i0.i1.u23.t311, i0.i2.t300,...1299
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 394 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 394 transition count 394
Applied a total of 64 rules in 16 ms. Remains 394 /426 variables (removed 32) and now considering 394/426 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 394 cols
[2025-06-05 06:13:46] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 302 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 393 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 1/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 7/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 788/788 variables, and 455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 393/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/863 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/883 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/903 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 788/788 variables, and 907 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 394/426 places, 394/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60395 ms. Remains : 394/426 places, 394/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3685461730958464498.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17062801409002267156.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3685461730958464498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17062801409002267156.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.20406e+35,13.0867,387952,2,7787,5,980334,6,0,1972,2.98241e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p231==1) * (((p79==1) + EX((p417==0))) + (((p86==1)&&(p281==1))&&((p300==1)&&(p114==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p231==1) * (((p79==1) + EX((p417==0))) + (((p86==1)&&(p281==1))&&((p300==1)&&(p114==1)))))))] = F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t62, t66, t68, t72, ...681
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9157287438041213646.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9157287438041213646.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9157287438041213646.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9157287438041213646.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9157287438041213646.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6060243311532066231.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1353312772299782762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6060243311532066231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1353312772299782762.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.20406e+35,0.936938,36320,724,42,59304,975,613,129658,54,3336,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i10.i2.u70.p231==1) * (((i0.i0.u28.p79==1) + EX((i18.u126.p417==0))) + (((i0.i0.u26.p86==1)&&(i13.i1.u86.p281==1))&&((i13.i3.u93.p30...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i10.i2.u70.p231==1) * (((i0.i0.u28.p79==1) + EX((i18.u126.p417==0))) + (((i0.i0.u26.p86==1)&&(i13...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t357, t359, t361, t364, t366, t368, t370, t372, i0.i0.t301, i0.i0.u28.t305, i0.i0.u28.t307, i...1318
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 70 rules in 11 ms. Remains 391 /426 variables (removed 35) and now considering 391/426 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:15:46] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 1/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 905 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60433 ms. Remains : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 391 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7293328259016587514.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:16:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16749098473060101475.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7293328259016587514.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16749098473060101475.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,12.3002,370780,2,7607,5,949042,6,0,1957,2.82851e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AX((((p217==0)||(p271==0))||(p305==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX(!((((p217==0)||(p271==0))||(p305==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...671
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3347152778440117599.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3347152778440117599.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3347152778440117599.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3347152778440117599.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3347152778440117599.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6976175006544735437.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2404883106472047494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6976175006544735437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2404883106472047494.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,1.57797,57992,1488,22,96534,484,595,255017,39,1221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AX((((i11.u67.p217==0)||(i12.u83.p271==0))||(i13.u92.p305==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX(!((((i11.u67.p217==0)||(i12.u83.p271==0))||(i13.u92.p305==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t352, t354, t356, t358, t361, t363, t365, t367, t369, i0.t30, i0.t29, i0.t25, i0.t21, i0.t12,...1127
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 70 rules in 9 ms. Remains 391 /426 variables (removed 35) and now considering 391/426 (removed 35) transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 225 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 328 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 903 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 391 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2833706384901620936.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:18:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17833958032205786030.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2833706384901620936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17833958032205786030.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,12.6122,370884,2,7607,5,949042,6,0,1957,2.82851e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(AX(AF(((p389==1)&&(p352==1))))) U (p475==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p389==1)&&(p352==1)))))))))) * (p475==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...671
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9376887733299464646.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9376887733299464646.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9376887733299464646.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9376887733299464646.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9376887733299464646.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability402471109323946783.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1754041664898359032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability402471109323946783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1754041664898359032.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,1.01164,39812,1057,38,63724,649,625,172513,47,1712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(AX(AF(((i15.u120.p389==1)&&(i18.i0.i1.u108.p352==1))))) U (i19.u144.p475==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((i15.u120.p389==1)&&(i18.i0.i1.u108.p352==1)))))))))) * (i19.u144.p475==1))] != FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t352, t354, t356, t358, t361, t363, t365, t367, t369, i0.t341, i0.t325, i0.u4.t348, i0.u8.t34...1130
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 425 transition count 340
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 340 transition count 335
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 335 transition count 335
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 335 transition count 274
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 274 transition count 274
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 325 place count 251 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 251 transition count 251
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 251 transition count 237
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 237 transition count 237
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 518 place count 166 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 166 transition count 165
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 521 place count 165 transition count 164
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 165 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 525 place count 163 transition count 162
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 526 place count 162 transition count 162
Applied a total of 526 rules in 49 ms. Remains 162 /426 variables (removed 264) and now considering 162/426 (removed 264) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 162 cols
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:19:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 10/162 variables, 25/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 162/324 variables, 162/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 12 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 2/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 13924 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 162/162 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/162 variables, 25/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/324 variables, 162/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 151/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 5/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 3/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 3/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 373 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 24331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 162/162 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 38262ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38262ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 162/426 places, 162/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38501 ms. Remains : 162/426 places, 162/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15385781008483422668.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12384899239366176784.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15385781008483422668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12384899239366176784.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1999e+22,0.430748,23088,2,770,5,63448,6,0,807,139500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((A(((p264==1)&&(((p144==1)&&(p401==1))||(((p266==1)&&(p320==1))&&(p354==1)))) U E((((p44==1)||(p233==1)) * EF((p111==1))) U (((p23==1)...495
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((!((E(!(E((((p44==1)||(p233==1)) * E(TRUE U (p111==1))) U (((p23==1)&&(p248==1))&&((p186==1)||(p25...1071
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t9, t15, t17, t18, t19, t22, t23, t29, t33, t35, t36, t38, t47, t52, t54, t58, t65, t...384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14332742998599403419.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14332742998599403419.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14332742998599403419.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14332742998599403419.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14332742998599403419.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2729229251290114501.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:20:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8890347598909286127.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2729229251290114501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8890347598909286127.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1999e+22,0.151728,10660,249,36,13135,347,420,27187,68,1154,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((A(((i6.u27.p264==1)&&(((i2.i2.u13.p144==1)&&(i12.u44.p401==1))||(((i6.u28.p266==1)&&(i10.u33.p320==1))&&(i10.u38.p354==1)))) U E((((i...762
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((!((E(!(E((((i0.i0.u4.p44==1)||(i4.u23.p233==1)) * E(TRUE U (i2.i0.u11.p111==1))) U (((i0.i0.u1.p2...1582
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t101, t152, t153, u31.t84, i0.i0.u1.t38, i0.i0.u1.t142, i0.i0.u3.t54, i0.i1.u2.t52, i0.i1.u5....667
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 396 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 396 transition count 396
Applied a total of 60 rules in 8 ms. Remains 396 /426 variables (removed 30) and now considering 396/426 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 396 cols
[2025-06-05 06:21:26] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:21:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:21:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 15/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 792/792 variables, and 456 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 395/395 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 16/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 395/848 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/868 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/888 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 19/907 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 792/792 variables, and 915 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 395/395 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 396/426 places, 396/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60355 ms. Remains : 396/426 places, 396/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 396 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10368844821929531990.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1191556218706598506.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10368844821929531990.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1191556218706598506.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.73707e+35,25.0823,677088,2,8805,5,1.38055e+06,6,0,1982,5.66825e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15916603503576032846.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15916603503576032846.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15916603503576032846.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15916603503576032846.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15916603503576032846.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 96 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8961563461055737843.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:22:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11961388438442239778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8961563461055737843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11961388438442239778.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.73707e+35,0.815607,31596,722,26,51009,476,595,109414,43,1097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((EF(((i18.i2.u125.p401==1)&&(i6.i2.u34.p101==1))) * AF(AX((i9.i1.u58.p182==1)))) + ((E((i19.u115.p363==1) U (i18.i0.u111.p359==1))...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((E(TRUE U ((i18.i2.u125.p401==1)&&(i6.i2.u34.p101==1))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i9.i1.u58.p18...350
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t359, t363, t368, t370, t372, t374, i0.i1.t21, i0.i1.t25, i0.i2.t12, i0.i2.u152.t16, i0.i3.t7...1338
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 425 transition count 317
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 317 transition count 316
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 316 transition count 316
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 316 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 253 transition count 253
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 373 place count 224 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 224 transition count 224
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 224 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 202 transition count 202
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 594 place count 128 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 595 place count 128 transition count 127
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 127 transition count 126
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 125 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 124 transition count 124
Applied a total of 600 rules in 31 ms. Remains 124 /426 variables (removed 302) and now considering 124/426 (removed 302) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 124/248 variables, 124/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 248/248 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 3756 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 124/248 variables, 124/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 122/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 248/248 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 3578 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7344ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7345ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/426 places, 124/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7521 ms. Remains : 124/426 places, 124/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11659849934359159438.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13306458250377947745.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11659849934359159438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13306458250377947745.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.41549e+19,0.044189,5712,2,209,5,8032,6,0,623,9814,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((!(E((p436==1) U (p298==1))) * ((p106==0) + AG(((p36==0)||(p55==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!(E((p436==1) U (p298==1))) * ((p106==0) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p36==0)||(p55==0))))))...168
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 122/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.297733,17628,1,0,16,73415,24,5,2933,77909,12
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 70 rules in 8 ms. Remains 391 /426 variables (removed 35) and now considering 391/426 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:23:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 1/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 782/782 variables, and 903 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60374 ms. Remains : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 391 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3318802701894300258.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17041864278094773741.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3318802701894300258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17041864278094773741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,12.8305,370796,2,7607,5,949042,6,0,1957,2.82851e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A(AX((p371!=1)) U !(EX(AG((p192==1)))))) U AG((EF((p456==1)) + (p170==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p456==1)) + (p170==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p456==1))...401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...671
(forward)formula 0,0,26.7801,548832,1,0,922,2.84455e+06,815,398,11224,2.82851e+06,965
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 425 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 313 transition count 312
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 312 transition count 312
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 312 transition count 249
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 249 transition count 249
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 381 place count 220 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 220 transition count 220
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 220 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 197 transition count 197
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 125 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 601 place count 125 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 124 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 605 place count 122 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 606 rules in 52 ms. Remains 121 /426 variables (removed 305) and now considering 121/426 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 4523 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 119/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 3709 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8238ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8239ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8493 ms. Remains : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13569225748768327114.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9477131684878577320.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13569225748768327114.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9477131684878577320.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17074e+19,0.063344,6468,2,207,5,10739,6,0,607,15288,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p213==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p213==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 119/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.125837,8132,1,0,9,23518,20,3,3059,15929,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 425 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 313 transition count 313
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 313 transition count 251
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 251 transition count 251
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 376 place count 223 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 223 transition count 223
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 223 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 200 transition count 200
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 125 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 601 place count 125 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 124 transition count 123
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 604 place count 124 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 122 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 607 rules in 33 ms. Remains 121 /426 variables (removed 305) and now considering 121/426 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2360 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 120/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3000 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5367ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5368ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5543 ms. Remains : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16023025576390845523.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13560151998792283760.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16023025576390845523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13560151998792283760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44091e+19,0.048051,5704,2,203,5,7649,6,0,608,9489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((p327==1)))) U (p178==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p327==1))))))))) * (p178==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13426273183290758388.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13426273183290758388.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13426273183290758388.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13426273183290758388.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13426273183290758388.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4073881021209504599.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:25:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8063230073620466845.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4073881021209504599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8063230073620466845.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44091e+19,0.039301,5240,32,16,2486,99,224,4358,40,270,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((i6.u26.p327==1)))) U (i3.u14.p178==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i6.u26.p327==1))))))))) * (i3.u14.p178==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 425 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 313 transition count 312
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 312 transition count 312
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 312 transition count 249
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 249 transition count 249
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 381 place count 220 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 220 transition count 220
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 220 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 197 transition count 197
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 125 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 601 place count 125 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 124 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 605 place count 122 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 606 rules in 38 ms. Remains 121 /426 variables (removed 305) and now considering 121/426 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:26:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 3530 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 119/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 5195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8731ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8731ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8916 ms. Remains : 121/426 places, 121/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11808721426295522861.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1200791195708188800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11808721426295522861.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1200791195708188800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17074e+19,0.054428,5968,2,207,5,8535,6,0,607,11477,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p360==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p360==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1275064834286199564.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1275064834286199564.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1275064834286199564.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1275064834286199564.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1275064834286199564.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9193608033654804521.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:26:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11887190821256645510.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9193608033654804521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11887190821256645510.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17074e+19,0.043845,5368,31,15,2783,62,218,5530,37,150,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((i7.u29.p360==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (i7.u29.p360==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 391 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 391 transition count 391
Applied a total of 70 rules in 14 ms. Remains 391 /426 variables (removed 35) and now considering 391/426 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 391 rows 391 cols
[2025-06-05 06:27:26] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:27:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 290 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 390 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:27:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 8/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 1/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 782/782 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 391/391 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 390/390 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 391/782 variables, 391/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 390/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/873 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/782 variables, 20/893 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60125ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 390 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60126ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60431 ms. Remains : 391/426 places, 391/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 391 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6715623842408749626.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14838669945688165332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6715623842408749626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14838669945688165332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,12.4876,370812,2,7607,5,949042,6,0,1957,2.82851e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((AG((p94==0)) + AF((p290==1))) * EG(AX((p225==1)))) * (EX((((p281==0)||(p300==0))||((p366==1)||(p17==1)))) * (p213==1)))) + AX((p43...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EG(!((((!(E(TRUE U !((p94==0)))) + !(EG(!((p290==1))))) * EG(!(EX(!((p225==1)))))) * (EX((((p28...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...671
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7909898032324386959.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7909898032324386959.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7909898032324386959.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7909898032324386959.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7909898032324386959.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1507911255850896383.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:28:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12382085914075115424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1507911255850896383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12382085914075115424.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.56678e+35,0.835755,34116,565,38,59033,735,542,119960,47,1620,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((AG((i2.u31.p94==0)) + AF((i10.u88.p290==1))) * EG(AX((i8.i2.u72.p225==1)))) * (EX((((i11.i2.u84.p281==0)||(i11.i3.u92.p300==0))||(...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EG(!((((!(E(TRUE U !((i2.u31.p94==0)))) + !(EG(!((i10.u88.p290==1))))) * EG(!(EX(!((i8.i2.u72.p...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t352, t354, t356, t358, t361, t363, t365, t367, t369, i0.i1.t341, i0.i1.u7.t345, i0.i2.t338, ...1263
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 398 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 398 transition count 398
Applied a total of 56 rules in 8 ms. Remains 398 /426 variables (removed 28) and now considering 398/426 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 398 rows 398 cols
[2025-06-05 06:29:26] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:29:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 280 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 397 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:29:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/398 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 16/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 398/796 variables, 398/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/796 variables, 1/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 timeout
0.0)
(s188 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 796/796 variables, and 459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 398/398 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 397/397 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/398 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 398/796 variables, 398/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/796 variables, 397/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/796 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/796 variables, 20/897 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/796 variables, 20/917 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 796/796 variables, and 917 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 398/398 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 397/397 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 398/426 places, 398/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60349 ms. Remains : 398/426 places, 398/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5549066733836586942.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7126906052317988134.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5549066733836586942.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7126906052317988134.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.16059e+35,17.7505,498092,2,10300,5,1.25318e+06,6,0,1992,3.79782e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((p417==1) * ((p355==0) + AX((p486==0))))) * AF(((p411==0) * AG(AF((p159==0)))))) * ((EX(((p193==1) * EG(((p457==0)&&((p477==0)||(p4...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p417==1) * ((p355==0) + !(EX(!((p486==0)))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((p411==0) * !(...778
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t19, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t41, t43, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t63, t67, ...726
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16674641384371876002.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16674641384371876002.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16674641384371876002.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16674641384371876002.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16674641384371876002.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9773395902601333341.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11891116980408944666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9773395902601333341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11891116980408944666.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.16059e+35,3.49317,116552,1883,25,203227,440,656,506336,43,1057,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((i17.u131.p417==1) * ((i13.u111.p355==0) + AX((i18.u153.p486==0))))) * AF(((i17.u132.p411==0) * AG(AF((i5.u48.p159==0)))))) * ((EX(...383
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i17.u131.p417==1) * ((i13.u111.p355==0) + !(EX(!((i18.u153.p486==0)))))))))] = FALSE * [...1086
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t361, t363, t365, t370, t372, t374, t376, i0.t59, i0.t55, i0.t46, i0.t41, i0.u137.t50, i0.u14...1249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 399 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 399 transition count 399
Applied a total of 54 rules in 16 ms. Remains 399 /426 variables (removed 27) and now considering 399/426 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 399 rows 399 cols
[2025-06-05 06:31:27] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:31:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 237 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 398 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:31:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/399 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 16/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 1/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 798/798 variables, and 458 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 399/399 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 398/398 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/399 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 17/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 399/798 variables, 399/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 398/856 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/876 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/896 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 20/916 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60120ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60121ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 399/426 places, 399/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60481 ms. Remains : 399/426 places, 399/426 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 399 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11533532386604754289.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10023590844552337448.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11533532386604754289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10023590844552337448.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18256e+36,19.8212,549344,2,10253,5,1.30336e+06,6,0,1997,4.33343e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17617839259473929693.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17617839259473929693.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17617839259473929693.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17617839259473929693.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17617839259473929693.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17558091399032803776.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:32:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11709753317727269327.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17558091399032803776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11709753317727269327.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18256e+36,1.807,61908,1573,23,95820,452,653,312157,40,984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((!(AX((i16.u141.p432==1))) + (((i8.u79.p243==1)||(i17.u152.p474==1))&&((i12.u109.p331==1)||(i2.u26.p76==1)))) + (((i5.u52.p160==1) * ...293
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(((!(!(EX(!((i16.u141.p432==1))))) + (((i8.u79.p243==1)||(i17.u152.p474==1))&&((i12.u109.p331==1)||...431
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t360, t362, t364, t369, t371, t373, t375, t377, i0.t349, i0.t346, i0.t342, i0.t333, i0.t328, ...1257
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16016420759344116460.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16016420759344116460.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16016420759344116460.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16016420759344116460.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16016420759344116460.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2884318649228316796.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:33:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11731971335441712603.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2884318649228316796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11731971335441712603.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08645e+36,6.18641,151484,1244,37,221951,468,733,724084,51,1424,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(A(EG((i0.i3.u100.p306==1)) U AF((i0.i3.u103.p303==1))) U (EX(((i5.i1.u48.p143==1)||(i0.i3.u103.p297==1))) + (i11.u82.p241!=1))) * (...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((EX(((i5.i1.u48.p143==1)||(i0.i3.u103.p297==1))) + (i11.u82.p241!=1))) U (!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i0...521
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t389, t402, t404, i0.i1.t184, i0.i1.u90.t186, i0.i1.u92.t180, i0.i2.t173, i0.i2.t177, i0.i3.t...2025
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15827112297357917279.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 07:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11091223523982903970.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15827112297357917279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11091223523982903970.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08645e+36,27.6357,672080,1593,422,1.07269e+06,1083,538,4.9248e+06,153,14752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(A(EG((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u52.p306==1)) U AF((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u52.p303==1))) U (EX(((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u30.p143==1)||(i0.i0.i0.i...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((EX(((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u30.p143==1)||(i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u52.p297==1))) + (i0.i0.i0.i0....706
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t404, i0.i0.t402, i0.i0.i0.t389, i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u10.t383, i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0...4174

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000266"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;