Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000265.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000265
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749102925933

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Transformed 503 places.
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Transformed 503 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 503 places and 503 transitions and 1186 arcs in 202 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 111 out of 503 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 503/503 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 434 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 434 transition count 434
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 433 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 433 transition count 433
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 432 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 432 transition count 432
Applied a total of 142 rules in 103 ms. Remains 432 /503 variables (removed 71) and now considering 432/503 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 432 cols
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 306 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:55:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 613 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:55:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/432 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 9/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 7/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 5/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 432/864 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/432 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/432 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 61/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 3/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 432/864 variables, 432/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/864 variables, 431/969 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/864 variables, 20/989 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 170 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/864 variables, 20/1009 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 864/864 variables, and 1009 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 432/432 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60124ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60137ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 432/503 places, 432/503 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60872 ms. Remains : 432/503 places, 432/503 transitions.
Support contains 111 out of 432 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 05:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:28] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 05:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 432 places (down from 111) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1351 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 2/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 224/864 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 41 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/432 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
Computed a total of 131 stabilizing places and 131 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 393 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 393 transition count 393
Applied a total of 78 rules in 22 ms. Remains 393 /432 variables (removed 39) and now considering 393/432 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 393 cols
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 392 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 4/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 786/786 variables, and 450 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 392/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 18/895 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 786/786 variables, and 899 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60395 ms. Remains : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9367613418104004743.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17503541054876337882.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9367613418104004743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17503541054876337882.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.58323e+35,12.153,364200,2,7831,5,935478,6,0,1967,2.76776e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AG(((p49==0)||(p441==0))) + (p311==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p49==0)||(p441==0))))) + (p311==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t46, t51, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, t81, ...671
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6145195652855982868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6145195652855982868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6145195652855982868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6145195652855982868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6145195652855982868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:57:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:58:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:58:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10708368666663148444.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10858109370188615253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10708368666663148444.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10858109370188615253.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.58323e+35,0.792179,31236,618,22,49323,565,545,122502,44,1475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AG(((i3.i3.u16.p49==0)||(i17.u138.p441==0))) + (i14.u99.p311==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.i3.u16.p49==0)||(i17.u138.p441==0))))) + (i14.u99.p311==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t354, t356, t358, t360, t363, t365, t367, t369, t371, i0.i1.t125, i0.i1.t129, i0.i2.t116, i0....1273
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,3.07308,96004,1,0,218123,565,4427,320643,237,1475,173408
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 393 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 393 transition count 393
Applied a total of 78 rules in 19 ms. Remains 393 /432 variables (removed 39) and now considering 393/432 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 393 cols
[2025-06-05 05:58:03] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:58:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 212 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 351 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 392 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:58:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 4/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 786/786 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 392/838 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/858 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/878 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/898 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60126ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60499 ms. Remains : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6638411140987452155.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5433778020899535055.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6638411140987452155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5433778020899535055.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.81755e+35,14.2807,412676,2,7571,5,961449,6,0,1967,3.28501e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(!(A((p374==1) U (p201==1))) U E((p393==1) U (p484==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(E((p393==1) U (p484==1)))) * !(!(!((E(!((p201==1)) U (!((p374==1)) * !((p201==1)))) + EG(!((...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...682
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15629401240568367814.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15629401240568367814.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15629401240568367814.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15629401240568367814.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15629401240568367814.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8031773773944473780.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1926520282790619311.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8031773773944473780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1926520282790619311.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.81755e+35,0.930534,38404,1349,23,63027,397,626,181585,38,840,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(!(A((i15.u119.p374==1) U (i2.u66.p201==1))) U E((i14.u123.p393==1) U (i0.u152.p484==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(E((i14.u123.p393==1) U (i0.u152.p484==1)))) * !(!(!((E(!((i2.u66.p201==1)) U (!((i15.u119.p3...347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t354, t356, t358, t360, t363, t365, t367, t369, t371, i0.t30, i0.t29, i0.t25, i0.t21, i0.t12,...1151
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,3.1455,109316,1,0,246176,397,5211,512381,208,1188,251846
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 392 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 392 transition count 392
Applied a total of 80 rules in 12 ms. Remains 392 /432 variables (removed 40) and now considering 392/432 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 392 rows 392 cols
[2025-06-05 05:59:37] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:59:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 334 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 391 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:59:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 2/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 784/784 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/392 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 392/784 variables, 392/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 391/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/855 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/784 variables, 20/895 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 784/784 variables, and 902 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 392/392 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 391/391 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 391 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/432 places, 392/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60421 ms. Remains : 392/432 places, 392/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 392 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8293608456325762569.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:00:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12720852417334418050.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8293608456325762569.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12720852417334418050.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.11092e+35,12.0684,353560,2,7815,5,919055,6,0,1962,2.66351e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11091617964059406922.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11091617964059406922.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11091617964059406922.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11091617964059406922.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11091617964059406922.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5128088134721197095.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6003817529544102003.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5128088134721197095.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6003817529544102003.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.11092e+35,0.859136,33108,592,35,54072,841,556,121051,47,2017,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EG((EX((i16.u130.p419==1)) + AX(((i18.i2.u152.p480==0)||(i1.i3.u13.p29==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(EX((i16.u130.p419==1)) + !(EX(!(((i18.i2.u152.p480==0)||(i1.i3.u13.p29==1)))))))] != ...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t353, t355, t357, t359, t362, t364, t366, t368, i0.i1.t307, i0.i1.u23.t311, i0.i2.t300, i0.i2...1263
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,1,2.65022,88660,1,0,215950,986,4469,272331,267,2919,266066
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 104 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 104 transitions
Performed 104 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 104
Iterating post reduction 0 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 431 transition count 327
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 327 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 323 transition count 323
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 323 transition count 261
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 261 transition count 261
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 239 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 239 transition count 239
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 239 transition count 226
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 226 transition count 226
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 552 place count 155 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 553 place count 155 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 555 place count 153 transition count 152
Applied a total of 555 rules in 80 ms. Remains 153 /432 variables (removed 279) and now considering 152/432 (removed 280) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 153 cols
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/153 variables, 21/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 152/305 variables, 153/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/305 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/305 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 8515 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/153 variables, 21/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 152/305 variables, 153/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 145/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 5/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 3/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/305 variables, 2/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/305 variables, 0/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 305/305 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 28850 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 37375ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37375ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/432 places, 152/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37632 ms. Remains : 153/432 places, 152/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10747926911830128982.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7938964730402076961.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10747926911830128982.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7938964730402076961.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.93873e+21,0.253721,14896,2,837,5,38295,6,0,762,74454,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(((AG(((p200==0)||(p393==1))) * (p439==0)) + (p345==1))) + !(A(((E(((p227==0)||(p136==1)) U (p16==1)) + AF(((p71==0)||(p344==1)))) + ...370
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p380==0))))))) * E(TRUE U (p293==1)))) * EG(((E(TRUE U (p111==0...612
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t5, t6, t7, t10, t12, t13, t14, t16, t19, t20, t21, t26, t28, t30, t33, t37, t40, t41, t4...423
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12675582896589750598.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12675582896589750598.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12675582896589750598.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12675582896589750598.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12675582896589750598.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 28 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4786869671653902683.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6882175653759251986.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4786869671653902683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6882175653759251986.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.93873e+21,0.196005,11844,269,36,14702,206,396,43317,69,805,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(((AG(((i3.u20.p200==0)||(i8.u38.p393==1))) * (i9.i1.u43.p439==0)) + (i6.i0.u33.p345==1))) + !(A(((E(((i4.u22.p227==0)||(i2.u14.p136=...551
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u35.p380==0))))))) * E(TRUE U (i5.u27.p293==1)))) * EG(((E(T...841
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t53, t114, t144, i0.t129, i0.t128, i0.u2.t30, i0.u3.t26, i0.u3.t33, i0.u4.t106, i0....734
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 396 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 396 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 14 ms. Remains 396 /432 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 396 cols
[2025-06-05 06:02:48] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:02:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 240 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:02:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 18/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 7/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 792/792 variables, and 464 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 395/395 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 395/855 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/895 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/915 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 792/792 variables, and 925 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 395/395 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 396/432 places, 396/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60429 ms. Remains : 396/432 places, 396/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 396 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2454218987868949836.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13112772752761989341.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2454218987868949836.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13112772752761989341.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.79311e+35,21.0082,581300,2,9084,5,1.44497e+06,6,0,1982,4.51674e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6742298067737325396.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6742298067737325396.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6742298067737325396.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6742298067737325396.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6742298067737325396.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17118186976523831689.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3508270354160513895.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17118186976523831689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3508270354160513895.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.79311e+35,3.44871,84100,921,23,121806,499,593,330800,40,1267,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((AX((i5.i3.u51.p155==1)) * ((i0.i0.u99.p310==0)||(i11.u78.p241==1))) * EG(((i16.i2.u121.p379==0)||(i10.u71.p221==1)))) + EF((i9.i2....266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!((((!(EX(!((i5.i3.u51.p155==1)))) * ((i0.i0.u99.p310==0)||(i11.u78.p241==1))) * EG(((i16.i2.u121.p...485
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t357, t359, t363, t366, t370, t372, t374, i0.i1.t124, i0.i1.t128, i0.i2.t115, i0.i2.u108.t119...1376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 394 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 394 transition count 394
Applied a total of 76 rules in 12 ms. Remains 394 /432 variables (removed 38) and now considering 394/432 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 394 cols
[2025-06-05 06:04:48] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:04:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 220 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 340 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 393 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:04:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 timeout
0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 3/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 788/788 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/394 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 394/788 variables, 394/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 393/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/863 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/883 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/788 variables, 20/903 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 788/788 variables, and 909 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 394/394 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 393/393 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 393 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 394/432 places, 394/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60402 ms. Remains : 394/432 places, 394/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2286451185366922517.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1950435091007680856.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2286451185366922517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1950435091007680856.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.83281e+35,14.2238,407188,2,9214,5,1.02944e+06,6,0,1972,3.10263e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(!(AG(EX(((p115==0)||(p133==1)))))) U !(AF((A((p432==1) U (((p343==1)||(p64==0))||(p286==1))) + (p246!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EG(!((!((E(!((((p343==1)||(p64==0))||(p286==1))) U (!((p432==1)) * !((((p343==1)||(p64==0))...669
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t52, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, ...694
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4245839742435860176.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4245839742435860176.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4245839742435860176.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4245839742435860176.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4245839742435860176.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14405799659705376361.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13433899426053544904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14405799659705376361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13433899426053544904.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.83281e+35,1.37688,48992,1456,25,81150,511,676,227874,43,1259,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(!(AG(EX(((i3.u39.p115==0)||(i0.u41.p133==1)))))) U !(AF((A((i15.u137.p432==1) U (((i12.u109.p343==1)||(i2.i1.i0.u21.p64==0))||(i10.u...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EG(!((!((E(!((((i12.u109.p343==1)||(i2.i1.i0.u21.p64==0))||(i10.u90.p286==1))) U (!((i15.u1...1001
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t355, t357, t359, t361, t364, t366, t368, t370, t372, i0.t271, i0.t267, i0.t258, i0.t253, i0....1210
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 397 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 397 transition count 397
Applied a total of 70 rules in 12 ms. Remains 397 /432 variables (removed 35) and now considering 397/432 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 397 cols
[2025-06-05 06:06:49] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:06:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:06:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/397 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 397/794 variables, 397/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/794 variables, 1/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 794/794 variables, and 455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 397/397 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/397 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 17/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 6/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 397/794 variables, 397/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/794 variables, 396/857 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/794 variables, 20/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/794 variables, 20/897 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 794/794 variables, and 914 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 397/397 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 397/432 places, 397/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60402 ms. Remains : 397/432 places, 397/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 397 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15147442158115485465.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:07:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15918603184774424836.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15147442158115485465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15918603184774424836.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.42872e+35,13.6809,391656,2,8311,5,997285,6,0,1987,2.99228e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((((EX((p221==0)) * (p104==0)) * ((p42==1) * ((A((p10==1) U ((p392==0)||(p40==1))) + EF((p71==1))) + ((EG((p24==1)) * (p66==0)) * ((...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((EX((p221==0)) * (p104==0)) * ((p42==1) * ((!((E(!(((p392==0)||(p40==1))) U (!((p10==1...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t81, ...707
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15618023854302769178.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15618023854302769178.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15618023854302769178.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15618023854302769178.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15618023854302769178.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5758686410022052589.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8442853607456980252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5758686410022052589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8442853607456980252.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.42872e+35,1.2092,45524,804,38,75898,641,669,163294,49,1327,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((((EX((i12.u70.p221==0)) * (i5.i3.u36.p104==0)) * ((i3.i3.u16.p42==1) * ((A((i3.i0.u5.p10==1) U ((i17.i1.u126.p392==0)||(i3.i3.u19....387
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((EX((i12.u70.p221==0)) * (i5.i3.u36.p104==0)) * ((i3.i3.u16.p42==1) * ((!((E(!(((i17.i...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t360, t364, t367, t369, t371, t373, t375, i0.i1.t61, i0.i1.u133.t65, i0.i2.t54, i0.i2.t58, i0...1382
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 396 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 396 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 11 ms. Remains 396 /432 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 396 cols
[2025-06-05 06:08:50] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 1/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 792/792 variables, and 453 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 395/395 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/396 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 16/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 396/792 variables, 396/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 395/851 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/792 variables, 20/891 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60077ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 396/432 places, 396/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 396/432 places, 396/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 396 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4773272859873551520.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 06:09:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8545775379392263134.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4773272859873551520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8545775379392263134.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05872e+35,18.6401,523708,2,9513,5,1.18795e+06,6,0,1982,4.18416e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!((EF(!((((p396==0)||(p128==1))&&(p400==0)))) * EF(!(AG((p252==1)))))) U (E(!(((p9==0)||(p441==1))) U (AG((p197==1)) * ((((p402==0)&&...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!((E(TRUE U !((((p396==0)||(p128==1))&&(p400==0)))) * E(TRUE U !(!(E(TRUE U !((p252==1)))))...323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t46, t51, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t77, t79, ...693
(forward)formula 0,1,29.6884,536112,1,0,773,2.7752e+06,821,397,11033,4.18416e+06,808
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 393 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 393 transition count 393
Applied a total of 78 rules in 21 ms. Remains 393 /432 variables (removed 39) and now considering 393/432 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 393 cols
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 212 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 303 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 392 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 3/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 786/786 variables, and 449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 393/393 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 392/392 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/393 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 393/786 variables, 393/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 392/838 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/858 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/878 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 20/898 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/786 variables, 16/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60049ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60376 ms. Remains : 393/432 places, 393/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11393705041245727500.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8271031480757151904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11393705041245727500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8271031480757151904.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.64611e+35,12.4821,364140,2,9698,5,916640,6,0,1967,2.80106e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((AX(AF((p484==0))) * (p272==1)) * ((p488==0)||(p375==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!(!(EG(!((p484==0))))))) * (p272==1)) * ((p488==0)||(p375==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, ...682
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1469187403154613023.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1469187403154613023.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1469187403154613023.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1469187403154613023.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1469187403154613023.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10858513043826157831.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality736623481901609802.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10858513043826157831.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality736623481901609802.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.64611e+35,1.40351,49104,1492,25,76078,394,603,228703,43,883,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((AX(AF((i19.u150.p484==0))) * (i11.u84.p272==1)) * ((i19.u151.p488==0)||(i15.u117.p375==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i19.u150.p484==0))))))) * (i11.u84.p272==1)) * ((i19.u151.p488==0)||(i1...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t354, t358, t360, t363, t365, t367, t369, t371, i0.t273, i0.t257, i0.u38.t277, i0.u46.t261, i...1146
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 432/432 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 395 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 395 transition count 395
Applied a total of 74 rules in 11 ms. Remains 395 /432 variables (removed 37) and now considering 395/432 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 395 rows 395 cols
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 394 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:12:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/395 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 19/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 395/790 variables, 395/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 9/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 790/790 variables, and 464 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 395/395 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 394/394 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/395 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 19/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 395/790 variables, 395/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 394/849 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 20/869 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 20/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/790 variables, 19/908 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 790/790 variables, and 915 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 395/395 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 394/394 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 394 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 395/432 places, 395/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60375 ms. Remains : 395/432 places, 395/432 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 395 transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9228355019195117170.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8449908197411981101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9228355019195117170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8449908197411981101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.90406e+35,13.7754,398320,2,10401,5,983761,6,0,1977,3.07927e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((EG(((p156==0)||(p457==1))) + (p197==0)) + ((p488==0)||((p439==0)&&(p247==1)))))) * EF(((((p386==0)||(p422==1)) * EX(EF((p74==1))...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU((Init * EX(E(TRUE U ((EG(((p156==0)||(p457==1))) + (p197==0)) + ((p488==0)||((p439==0)&&(p247==1))))...454
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t47, t51, t53, t56, t62, t64, t68, ...698
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph451573962702864430.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph451573962702864430.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph451573962702864430.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph451573962702864430.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph451573962702864430.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9857544825344850548.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 06:13:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3203957275199667933.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9857544825344850548.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3203957275199667933.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.90406e+35,0.975508,35960,691,23,59553,385,578,130918,40,826,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((EG(((i6.i3.u50.p156==0)||(i19.i0.u142.p457==1))) + (i1.i2.u62.p197==0)) + ((i20.u150.p488==0)||((i17.i1.u137.p439==0)&&(i10.i3.u...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU((Init * EX(E(TRUE U ((EG(((i6.i3.u50.p156==0)||(i19.i0.u142.p457==1))) + (i1.i2.u62.p197==0)) + ((i2...677
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t356, t358, t360, t362, t367, t369, t371, t373, i1.i1.t232, i1.i1.t236, i1.i2.t223, i1.i2.u61...1367
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8291443864603880931.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8291443864603880931.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8291443864603880931.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8291443864603880931.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8291443864603880931.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 77 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5388917179303238010.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:14:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4303456292405912247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5388917179303238010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4303456292405912247.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31335e+37,6.50324,179916,1624,37,271455,594,776,857120,51,2176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(((AG(((i8.i1.u71.p200==0)||(i17.u138.p393==1))) * (i19.u155.p439==0)) + (i15.i3.u122.p345==1))) + !(A(((E(((i10.i2.u79.p227==0)||(i6...601
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i16.i2.u134.p380==0))))))) * E(TRUE U (i12.i2.u105.p293==1)))) ...905
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t399, t406, i0.i1.t60, i0.i1.u151.t64, i0.i1.u151.t66, i0.i2.t43, i0.i2.u158.t39, i1.i2.t266,...1967
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3393874018561013451.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 06:40:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11372863951136301148.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3393874018561013451.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11372863951136301148.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31335e+37,23.1356,608588,1698,471,1.00297e+06,1125,532,4.63627e+06,159,14260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(((AG(((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u38.p200==0)||(i0.i0.i1.i0.u65.p393==1))) * (i0.i1.i0.u72.p439==0)) + (i0.i0.i0.i1.u59.p345==1))) + !(A(...949
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u64.p380==0))))))) * E(TRUE U (i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0...1317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.t406, i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.t399, i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u10.t389, i0.i0.i0.i0...4076
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000265"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;