Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000250.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-005B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000250
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749100848767

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Transformed 253 places.
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Transformed 253 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 253 places and 253 transitions and 596 arcs in 162 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 122 out of 253 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 253/253 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 239 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 239 transition count 239
Applied a total of 28 rules in 33 ms. Remains 239 /253 variables (removed 14) and now considering 239/253 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 442 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 238 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 11/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 14/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 5/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 239/478 variables, 239/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 478/478 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 238/238 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 64/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 239/478 variables, 239/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 238/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 20/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 167 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 13/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 10/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 3/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 3/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 478/478 variables, and 621 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 238/238 constraints, Known Traps: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60098ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/253 places, 239/253 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60590 ms. Remains : 239/253 places, 239/253 transitions.
Support contains 122 out of 239 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 1704 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 9/93 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 159 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 289 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
[2025-06-05 05:21:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp76 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp84 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 199/208 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 31/239 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 239/478 variables, 239/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/478 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 478/478 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved in 802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 189/193 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 46/239 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 239/478 variables, 239/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/478 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 478/478 variables, and 272 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 205 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1014ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 42 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 239 transition count 168
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 168 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 167 transition count 166
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 167 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 145 transition count 144
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 120 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 120 transition count 119
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 120 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 106 transition count 105
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 59 transition count 58
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -13
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 45 transition count 71
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 45 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 44 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 43 transition count 69
Applied a total of 392 rules in 52 ms. Remains 43 /239 variables (removed 196) and now considering 69/239 (removed 170) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 43/239 places, 69/239 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (26 resets) in 296 ms. (134 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (10 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2837023 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=945 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2837023 steps, saw 823304 distinct states, run finished after 3010 ms. (steps per millisecond=942 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/21 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 50/71 variables, 16/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 33/104 variables, 16/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 8/112 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 112/112 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 80 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/21 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 50/71 variables, 16/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 33/104 variables, 16/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 8/112 variables, 4/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 112/112 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 78 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 166ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 43 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 69/69 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 69/69 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 43/43 places, 69/69 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 69/69 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 69/69 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/112 variables, 43/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 112/112 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1318 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/112 variables, 43/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 65/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 112/112 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1707 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3044ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3173 ms. Remains : 43/43 places, 69/69 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 20 edges and 43 vertex of which 4 / 43 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 122 edges and 41 vertex of which 39 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 17 edges and 37 vertex of which 4 / 37 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 35 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 16 edges and 33 vertex of which 6 / 33 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 30 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 7 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 13 edges and 28 vertex of which 6 / 28 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 25 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 7 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 10 edges and 22 vertex of which 4 / 22 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 20 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 8 edges and 18 vertex of which 2 / 18 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 17 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 29 edges and 16 vertex of which 11 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 11 transition count 13
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 11 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 10 transition count 12
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 8 transition count 11
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 8 transition count 8
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 6 transition count 7
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 4 transition count 6
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 80 rules in 18 ms. Remains 4 /43 variables (removed 39) and now considering 4/69 (removed 65) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 4 cols
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] After 4ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] After 12ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] After 40ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 63 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
Computed a total of 72 stabilizing places and 72 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 238 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 167 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 166 transition count 165
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 166 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 143 transition count 142
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 117 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 117 transition count 116
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 117 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 103 transition count 102
Performed 39 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 64 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 62 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 61 transition count 61
Applied a total of 352 rules in 23 ms. Remains 61 /239 variables (removed 178) and now considering 61/239 (removed 178) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 60/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1879ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1881ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/239 places, 61/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2004 ms. Remains : 61/239 places, 61/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5314043145669321107.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7216714684794261141.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5314043145669321107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7216714684794261141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.13249e+09,0.032351,4432,2,103,5,3607,6,0,308,4493,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(E((p195==1) U (p37==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(E((p195==1) U (p37==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 59/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.091078,7120,1,0,10,18477,21,2,1462,18354,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 238 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 178 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 177 transition count 176
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 177 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 152 transition count 151
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 124 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 124 transition count 123
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 124 transition count 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 112 transition count 111
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 84 transition count 83
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 84 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 82 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 313 rules in 30 ms. Remains 81 /239 variables (removed 158) and now considering 81/239 (removed 158) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 1962 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 77/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 4/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 5831 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 7799ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7800ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/239 places, 81/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7929 ms. Remains : 81/239 places, 81/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13221040047875216554.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5744062523545595979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13221040047875216554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5744062523545595979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.10233e+10,0.06473,6988,2,320,5,11733,6,0,405,20726,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG((((((p43==1)&&(p55==1))&&((p87==1)&&(p158==1)))||((p147==1)&&(p140==1))) * ((EF((((p16==1)&&(p70==1))&&(p104==1))) + (p107==1)) + (p...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U EG((!(E(TRUE U !((p72==1)))) * (!((E(!((p59==1)) U (!((p200==1)) * !((p59==1)))) + EG(...814
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t7, t22, t24, t29, t31, t35, t44, t45, t48, t50, t52, t54, t69, t74, t77, Intersecti...242
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1291715365706440771.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1291715365706440771.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1291715365706440771.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1291715365706440771.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1291715365706440771.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14927860811085806280.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3411674718562329853.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14927860811085806280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3411674718562329853.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.10233e+10,0.035856,5372,117,20,3062,152,264,5552,50,476,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG((((((i0.u5.p43==1)&&(i2.u6.p55==1))&&((i3.u11.p87==1)&&(i8.u19.p158==1)))||((i7.u18.p147==1)&&(i6.u17.p140==1))) * ((EF((((i1.u3.p16...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U EG((!(E(TRUE U !((i4.u9.p72==1)))) * (!((E(!((i5.i0.u7.p59==1)) U (!((i9.u24.p200==1))...1114
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t69, t74, i0.u5.t44, i1.u2.t22, i2.u4.t24, i2.u6.t45, i3.u12.t31, i4.u8.t48, i5.i0.u10.t29, i...344
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,2.92317,112124,1,0,189876,238,1489,350218,249,476,169792
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 197 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 196 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 86 rules in 14 ms. Remains 196 /239 variables (removed 43) and now considering 196/239 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 196 cols
[2025-06-05 05:22:42] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:22:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 392/392 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 10737 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 195/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 14/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 18/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 392/392 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 40768ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40768ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 196/239 places, 196/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40945 ms. Remains : 196/239 places, 196/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability45672682201693175.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9890853385698155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability45672682201693175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9890853385698155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...278
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,1.11466,44192,2,1831,5,118079,6,0,982,280217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((A((p108==1) U (p127==1)) + ((p52==0) * AG((p34==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((p127==1))))) * !(E(!((p127==1)) U (!((p108==1)) * !((p127==1))))))] != FALSE +...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12832259536871810480.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12832259536871810480.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12832259536871810480.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12832259536871810480.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12832259536871810480.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6798010510745936743.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5651908823784159140.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6798010510745936743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5651908823784159140.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,0.111194,9148,335,22,10684,285,370,16426,38,561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((A((i7.i0.u34.p108==1) U (i9.u40.p127==1)) + ((i0.i2.u16.p52==0) * AG((i3.u14.p34==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((i9.u40.p127==1))))) * !(E(!((i9.u40.p127==1)) U (!((i7.i0.u34.p108==1)) * !((i...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t177, t179, t182, t184, i0.i0.u2.t173, i0.i2.t145, i0.i2.u15.t141, i1.t166, i1.u6.t170, i2.t1...632
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 199 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 199 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Applied a total of 82 rules in 8 ms. Remains 198 /239 variables (removed 41) and now considering 198/239 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-05 05:24:24] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:24:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:24:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 3/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 2/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 396/396 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 20128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 197/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 15/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 11/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 7/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 5/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 4/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 7/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 396/396 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 50160ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50160ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 198/239 places, 198/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50341 ms. Remains : 198/239 places, 198/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3592767259141150454.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10179343289560904831.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3592767259141150454.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10179343289560904831.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4213e+18,1.16212,46216,2,1854,5,121172,6,0,992,292255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((((p70==1)&&(p76==1))&&(p92==1))) + AG(AX((((p70==0)||(p76==0))||(p92==0))))) + !(E((((p114==1)&&(p168==1))&&(p202==1)) U ((p213!...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (((p70==1)&&(p76==1))&&(p92==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((((p70==0)||(p76...473
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, t81, ...407
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14581455635995448960.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14581455635995448960.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14581455635995448960.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14581455635995448960.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14581455635995448960.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability457502164078987807.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13491692228829026390.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability457502164078987807.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13491692228829026390.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4213e+18,0.113975,8968,355,23,9923,296,387,15894,38,590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((((i4.u22.p70==1)&&(i3.u23.p76==1))&&(i5.u29.p92==1))) + AG(AX((((i4.u22.p70==0)||(i3.u23.p76==0))||(i5.u29.p92==0))))) + !(E((((...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (((i4.u22.p70==1)&&(i3.u23.p76==1))&&(i5.u29.p92==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(...635
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t179, t181, t184, t186, i0.t147, i0.u15.t143, i1.t165, i2.t152, i2.u12.t156, i3.t130, i3.u25....643
(forward)formula 0,1,2.61691,106248,1,0,177074,296,2403,388299,195,903,244345
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 199 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 199 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 84 rules in 8 ms. Remains 197 /239 variables (removed 42) and now considering 197/239 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:25:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:25:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:25:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 12408 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 13/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 6/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 8/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 42432ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42433ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42595 ms. Remains : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17513867218523490275.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14955526163140301148.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17513867218523490275.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14955526163140301148.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23679e+18,1.1473,47352,2,1935,5,123592,6,0,987,304000,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AX((p64==0)) + (((p7==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p55==1))) + (((p176==1) * AF(AG((p8==0)))) + (EX(EF((p164==0))) * EX((AF((p230==1)) * (p78==1)...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((p64==0)))) + (((p7==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p55==1))))) * !((EX(E(TRUE U (p164==0))) *...416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2137947412185463968.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2137947412185463968.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2137947412185463968.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2137947412185463968.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2137947412185463968.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9323257764422550060.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:26:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17142149458401407981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9323257764422550060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17142149458401407981.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23679e+18,0.122497,9100,370,22,9563,289,405,17356,38,609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AX((i4.u24.p64==0)) + (((i3.i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i0.u16.p55==1))) + (((i11.i1.u58.p176==1) * AF(AG((i3.i0.u3.p8==0)))) + ...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((i4.u24.p64==0)))) + (((i3.i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i0.u16.p55==1))))) *...546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t180, t185, i0.t146, i0.u16.t142, i1.t167, i1.u6.t171, i2.t164, i3.i0.u2.t174, i3.i1.t1...649
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 203 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 202 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 202 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 201 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 201 transition count 201
Applied a total of 76 rules in 16 ms. Remains 201 /239 variables (removed 38) and now considering 201/239 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 05:27:30] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:27:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:27:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 5/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/402 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 19983 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 17/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 200/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 19/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 10/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 486 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 50012ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50013ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50189 ms. Remains : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18379086610067416699.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6476800084112204419.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18379086610067416699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6476800084112204419.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67918e+18,1.33115,54248,2,2287,5,140094,6,0,1007,361351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p11==1) * (((EX((p123==0)) + (p57==1)) + ((p52==1)||(p209==1))) + (((p74==1)||(((p190==1)&&(p202==1))&&(p234==1)))||(((p29==0)&&(p18...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p11==1) * (((EX((p123==0)) + (p57==1)) + ((p52==1)||(p209==1))) + (((p74==1)||(((p190==1)&&(p202=...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t37, t41, t46, t51, t53, t56, t60, t63, t67, ...422
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17864067954478757725.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17864067954478757725.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17864067954478757725.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17864067954478757725.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17864067954478757725.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8391278777749822203.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:28:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16028275522727258321.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8391278777749822203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16028275522727258321.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67918e+18,0.157021,10156,415,25,11979,308,404,20272,43,646,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i0.i1.u4.p11==1) * (((EX((i10.i1.u38.p123==0)) + (i4.i0.u18.p57==1)) + ((i0.i2.u16.p52==1)||(i15.u66.p209==1))) + (((i6.u26.p74==1)|...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i0.i1.u4.p11==1) * (((EX((i10.i1.u38.p123==0)) + (i4.i0.u18.p57==1)) + ((i0.i2.u16.p52==1)||(i15....351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t182, t184, t187, i0.i0.u2.t178, i0.i2.t150, i0.i2.u15.t146, i1.t171, i1.u6.t175, i2.t168, i2...720
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,27.9451,514732,1,0,832350,308,2322,1.65372e+06,213,966,599242
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 204 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 204 transition count 204
Applied a total of 70 rules in 10 ms. Remains 204 /239 variables (removed 35) and now considering 204/239 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-05 05:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 203 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 204/408 variables, 204/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/408 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 408/408 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved in 12731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 203/203 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 204/408 variables, 204/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 203/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 20/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 5/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 11/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 6/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 2/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 5/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 5/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 408/408 variables, and 494 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 203/203 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 42751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42752ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/239 places, 204/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42930 ms. Remains : 204/239 places, 204/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12577231714864462803.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16922398884027166916.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12577231714864462803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16922398884027166916.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.57411e+18,1.49432,57576,2,2706,5,151453,6,0,1022,383118,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EF((p210==1)) + E((p199==1) U (((!(AF((p241==1))) + (p211==1)) + ((p233!=1)||(p220==1))) + (p243==1)))) + ((EF(((p61==1)||(p14==1))) ...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((p42==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((p42==1))))))))) U (!(((E(TRUE U (p...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t18, t19, t23, t27, t31, t35, t37, t42, t46, t51, t55, t60, t64, t67, ...440
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3155112028247868396.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3155112028247868396.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3155112028247868396.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3155112028247868396.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3155112028247868396.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11533751344484437097.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:30:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12348523457898014766.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11533751344484437097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12348523457898014766.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.57411e+18,0.186753,11952,492,23,15870,303,388,26161,40,611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EF((i17.u69.p210==1)) + E((i13.i2.u63.p199==1) U (((!(AF((i19.u74.p241==1))) + (i17.u68.p211==1)) + ((i19.u78.p233!=1)||(i18.u70.p220...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i3.u14.p42==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i3.u14.p42==1))))))))) U (!...502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t185, t187, t190, i0.i0.u2.t181, i1.t170, i1.t166, i2.t177, i2.u5.t179, i2.u8.t173, i3.t156, ...706
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 203 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 202 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 202 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 201 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 201 transition count 201
Applied a total of 76 rules in 5 ms. Remains 201 /239 variables (removed 38) and now considering 201/239 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 05:31:01] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/402 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 18481 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 11/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 200/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 20/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 13/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 6/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 4/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 48504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48504ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48660 ms. Remains : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12054473319036575727.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13897145156771411537.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12054473319036575727.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13897145156771411537.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86487e+18,1.46702,59228,2,2106,5,148045,6,0,1007,404351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX((AG((p173==1)) * A(AX(((p86==1)&&(p48==1))) U (p47!=1)))) + A((p177==1) U (p216==1))) + (AG((((p168==0)||(p174==0))||(p190==0))) + E...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((Init * !((EX((!(E(TRUE U !((p173==1)))) * !((E(!((p47!=1)) U (!(!(EX(!(((p86==1)&&(p48==1)))))) * !((p4...437
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t60, t63, t67, ...434
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10580625053063599019.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10580625053063599019.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10580625053063599019.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10580625053063599019.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10580625053063599019.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4126720397003749267.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2513790566233924676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4126720397003749267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2513790566233924676.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86487e+18,0.179808,11948,463,23,15766,302,418,26591,40,629,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX((AG((i14.u57.p173==1)) * A(AX(((i6.u32.p86==1)&&(i3.u17.p48==1))) U (i3.u16.p47!=1)))) + A((i14.u59.p177==1) U (i17.u69.p216==1))) +...395
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((Init * !((EX((!(E(TRUE U !((i14.u57.p173==1)))) * !((E(!((i3.u16.p47!=1)) U (!(!(EX(!(((i6.u32.p86==1)&...601
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t182, t184, t187, i0.i0.u2.t178, i0.i2.t155, i0.i2.u12.t159, i1.t168, i1.t164, i2.t171, i2.u7...721
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 207 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 207 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 206 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 206 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 205 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 205 transition count 205
Applied a total of 68 rules in 10 ms. Remains 205 /239 variables (removed 34) and now considering 205/239 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-05 05:32:50] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:32:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:32:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 205/410 variables, 205/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/410 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 410/410 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 14413 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 11/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 205/410 variables, 205/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 204/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 20/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 9/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 9/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 7/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 7/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 4/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 2/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 1/500 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 410/410 variables, and 502 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 44433ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44434ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/239 places, 205/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44596 ms. Remains : 205/239 places, 205/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 205 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7199623745770125214.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:33:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2123363189310957752.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7199623745770125214.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2123363189310957752.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19884e+18,2.06214,76076,2,2703,5,185925,6,0,1027,539228,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(AG((A((p22==1) U (p225==1)) + EX((p169==1)))) U AF(!(((p40==1)||(p113==1)))))) + EX((AG((p75==1)) + ((p164==1)&&(p57==1))))) + AG((...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !((!(!((E(!(!(EG(!(!(((p40==1)||(p113==1))))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((p225==1)) U (!((p22==...547
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t52, t55, t59, t63, t68, t73, t74, ...458
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9066727858494979733.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9066727858494979733.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9066727858494979733.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9066727858494979733.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9066727858494979733.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7181772044672229646.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11505813354073392733.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7181772044672229646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11505813354073392733.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19884e+18,0.348067,16996,554,23,24053,298,423,46653,40,627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(AG((A((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i16.u80.p225==1)) + EX((i12.u61.p169==1)))) U AF(!(((i3.u15.p40==1)||(i9.u41.p113==1)))))) + EX((AG((i6.u28...344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !((!(!((E(!(!(EG(!(!(((i3.u15.p40==1)||(i9.u41.p113==1))))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((i16.u80...727
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u2.t182, i1.t180, i1.u7.t179, i1.u8.t175, i2.i1.t167, i2.i1.t171, i2.i2.t153, i2.i2.u17...777
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 199 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 199 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 84 rules in 5 ms. Remains 197 /239 variables (removed 42) and now considering 197/239 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:34:35] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:34:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:34:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 3/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 12715 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 10/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 6/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 42740ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42741ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42899 ms. Remains : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15143710125224127688.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6313245103947671054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15143710125224127688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6313245103947671054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29848e+18,1.18666,49172,2,1960,5,128040,6,0,987,319875,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AX(AF((p134==1))) * ((p66==0) + AF((((p77==0)&&(p45==0))&&(p46==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!((p134==1)))] = FALSE * [FwdG((EY(Init) * !((p66==0))),!((((p77==0)&&(p45==0))&&(p46==0))))...165
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 195/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,2.78701,83524,1,0,94,296288,29,6,4536,426224,91
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 199 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 199 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 84 rules in 6 ms. Remains 197 /239 variables (removed 42) and now considering 197/239 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:35:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:35:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 10774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 6/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 11/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 471 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 40797ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40797ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40954 ms. Remains : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16822863013650267889.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1476734868284696161.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16822863013650267889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1476734868284696161.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13648e+18,1.02852,44328,2,1838,5,118261,6,0,987,281855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((p57==1))) + AG((p105==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((p57==1))))))))),TRUE) * !((p105==0)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:36:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18328964006183398861.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18328964006183398861.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18328964006183398861.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18328964006183398861.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18328964006183398861.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10881197110403306718.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability36903041011408390.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10881197110403306718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability36903041011408390.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13648e+18,0.196268,11524,336,23,14954,291,372,24630,41,573,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((i3.i0.u18.p57==1))) + AG((i6.u32.p105==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i3.i0.u18.p57==1))))))))),TRUE) * !((i6.u32.p105==0)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t180, t183, t185, i0.i1.t164, i0.i2.t146, i0.i2.u15.t142, i1.t167, i1.u5.t171, i2.t151,...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,25.9957,685712,1,0,1.11012e+06,498,2688,2.08836e+06,236,1408,954116
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 202 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 202 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 201 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 201 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 200 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 200 transition count 200
Applied a total of 78 rules in 11 ms. Remains 200 /239 variables (removed 39) and now considering 200/239 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-05 05:36:58] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:36:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:36:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 199 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:36:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 200/400 variables, 200/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/400 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/400 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/400 variables, and 236 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 17304 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 200/200 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 12/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 200/400 variables, 200/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 199/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 15/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 7/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 5/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 3/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 1/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/400 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 200/200 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 47322ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47322ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/239 places, 200/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47491 ms. Remains : 200/239 places, 200/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17712419534296246348.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:37:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3901356275391980376.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17712419534296246348.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3901356275391980376.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.50766e+18,1.55916,60928,2,2461,5,153591,6,0,1002,418448,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EX((p182==0)) + (EF((p52==1)) * ((A((p154==1) U (p207==1)) + (p171==1)) + (p184==1)))) + ((p10==1) * AF((p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EX((p182==0)) + (E(TRUE U (p52==1)) * ((!((E(!((p207==1)) U (!((p154==1)) * !((p207==1)))) + EG(!((...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t51, t53, t56, t60, t63, t67, t74, ...428
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12510442290510512984.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12510442290510512984.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12510442290510512984.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12510442290510512984.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12510442290510512984.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15507512712921220124.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4899856439185910814.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15507512712921220124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4899856439185910814.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.50766e+18,0.221783,12684,464,25,16748,301,393,29396,43,605,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EX((i15.u57.p182==0)) + (EF((i1.i2.u17.p52==1)) * ((A((i12.u47.p154==1) U (i8.i1.u65.p207==1)) + (i14.i1.u53.p171==1)) + (i15.u59.p1...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EX((i15.u57.p182==0)) + (E(TRUE U (i1.i2.u17.p52==1)) * ((!((E(!((i8.i1.u65.p207==1)) U (!((i12.u47...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t181, t186, t188, i0.i0.u2.t177, i1.i1.t163, i1.i1.t167, i1.i2.t149, i1.i2.u15.t145, i2.t170,...696
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 203 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 202 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 202 transition count 202
Applied a total of 74 rules in 4 ms. Remains 202 /239 variables (removed 37) and now considering 202/239 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2025-06-05 05:38:45] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:38:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 201 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:38:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 202/404 variables, 202/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/404 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/404 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 404/404 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 17861 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 12/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/404 variables, 202/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 201/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 18/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 10/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 3/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 3/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 4/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 404/404 variables, and 497 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 47885ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47886ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/239 places, 202/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48068 ms. Remains : 202/239 places, 202/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13723656679212922878.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2954878928580105062.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13723656679212922878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2954878928580105062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82826e+18,1.76564,65308,2,2042,5,160455,6,0,1012,453568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!((((p118==1)||(p115==1)) * AG((p54==1)))) * (p213==1))) U EG((EG((((p18==1)||(p126==1)) * EX((p61==1)))) * (AF(((p162==1)&&(p89==1)...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((!((((p118==1)||(p115==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p54==1)))))) * (p213==1)))),(EG((((p18==1)||(p126==...324
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t13, t17, t22, t26, t28, t31, t32, t38, t42, t47, t51, t56, t60, t61, t64, t68, t69, ...429
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3228921938024049872.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3228921938024049872.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3228921938024049872.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3228921938024049872.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3228921938024049872.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5159827428777489680.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10518619950710039651.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5159827428777489680.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10518619950710039651.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82826e+18,0.136955,9956,388,23,10941,261,411,20341,43,536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!((((i8.u37.p118==1)||(i8.u36.p115==1)) * AG((i3.u15.p54==1)))) * (i16.u69.p213==1))) U EG((EG((((i1.u6.p18==1)||(i9.i1.u40.p126==1)...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((!((((i8.u37.p118==1)||(i8.u36.p115==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((i3.u15.p54==1)))))) * (i16.u69.p213==...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t183, t185, i0.i0.u2.t179, i0.i2.t156, i0.i2.u13.t160, i1.t172, i1.u6.t176, i2.t169, i2.t165,...716
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 199 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 199 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 198 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 84 rules in 13 ms. Remains 197 /239 variables (removed 42) and now considering 197/239 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:40:34] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 20321 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 16/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 19/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 13/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 50346ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50347ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50524 ms. Remains : 197/239 places, 197/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8844473958971212711.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3753706890816152124.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8844473958971212711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3753706890816152124.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26042e+18,1.27169,51104,2,1844,5,129755,6,0,987,339994,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((p161==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((p161==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t67, t72, t76, t81, ...401
(forward)formula 0,0,1.80874,51696,1,0,384,198695,410,200,5264,339994,401
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 238 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 167 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 166 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 165 transition count 164
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 165 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 142 transition count 141
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 116 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 116 transition count 115
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 116 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 102 transition count 101
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 64 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 62 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 61 transition count 61
Applied a total of 352 rules in 41 ms. Remains 61 /239 variables (removed 178) and now considering 61/239 (removed 178) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 1532 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 59/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 1472 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3007ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3008ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/239 places, 61/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3187 ms. Remains : 61/239 places, 61/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2406326929575875406.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability506773657634379815.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2406326929575875406.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability506773657634379815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.35322e+09,0.033373,5156,2,121,5,5517,6,0,307,7790,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p34==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p34==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 59/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.051576,5412,1,0,9,8355,20,3,1551,7790,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 203 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 202 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 202 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 201 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 201 transition count 201
Applied a total of 76 rules in 8 ms. Remains 201 /239 variables (removed 38) and now considering 201/239 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:41:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:41:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/402 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 230 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 11369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 201/402 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 200/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 20/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 13/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 4/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 4/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 489 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 41391ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41392ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41630 ms. Remains : 201/239 places, 201/239 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15319736403784760321.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17818037078256977810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15319736403784760321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17818037078256977810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86241e+18,1.33052,54312,2,2540,5,142989,6,0,1007,358186,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(((EX((p0==1)) + !(((p23==1)&&(p62==1)))) * ((((p238==1)&&(p67==1))&&((p120==1)&&(p59==1)))||(((!(((p190==1)&&(p202==1))&&(p234==1)...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((E((p116==1) U E(TRUE U (p36==1))) * !(EG(!(((p156==1)&&(p232==1)))))))))) * !(E(!((...477
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t20, t23, t27, t31, t32, t38, t42, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t73, ...429
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14301778853908898875.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14301778853908898875.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14301778853908898875.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14301778853908898875.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14301778853908898875.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14136473245437241163.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:42:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1119585756711269380.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14136473245437241163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1119585756711269380.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86241e+18,0.129656,9580,421,23,11054,306,398,18082,40,626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(((EX((i7.i0.u0.p0==1)) + !(((i1.u5.p23==1)&&(i4.u23.p62==1)))) * ((((i16.u79.p238==1)&&(i4.u24.p67==1))&&((i8.u40.p120==1)&&(i5.i0...378
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((E((i8.u39.p116==1) U E(TRUE U (i0.i2.u13.p36==1))) * !(EG(!(((i12.i0.u52.p156==1)&&...682
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t187, t189, i0.i0.u2.t178, i0.i2.t154, i0.i2.t160, i0.i2.u14.t158, i1.t171, i1.u6.t175, i2.t1...722
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16912841326864228537.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16912841326864228537.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16912841326864228537.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16912841326864228537.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16912841326864228537.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11301631585004853532.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14104038613806262885.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11301631585004853532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14104038613806262885.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.21925e+19,0.901478,36028,914,30,55516,223,473,119566,40,503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((A((i10.i1.u43.p108==1) U (i10.i0.u51.p127==1)) + ((i0.u20.p52==0) * AG((i3.u18.p34==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((i10.i0.u51.p127==1))))) * !(E(!((i10.i0.u51.p127==1)) U (!((i10.i1.u43.p108==1...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t183, i0.u19.t177, i0.u19.t184, i0.u21.t176, i0.u21.t181, i1.t214, i1.t208, i1.u9.t212, i2...1176
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 101 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 06:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 141 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-05 06:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15036835504408468949.gal : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 06:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3354178682352800105.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15036835504408468949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3354178682352800105.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.21925e+19,16.8869,505048,1795,432,810929,1072,315,4.19569e+06,130,13521,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((A((i0.i0.i1.i0.u57.p108==1) U (i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u24.p127==1)) + ((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.p52==0) * AG((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u11.p34==1)))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u24.p127==1))))) * !(E(!((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u24.p127==1)) U (!((i0...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.t216, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t176, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t177, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t18...2056

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-005B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000250"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;