Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901994000249.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000249
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749100000864

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 68 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Transformed 253 places.
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Transformed 253 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 253 places and 253 transitions and 596 arcs in 151 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 97 out of 253 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 253/253 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 225 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 225 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 224 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 224 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 223 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 223 transition count 223
Applied a total of 60 rules in 46 ms. Remains 223 /253 variables (removed 30) and now considering 223/253 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 223 cols
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 274 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 548 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/223 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 10/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 223/446 variables, 223/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 5/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/446 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 24355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 223/223 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/223 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 48/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/446 variables, 223/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 222/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 16/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 17/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 6/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 3/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 54436ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54446ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 223/253 places, 223/253 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55057 ms. Remains : 223/253 places, 223/253 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 223 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:37] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 05:07:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 05:07:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 223 places (down from 97) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1210 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 4/66 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 213/223 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 223/446 variables, 223/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/446 variables, and 244 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 166 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 223/223 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 213/223 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 223/446 variables, 223/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 5/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/446 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 223/223 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 950ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 106 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 223 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 50 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 50 transitions
Performed 50 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 50
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 223 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 173 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 171 transition count 171
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 171 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 143 transition count 143
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 120 transition count 120
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 120 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 101 transition count 101
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 64 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 64 transition count 63
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 63 transition count 62
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -11
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 50 transition count 73
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 50 transition count 72
Applied a total of 348 rules in 44 ms. Remains 50 /223 variables (removed 173) and now considering 72/223 (removed 151) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 50/223 places, 72/223 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (45 resets) in 627 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (9 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 977061 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=325 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 977061 steps, saw 333932 distinct states, run finished after 3007 ms. (steps per millisecond=324 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 05:07:42] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 44/50 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/122 variables, 50/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 42/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 62 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 44/50 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/122 variables, 50/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 42/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 292 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 363ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 91 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 72/72 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 49/50 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 49/50 places, 72/72 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (42 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1040159 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=346 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1040159 steps, saw 337766 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=346 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/49 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 59 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/49 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 254 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 318ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 57 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 49 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 49/49 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 49/49 places, 72/72 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 49/49 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 05:07:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1228 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 40/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 71/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 3032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4280ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4281ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4391 ms. Remains : 49/49 places, 72/72 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 18 edges and 49 vertex of which 4 / 49 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 149 edges and 47 vertex of which 45 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 64
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 45 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 44 transition count 61
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 43 transition count 60
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 43 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 42 transition count 56
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 42 transition count 56
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 42 transition count 54
Applied a total of 21 rules in 18 ms. Remains 42 /49 variables (removed 7) and now considering 54/72 (removed 18) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] After 28ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] After 16ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 05:07:50] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] After 17ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] After 68ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 129 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
Computed a total of 65 stabilizing places and 65 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 222 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 181 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 177 transition count 177
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 177 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 150 transition count 150
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 132 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 132 transition count 132
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 132 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 121 transition count 121
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 89 transition count 89
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 89 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 87 transition count 87
Applied a total of 269 rules in 23 ms. Remains 87 /223 variables (removed 136) and now considering 87/223 (removed 136) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 18/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/174 variables, 87/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 174/174 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 18/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/174 variables, 87/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 84/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 174/174 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 5877 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 87/87 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 7997ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7998ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/223 places, 87/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8140 ms. Remains : 87/223 places, 87/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1552564430487940176.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6841765147433790339.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1552564430487940176.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6841765147433790339.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.62944e+11,0.067763,6244,2,344,5,10315,6,0,435,16052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(A(((AF(((p240==0)||(p35==1))) * (p136==0)) * ((EF(((p41==0)||(p152==1))) + ((p68==0)&&((p140==0)||(p210==1)))) * ((p90==0)||(p10==1)...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p193==0)||(p100==1)))) * !(((p193==0)||(p100==1)))),!(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p37...1385
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/4/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.096129,6628,1,0,17,12389,20,2,2158,16052,16
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 196 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 54 rules in 12 ms. Remains 196 /223 variables (removed 27) and now considering 196/223 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 196 cols
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 392/392 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 10924 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 195/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 14/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 18/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 392/392 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 40950ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40951ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41136 ms. Remains : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5940475403404609674.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12942703598681623710.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5940475403404609674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12942703598681623710.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,1.056,44188,2,1831,5,118079,6,0,982,280217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EG(((p157==1)&&(p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((p157==1)&&(p116==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7826471474981323754.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7826471474981323754.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7826471474981323754.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7826471474981323754.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7826471474981323754.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17513792687841185377.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17770900307475051195.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17513792687841185377.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17770900307475051195.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,0.108131,8780,373,22,9344,219,380,15930,38,441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EG(((i12.i0.u49.p157==1)&&(i8.u36.p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((i12.i0.u49.p157==1)&&(i8.u36.p116==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t177, t179, t182, t184, i0.i0.u2.t173, i0.i2.t145, i0.i2.u15.t141, i1.t166, i1.u6.t170, i2.t1...632
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 52 rules in 12 ms. Remains 197 /223 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/223 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:09:40] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:09:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:09:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 17769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 7/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 5/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 10/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 47793ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47794ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47981 ms. Remains : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11825233614112071017.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1174026263551590413.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11825233614112071017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1174026263551590413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23272e+18,1.28685,53596,2,2115,5,140675,6,0,987,355145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AX(AG(((p148==1)||(p152==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p148==1)||(p152==0))))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t76, t78, ...406
(forward)formula 0,1,18.815,604372,1,0,455,3.10547e+06,416,236,5527,4.0894e+06,488
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 198 transition count 198
Applied a total of 50 rules in 5 ms. Remains 198 /223 variables (removed 25) and now considering 198/223 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-05 05:10:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:10:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 396/396 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 22214 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 197/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 17/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 16/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 5/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 3/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 10/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 1)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 1)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 1)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 396/396 variables, and 483 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 52238ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52239ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 198/223 places, 198/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52405 ms. Remains : 198/223 places, 198/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1993469633072254739.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4300432908346201813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1993469633072254739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4300432908346201813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36463e+18,1.42077,58144,2,2476,5,152299,6,0,992,389500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p243==1) + E(EF((p104==0)) U !(EX(!(((p29==0)||(p113==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p243==1))) * !(E(E(TRUE U (p104==0)) U !(EX(!(((p29==0)||(p113==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t20, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, ...417
(forward)formula 0,0,15.6561,501400,1,0,461,2.51014e+06,424,241,5550,3.58381e+06,482
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 52 rules in 10 ms. Remains 197 /223 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/223 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:11:56] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:11:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:11:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 15279 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 5/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 5/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 468 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 45320ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45321ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45512 ms. Remains : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18128799529271553363.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:12:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6435969201593951021.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18128799529271553363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6435969201593951021.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22252e+18,1.06447,45428,2,1897,5,119510,6,0,987,284310,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(((p42==0)||(p72==1))) * ((AG((p166==1)) + AX(((p35==0)&&(p149==1)))) + (p90==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((p42==0)||(p72==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p166==1)))))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRU...315
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...413
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16820948663212114959.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16820948663212114959.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16820948663212114959.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16820948663212114959.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16820948663212114959.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11144083658542096988.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13328942924759672237.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11144083658542096988.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13328942924759672237.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22252e+18,0.147664,10180,362,23,12277,292,375,21109,40,569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(((i0.i2.u14.p42==0)||(i5.u20.p72==1))) * ((AG((i13.u51.p166==1)) + AX(((i0.i2.u14.p35==0)&&(i11.u46.p149==1)))) + (i6.u29.p90==1))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((i0.i2.u14.p42==0)||(i5.u20.p72==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i13.u51.p166==1)))))] !=...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t180, t183, t185, i0.i0.u2.t174, i0.i2.t150, i0.i2.u13.t155, i0.i2.u14.t157, i1.t145, i...651
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 52 rules in 8 ms. Remains 197 /223 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/223 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:13:41] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:13:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 17023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 11/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 13/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 6/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 471 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 47050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47251 ms. Remains : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11944101319741336126.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10805433629925715191.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11944101319741336126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10805433629925715191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26122e+18,1.11115,47152,2,1890,5,124270,6,0,987,302441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((EX(((((p205==0)||(p0==1))||((p30==0)||(p29==1))) * EF(((p147==0)||(p100==1))))) * A(EX(((p121==0)||(p46==1))) U EF((p30==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((EX(((((p205==0)||(p0==1))||((p30==0)||(p29==1))) * E(TRUE U ((p147==0)||(p100==1))))) * !((...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t76, ...406
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12808612549959170164.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12808612549959170164.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12808612549959170164.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12808612549959170164.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12808612549959170164.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5165972138573326351.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16448670744814424101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5165972138573326351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16448670744814424101.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26122e+18,0.110996,8584,328,22,8680,280,365,16082,38,561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((EX(((((i14.i0.u64.p205==0)||(i8.i0.u0.p0==1))||((i1.u10.p30==0)||(i1.u10.p29==1))) * EF(((i10.u47.p147==0)||(i5.i2.u32.p100==1))))...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((EX(((((i14.i0.u64.p205==0)||(i8.i0.u0.p0==1))||((i1.u10.p30==0)||(i1.u10.p29==1))) * E(TRUE...368
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t180, t183, t185, i0.t167, i0.u5.t171, i1.t164, i2.t146, i2.u15.t142, i3.t116, i3.u28.t...661
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 196 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 54 rules in 4 ms. Remains 196 /223 variables (removed 27) and now considering 196/223 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 196 cols
[2025-06-05 05:15:29] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:15:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:15:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 392/392 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 10919 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 195/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 14/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 18/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 392/392 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 40949ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40949ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41126 ms. Remains : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3587363740922390985.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14023624755328367753.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3587363740922390985.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14023624755328367753.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,0.992021,44188,2,1831,5,118079,6,0,982,280217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((p247==0) U (p175==1)) + AG(EX(EX(((p24!=0)&&(p76!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((p175==1)) U (!((p247==0)) * !((p175==1)))) + EG(!((p175==1))))))),TRUE) * !(EX(EX(((p24...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9558809417775989350.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9558809417775989350.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9558809417775989350.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9558809417775989350.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9558809417775989350.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2182232833351313426.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5270520136465990445.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2182232833351313426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5270520136465990445.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,0.132648,10016,361,22,12116,260,359,19973,38,492,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((i20.u76.p247==0) U (i14.u54.p175==1)) + AG(EX(EX(((i2.u8.p24!=0)&&(i6.u25.p76!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((i14.u54.p175==1)) U (!((i20.u76.p247==0)) * !((i14.u54.p175==1)))) + EG(!((i14.u54.p175...228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t177, t179, t182, t184, i0.i0.u2.t173, i0.i2.t150, i0.i2.u13.t154, i1.t166, i1.u7.t170, i2.t1...616
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 198 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 198 transition count 198
Applied a total of 50 rules in 11 ms. Remains 198 /223 variables (removed 25) and now considering 198/223 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-05 05:17:10] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:17:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:17:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/396 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 396/396 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 22310 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 198/396 variables, 198/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 197/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 18/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 6/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 5/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 2/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 5/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 3/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/396 variables, 1/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 396/396 variables, and 468 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 52333ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52334ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 198/223 places, 198/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52500 ms. Remains : 198/223 places, 198/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16775736192282370821.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8513377260534224209.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16775736192282370821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8513377260534224209.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31409e+18,1.26914,51944,2,2297,5,135282,6,0,992,341074,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(EX((p91==1))) + (p182==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p182==0)))) * !(EX((p91==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t52, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, ...424
(forward)formula 0,0,2.11034,54200,1,0,398,264985,414,204,5429,341074,405
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 43 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 43 transitions
Performed 43 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 43
Iterating post reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 222 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 179 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 176 transition count 176
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 176 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 147 transition count 147
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 127 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 127 transition count 127
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 127 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 114
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 81 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 81 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 80 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 78 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 77 transition count 77
Applied a total of 288 rules in 24 ms. Remains 77 /223 variables (removed 146) and now considering 77/223 (removed 146) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/77 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/154 variables, 77/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/154 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 1977 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/77 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/154 variables, 77/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 72/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 154/154 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 2490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 4484ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4485ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/223 places, 77/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4621 ms. Remains : 77/223 places, 77/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2135267738310911289.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10765020353933542120.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2135267738310911289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10765020353933542120.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.62e+10,0.083431,7924,2,235,5,14221,6,0,384,29198,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(((((p18!=1)&&(p128!=0))&&(p92!=1))||(p140==0)))) * E(((E(EF(((p199==0)||(p130==1))) U (p16==1)) + !((AG((p202==1)) + (p199==1)))) ...252
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG(!(EG(!(((((p18!=1)&&(p128!=0))&&(p92!=1))||(p140==0))))))),((E(E(TRUE U ((p199==0)||(p130==1))...340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t17, t23, t26, t29, t31, t33, t36, t38, t39, t51, t54, t57, t69, t71, t73, t74, Intersec...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4753038382618984297.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4753038382618984297.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4753038382618984297.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4753038382618984297.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4753038382618984297.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16007167922491765265.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:18:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5578838263789525263.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16007167922491765265.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5578838263789525263.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.62e+10,0.030398,5264,88,23,2744,123,233,4608,59,335,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(((((i0.u3.p18!=1)&&(i5.u13.p128!=0))&&(u9.p92!=1))||(u15.p140==0)))) * E(((E(EF(((u21.p199==0)||(i5.u14.p130==1))) U (i0.u2.p16==1...332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG(!(EG(!(((((i0.u3.p18!=1)&&(i5.u13.p128!=0))&&(u9.p92!=1))||(u15.p140==0))))))),((E(E(TRUE U ((...420
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t73, t74, u9.t57, u15.t36, u16.t38, i0.u3.t17, i1.i0.u5.t51, i1.i1.u4.t23, i1.i1.u6.t54,...331
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 197 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 197 transition count 197
Applied a total of 52 rules in 3 ms. Remains 197 /223 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/223 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 05:19:10] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:19:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:19:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 3/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/394 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 394/394 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 16317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/394 variables, 197/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 196/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 5/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 2/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 3/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/394 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 46335ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46336ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46507 ms. Remains : 197/223 places, 197/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17386039652463466201.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14648135081065766517.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17386039652463466201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14648135081065766517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22314e+18,1.17722,48028,2,1983,5,126816,6,0,987,307890,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((EF((p200==1)) * EF(((p24==0)&&(p84==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((E(TRUE U (p200==1)) * E(TRUE U ((p24==0)&&(p84==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...413
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2859427638920835905.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2859427638920835905.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2859427638920835905.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2859427638920835905.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2859427638920835905.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17107888773146914205.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5913030288412672968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17107888773146914205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5913030288412672968.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22314e+18,0.114676,8948,385,23,9942,275,384,16105,40,526,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((EF((i15.u61.p200==1)) * EF(((i3.u11.p24==0)&&(i4.u28.p84==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((E(TRUE U (i15.u61.p200==1)) * E(TRUE U ((i3.u11.p24==0)&&(i4.u28.p84==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t180, t183, t185, i0.i0.u2.t174, i0.i2.t151, i0.i2.u12.t155, i1.t146, i1.u16.t142, i2.t...648
(forward)formula 0,1,3.03881,116852,1,0,191559,275,2476,450763,199,895,249479
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 222 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 169 transition count 169
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 169 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 140 transition count 140
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 118 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 118 transition count 118
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 118 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 100 transition count 100
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 65 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 65 transition count 64
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 64 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 62 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 61 transition count 61
Applied a total of 320 rules in 16 ms. Remains 61 /223 variables (removed 162) and now considering 61/223 (removed 162) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 1075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/122 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 59/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 1390 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2469ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/223 places, 61/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2571 ms. Remains : 61/223 places, 61/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality815386255934041428.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8675500237906656483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality815386255934041428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8675500237906656483.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.32453e+09,0.023185,4636,2,142,5,3777,6,0,307,4939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p142==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p142==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 59/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.037364,5020,1,0,9,6078,20,3,1531,4939,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 196 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 54 rules in 8 ms. Remains 196 /223 variables (removed 27) and now considering 196/223 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 196 cols
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:20:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 392/392 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 10513 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 195/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 14/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 18/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 392/392 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 40530ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40531ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40699 ms. Remains : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14522927830630664206.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16626964109598637080.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14522927830630664206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16626964109598637080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,1.07705,44184,2,1831,5,118079,6,0,982,280217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph838799809383487557.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph838799809383487557.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph838799809383487557.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph838799809383487557.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph838799809383487557.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8495591563732601487.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15893262861165955018.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8495591563732601487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15893262861165955018.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,0.164601,10192,384,22,12284,287,373,20317,38,556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t177, t179, t182, t184, i0.i0.u2.t173, i0.i2.t150, i0.i2.u12.t154, i1.t166, i1.u6.t170, i2.t1...634
(forward)formula 0,0,27.9279,709856,1,0,905543,287,2312,3.01918e+06,189,969,761684
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 196 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 54 rules in 5 ms. Remains 196 /223 variables (removed 27) and now considering 196/223 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/392 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 392/392 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 10664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/392 variables, 196/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 195/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 14/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 12/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 7/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 3/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 4/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 18/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 392/392 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 196/196 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 40683ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40683ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40858 ms. Remains : 196/223 places, 196/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9035890920547262441.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2448266836902433426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9035890920547262441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2448266836902433426.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13628e+18,1.07694,44192,2,1831,5,118079,6,0,982,280217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p157==1)) * !(A((AX(EX(((p193==0)||(p4==1)))) + AX((p163==1))) U !(EF((((p237==1)&&(p144==1))&&((p19==0)||(p198==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (p157==1))),!(!(E(TRUE U (((p237==1)&&(p144==1))&&((p19==0)||(p198==1))))))) * !(...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...401
(forward)formula 0,1,8.37741,275980,1,0,1312,1.13463e+06,428,1044,5913,2.28819e+06,1361
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 222 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 171 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 169 transition count 169
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 169 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 142 transition count 142
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 119 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 119 transition count 119
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 119 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 102 transition count 102
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 69 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 69 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 68 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 66 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 65 transition count 65
Applied a total of 312 rules in 24 ms. Remains 65 /223 variables (removed 158) and now considering 65/223 (removed 158) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/65 variables, 5/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 65/130 variables, 65/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 1454 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/65 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 65/130 variables, 65/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 62/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 1748 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3209ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/223 places, 65/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3325 ms. Remains : 65/223 places, 65/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3453191942783903561.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7276581110366546629.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3453191942783903561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7276581110366546629.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.43734e+09,0.036606,5232,2,122,5,6038,6,0,327,8619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(EF(((p9==0)||(p164==1)))) + ((EF(((p80==0)||(p7==1))) * (p248==0)) * (p150==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(E(TRUE U ((p9==0)||(p164==1)))) + ((E(TRUE U ((p80==0)||(p7==1))) * (p248==0)) * (p150==1))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t60, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :...164
(forward)formula 0,1,1.69592,74740,1,0,350,298852,157,173,2148,576144,496
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 223/223 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 203 transition count 203
Applied a total of 40 rules in 5 ms. Remains 203 /223 variables (removed 20) and now considering 203/223 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 203 rows 203 cols
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 202 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 203/406 variables, 203/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 3/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 21300 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 203/203 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 10/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 203/406 variables, 203/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 202/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 20/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 10/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 8/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 4/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 1/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 5/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 4/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 491 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 203/203 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 51323ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51323ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/223 places, 203/223 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51473 ms. Remains : 203/223 places, 203/223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 203 transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7399647004861998781.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13664076726747618979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7399647004861998781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13664076726747618979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.0672e+18,1.42242,57600,2,2249,5,147983,6,0,1017,385181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((A(AF(((p58==0)||(p100==1))) U ((((p47==0)||(p179==1))&&(p170==1))||((p15==1)&&((p225==0)||(p138==1))))) * AF(EX((p139==1)))) * (AF((...385
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!((E(!(((((p47==0)||(p179==1))&&(p170==1))||((p15==1)&&((p225==0)||(p138==1))))) U (!(!(EG(!(((p58=...755
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t37, t41, t47, t52, t57, t62, t64, t68, t74, ...429
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11837385726062158410.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11837385726062158410.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11837385726062158410.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11837385726062158410.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11837385726062158410.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9029350225188022904.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2346274525650833700.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9029350225188022904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2346274525650833700.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.0672e+18,0.16653,10548,428,23,12645,300,454,21869,46,646,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((A(AF(((i7.i0.u19.p58==0)||(i7.i1.u34.p100==1))) U ((((i0.i1.u18.p47==0)||(i14.u55.p179==1))&&(i13.u54.p170==1))||((i1.i1.u5.p15==1)&...604
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!((E(!(((((i0.i1.u18.p47==0)||(i14.u55.p179==1))&&(i13.u54.p170==1))||((i1.i1.u5.p15==1)&&((i17.i1....1134
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t184, t189, i0.i0.u2.t180, i0.i1.t151, i0.i1.u16.t146, i0.i1.u18.t153, i1.t177, i1.i1.u5.t176...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7125062786086634900.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7125062786086634900.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7125062786086634900.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7125062786086634900.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7125062786086634900.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7211543535221140115.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 05:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7842286448255584850.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7211543535221140115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7842286448255584850.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.53804e+18,0.476776,21652,806,28,32404,271,476,64802,43,667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EG(((i13.i0.u60.p157==1)&&(i11.u44.p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((i13.i0.u60.p157==1)&&(i11.u44.p116==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, i0.i0.u2.t200, i1.t198, i1.t191, i1.u6.t192, i1.u6.t199, i1.u7.t196, i2.t187, i2.t183, i...1143
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2025-06-05 05:51:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1899804068863491967.gal : 30 ms
[2025-06-05 05:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1545010933106344575.ctl : 10 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1899804068863491967.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1545010933106344575.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.53804e+18,4.09276,145300,1111,423,222617,1159,334,1.18235e+06,144,12519,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EG(((i0.i1.i0.u58.p157==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u23.p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((i0.i1.i0.u58.p157==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u23.p116==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.t200, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t162, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t163, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t16...1964
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901994000249"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;