Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900234.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900234
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 476K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749098063198

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 68 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Transformed 203 places.
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Transformed 203 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 203 places and 203 transitions and 478 arcs in 161 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 98 out of 203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 203/203 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 190 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 190 transition count 190
Applied a total of 26 rules in 29 ms. Remains 190 /203 variables (removed 13) and now considering 190/203 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 190 cols
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 424 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 189 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 18/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 7/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 190/380 variables, 190/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/380 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 236 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 16467 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 29/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 190/380 variables, 190/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 189/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 144 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 12/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 10/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 10/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/380 variables, and 492 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46559ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/203 places, 190/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47032 ms. Remains : 190/203 places, 190/203 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 190 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 04:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 190 places (down from 98) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (10 resets) in 1428 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 4/74 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 192 ms. (207 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 72 ms. (547 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 67/75 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/380 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 97 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 103ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 190 places (down from 90) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 158 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 158 transition count 158
Applied a total of 64 rules in 36 ms. Remains 158 /190 variables (removed 32) and now considering 158/190 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 158 cols
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/316 variables, 158/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/316 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/316 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 316/316 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 9375 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/316 variables, 158/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 157/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 11/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 128 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 6/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 5/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 5/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 3/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 7/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 316/316 variables, and 381 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 39408ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39411ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/190 places, 158/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39630 ms. Remains : 158/190 places, 158/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8725341640515243847.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5040890718367815851.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8725341640515243847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5040890718367815851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.64802e+14,0.484753,24904,2,1404,5,63634,6,0,792,142136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EF((p194==1)) * AX((p187==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p194==1)) * !(EX(!((p187==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t13, t17, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, t...351
(forward)formula 0,0,4.66322,162364,1,0,368,814941,339,191,4425,1.03268e+06,401
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 158 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 158 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 157 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 157 transition count 157
Applied a total of 66 rules in 13 ms. Remains 157 /190 variables (removed 33) and now considering 157/190 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 157 cols
[2025-06-05 04:35:57] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:35:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:35:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 157/314 variables, 157/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 314/314 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 10774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 157/314 variables, 157/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 156/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 10/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 7/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 5/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 4/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 4/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 8/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 314/314 variables, and 382 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 40800ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40801ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/190 places, 157/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41038 ms. Remains : 157/190 places, 157/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4882716571320146687.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6905901735442573670.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4882716571320146687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6905901735442573670.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.29193e+14,0.469234,24412,2,1363,5,63132,6,0,787,137563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.47441,24412,1,0,6,63132,7,1,931,137563,1
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 163 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 163 transition count 163
Applied a total of 54 rules in 6 ms. Remains 163 /190 variables (removed 27) and now considering 163/190 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 163 cols
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:36:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 163/326 variables, 163/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 3/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 326/326 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 9701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 163/326 variables, 163/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 162/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 15/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 6/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 3/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 7/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 326/326 variables, and 395 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 39740ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39740ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/190 places, 163/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39932 ms. Remains : 163/190 places, 163/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16945551880444030111.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2725141407071509762.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16945551880444030111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2725141407071509762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.69841e+14,0.613853,26468,2,1495,5,68242,6,0,817,154359,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AF(!(((p194==1)||(p153==1))))) + (!((!((AG((p51==1)) * (p149==1))) + (AG((p8==1)) * !(((p40==1)&&(p88==1)))))) * (p168==1))) U EX(A...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((p164==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (p145!=1))) * !((p164==1)))) + EG(!((p164==1)))))))))) * !(E...514
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t13, t17, t22, t26, t35, t41, t45, t47, t51, t55, t60, t64, t67, t71, t77, t81, t...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10844953583485918537.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10844953583485918537.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10844953583485918537.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10844953583485918537.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10844953583485918537.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:37:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6805240389659739098.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12577112231551140621.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6805240389659739098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12577112231551140621.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.69841e+14,0.106285,8528,320,22,9613,266,351,12720,38,546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AF(!(((i16.u66.p194==1)||(i12.u45.p153==1))))) + (!((!((AG((i0.u16.p51==1)) * (i12.u46.p149==1))) + (AG((i2.i0.u3.p8==1)) * !(((i3....262
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((i13.u54.p164==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (i12.u46.p145!=1))) * !((i13.u54.p164==1)))) + EG(!(...672
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t148, t151, t153, i0.t116, i0.u15.t112, i1.t137, i1.u7.t141, i2.i1.t134, i3.t121, i3.u13.t125...534
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 189 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 138 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 137 transition count 136
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 137 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 117 transition count 116
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 95 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 95 transition count 94
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 95 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 83 transition count 82
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 57 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 55 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 54 transition count 54
Applied a total of 268 rules in 38 ms. Remains 54 /190 variables (removed 136) and now considering 54/190 (removed 136) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/54 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/108 variables, 54/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 108/108 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/54 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/108 variables, 54/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 51/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 108/108 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2165ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2168ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/190 places, 54/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2304 ms. Remains : 54/190 places, 54/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7549855750279948688.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2849433976553826548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7549855750279948688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2849433976553826548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14774e+08,0.026309,4984,2,113,5,4994,6,0,272,7197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(EF(((EF((p150==1)) * (p172==1)) * ((p189==1)&&(p201==1)))) U (p45==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((p45==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U (p150==1)) * (p172==1)) * ((p189==1)&&(p201==1))))) * !((...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t14, t16, t21, t28, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse...183
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12102721058743573421.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12102721058743573421.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12102721058743573421.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12102721058743573421.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12102721058743573421.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4120797047911942644.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12238839321205568150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4120797047911942644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12238839321205568150.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14774e+08,0.014933,4372,48,19,1069,106,156,1356,45,232,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(EF(((EF((i8.u12.p150==1)) * (u14.p172==1)) * ((u15.p189==1)&&(u16.p201==1)))) U (i1.u4.p45==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((i1.u4.p45==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U (i8.u12.p150==1)) * (u14.p172==1)) * ((u15.p189==1)...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, u1.t28, i1.u2.t14, i1.u4.t6, i2.u3.t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enable...204
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,0.286928,20244,1,0,37949,185,862,56097,206,351,45298
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 166 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 166 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 165 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 165 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 164 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 164 transition count 164
Applied a total of 52 rules in 13 ms. Remains 164 /190 variables (removed 26) and now considering 164/190 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:38:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/328 variables, 164/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 7041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/328 variables, 164/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 17/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 8/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 6/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 11/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 37066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37067ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/190 places, 164/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37231 ms. Remains : 164/190 places, 164/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5633407637853288478.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11716599098933162633.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5633407637853288478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11716599098933162633.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95763e+14,0.604188,30392,2,1641,5,76409,6,0,822,186024,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((p127!=1)&&(!((p12==1)&&(p22==1))))) U (E(!(((EX((p136==1)) * AF((p48==1))) * ((p153!=1)&&(p31!=1)))) U (!(((((p6==1)&&(p20==1))&&(...299
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((E(!(((EX((p136==1)) * !(EG(!((p48==1))))) * ((p153!=1)&&(p31!=1)))) U (!(((((p6==1)&&(p20==1))...942
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t38, t43, t47, t51, t53, t57, t61, t64, t68, ...386
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15042620546070770879.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15042620546070770879.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15042620546070770879.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15042620546070770879.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15042620546070770879.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4960212132633569097.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8689716426020064714.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4960212132633569097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8689716426020064714.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95763e+14,0.140368,10068,521,27,12474,292,374,19351,49,674,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((i11.i1.u41.p127!=1)&&(!((i2.u5.p12==1)&&(i2.u7.p22==1))))) U (E(!(((EX((i12.u45.p136==1)) * AF((i1.u15.p48==1))) * ((i13.u46.p153!...440
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((E(!(((EX((i12.u45.p136==1)) * !(EG(!((i1.u15.p48==1))))) * ((i13.u46.p153!=1)&&(i3.u10.p31!=1)...1319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, t152, i0.t7, i0.u61.t3, i1.t114, i1.u14.t109, i1.u15.t113, i2.t137, i2.u5.t138, i2.u5.t...616
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 62 rules in 7 ms. Remains 159 /190 variables (removed 31) and now considering 159/190 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:40:29] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:40:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:40:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 12266 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 18/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 6/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 387 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 42290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42290ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42452 ms. Remains : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11101356155055999459.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9205647680784443152.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11101356155055999459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9205647680784443152.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52783e+14,0.546546,26376,2,1383,5,68833,6,0,797,151545,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AF(((AX((p61==1)) * (p198==1)) * ((p141==0)||(p5==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!((p61==1)))) * (p198==1)) * ((p141==0)||(p5==0))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t46, t51, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, t81, ...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4013878264293420596.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4013878264293420596.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4013878264293420596.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4013878264293420596.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4013878264293420596.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17564784067865615699.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6837292271990070667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17564784067865615699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6837292271990070667.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52783e+14,0.108208,8596,359,22,9563,256,333,13585,40,506,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AF(((AX((i5.u22.p61==1)) * (i17.u63.p198==1)) * ((i12.u45.p141==0)||(i0.i0.u2.p5==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!((i5.u22.p61==1)))) * (i17.u63.p198==1)) * ((i12.u45.p141==0)||(i0.i0.u2.p5==0)...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, t149, i0.i0.u2.t140, i1.t133, i1.u5.t137, i2.t130, i3.t117, i3.u14.t121, i4.t112, i4.u1...527
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,9.71933,305432,1,0,508644,360,2190,1.1684e+06,214,1068,477656
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 189 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 142 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 138 transition count 137
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 138 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 118 transition count 117
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 101 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 101 transition count 100
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 101 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 93 transition count 92
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 60 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 58 transition count 57
Applied a total of 261 rules in 32 ms. Remains 58 /190 variables (removed 132) and now considering 57/190 (removed 133) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/58 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/115 variables, 58/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 952 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/58 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/115 variables, 58/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 55/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 1296 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2259ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2259ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/190 places, 57/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2399 ms. Remains : 58/190 places, 57/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15976214351559160707.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12989996922109341281.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15976214351559160707.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12989996922109341281.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.77384e+08,0.03673,4644,2,202,5,3822,6,0,291,5021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((!((p68==1)||(p83==1)))||(p149==1))||((p79==1)&&(p98==1))) U !((!(AF(!(((p164==1)||(p202==1))))) + EF((p139==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!(!(EG(!(!(((p164==1)||(p202==1))))))) + E(TRUE U (p139==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!((!(!(EG(!(!(((p...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t26, t29, t31, t35, t37, t39, t41, t42, Inter...247
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,12.0059,411304,1,0,877,2.01867e+06,150,445,1889,3.48068e+06,927
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 62 rules in 25 ms. Remains 159 /190 variables (removed 31) and now considering 159/190 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:42:06] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:42:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:42:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 11729 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 11/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 8/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 6/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 385 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 41762ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41762ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41950 ms. Remains : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15320329957820713492.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:42:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12919060447505440145.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15320329957820713492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12919060447505440145.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0331e+14,0.525135,26028,2,1509,5,66972,6,0,797,149083,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(E(!((((p19==1)&&(p150==1)) + A((p65==1) U (p60==1)))) U AF(AX((p8==1)))) U AX(AG((EF((p27==1)) + (p36!=1))))) * EF((p174==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(E(!((((p19==1)&&(p150==1)) + !((E(!((p60==1)) U (!((p65==1)) * !((p60==1)))) + EG(!((p60==1))))...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...365
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11701507185388319556.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11701507185388319556.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11701507185388319556.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11701507185388319556.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11701507185388319556.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6872897360513386088.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3048830292446815429.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6872897360513386088.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3048830292446815429.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0331e+14,0.103798,8328,377,38,9024,296,346,12878,49,607,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(E(!((((i2.u6.p19==1)&&(i13.u48.p150==1)) + A((i6.u23.p65==1) U (i6.u21.p60==1)))) U AF(AX((i1.i1.u3.p8==1)))) U AX(AG((EF((i3.u9.p27==...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(E(!((((i2.u6.p19==1)&&(i13.u48.p150==1)) + !((E(!((i6.u21.p60==1)) U (!((i6.u23.p65==1)) * !((i...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, t147, t149, i1.i0.u2.t140, i2.t132, i2.u5.t137, i2.u6.t139, i3.t129, i3.t125, i4.t115, ...546
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 162 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 162 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Applied a total of 60 rules in 6 ms. Remains 160 /190 variables (removed 30) and now considering 160/190 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 160 cols
[2025-06-05 04:43:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:43:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:43:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 160/320 variables, 160/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 10731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 160/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 160/320 variables, 160/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 159/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 15/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 4/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 383 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 160/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 40748ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40749ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 160/190 places, 160/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40974 ms. Remains : 160/190 places, 160/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17019677578878266193.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4982780101476436868.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17019677578878266193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4982780101476436868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.45172e+14,0.620587,29464,2,1809,5,77927,6,0,802,174985,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EX((EF((p193==1)) * A(((p30==1)&&(p49==1)) U (((p118==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p140==1))))) + (p70==1)) U !((AF(E((p105==1) U (p82==1))) + A...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,(EX((E(TRUE U (p193==1)) * !((E(!((((p118==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p140==1))) U (!(((p30==1)&&(p49==1)...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t20, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, ...363
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4759279615679604893.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4759279615679604893.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4759279615679604893.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4759279615679604893.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4759279615679604893.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9976428963683244486.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:44:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14548951316220136588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9976428963683244486.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14548951316220136588.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.45172e+14,0.078078,7256,373,27,6462,272,347,9756,46,563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EX((EF((i16.u62.p193==1)) * A(((i1.u10.p30==1)&&(i0.i2.u16.p49==1)) U (((i8.u35.p118==1)&&(i9.u40.p124==1))&&(i10.u43.p140==1))))) +...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,(EX((E(TRUE U (i16.u62.p193==1)) * !((E(!((((i8.u35.p118==1)&&(i9.u40.p124==1))&&(i10.u43.p140=...466
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t148, i0.i0.u2.t141, i0.i2.t112, i0.i2.u15.t108, i1.t127, i1.u10.t131, i1.u10.t132, i2.t...565
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 189 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 133 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 132 transition count 131
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 132 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 113 transition count 112
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 93 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 93 transition count 92
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 93 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 82 transition count 81
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 51 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 49 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 48 transition count 48
Applied a total of 280 rules in 31 ms. Remains 48 /190 variables (removed 142) and now considering 48/190 (removed 142) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:45:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 48/96 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 96/96 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 48/96 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 47/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 96/96 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 639 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1260ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1262ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/190 places, 48/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1430 ms. Remains : 48/190 places, 48/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15285440091009910078.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8720053123181669839.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15285440091009910078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8720053123181669839.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.82638e+07,0.02043,4436,2,81,5,2665,6,0,243,3340,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p188==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p188==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 46/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.029988,4692,1,0,8,3456,19,3,1224,3340,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 62 rules in 11 ms. Remains 159 /190 variables (removed 31) and now considering 159/190 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 11237 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 14/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 9/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 7/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 7/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 392 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 41261ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41262ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41457 ms. Remains : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13269183932028173962.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13576213630669670023.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13269183932028173962.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13576213630669670023.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90739e+14,0.634991,31204,2,1470,5,79187,6,0,797,192719,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EF(((E((p88==1) U (p27==1)) + (p61==1)) * ((p112==1)||(p186==1))))) * EG(EF((p28==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((E((p88==1) U (p27==1)) + (p61==1)) * ((p112==1)||(p186==1))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t19, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t66, t72, ...356
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10667941093753087096.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10667941093753087096.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10667941093753087096.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10667941093753087096.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10667941093753087096.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10631594518976811845.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9891759394426206384.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10631594518976811845.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9891759394426206384.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90739e+14,0.116252,7048,340,38,6011,295,332,8810,49,612,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EF(((E((i5.u29.p88==1) U (i3.u10.p27==1)) + (i6.u20.p61==1)) * ((i9.u39.p112==1)||(i16.u59.p186==1))))) * EG(EF((i3.u11.p28==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((E((i5.u29.p88==1) U (i3.u10.p27==1)) + (i6.u20.p61==1)) * ((i9.u39.p112==1)||(i16.u59...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t144, i0.i0.u2.t140, i1.t112, i1.u15.t108, i2.t133, i2.u7.t137, i3.t130, i4.t117, i4.u14...540
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.78229,306936,1,0,569819,509,2329,962958,280,1486,653544
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 168 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 168 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 167 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 167 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 166 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 166 transition count 166
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 166 /190 variables (removed 24) and now considering 166/190 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 166 cols
[2025-06-05 04:46:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:46:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:46:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/332 variables, 166/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/332 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/332 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 332/332 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 10872 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/332 variables, 166/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 165/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 20/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 9/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 9/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 4/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 4/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 1/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 2/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 5/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 5/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 332/332 variables, and 423 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 40890ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40891ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/190 places, 166/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41085 ms. Remains : 166/190 places, 166/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2257911649086651610.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:47:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17963973937428875924.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2257911649086651610.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17963973937428875924.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.26621e+14,1.00178,40604,2,1886,5,95962,6,0,832,270463,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((E((p148==1) U (p176==1)) + AG((p105==1))) + (AF(((p51==1)||(p38==1))) + (p171==1))) + (((p129==1) + (AF(((AX((p63==1)) * (p105==0))...354
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((E((p148==1) U (p176==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((p105==1))))) + (!(EG(!(((p51==1)||(p38=...770
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t19, t21, t27, t29, t31, t32, t34, t38, t42, t47, t51, t57, t62, t64, t68, ...384
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4479988572664855811.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4479988572664855811.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4479988572664855811.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4479988572664855811.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4479988572664855811.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6680376582150955187.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16568544278430059452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6680376582150955187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16568544278430059452.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.26621e+14,0.093076,7888,407,38,7374,296,371,12636,49,624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((E((i10.i1.u50.p148==1) U (i0.u58.p176==1)) + AG((i10.i0.u36.p105==1))) + (AF(((i4.u17.p51==1)||(i3.u13.p38==1))) + (i0.u59.p171==1)...529
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((E((i10.i1.u50.p148==1) U (i0.u58.p176==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((i10.i0.u36.p105==1)))...1065
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t154, i0.u59.t27, i0.u60.t21, i1.t139, i1.u5.t144, i1.u6.t146, i2.t132, i2.u8.t137, i3.t...636
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 162 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 162 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Applied a total of 60 rules in 12 ms. Remains 160 /190 variables (removed 30) and now considering 160/190 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 160 cols
[2025-06-05 04:48:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:48:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:48:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 160/320 variables, 160/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 9409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 160/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 160/320 variables, 160/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 159/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 12/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 8/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 4/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 7/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 4/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 9/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 160/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 39433ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39433ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 160/190 places, 160/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39583 ms. Remains : 160/190 places, 160/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3373641143470166270.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability577007530072551820.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3373641143470166270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability577007530072551820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23346e+14,0.756959,32956,2,1550,5,83782,6,0,802,205245,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((E(EF((((p72==1)&&(p128==1))&&(p147==1))) U !(((p66!=1) * AG((p74==1))))) * EG((p117==0)))) * E((AX(!(((p121==1)||(p102==1)))) + (p12...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG((E(E(TRUE U (((p72==1)&&(p128==1))&&(p147==1))) U !(((p66!=1) * !(E(TRUE U !((p74==1))))))) * ...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t62, t66, t68, t72, ...366
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1984240885749571254.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1984240885749571254.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1984240885749571254.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1984240885749571254.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1984240885749571254.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17972953119464741528.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17983594974286318478.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17972953119464741528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17983594974286318478.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23346e+14,0.134073,9024,341,23,10360,262,336,15969,41,517,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((E(EF((((i5.u22.p72==1)&&(i10.i1.u39.p128==1))&&(i12.u46.p147==1))) U !(((i6.u19.p66!=1) * AG((i5.u25.p74==1))))) * EG((i9.u35.p117==...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG((E(E(TRUE U (((i5.u22.p72==1)&&(i10.i1.u39.p128==1))&&(i12.u46.p147==1))) U !(((i6.u19.p66!=1)...329
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t150, i0.t113, i0.u14.t109, i1.t134, i1.u4.t138, i2.t131, i2.t127, i3.t118, i3.u12.t122, i4.i...575
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 189 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 133 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 132 transition count 131
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 132 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 113 transition count 112
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 94 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 94 transition count 93
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 94 transition count 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 84 transition count 83
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 52 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 50 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 49 transition count 49
Applied a total of 278 rules in 26 ms. Remains 49 /190 variables (removed 141) and now considering 49/190 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 49/98 variables, 49/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 602 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 49/98 variables, 49/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 48/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 98/98 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 626 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1266ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1266ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/190 places, 49/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1431 ms. Remains : 49/190 places, 49/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3534058689715922388.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5867316007892963491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3534058689715922388.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5867316007892963491.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.09835e+07,0.018184,4440,2,153,5,2981,6,0,248,3854,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(!(E((p90==1) U (p193==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E((p90==1) U (p193==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t6, t7, t10, t12, t14, t17, t19, t21, t25, t27, t28, t31, t33, t36, Intersection wit...236
(forward)formula 0,0,0.162421,10712,1,0,225,34691,124,105,1529,61381,216
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 189 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 136 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 135 transition count 134
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 135 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 115 transition count 114
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 93 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 93 transition count 92
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 93 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 82 transition count 81
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 53 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 51 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 50 transition count 50
Applied a total of 276 rules in 35 ms. Remains 50 /190 variables (removed 140) and now considering 50/190 (removed 140) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 780 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 47/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1562ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/190 places, 50/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1689 ms. Remains : 50/190 places, 50/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14152162508072108211.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15099322392015986150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14152162508072108211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15099322392015986150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.80244e+07,0.02395,4440,2,85,5,2968,6,0,253,3695,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((p118==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p140==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p118==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p140==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.042781,5080,1,0,8,6095,19,5,1333,6260,10
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 190/190 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 62 rules in 6 ms. Remains 159 /190 variables (removed 31) and now considering 159/190 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:50:15] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:50:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 10796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 13/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 12/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 6/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 388 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 40816ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40817ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40979 ms. Remains : 159/190 places, 159/190 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:50:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6506007730524518201.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:50:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15322365097198330278.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6506007730524518201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15322365097198330278.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17529e+14,0.554569,27652,2,1538,5,70011,6,0,797,164250,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((p182==1) * (AX((((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&(p42==1))) + EX((p27==1)))) * ((p145==1)||(((p30==1)&&(p49==1))&&(((p118==0)||(p124==0))||...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p182==1) * (!(EX(!((((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&(p42==1))))) + EX((p27==1)))) * ((p1...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t18, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t43, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t73, ...357
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5958878405718944016.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5958878405718944016.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5958878405718944016.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5958878405718944016.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5958878405718944016.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3595825308687553346.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2377751677161570800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3595825308687553346.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2377751677161570800.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17529e+14,0.164112,11500,412,38,16126,346,339,23140,47,723,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((i15.u58.p182==1) * (AX((((i2.u5.p20==1)&&(i3.i1.u8.p26==1))&&(i4.u14.p42==1))) + EX((i3.i1.u8.p27==1)))) * ((i12.u44.p145==1)||(...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((i15.u58.p182==1) * (!(EX(!((((i2.u5.p20==1)&&(i3.i1.u8.p26==1))&&(i4.u14.p42==...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, t147, t149, i0.i1.u2.t140, i1.t77, i1.u29.t73, i2.t133, i2.u5.t137, i3.i1.t130, i4.t117...551
(forward)formula 0,0,9.46535,313272,1,0,451480,418,2024,1.4016e+06,246,1339,555327
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10376303679752446227.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10376303679752446227.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10376303679752446227.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10376303679752446227.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10376303679752446227.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2345728434222392754.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3534135076564632937.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2345728434222392754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3534135076564632937.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.11865e+15,0.191652,12044,895,35,14542,256,400,28715,47,629,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AF(!(((i16.u73.p194==1)||(i11.u53.p153==1))))) + (!((!((AG((i0.u18.p51==1)) * (i11.u54.p149==1))) + (AG((i3.i0.u2.p8==1)) * !(((i3....265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((i13.u60.p164==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (i11.u54.p145!=1))) * !((i13.u60.p164==1)))) + EG(!(...675
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t140, i0.t139, i0.u16.t134, i0.u17.t138, i1.t163, i1.u4.t164, i1.u4.t170, i1.u5.t168, i2.t...935
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 05:17:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14499634612211921943.gal : 68 ms
[2025-06-05 05:17:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1619921010356933902.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14499634612211921943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1619921010356933902.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.11865e+15,3.56529,131608,1031,416,218062,1034,278,1.0544e+06,131,11017,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AF(!(((i1.u32.p194==1)||(i0.i1.u25.p153==1))))) + (!((!((AG((i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.p51==1)) * (i0.i1.u25.p149==1))) + (AG((i0.i0.i0.i1.u4...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((i1.i0.i0.u29.p164==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (i0.i1.u25.p145!=1))) * !((i1.i0.i0.u29.p164==1...768
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.u4.t171, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t134, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t138, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t139, i0.i0.i0....1539

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900234"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;