Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900233.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900233
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 476K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749097228012

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Transformed 203 places.
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Transformed 203 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 203 places and 203 transitions and 478 arcs in 161 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 88 out of 203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 203/203 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 187 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 187 transition count 187
Applied a total of 32 rules in 27 ms. Remains 187 /203 variables (removed 16) and now considering 187/203 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 187 cols
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 186 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:20:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/187 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 429 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 19/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 6/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 187/374 variables, 187/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/374 variables, 2/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/374 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved in 20783 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 187/187 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/187 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 32/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 187/374 variables, 187/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 186/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 20/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 12/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 7/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 5/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 187/187 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 50877ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50887ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/203 places, 187/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51353 ms. Remains : 187/203 places, 187/203 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 187 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 04:21:20] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 04:21:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 04:21:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 187 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 187 places (down from 88) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (10 resets) in 816 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 2/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 231 ms. (172 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 263 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 04:21:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 96/103 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 84/187 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 187/374 variables, 187/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/374 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 222 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 187/187 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 96/103 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/187 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 187/374 variables, 187/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/374 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 1084 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 187/187 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1319ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 23 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 187 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 187 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 135 transition count 135
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 135 transition count 113
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 113 transition count 113
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 92 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 92 transition count 92
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 92 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 81 transition count 81
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 53 transition count 53
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 41 transition count 65
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 41 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 40 transition count 63
Applied a total of 294 rules in 77 ms. Remains 40 /187 variables (removed 147) and now considering 63/187 (removed 124) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 40/187 places, 63/187 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 30247 steps (40 resets) in 185 ms. (162 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 187 transitions.
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 60 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 165 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 165 transition count 165
Applied a total of 44 rules in 33 ms. Remains 165 /187 variables (removed 22) and now considering 165/187 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 165 cols
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 165/330 variables, 165/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/330 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/330 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 330/330 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 13332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/330 variables, 165/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 164/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 14/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 5/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 1/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 3/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 188 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 4/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 2/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 4/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 7/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 330/330 variables, and 399 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 43360ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43363ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 165/187 places, 165/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43627 ms. Remains : 165/187 places, 165/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1339996689699132844.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13899715999525539462.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1339996689699132844.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13899715999525539462.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.13484e+14,0.672221,33052,2,1891,5,84901,6,0,827,205043,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((((A((p54==1) U (p197==1)) + E(((p131==0)||(p151==1)) U ((p157==0)||(p96==1)))) + (EF(((p77==0)||(p11==1))) + ((p75==0)&&((p133==0)...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((((!((E(!((p197==1)) U (!((p54==1)) * !((p197==1)))) + EG(!((p197==1))))) + E(((p131==0)||(p15...336
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t34, t39, t44, t46, t50, t54, t56, t60, t64, t67, t71, t77, t81, ...365
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5997021860941976002.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5997021860941976002.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5997021860941976002.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5997021860941976002.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5997021860941976002.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 93 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17432907367460240420.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2436781061995347615.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17432907367460240420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2436781061995347615.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.13484e+14,0.137094,10212,407,25,12988,259,335,19566,43,550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((((A((i4.u14.p54==1) U (i16.u65.p197==1)) + E(((i11.u42.p131==0)||(i12.u49.p151==1)) U ((i14.i0.u51.p157==0)||(i8.u32.p96==1)))) + ...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((((!((E(!((i16.u65.p197==1)) U (!((i4.u14.p54==1)) * !((i16.u65.p197==1)))) + EG(!((i16.u65.p1...485
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t153, t155, i0.i0.u2.t146, i1.t139, i1.u5.t143, i2.t132, i2.u10.t136, i2.u10.t137, i3.t122, i...565
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,12.7289,452016,1,0,672264,402,2294,1.9415e+06,229,1166,506355
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 57 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 57 transitions
Performed 57 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 57
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 186 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 129 transition count 126
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 127 transition count 126
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 127 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 108 transition count 107
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 88 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 88 transition count 87
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 88 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 79 transition count 78
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 53 transition count 52
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 53 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 51 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 50 transition count 50
Applied a total of 271 rules in 24 ms. Remains 50 /187 variables (removed 137) and now considering 50/187 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 715 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 49/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1545ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/187 places, 50/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1714 ms. Remains : 50/187 places, 50/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4910516333839479256.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14481144346345079966.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4910516333839479256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14481144346345079966.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.37729e+07,0.033237,4448,2,85,5,2889,6,0,253,3665,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p27==0)||(p138==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p27==0)||(p138==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 46/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107531,6496,1,0,8,12179,19,4,1268,16260,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 56 rules in 15 ms. Remains 159 /187 variables (removed 28) and now considering 159/187 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 397 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 494 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:22:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 8414 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 14/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 5/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 259 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 10/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 38450ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38451ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/187 places, 159/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38960 ms. Remains : 159/187 places, 159/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11096905981994518948.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8166410907000756482.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11096905981994518948.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8166410907000756482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.82887e+14,0.562066,28344,2,1647,5,72568,6,0,797,169012,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX((p116==1))) * AG((EX((((p159==0) + EG(((p128==0)||(p103==1)))) * E(((p170==0)||(p139==1)) U ((p201==0)||(p52==1))))) * EF((p86==0)...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p116==1)))))))] = FALSE * ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((p159==0) + EG(((p128==0)||(p...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t37, t41, t46, t51, t53, t56, t60, t63, t67, ...362
(forward)formula 0,0,4.83401,167236,1,0,368,852771,339,189,4350,1.05164e+06,391
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 165 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 165 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 164 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 164 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 163 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 163 transition count 163
Applied a total of 48 rules in 10 ms. Remains 163 /187 variables (removed 24) and now considering 163/187 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 163 cols
[2025-06-05 04:23:36] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:23:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 323 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:23:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 163/326 variables, 163/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 326/326 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 22412 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 14/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 163/326 variables, 163/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 162/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 13/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 8/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 4/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 4/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 326/326 variables, and 401 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 52432ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52434ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/187 places, 163/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52768 ms. Remains : 163/187 places, 163/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2438511759731008632.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7365837306900394509.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2438511759731008632.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7365837306900394509.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.66881e+14,0.895761,39960,2,1925,5,100829,6,0,817,259870,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((p185==0)||(p107==1)) * AX(((p133==0)||(p164==1))))) U (((p144==0) * !((!((AF((p197==1)) + EF((p171==1)))) * E(AX((p125==0)) U AF((...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((p144==0) * !((!((!(EG(!((p197==1)))) + E(TRUE U (p171==1)))) * E(!(EX(!((p125==0)))) U !(EG(...640
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t27, t30, t31, t37, t42, t44, t47, t51, t53, t57, t61, t64, t65, t69, ...384
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5912492202638229099.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5912492202638229099.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5912492202638229099.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5912492202638229099.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5912492202638229099.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3048878426565253840.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:24:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9229548565601908618.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3048878426565253840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9229548565601908618.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.66881e+14,0.139742,9660,395,23,11156,268,353,18451,40,566,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((i15.u61.p185==0)||(i11.i0.u36.p107==1)) * AX(((i12.u47.p133==0)||(i0.i1.u55.p164==1))))) U (((i13.u50.p144==0) * !((!((AF((i16.u64...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i13.u50.p144==0) * !((!((!(EG(!((i16.u64.p197==1)))) + E(TRUE U (i14.u57.p171==1)))) * E(!(E...869
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t151, t153, i0.i1.t30, i0.i1.t31, i1.i0.u2.t144, i2.t137, i2.u6.t141, i3.t134, i3.t130, i4.t1...619
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 159 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 158 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 158 transition count 158
Applied a total of 58 rules in 10 ms. Remains 158 /187 variables (removed 29) and now considering 158/187 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 158 cols
[2025-06-05 04:25:29] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:25:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 377 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:25:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/316 variables, 158/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/316 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 316/316 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 8849 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/316 variables, 158/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 157/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 14/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 10/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 3/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 12/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 316/316 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 38889ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38889ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/187 places, 158/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39276 ms. Remains : 158/187 places, 158/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8910095823573171422.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5036514720182293721.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8910095823573171422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5036514720182293721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59378e+14,0.534436,26112,2,1742,5,68373,6,0,792,149864,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EG((p197==0))) * EF(((p199==0)||(p181==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(EG((p197==0)))),TRUE) * ((p199==0)||(p181==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, ...358
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3271260968574313738.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3271260968574313738.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3271260968574313738.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3271260968574313738.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3271260968574313738.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14790532773289855558.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17078467401718344222.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14790532773289855558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17078467401718344222.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59378e+14,0.068421,6912,379,23,6090,269,333,8293,40,530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EG((i17.u62.p197==0))) * EF(((i17.u61.p199==0)||(i14.u59.p181==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(EG((i17.u62.p197==0)))),TRUE) * ((i17.u61.p199==0)||(i14.u59.p181==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t143, t146, t148, i0.i0.u2.t139, i1.t132, i1.u7.t136, i2.t129, i2.t125, i3.t116, i3.u14.t120,...530
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,1,7.53581,282336,1,0,454784,487,2436,1.14852e+06,222,1458,341836
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 163 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 163 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 162 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 162 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 161 transition count 161
Applied a total of 52 rules in 6 ms. Remains 161 /187 variables (removed 26) and now considering 161/187 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 161 cols
[2025-06-05 04:26:46] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:26:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:26:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 161/322 variables, 161/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 8158 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 161/161 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 161/322 variables, 161/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 160/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 12/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 8/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 9/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 5/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 7/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 161/161 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 38196ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38196ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 161/187 places, 161/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38421 ms. Remains : 161/187 places, 161/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2585174142018678416.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1946762398075899597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2585174142018678416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1946762398075899597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.97866e+14,0.779315,34564,2,1923,5,87742,6,0,807,216436,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((p144==1) + !(E(EG(((p77==0)||(p94==1))) U ((p146!=1)&&(p5!=1))))) + (((p54==0)||(p96==1)) * ((AG(!(A(((p134==0)||(p150==1)) U ((p11...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(((p144==1) + !(E(EG(((p77==0)||(p94==1))) U ((p146!=1)&&(p5!=1))))))) * !(((p54==0)||(p96==1)))...469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t41, t42, t44, t47, t51, t52, t53, t57, t61, t64, ...373
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6579236576054016456.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6579236576054016456.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6579236576054016456.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6579236576054016456.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6579236576054016456.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:27:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:27:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:27:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:27:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:27:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13690981123626780450.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:27:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14677174482202074833.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13690981123626780450.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14677174482202074833.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.97866e+14,0.117582,9400,373,32,10858,460,367,17113,49,833,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((i12.u50.p144==1) + !(E(EG(((i7.u25.p77==0)||(i5.u30.p94==1))) U ((i12.u48.p146!=1)&&(i0.i0.u2.p5!=1))))) + (((i1.u16.p54==0)||(i5.u...337
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(((i12.u50.p144==1) + !(E(EG(((i7.u25.p77==0)||(i5.u30.p94==1))) U ((i12.u48.p146!=1)&&(i0.i0.u2...651
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, t151, i0.i0.u2.t142, i1.t114, i1.u16.t110, i2.t135, i2.u5.t139, i3.t132, i3.t128, i4.t1...595
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 186 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 131 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 129 transition count 128
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 129 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 108 transition count 107
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 90 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 90 transition count 89
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 90 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 82 transition count 81
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 56 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 54 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 53 transition count 53
Applied a total of 264 rules in 14 ms. Remains 53 /187 variables (removed 134) and now considering 53/187 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 53/106 variables, 53/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/106 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 53/106 variables, 53/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 51/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/106 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 2381 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3443ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/187 places, 53/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3673 ms. Remains : 53/187 places, 53/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7205440577587598867.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality406196469166631.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7205440577587598867.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality406196469166631.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...279
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.33389e+07,0.031479,4468,2,155,5,2977,6,0,267,3790,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG((E((p49==1) U A((p6==1) U (p48==1))) * AF(((p46==0)||(p35==1))))) U EF(AG((p107==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p107==0))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p107==0)))))) U (!(!(E(T...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t6, t9, t15, t17, t19, t30, t37, t43, t48, Intersection with reachable at each s...215
(forward)formula 0,1,0.064244,6004,1,0,124,9907,142,55,1675,10201,127
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 186 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 128 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 126 transition count 125
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 126 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 107 transition count 106
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 87 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 87 transition count 86
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 87 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 78 transition count 77
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 52 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 50 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 49 transition count 49
Applied a total of 272 rules in 31 ms. Remains 49 /187 variables (removed 138) and now considering 49/187 (removed 138) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 49/98 variables, 49/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 595 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 49/98 variables, 49/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 48/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 98/98 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1245ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/187 places, 49/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1398 ms. Remains : 49/187 places, 49/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 175 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11341127701898099903.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7414319415487302237.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11341127701898099903.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7414319415487302237.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 166 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 166 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 165 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 165 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 164 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 164 transition count 164
Applied a total of 46 rules in 4 ms. Remains 164 /187 variables (removed 23) and now considering 164/187 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 164/328 variables, 164/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 8268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 164/328 variables, 164/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 20/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 4/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 4/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 3/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 4/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 6/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 38324ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38324ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/187 places, 164/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38557 ms. Remains : 164/187 places, 164/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7584908491936246780.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5567592248934983145.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7584908491936246780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5567592248934983145.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.93688e+14,0.883642,39544,2,2019,5,96676,6,0,822,259335,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(((A(AF((p119==1)) U !(((p123==0)||(p138==1)))) * (p65==1)) * ((p132==0)||(p77==0))))) U ((EX((EX(((p182==0)||(p144==1))) + (p23!=1...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EX((EX(((p182==0)||(p144==1))) + (p23!=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p153==0))))) * !((E(TRUE U (p65==...843
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t18, t22, t26, t30, t31, t38, t39, t43, t44, t45, t48, t49, t53, t55, t58, ...393
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16770060449845302673.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16770060449845302673.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16770060449845302673.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16770060449845302673.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16770060449845302673.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16982821915534982677.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:29:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7429595849041608010.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16982821915534982677.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7429595849041608010.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.93688e+14,0.118637,9280,461,25,10113,219,377,17723,43,485,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(((A(AF((i11.u40.p119==1)) U !(((i12.i1.u43.p123==0)||(i10.u46.p138==1)))) * (i6.u20.p65==1)) * ((i10.u46.p132==0)||(i7.u24.p77==0)...347
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EX((EX(((i15.u63.p182==0)||(i13.u50.p144==1))) + (i3.u8.p23!=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i13.u48.p15...1182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t152, i0.i1.t31, i0.i1.u53.t30, i1.i0.u2.t145, i2.t138, i2.u7.t142, i3.t135, i3.t131, i4.t122...651
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 161 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 161 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 160 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 160 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 159 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 159 transition count 159
Applied a total of 56 rules in 4 ms. Remains 159 /187 variables (removed 28) and now considering 159/187 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-05 04:30:09] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 11078 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 8/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 159/318 variables, 159/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 158/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 17/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 5/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41106ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41108ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/187 places, 159/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41364 ms. Remains : 159/187 places, 159/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4253932573234737385.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:30:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13520834094245165186.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4253932573234737385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13520834094245165186.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.00875e+14,0.686575,30316,2,1509,5,77945,6,0,797,183691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX((AF(((p52==0)||(p177==1))) + ((((p76==0)&&(p180==1))||(p29==0))&&((p110==0)||(p133==0))))) * ((p23==0)||(p58==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!((!(EG(!(((p52==0)||(p177==1))))) + ((((p76==0)&&(p180==1))||(p29==0))&&((p110==0)||(p133==0))...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t51, t55, t59, t62, t63, t67, t69, ...356
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13365061792917342155.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13365061792917342155.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13365061792917342155.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13365061792917342155.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13365061792917342155.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17138641865690133936.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6697222440642460198.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17138641865690133936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6697222440642460198.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.00875e+14,0.093756,8184,306,23,8713,256,345,13072,41,532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX((AF(((i3.u15.p52==0)||(i14.u56.p177==1))) + ((((i4.i1.u22.p76==0)&&(i12.u59.p180==1))||(i1.u10.p29==0))&&((i9.u35.p110==0)||(i8.u4...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!((!(EG(!(((i3.u15.p52==0)||(i14.u56.p177==1))))) + ((((i4.i1.u22.p76==0)&&(i12.u59.p180==1))||...265
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t147, t149, i0.i0.u1.t140, i0.i2.t133, i0.i2.u4.t137, i1.t130, i2.t117, i2.u12.t121, i3.t112,...558
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 186 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 140 transition count 140
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 140 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 117 transition count 117
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 98 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 98 transition count 98
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 98 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 88 transition count 88
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 66 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 64 transition count 64
Applied a total of 242 rules in 22 ms. Remains 64 /187 variables (removed 123) and now considering 64/187 (removed 123) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:31:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/64 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/128 variables, 64/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 1195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/64 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/128 variables, 64/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 59/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 4/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 4331ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4331ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/187 places, 64/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4547 ms. Remains : 64/187 places, 64/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5282642438737337959.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10066800790086134235.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5282642438737337959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10066800790086134235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.63388e+08,0.055117,5540,2,217,5,6703,6,0,319,10545,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(EG((p124==0)) U AF(!((((p22==0)||(p162==0))||((p177==1)||(p107==1)))))) U EG((AG(((p43==0)||(p52==1))) + A((p38!=0) U (p190==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,E(EG((p124==0)) U !(EG(!(!((((p22==0)||(p162==0))||((p177==1)||(p107==1))))))))),(!(E(TRUE U !((...262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t7, t11, t14, t17, t20, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t35, t37, t40, t42, t45, t47, t49, t...257
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17846889355973049898.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17846889355973049898.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17846889355973049898.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17846889355973049898.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17846889355973049898.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16730083949729351890.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9903753303140316021.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16730083949729351890.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9903753303140316021.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.63388e+08,0.020688,4688,83,17,1771,102,181,2760,35,179,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(EG((i7.u15.p124==0)) U AF(!((((i0.u1.p22==0)||(i8.u20.p162==0))||((i10.u21.p177==1)||(i6.u13.p107==1)))))) U EG((AG(((i1.u6.p43==0)||...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,E(EG((i7.u15.p124==0)) U !(EG(!(!((((i0.u1.p22==0)||(i8.u20.p162==0))||((i10.u21.p177==1)||(i6.u...336
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t60, u9.t23, u11.t40, i0.u2.t14, i1.t7, i1.u5.t20, i2.u3.t17, i2.u8.t5, i5.u10.t25, i5.u...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,24.3883,795924,1,0,1.31264e+06,144,1132,3.29656e+06,173,335,715459
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 186 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 130 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 128 transition count 126
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 127 transition count 126
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 127 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 107 transition count 106
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 88 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 88 transition count 87
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 88 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 78 transition count 77
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 53 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 51 transition count 50
Applied a total of 269 rules in 21 ms. Remains 51 /187 variables (removed 136) and now considering 50/187 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-05 04:32:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/101 variables, 51/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/101 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 895 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/101 variables, 51/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 49/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/101 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 856 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1781ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1781ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/187 places, 50/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1916 ms. Remains : 51/187 places, 50/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1041909268587060402.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11457029724732599664.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1041909268587060402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11457029724732599664.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.82638e+07,0.019569,4376,2,137,5,2669,6,0,254,3375,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p180==0)||(p145==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p180==0)||(p145==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 46/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.03339,4632,1,0,10,4054,19,3,1288,3375,10
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 187/187 places, 187/187 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 186 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 134 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 132 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 131 transition count 130
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 131 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 111 transition count 110
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 92 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 92 transition count 91
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 92 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 82 transition count 81
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 58 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 57 transition count 56
Applied a total of 258 rules in 14 ms. Remains 57 /187 variables (removed 130) and now considering 56/187 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/57 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/113 variables, 57/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 113/113 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1590 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/57 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/113 variables, 57/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 53/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 113/113 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1672 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3288ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3288ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/187 places, 56/187 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3425 ms. Remains : 57/187 places, 56/187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6586753535662791356.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15311298805308242673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6586753535662791356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15311298805308242673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06295e+08,0.020472,4636,2,189,5,3724,6,0,282,5190,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((p156==0) * AF(((p185==0)&&(p130==1)))) + ((p57==0)&&(p101==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((p156==0) * !(EG(!(((p185==0)&&(p130==1)))))) + ((p57==0)&&(p101==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t8, t10, t13, t16, t18, t20, t21, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t39, t41, t48, t54, Intersect...243
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3256744676761349904.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3256744676761349904.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3256744676761349904.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3256744676761349904.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3256744676761349904.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2483199175581910885.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality688841581691011982.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2483199175581910885.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality688841581691011982.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06295e+08,0.014962,4436,68,13,1189,77,172,1517,27,141,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((i10.u16.p156==0) * AF(((i11.u19.p185==0)&&(i7.u12.p130==1)))) + ((i2.u5.p57==0)&&(i5.u10.p101==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((i10.u16.p156==0) * !(EG(!(((i11.u19.p185==0)&&(i7.u12.p130==1)))))) + ((i2.u5.p57==0)...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t48, t54, u6.t18, u8.t32, u11.t35, u14.t38, u15.t39, i0.u2.t13, i0.u4.t29, i1.u1.t10, i1...315
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,0.420361,29140,1,0,51314,93,911,97062,136,160,47814
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4513023577526010763.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4513023577526010763.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4513023577526010763.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4513023577526010763.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4513023577526010763.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:33:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9405681222736227401.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8700036267704824178.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9405681222736227401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8700036267704824178.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.34869e+15,0.289943,16352,711,37,24033,297,410,40074,51,758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((i15.u68.p185==0)||(i0.i1.u39.p107==1)) * AX(((i11.u48.p133==0)||(i13.u62.p164==1))))) U (((i12.u55.p144==0) * !((!((AF((i16.u73.p1...303
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i12.u55.p144==0) * !((!((!(EG(!((i16.u73.p197==1)))) + E(TRUE U (i14.u66.p171==1)))) * E(!(E...854
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t175, i1.t161, i1.u6.t165, i2.t154, i2.u10.t158, i2.u10.t159, i3.i0.u2.t168, i3.i1.t143, i3.i...869
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,219.659,2431256,1,0,3.19875e+06,490,839,8.50217e+06,110,1264,588537
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX((((i12.u55.p144==1) + !(E(EG(((i5.i1.u28.p77==0)||(i8.u36.p94==1))) U ((i12.u56.p146!=1)&&(i3.i0.u2.p5!=1))))) + (((i4.u17.p54==0)||(i...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(((i12.u55.p144==1) + !(E(EG(((i5.i1.u28.p77==0)||(i8.u36.p94==1))) U ((i12.u56.p146!=1)&&(i3.i0...651
(forward)formula 1,1,350.366,3431816,1,0,5.4018e+06,490,1412,1.23438e+07,141,1264,1901468
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 5 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13837240566220388042.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:57:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12290989102588758069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13837240566220388042.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12290989102588758069.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.34869e+15,1.07887,54728,642,307,85021,812,273,411505,132,8123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(((A(AF((i0.i1.i0.i0.u22.p119==1)) U !(((i0.i1.i0.i0.u23.p123==0)||(i0.i1.i0.u24.p138==1)))) * (i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u15.p65==1)) * ((i0....453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EX((EX(((i1.i0.u31.p182==0)||(i0.i1.u25.p144==1))) + (i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u9.p23!=1))) * !(E(TR...1456
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.t175, i0.i0.i0.u4.t168, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t131, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t132, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t13...1389

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900233"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;