Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900218.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900218
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 396K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749095795832

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 153 places.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 153 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 153 places and 153 transitions and 360 arcs in 141 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 70 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 153/153 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 143 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 143 transition count 143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 142 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 142 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 141 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 141 transition count 141
Applied a total of 24 rules in 30 ms. Remains 141 /153 variables (removed 12) and now considering 141/153 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 417 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 13/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 6/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 141/282 variables, 141/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 4/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 282/282 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 15611 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 25/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 141/282 variables, 141/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 140/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 17/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 6/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 5/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 4/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 282/282 variables, and 372 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 45683ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45694ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/153 places, 141/153 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46156 ms. Remains : 141/153 places, 141/153 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 141 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (10 resets) in 826 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 1/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 21501 steps (4 resets) in 37 ms. (565 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-05 03:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 121 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 40 rules in 10 ms. Remains 121 /141 variables (removed 20) and now considering 121/141 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 6258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 12/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 120/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 7/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 26557 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 32826ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32827ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33049 ms. Remains : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5555890735587166940.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8855170261331145544.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5555890735587166940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8855170261331145544.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29593e+11,0.21533,13476,2,1118,5,30765,6,0,607,63276,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((((p78==1)&&(p97==1)) + !(A(((p46!=1) * E((((p41==1)&&(p53==1))&&(p85==1)) U (p95==1))) U ((EF((p129==1)) * (p129==1)) * ((p29==1)&&(p...242
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((p144==1)))) + (p28==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((p144==1)))) + (p28==1))...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t13, t17, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t43, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t73, t...312
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8173633603525097052.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8173633603525097052.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8173633603525097052.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8173633603525097052.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8173633603525097052.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9409129587220536078.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4578541111316589200.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9409129587220536078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4578541111316589200.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29593e+11,0.063588,6612,344,21,5973,245,284,7736,38,487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((((i6.u24.p78==1)&&(i8.u33.p97==1)) + !(A(((i4.u17.p46!=1) * E((((i3.u11.p41==1)&&(i4.u17.p53==1))&&(i7.u28.p85==1)) U (i8.u31.p95==1)...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i12.u48.p144==1)))) + (i2.i1.u9.p28==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i12.u4...797
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t110, t113, i0.i0.u1.t106, i1.t99, i1.u6.t103, i2.i1.t92, i2.i1.t96, i3.t83, i3.u11.t87, i4.t...458
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 125 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 125 transition count 125
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 125 /141 variables (removed 16) and now considering 125/141 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 125/250 variables, 125/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 6122 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 11/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 125/250 variables, 125/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 124/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 14/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 5/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 36140ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36141ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/141 places, 125/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36281 ms. Remains : 125/141 places, 125/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11488173414836022936.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10204853490286834964.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11488173414836022936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10204853490286834964.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.87443e+11,0.341409,19248,2,1597,5,43606,6,0,627,108629,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AX(((p62==0)||(p124==0))) * EF((p18==0))) * (EF(AG((p69==0))) * (E(((p139==1)&&(p151==1)) U !(EF((p49==1)))) + A((p144==1) U ((((p12...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((p62==0)||(p124==0))))) * E(TRUE U (p18==0)))) * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p69...574
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t13, t17, t19, t21, t23, t27, t31, t32, t38, t42, t47, t52, t54, t57, t61, t65, t...335
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 118/6/7
(forward)formula 0,1,6.33294,231888,1,0,322,1.19416e+06,283,164,3659,1.5634e+06,356
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 140 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 100
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 71 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 71
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 64 transition count 64
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 40 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 40 transition count 39
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 39 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 37 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 36 transition count 36
Applied a total of 206 rules in 28 ms. Remains 36 /141 variables (removed 105) and now considering 36/141 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 35 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 36/72 variables, 36/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved in 395 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 36/72 variables, 36/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 35/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved in 392 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 792ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 793ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/141 places, 36/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 900 ms. Remains : 36/141 places, 36/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 598 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1469609156973305406.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1638669052666083630.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1469609156973305406.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1638669052666083630.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 119 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 119 transition count 119
Applied a total of 44 rules in 7 ms. Remains 119 /141 variables (removed 22) and now considering 119/141 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 5198 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 118/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 10/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 35213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35214ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/141 places, 119/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35353 ms. Remains : 119/141 places, 119/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9422978802110694813.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4544859595474752447.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9422978802110694813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4544859595474752447.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03944e+11,0.201223,13200,2,975,5,29937,6,0,597,60294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((p18==1) * AG((p114==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((p18==1) * !(E(TRUE U !((p114==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...304
(forward)formula 0,0,0.760474,32676,1,0,286,123050,265,127,3503,157988,303
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 122 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 122 transition count 122
Applied a total of 38 rules in 7 ms. Remains 122 /141 variables (removed 19) and now considering 122/141 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/244 variables, 122/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 7407 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/244 variables, 122/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 121/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 8/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 12/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 24959 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 32374ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32376ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/141 places, 122/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32517 ms. Remains : 122/141 places, 122/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2258867248165535860.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9330252465849119786.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2258867248165535860.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9330252465849119786.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48536e+11,0.215699,13600,2,1042,5,30735,6,0,612,62642,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((p145==0)&&(p122==0))) * A(EG((p35==1)) U !((((p41==1)&&(p53==1))&&(p85==1))))) * AX(AF(((p87==1)||(p69==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p145==0)&&(p122==0)))))] = FALSE * ([((FwdU(Init,!(!((((p41==1)&&(p53==1))&&(p85==1)))))...341
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 117/5/5
(forward)formula 0,0,0.463605,20256,1,0,58,80807,20,3,2803,63095,56
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 140 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 101 transition count 101
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 101 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 87 transition count 87
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 72 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 72 transition count 72
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 72 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 65 transition count 65
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 42 transition count 42
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 42 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 41 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 39 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 38 transition count 38
Applied a total of 202 rules in 16 ms. Remains 38 /141 variables (removed 103) and now considering 38/141 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 38/76 variables, 38/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/76 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 76/76 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 418 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 38/76 variables, 38/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 37/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/76 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 76/76 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 449 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 869ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 869ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/141 places, 38/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 956 ms. Remains : 38/141 places, 38/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14430936218603014738.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8740499697281403987.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14430936218603014738.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8740499697281403987.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,787320,0.010587,4240,2,65,5,1833,6,0,193,2240,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p17==1) U EG(!(EF((p61==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(p17==1)),!(E(TRUE U (p61==1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 36/0/2
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.022792,4624,1,0,11,4607,27,4,961,4034,10
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 121 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 40 rules in 7 ms. Remains 121 /141 variables (removed 20) and now considering 121/141 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 6344 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 7/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 120/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 9/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 8/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 24248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 30600ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30600ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30724 ms. Remains : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9958491757485780590.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1408381963585132184.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9958491757485780590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1408381963585132184.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14532e+11,0.248695,15004,2,1158,5,34477,6,0,607,74111,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p51==1) + (((p21==0) * EX(EF((p125==0)))) * ((p101==0)&&((p96==1)||(p54==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p51==1) + (((p21==0) * EX(E(TRUE U (p125==0)))) * ((p101==0)&&((p96==1)||(p54==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t41, t42, t44, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t74, ...307
(forward)formula 0,1,1.02398,44492,1,0,557,197122,272,308,3467,260172,486
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 118 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 118 transition count 118
Applied a total of 46 rules in 6 ms. Remains 118 /141 variables (removed 23) and now considering 118/141 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 5417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 117/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 35436ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35436ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/141 places, 118/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35559 ms. Remains : 118/141 places, 118/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10736742086315783353.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6501415100964469452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10736742086315783353.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6501415100964469452.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.5348e+10,0.178479,12304,2,934,5,27807,6,0,592,54532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX(((p148==1) * EX((p87==0)))) + AG(EF((p6==1)))) + AG((((p6==0)||(p130==0)) + AX((p38==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((p148==1) * EX((p87==0)))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p6==1))))))...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...293
(forward)formula 0,0,0.533604,24232,1,0,256,106897,262,140,3389,111602,277
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 120 transition count 120
Applied a total of 42 rules in 2 ms. Remains 120 /141 variables (removed 21) and now considering 120/141 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-05 04:01:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:01:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 7/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/240 variables, 120/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 5228 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 7/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/240 variables, 120/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 119/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 8/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 35240ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35240ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/141 places, 120/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35338 ms. Remains : 120/141 places, 120/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12150636916047373311.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12588368799689671778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12150636916047373311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12588368799689671778.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0285e+11,0.199284,13456,2,1091,5,30448,6,0,602,62916,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((p89==0)) * AF((p50==0))) * EF((EX(((p139==1)&&(p151==1))) * AF((p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !((p89==0)))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!((p50==0)))] = FALSE) * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX(((p139==1)&&(...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t52, t55, t59, t62, t66, t73, t77, ...308
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2474424285160532923.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2474424285160532923.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2474424285160532923.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2474424285160532923.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2474424285160532923.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8440970477086244797.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7987729621898145174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8440970477086244797.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7987729621898145174.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0285e+11,0.072708,7080,352,23,6865,269,283,8836,40,546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((i8.u28.p89==0)) * AF((i4.u16.p50==0))) * EF((EX(((i11.u44.p139==1)&&(i12.u45.p151==1))) * AF((i4.u17.p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !((i8.u28.p89==0)))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!((i4.u16.p50==0)))] = FALSE) * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t109, t112, i0.i0.u1.t105, i1.i1.t91, i1.i1.t95, i2.t98, i2.u6.t102, i3.t82, i3.u12.t86, i4.t...446
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,6.10445,248360,1,0,476254,382,1766,789007,216,1240,409085
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 140 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 101 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 100
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 71 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 71
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 63 transition count 63
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 41 transition count 41
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 41 transition count 40
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 40 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 38 transition count 37
Applied a total of 203 rules in 10 ms. Remains 38 /141 variables (removed 103) and now considering 37/141 (removed 104) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 35 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 04:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 37/75 variables, 38/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/75 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved in 492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 37/75 variables, 38/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 35/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/75 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved in 620 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1116ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1116ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/141 places, 37/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1219 ms. Remains : 38/141 places, 37/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10699024009008694441.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9126471359115963362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10699024009008694441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9126471359115963362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,590490,0.016849,4236,2,65,5,1885,6,0,189,2370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p120==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p120==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021244,4492,1,0,9,2111,14,3,880,2370,5
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 121 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 40 rules in 2 ms. Remains 121 /141 variables (removed 20) and now considering 121/141 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4957 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 120/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 8/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 10/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 27597 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 32561ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32561ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32667 ms. Remains : 121/141 places, 121/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12044101526519863206.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10489936861757055280.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12044101526519863206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10489936861757055280.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26671e+11,0.24246,14744,2,967,5,33682,6,0,607,71225,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EX(AG((((p114==1)&&(p139==1))&&(p151==1)))) * A((EG((p67==1)) * !(AX((p106==1)))) U A((p73!=1) U (p30==1))))) + (EG(EF(((p67==1)&&(p...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((p114==1)&&(p139==1))&&(p151==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!((E(!((p30==1)) U (!((...515
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t59, t62, t63, t67, t69, ...302
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10773889321731423129.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10773889321731423129.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10773889321731423129.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10773889321731423129.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10773889321731423129.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17226894134399955007.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10352659824925746825.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17226894134399955007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10352659824925746825.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26671e+11,0.070428,7076,349,24,6822,263,301,9143,43,566,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EX(AG((((i9.u34.p114==1)&&(i11.u41.p139==1))&&(i12.u43.p151==1)))) * A((EG((i6.u18.p67==1)) * !(AX((i0.i2.u32.p106==1)))) U A((i7.u2...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((i9.u34.p114==1)&&(i11.u41.p139==1))&&(i12.u43.p151==1))))))) * !(EG(!(...659
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t113, i0.i0.u1.t106, i1.u9.t97, i2.t99, i2.u6.t103, i3.t82, i3.u12.t86, i4.i1.t77, i4.i1.u13....451
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 140 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 103 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 100
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 100 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 71 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 71
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 71 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 64 transition count 64
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 42 transition count 42
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 42 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 41 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 39 transition count 38
Applied a total of 201 rules in 12 ms. Remains 39 /141 variables (removed 102) and now considering 38/141 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 04:04:44] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 36 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/77 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 77/77 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved in 503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/77 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 36/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 77/77 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 36 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1191ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/141 places, 38/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1279 ms. Remains : 39/141 places, 38/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12527310996526074924.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1190514045576974101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12527310996526074924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1190514045576974101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,787320,0.015411,4252,2,67,5,1907,6,0,194,2395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(AF((p120==0))) + EG((p16==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p120==0))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p16==1))] != FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.104318,8860,1,0,11,27581,23,5,968,29942,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 127 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 127 transition count 127
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 127 /141 variables (removed 14) and now considering 127/141 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 127 cols
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:04:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 127/254 variables, 127/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/254 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 254/254 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 6818 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 127/254 variables, 127/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 126/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 10/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 6/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 3/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 3/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/254 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 254/254 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 36847ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36847ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/141 places, 127/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36965 ms. Remains : 127/141 places, 127/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1465906980736125101.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9108540295408942767.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1465906980736125101.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9108540295408942767.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88194e+11,0.312112,17976,2,1480,5,43167,6,0,637,96820,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p147==1)&&(p45==1)) * (A(AF((p2!=1)) U !(((p103==1)||(p50==1)))) + EF(((!((p54==1)||(p72==1)))||(p65==1))))) U A((AF((!(((p78==1)&&(...459
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((p147==1)&&(p45==1)) * (!((E(!(!(((p103==1)||(p50==1)))) U (!(!(EG(!((p2!=1))))) * !(!(((p103==1)...1037
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t20, t23, t27, t29, t31, t33, t34, t36, t41, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, ...351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5025693841401095248.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5025693841401095248.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5025693841401095248.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5025693841401095248.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5025693841401095248.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16536821299230830671.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:05:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11285307999931152874.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16536821299230830671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11285307999931152874.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88194e+11,0.047721,5956,349,33,4044,284,309,5883,52,594,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i9.u43.p147==1)&&(i4.u15.p45==1)) * (A(AF((i0.i0.u31.p2!=1)) U !(((i8.u30.p103==1)||(i4.u14.p50==1)))) + EF(((!((i4.u13.p54==1)||(i6...697
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((i9.u43.p147==1)&&(i4.u15.p45==1)) * (!((E(!(!(((i8.u30.p103==1)||(i4.u14.p50==1)))) U (!(!(EG(!(...1503
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t116, i0.i0.u0.t112, i1.t104, i1.u4.t109, i1.u5.t105, i1.u5.t111, i2.t101, i2.t97, i3.t8...572
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 118 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 118 transition count 118
Applied a total of 46 rules in 7 ms. Remains 118 /141 variables (removed 23) and now considering 118/141 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-05 04:06:23] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:06:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:06:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 5317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 117/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 35331ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35332ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/141 places, 118/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35455 ms. Remains : 118/141 places, 118/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7918675156994460943.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13205222099370447208.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7918675156994460943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13205222099370447208.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.5348e+10,0.180372,12296,2,934,5,27807,6,0,592,54532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EX((((p120==0)&&(p98==0))||((p125==0)&&(p87==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(EX((((p120==0)&&(p98==0))||((p125==0)&&(p87==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...293
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,12.0271,401592,1,0,647,2.47513e+06,260,399,3389,2.66027e+06,759
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 140 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 106 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 101 transition count 101
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 101 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 86 transition count 86
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 73 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 73 transition count 73
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 73 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 67 transition count 67
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 46 transition count 46
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 46 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 45 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 43 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 42 transition count 42
Applied a total of 194 rules in 15 ms. Remains 42 /141 variables (removed 99) and now considering 42/141 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/84 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/84 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 84/84 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 553 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/84 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 40/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/84 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 84/84 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 755 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1313ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/141 places, 42/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1399 ms. Remains : 42/141 places, 42/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6409016750046537661.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14065031108027140235.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6409016750046537661.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14065031108027140235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.32972e+06,0.020717,4432,2,108,5,2605,6,0,212,3827,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p70==1) * ((p58==1) + AF(AG((p16==0))))) * (E((p65==1) U (p47==1)) + AF((p58==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p70==1) * ((p58==1) + !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p16==0)))))))))),(p65==1)) * (p47==1))] ...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t11, t14, t25, t29, t36, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.886299,43532,1,0,173,202921,124,100,1366,282900,209
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 141/141 places, 141/141 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 120 transition count 120
Applied a total of 42 rules in 4 ms. Remains 120 /141 variables (removed 21) and now considering 120/141 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-05 04:07:13] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 120/240 variables, 120/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 6819 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/240 variables, 120/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 119/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 11/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 27399 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 34223ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34223ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/141 places, 120/141 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34332 ms. Remains : 120/141 places, 120/141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3058167845396635396.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5221837577103320494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3058167845396635396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5221837577103320494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15101e+11,0.213284,13464,2,1005,5,30545,6,0,602,62934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((AG((p87==0)) * (p45==0)) * (p69==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!(E(TRUE U !((p87==0)))) * (p45==0)) * (p69==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t62, t67, t72, t77, t79, ...297
(forward)formula 0,0,2.77564,110544,1,0,331,569202,270,148,3362,662496,355
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10801262531185037232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10801262531185037232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10801262531185037232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10801262531185037232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10801262531185037232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10009698926284083376.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:07:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9958994286126611801.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10009698926284083376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9958994286126611801.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.08785e+11,0.08887,7656,519,35,6845,216,339,12824,46,538,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((((i6.i1.u30.p78==1)&&(i7.u37.p97==1)) + !(A(((i3.u16.p46!=1) * E((((i0.i2.u15.p41==1)&&(i3.u19.p53==1))&&(i4.u32.p85==1)) U (i7.u35.p...366
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i11.u51.p144==1)))) + (i2.u9.p28==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i11.u51.p...796
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t23, i0.i0.u1.t126, i0.i2.t104, i0.i2.t105, i0.i2.u12.t99, i0.i2.u15.t103, i1.t122, i1.u4.t11...742
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,207.282,2217544,1,0,3.00927e+06,488,1565,6.43537e+06,166,1195,1632561
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF((EX(AG((((i9.i1.u43.p114==1)&&(i8.u50.p139==1))&&(i11.u52.p151==1)))) * A((EG((i5.u23.p67==1)) * !(AX((i9.i0.u40.p106==1)))) U A((i6....297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((i9.i1.u43.p114==1)&&(i8.u50.p139==1))&&(i11.u52.p151==1))))))) * !(EG(...685
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,284.873,2451020,1,0,3.24992e+06,491,1359,6.94129e+06,150,1204,1250312
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:14:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:14:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2465210491214136205.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:14:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16058861670468978988.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2465210491214136205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16058861670468978988.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.08785e+11,0.623925,32524,760,305,51331,796,225,214240,122,6685,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i1.u24.p147==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.u10.p45==1)) * (A(AF((i0.i0.u32.p2!=1)) U !(((i0.i1.u17.p103==1)||(i0.i0.i1.u10.p50==1)))) + EF(((!((i0.i...853
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((i1.u24.p147==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.u10.p45==1)) * (!((E(!(!(((i0.i1.u17.p103==1)||(i0.i0.i1.u10.p50==1))...1825
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u3.t126, i0.i0.i1.u10.t88, i0.i0.i1.u10.t89, i0.i0.i1.u10.t93, i0.i0.i1.u10.t95, i0.i0....1098
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Transformed 141 places.
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Transformed 141 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6534679433460145739.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1501364094806000033.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6534679433460145739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1501364094806000033.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.08785e+11,3.01472,99556,2,47302,5,419699,6,0,707,439957,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p147==1)&&(p45==1)) * (A(AF((p2!=1)) U !(((p103==1)||(p50==1)))) + EF(((!((p54==1)||(p72==1)))||(p65==1))))) U A((AF((!(((p78==1)&&(...459
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((p147==1)&&(p45==1)) * (!((E(!(!(((p103==1)||(p50==1)))) U (!(!(EG(!((p2!=1))))) * !(!(((p103==1)...1037
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t9, t11, t12, t15, t19, t21, t23, t26, t30, t32, t34, t36, t37, t39, t44, t45, t49, t...425
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3170264 ms.

BK_STOP 1749098967329

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900218"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;