Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900217.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900217
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 396K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749095796164

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 54 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 153 places.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 153 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 153 places and 153 transitions and 360 arcs in 135 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 72 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 153/153 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 142 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 142 transition count 142
Applied a total of 22 rules in 22 ms. Remains 142 /153 variables (removed 11) and now considering 142/153 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 16/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 142/284 variables, 142/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 284/284 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 9049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 26/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 142/284 variables, 142/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 141/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 10/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 6/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 4/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 9/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 2/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 284/284 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39119ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/153 places, 142/153 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39527 ms. Remains : 142/153 places, 142/153 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 142 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 142 places (down from 72) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (10 resets) in 760 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 1/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (9 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/99 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 43/142 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/284 variables, 142/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 284/284 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 83 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/99 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/284 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 72 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/13 constraints, State Equation: 0/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 161ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 42 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 121 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 121 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 120 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 119 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 119 transition count 119
Applied a total of 46 rules in 22 ms. Remains 119 /142 variables (removed 23) and now considering 119/142 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 6688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 118/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 13/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 36712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36712ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/142 places, 119/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36868 ms. Remains : 119/142 places, 119/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2159393247393667267.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10771789210931815913.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2159393247393667267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10771789210931815913.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05376e+11,0.182449,12392,2,944,5,28022,6,0,597,55292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((p24==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((p24==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...298
(forward)formula 0,0,13.0805,476768,1,0,1007,1.51528e+06,261,687,3255,4.26148e+06,860
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 141 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 103 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 100
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 87 transition count 86
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 74 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 74 transition count 73
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 74 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 65 transition count 64
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 42 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 40 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 39 transition count 39
Applied a total of 202 rules in 36 ms. Remains 39 /142 variables (removed 103) and now considering 39/142 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 03:58:07] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:58:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 38 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 39/78 variables, 39/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 473 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 39/78 variables, 39/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 38/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 433 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 911ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 911ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/142 places, 39/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1027 ms. Remains : 39/142 places, 39/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12523467703850570660.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8229059699388882590.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12523467703850570660.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8229059699388882590.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11974e+06,0.012044,4212,2,67,5,2169,6,0,198,2795,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p60==0)&&((p147==1)||((p47==1)&&(p35==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p60==0)&&((p147==1)||((p47==1)&&(p35==0))))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 31/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,0.050793,6260,1,0,8,13209,20,4,987,14316,8
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 120 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 119 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 119 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 118 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 118 transition count 118
Applied a total of 48 rules in 13 ms. Remains 118 /142 variables (removed 24) and now considering 118/142 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 5501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/236 variables, 118/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 117/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 35521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35521ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/142 places, 118/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35657 ms. Remains : 118/142 places, 118/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12828609963368526592.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality300324660121298156.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12828609963368526592.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality300324660121298156.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.5348e+10,0.178893,12296,2,934,5,27807,6,0,592,54532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EX((p127==0)) * ((p68==0)||(p148==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((EX((p127==0)) * ((p68==0)||(p148==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t65, t71, t75, t80, ...293
(forward)formula 0,0,3.44021,140200,1,0,287,516527,259,128,3231,1.06569e+06,297
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 141 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 104 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 102 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 100
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 87 transition count 86
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 73 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 73 transition count 72
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 73 transition count 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 63 transition count 62
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 42 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 40 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 39 transition count 39
Applied a total of 202 rules in 18 ms. Remains 39 /142 variables (removed 103) and now considering 39/142 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 39/78 variables, 39/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 670 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 39/78 variables, 39/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 37/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1586ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1587ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/142 places, 39/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1725 ms. Remains : 39/142 places, 39/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6613949237844808126.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13130357449932093699.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6613949237844808126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13130357449932093699.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,901044,0.020847,4768,2,80,5,3699,6,0,197,6272,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p35!=1) U AG(((p22==0)||(p123==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p35!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p22==0)||(p123==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t33, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 37/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.062272,6304,1,0,86,12763,107,36,1245,14910,99
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 124 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 124 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 123 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 123 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 122 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 122 transition count 122
Applied a total of 40 rules in 8 ms. Remains 122 /142 variables (removed 20) and now considering 122/142 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-05 03:58:49] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:58:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:58:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/244 variables, 122/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 6806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/244 variables, 122/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 121/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 9/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 8/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 36825ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36825ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/142 places, 122/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36949 ms. Remains : 122/142 places, 122/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7067288696036499278.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6336588628104945598.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7067288696036499278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6336588628104945598.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41608e+11,0.223058,14624,2,1345,5,33370,6,0,612,70356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(EX(EG(((p96==0)||(p63==1))))) + ((AX(AF((p47==1))) * AG(EX((p81==1)))) * (((p131==1)||(p145==0))&&((p26==0)||(p97==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!(EX(EG(((p96==0)||(p63==1)))))))))),!((p47==1)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU((FwdU(I...373
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t8, t9, t13, t18, t20, t23, t27, t31, t32, t38, t42, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61, t6...332
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17241927451297303805.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17241927451297303805.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17241927451297303805.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17241927451297303805.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17241927451297303805.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2681712721308965678.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:59:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13720650934782607067.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2681712721308965678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13720650934782607067.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41608e+11,0.062149,6716,367,22,5553,250,291,8016,40,498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(EX(EG(((i7.u32.p96==0)||(i4.u21.p63==1))))) + ((AX(AF((i3.u15.p47==1))) * AG(EX((i6.u29.p81==1)))) * (((i11.u44.p131==1)||(i12.u49...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!(EX(EG(((i7.u32.p96==0)||(i4.u21.p63==1)))))))))),!((i3.u15.p47==1)))] = F...461
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t111, t114, i0.i1.t93, i0.i1.t97, i1.t100, i1.u5.t104, i2.t84, i2.u12.t88, i3.t80, i3.t79, i3...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,0,7.70874,319820,1,0,570591,355,1762,1.06167e+06,206,1092,473930
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 120 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 120 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 119 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 119 transition count 119
Applied a total of 46 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /142 variables (removed 23) and now considering 119/142 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-05 04:00:04] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 4775 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/238 variables, 119/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 118/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 8/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 7/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 9/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 34792ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34792ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/142 places, 119/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34927 ms. Remains : 119/142 places, 119/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10649701575593398956.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12037543806169039231.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10649701575593398956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12037543806169039231.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08233e+11,0.175944,12436,2,944,5,28286,6,0,597,55456,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EF((p108==1))) + (p64==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p64==1))) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (p108==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t62, t66, t72, t76, t81, ...293
(forward)formula 0,0,0.397105,19012,1,0,239,76637,261,127,3330,73302,251
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 121 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 121 transition count 121
Applied a total of 42 rules in 5 ms. Remains 121 /142 variables (removed 21) and now considering 121/142 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 04:00:40] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:00:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:00:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/242 variables, 121/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 120/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 34385ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34386ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/142 places, 121/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34511 ms. Remains : 121/142 places, 121/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16392812498992804384.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10171326835510701663.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16392812498992804384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10171326835510701663.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38408e+11,0.219862,13724,2,1054,5,30864,6,0,607,64498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((EG(EX(((p87==0)&&(p123==1)))) + (p15==0)) + ((p117==1) + ((EF(((p139==0)&&(p119==1))) * (p132==0)) * ((p87==0)&&(p56==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((EG(EX(((p87==0)&&(p123==1)))) + (p15==0)) + ((p117==1) + ((E(TRUE U ((p139==0)&&(p119==1))) * (...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t18, t22, t26, t33, t39, t43, t48, t52, t57, t61, t64, t68, t74, t78, t83, ...299
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10303525081222504631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10303525081222504631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10303525081222504631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10303525081222504631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10303525081222504631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3477090950930735161.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11617560235320293960.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3477090950930735161.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11617560235320293960.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38408e+11,0.048059,5932,296,23,4094,248,277,5660,38,483,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((EG(EX(((i8.u28.p87==0)&&(i11.u39.p123==1)))) + (i1.u4.p15==0)) + ((i10.u35.p117==1) + ((EF(((i12.u43.p139==0)&&(i10.u37.p119==1))...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((EG(EX(((i8.u28.p87==0)&&(i11.u39.p123==1)))) + (i1.u4.p15==0)) + ((i10.u35.p117==1) + ((E(TRUE ...271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t110, t113, i0.i0.u1.t106, i1.t99, i1.u4.t103, i2.t96, i3.t83, i3.u12.t87, i4.t78, i4.u14.t74...428
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,20.1932,587576,1,0,1.09581e+06,376,1891,1.72296e+06,220,1265,1129939
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 125 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 125 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 124 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 124 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 123 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 123 transition count 123
Applied a total of 38 rules in 8 ms. Remains 123 /142 variables (removed 19) and now considering 123/142 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:02:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 3/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 123/246 variables, 123/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 2/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 11358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 11/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 123/246 variables, 123/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 122/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 6/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 25898 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 37266ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37266ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/142 places, 123/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37385 ms. Remains : 123/142 places, 123/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6213952324680044948.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:02:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17035251695059881794.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6213952324680044948.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17035251695059881794.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45824e+11,0.235533,14504,2,1271,5,34175,6,0,617,69651,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p124==1) * (A(AF((p26==1)) U EF((p122==1))) + A(AX(((p0==0)||(p43==1))) U ((A((p115==1) U ((p150==0)||(p147==1))) + ((p24==1)&&((p30...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p124==1)) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p122==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (p122==1))) U (!(!(EG(!((p26...843
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t20, t22, t26, t27, t28, t31, t32, t38, t42, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, ...323
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11994399068999534297.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11994399068999534297.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11994399068999534297.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11994399068999534297.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11994399068999534297.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16835589425344789823.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3185131001090953881.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16835589425344789823.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3185131001090953881.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45824e+11,0.072416,6824,366,38,5849,357,318,8074,57,806,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i10.u36.p124==1) * (A(AF((i3.u7.p26==1)) U EF((i10.u38.p122==1))) + A(AX(((i0.i0.u0.p0==0)||(i4.u10.p43==1))) U ((A((i9.u34.p115==1)...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i10.u36.p124==1)) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (i10.u38.p122==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (i10.u38.p12...1166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t112, i0.i0.u1.t108, i1.t79, i1.u14.t78, i1.u15.t74, i2.i1.t101, i2.i1.u5.t105, i3.t93, ...491
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.45342,293100,1,0,574081,590,2097,972831,328,1543,469757
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 141 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 108 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 106 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 104 transition count 103
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 104 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 91 transition count 90
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 77 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 77 transition count 76
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 77 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 68 transition count 67
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 46 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 44 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 43 transition count 43
Applied a total of 194 rules in 11 ms. Remains 43 /142 variables (removed 99) and now considering 43/142 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/43 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/86 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/86 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 86/86 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/43 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/86 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 40/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/86 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 86/86 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 552 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1232ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1232ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/142 places, 43/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1319 ms. Remains : 43/142 places, 43/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7545078440916814620.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13609035775015408498.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7545078440916814620.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13609035775015408498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.62778e+06,0.018285,4456,2,108,5,2592,6,0,217,3395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(((p44==1) + AF((((p46==1)&&((p50==0)||(p78==1)))&&(((p98==0)||(p45==1))||(p63==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(((p44==1) + !(EG(!((((p46==1)&&((p50==0)||(p78==1)))&&(((p98==0)||(p45==1))||(p63==0))))))))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t11, t21, t23, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...186
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,8.00533,295796,1,0,640,1.44156e+06,120,356,1355,2.48766e+06,810
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 142/142 places, 142/142 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 142 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 103 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 101 transition count 100
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 101 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 88 transition count 87
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 74 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 74 transition count 73
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 74 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 66 transition count 65
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 41 transition count 40
Applied a total of 203 rules in 19 ms. Remains 41 /142 variables (removed 101) and now considering 40/142 (removed 102) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [30]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/142 places, 40/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 40/40 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 40/142 places, 40/142 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11022927943102140223.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1733068333329365262.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11022927943102140223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1733068333329365262.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,829477,0.012822,4296,2,163,5,2259,6,0,202,2828,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(!(A(E((p28==0) U (p1==1)) U AF(((p82==0)||(p150==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!(((p82==0)||(p150==1)))))) U (!(E((p28==0) U (p1==1))) * !(!(EG(!(((p82==0)||(p...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t8, t12, t20, t22, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed...191
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,6.1676,216900,1,0,564,985382,121,314,1329,1.8e+06,596
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 04:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 04:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 417745 ms.

BK_STOP 1749096215070

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900217"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;