About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVt-PT-002B
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 114454.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TFFFFFFFFFFFTFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900204.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900204
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749095567936
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Transformed 103 places.
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Transformed 103 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 103 places and 103 transitions and 242 arcs in 134 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 34 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 90 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 90 transition count 90
Applied a total of 26 rules in 19 ms. Remains 90 /103 variables (removed 13) and now considering 90/103 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 313 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 408 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 90/180 variables, 90/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 5374 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 17/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/180 variables, 90/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 89/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 4/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 180/180 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 16148 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 21557ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21570ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/103 places, 90/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21918 ms. Remains : 90/103 places, 90/103 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 90 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (25 resets) in 672 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 1/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 03:53:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 23/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 25/180 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 56 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Computed a total of 26 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0)&&F(p1)) U X(p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 80 /90 variables (removed 10) and now considering 80/90 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2515 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 5/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 4/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 12227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 14759ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14760ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/90 places, 80/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14865 ms. Remains : 80/90 places, 80/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 405 ms :[(NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9269 steps with 104 reset in 47 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-01 finished in 15384 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!(p0 U p1)&&X(X(p0))&&p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 83 transition count 83
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 83 /90 variables (removed 7) and now considering 83/90 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-05 03:53:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 2593 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 82/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 10073 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 12673ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12673ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/90 places, 83/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12781 ms. Remains : 83/90 places, 83/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 267 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), true, p1, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-02 finished in 13071 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U X(p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 22 rules in 16 ms. Remains 79 /90 variables (removed 11) and now considering 79/90 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:53:40] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5822 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8130ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8131ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8243 ms. Remains : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1496 steps with 12 reset in 10 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-03 finished in 8464 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G((X(p0)||F((p1&&X(G((p1||G(p2)))))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 22 rules in 14 ms. Remains 79 /90 variables (removed 11) and now considering 79/90 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2359 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8100ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8102ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8202 ms. Remains : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 344 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14633 reset in 130 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 16195 steps with 3152 reset with depth 324 and stack size 321 in 18 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-04 finished in 8723 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 89 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 65 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 64 transition count 64
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 64 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 54 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 48 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 48
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 44 transition count 44
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 28 transition count 28
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 28 transition count 27
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 22 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 20 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 19 transition count 27
Applied a total of 138 rules in 103 ms. Remains 19 /90 variables (removed 71) and now considering 27/90 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/45 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/45 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 45/46 variables, and 27 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/45 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 23/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/45 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 45/46 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 457ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 457ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/90 places, 27/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 637 ms. Remains : 19/90 places, 27/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-05 finished in 762 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U X(p1))&&G((p2||X((X((p3&&G(!p0))) U (p2&&X((p3&&G(!p0))))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 20 rules in 10 ms. Remains 80 /90 variables (removed 10) and now considering 80/90 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1957 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 6/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 12376 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 14337ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14339ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/90 places, 80/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14462 ms. Remains : 80/90 places, 80/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 300 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), true, (OR (NOT p3) p0), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 119 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-06 finished in 14784 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 89 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 65 transition count 65
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 65 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 55 transition count 55
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 48 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 48
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 44 transition count 44
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 27 transition count 27
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 26 transition count 25
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 23 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 21 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 20 transition count 26
Applied a total of 136 rules in 13 ms. Remains 20 /90 variables (removed 70) and now considering 26/90 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/46 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 198 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/46 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 25/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 438ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 438ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/90 places, 26/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 526 ms. Remains : 20/90 places, 26/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 3236 steps with 0 reset in 11 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-07 finished in 591 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U G(p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 89 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 67 transition count 67
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 67 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 55 transition count 55
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 50 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 50 transition count 50
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 50 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 46 transition count 46
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 29 transition count 29
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 29 transition count 28
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 28 transition count 27
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 23 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 21 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 20 transition count 29
Applied a total of 136 rules in 18 ms. Remains 20 /90 variables (removed 70) and now considering 29/90 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/48 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/49 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 49/49 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 402 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/48 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 27/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/49 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 49/49 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 754 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 1161ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1161ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/90 places, 29/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1247 ms. Remains : 20/90 places, 29/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[(NOT p1), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1351 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 89 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 65 transition count 65
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 65 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 54 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 48 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 48
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 44 transition count 44
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 27 transition count 27
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 26 transition count 25
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 21 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 20 transition count 28
Applied a total of 138 rules in 16 ms. Remains 20 /90 variables (removed 70) and now considering 28/90 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/90 places, 28/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 19/90 places, 28/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-09 finished in 163 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U (p1&&X(X((F(G(p2)) U !p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 79 /90 variables (removed 11) and now considering 79/90 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2309 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8002ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8002ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8096 ms. Remains : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 673 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 2290 steps with 2 reset in 14 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-10 finished in 8807 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F((p0||G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 22 rules in 3 ms. Remains 79 /90 variables (removed 11) and now considering 79/90 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2364 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8144ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8145ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8231 ms. Remains : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1062 reset in 106 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 186 steps with 2 reset with depth 47 and stack size 47 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-11 finished in 8512 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 22 rules in 5 ms. Remains 79 /90 variables (removed 11) and now considering 79/90 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2421 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5743 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8172ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8262 ms. Remains : 79/90 places, 79/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 108 ms.
Computed a total of 22 stabilizing places and 22 stable transitions
Computed a total of 22 stabilizing places and 22 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-12 finished in 8610 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 90/90 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 89 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 67 transition count 67
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 67 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 55 transition count 55
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 48 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 48
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 48 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 44 transition count 44
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 28 transition count 28
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 28 transition count 27
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 22 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 20 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 19 transition count 28
Applied a total of 138 rules in 14 ms. Remains 19 /90 variables (removed 71) and now considering 28/90 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:54:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/19 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/47 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/47 variables, and 27 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/19 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/47 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 26/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/47 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 305 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 568ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 568ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/90 places, 28/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 648 ms. Remains : 19/90 places, 28/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 119 reset in 116 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 19 steps with 0 reset with depth 20 and stack size 11 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVt-PT-002B-LTLFireability-15 finished in 823 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 113218 ms.
BK_STOP 1749095682390
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900204"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;