Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900202.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900202
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749095262177

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 56 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Transformed 103 places.
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Transformed 103 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 103 places and 103 transitions and 242 arcs in 142 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 64 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 97 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 97 transition count 97
Applied a total of 12 rules in 17 ms. Remains 97 /103 variables (removed 6) and now considering 97/103 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 97 cols
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 293 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 14/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 8/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 5/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/194 variables, 97/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 5555 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/194 variables, 97/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 96/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 5/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 297 ms of which 254 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 5/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 7/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 23380 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 28964ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28978ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/103 places, 97/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29304 ms. Remains : 97/103 places, 97/103 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 97 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 64 to 63
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (25 resets) in 1076 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 3/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (14 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 55/97 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/194 variables, 97/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 166 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 23/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/97 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/194 variables, 97/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 85 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 255ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 10 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 97 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 29 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 29 transitions
Performed 29 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 29
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 97 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 65
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 59 transition count 58
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 50 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 50 transition count 49
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 50 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 45 transition count 44
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 26 transition count 25
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 21 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 21 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 20 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 19 transition count 26
Applied a total of 156 rules in 21 ms. Remains 19 /97 variables (removed 78) and now considering 26/97 (removed 71) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 19/97 places, 26/97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (215 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 370 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 2032 steps, saw 370 distinct states, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=184 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 370 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 2032 steps, saw 370 distinct states, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=677 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
Support contains 60 out of 97 places (down from 63) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 30 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 32 rules in 7 ms. Remains 81 /97 variables (removed 16) and now considering 81/97 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2527 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 8/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 6/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 12874 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 15411ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15411ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15502 ms. Remains : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3913341682984089161.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability69269153182133898.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3913341682984089161.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability69269153182133898.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.53762e+07,0.06867,6856,2,613,5,10597,6,0,407,18777,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX((((p34==0)&&(p57==0)) + AG(EX((p26==1))))) * (A(AX((((p89==1)&&(p101==1))&&((p2==1)&&(p35==1)))) U ((AX((p27==1)) + ((p2==1)&&(p35...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!((((p34==0)&&(p57==0)) + !(E(TRUE U !(EX((p26==1))))))))) * (!((E(!(((!(EX(!((p27==1)))) + (...542
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t51, t60, t63, t67, t70, t75, Inte...248
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.69744,301160,1,0,1140,1.57782e+06,204,709,2439,2.44727e+06,1040
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 96 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 68 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 65
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 58 transition count 57
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 48 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 48 transition count 47
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 48 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 41 transition count 40
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 28 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 26 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 140 rules in 28 ms. Remains 25 /97 variables (removed 72) and now considering 25/97 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 239 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 528ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 529ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/97 places, 25/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 617 ms. Remains : 25/97 places, 25/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12913281847813373784.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16978811125164944312.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12913281847813373784.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16978811125164944312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7290,0.006699,3944,2,43,5,1009,6,0,127,1322,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p19==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p19==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.009679,4200,1,0,9,1264,14,3,580,1322,5
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 34 rules in 9 ms. Remains 80 /97 variables (removed 17) and now considering 80/97 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2418 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 6/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 4/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 13029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 15453ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15454ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15592 ms. Remains : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14259323235720752955.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10069706618512553913.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14259323235720752955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10069706618512553913.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.00032e+07,0.060995,7020,2,584,5,10784,6,0,402,19384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(!(A((p5==1) U AF((p10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),!(!(EG(!((p10==1)))))) * !((p5==1))),!((p10==1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Ini...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t54, t58, t61, t66, t68, t69, t74, ...253
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,11.5249,421300,1,0,933,2.11419e+06,196,436,2310,4.092e+06,1009
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 96 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 72 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 65 transition count 64
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 65 transition count 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 59 transition count 58
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 48 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 48 transition count 47
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 48 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 43 transition count 42
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 31 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 30 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 29 transition count 29
Applied a total of 133 rules in 15 ms. Remains 29 /97 variables (removed 68) and now considering 29/97 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/58 variables, 29/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/58 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 287 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/58 variables, 29/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 27/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/58 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 337 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 627ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 627ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/97 places, 29/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 701 ms. Remains : 29/97 places, 29/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4402822341803003748.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability171408086540256214.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4402822341803003748.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability171408086540256214.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20784,0.007403,4008,2,64,5,1201,6,0,147,1447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p86==1) U AG(!(E((p75!=1) U (E((p49==1) U ((p2==1)&&(p35==1))) * ((p36==1)||(p86==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E((p75!=1) U (E((p49==1) U ((p2==1)&&(p35==1))) * ((p36==1)||(p86==1))))))))))))...382
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 26/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 26/0/3
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.036535,5416,1,0,20,8298,38,9,803,8679,21
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 96 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 76 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 75 transition count 74
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 75 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 65 transition count 64
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 54 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 54 transition count 53
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 54 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 50 transition count 49
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 38 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 36 transition count 35
Applied a total of 119 rules in 15 ms. Remains 36 /97 variables (removed 61) and now considering 35/97 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 31 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/36 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 35/71 variables, 36/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 396 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/36 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 35/71 variables, 36/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 31/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 77 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 605 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1012ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1012ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/97 places, 35/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1102 ms. Remains : 36/97 places, 35/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5050349616338997720.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6159479196526940296.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5050349616338997720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6159479196526940296.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144000,0.012655,4188,2,64,5,1813,6,0,181,2317,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AG(!((EG((p50==1)) * E((((p13==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p101==1)) U (p85==1))))) U EG((((p67==1)&&(p73==1))&&(p89==1)))) + EG(((p36==1) + AG((!...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!((EG((p50==1)) * E((((p13==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p101==1)) U (p85==1)))))))),(((p67==1)...323
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 29/10/6
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.101728,8668,1,0,29,28636,60,14,1015,26561,26
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 36 rules in 10 ms. Remains 79 /97 variables (removed 18) and now considering 79/97 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 7905ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7905ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/97 places, 79/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7990 ms. Remains : 79/97 places, 79/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14385942943860204426.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11100968767331380188.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14385942943860204426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11100968767331380188.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75398e+07,0.053385,6496,2,544,5,9344,6,0,397,16022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(AG((p8==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p8==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t58, t61, t65, t68, t73, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.154388,10336,1,0,156,32327,180,81,2160,29957,168
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 36 rules in 3 ms. Remains 79 /97 variables (removed 18) and now considering 79/97 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5757 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/97 places, 79/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8145 ms. Remains : 79/97 places, 79/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15583560940593437768.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6378543332275969418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15583560940593437768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6378543332275969418.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75398e+07,0.061397,6500,2,544,5,9344,6,0,397,16022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(((p89==1)&&(p101==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((p89==1)&&(p101==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 74/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.127912,9060,1,0,41,24093,20,3,1823,18118,40
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 32 rules in 13 ms. Remains 81 /97 variables (removed 16) and now considering 81/97 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2442 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 5/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 7040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 9490ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9491ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9592 ms. Remains : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2106690686294941195.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11790842589205813408.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2106690686294941195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11790842589205813408.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.15714e+07,0.066285,7028,2,618,5,10392,6,0,407,19230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((E((p32==1) U (p15==1)) * AX(((p19==0)&&(p49==0)))) * (p55==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p55==0)) * E((p32==1) U (p15==1))) * !(EX(!(((p19==0)&&(p49==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t50, t52, t55, t59, t63, t68, t70, Inte...248
(forward)formula 0,1,0.352377,20976,1,0,333,92730,185,172,2160,128409,346
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 32 rules in 12 ms. Remains 81 /97 variables (removed 16) and now considering 81/97 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 6/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 18679 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 20761ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20761ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20864 ms. Remains : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2169116656527544674.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability742682441468835423.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2169116656527544674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability742682441468835423.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.21994e+07,0.064081,6892,2,686,5,10225,6,0,407,18230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((((p19==1)||(p88==0))||(p70==0))) + (p56==1)) + (AG((p49==0)) * AF((p16==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((((p19==1)||(p88==0))||(p70==0))) + (p56==1)))),TRUE) * !((p49==0)))] = FALSE *...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t55, t59, t63, t67, t68, t70, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,0.205147,13420,1,0,198,42256,192,90,2333,49583,207
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 32 rules in 6 ms. Remains 81 /97 variables (removed 16) and now considering 81/97 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2371 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 5/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 4/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 4/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 13432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 15809ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15809ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15910 ms. Remains : 81/97 places, 81/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4490193962613545008.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3714113348634628554.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4490193962613545008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3714113348634628554.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.50568e+07,0.071431,6644,2,563,5,9703,6,0,407,16707,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((EG(((p43==1)&&(p69==1))) + (p36==1)))) + AG(EF(((EG((p49==0)) + (p13==0)) + ((p67==0)||(p101==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((EG(((p43==1)&&(p69==1))) + (p36==1)))))))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((EG((p49==0)) + (p13=...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t32, t38, t42, t47, t51, t60, t63, t67, t70, t71, t75, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,1,6.55333,259712,1,0,1162,1.41611e+06,191,524,2317,2.37182e+06,1292
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 34 rules in 7 ms. Remains 80 /97 variables (removed 17) and now considering 80/97 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 5/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 4/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 8555 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 11050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11132 ms. Remains : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14726724948259185772.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11058211427086818598.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14726724948259185772.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11058211427086818598.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0423e+07,0.067823,6768,2,602,5,10128,6,0,402,17881,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((p46==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * (p46==0))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.069589,7024,1,0,7,10128,8,1,478,17881,2
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 84 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 83
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /97 variables (removed 14) and now considering 83/97 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 2396 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 82/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 5/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 12184 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 14584ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14585ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/97 places, 83/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14683 ms. Remains : 83/97 places, 83/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10885891744287065883.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13166921723176193375.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10885891744287065883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13166921723176193375.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.81697e+07,0.078861,7548,2,691,5,12396,6,0,417,23725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((!(EF((p0==1))) * EX((p10==1))) * EX(AX((p29==1))))) * (EG((p3==1)) + EF(((((p25==1)||(p41==1))&&(p70!=1))&&(p98==1))))) U (AG(!((A...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(((!(E(TRUE U (p0==1))) * EX((p10==1))) * EX(!(EX(!((p29==1))))))) * (EG((p3==1)) + E(TRUE U ((((...446
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t18, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t47, t52, t57, t62, t64, t69, t71, t72, ...258
(forward)formula 0,1,7.43918,219300,1,0,917,969064,205,531,2371,1.73306e+06,1072
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 80 /97 variables (removed 17) and now considering 80/97 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 5/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 5/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 5/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 12218 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 14619ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14619ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14716 ms. Remains : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12189449279235008846.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14519540385124430078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12189449279235008846.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14519540385124430078.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.07177e+07,0.059252,6508,2,550,5,9512,6,0,402,16243,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(AG((p64==0))) * (EF((p8==1)) + ((p49==1) * AX((p78==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p64==0)))))),TRUE) * (p8==1))] != FALSE + [(((EY(Init) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t22, t27, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t59, t62, t66, t69, t74, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.449906,23572,1,0,183,104789,186,96,2283,114283,201
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 87 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 87 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 86 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 86 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 85 transition count 85
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 85 /97 variables (removed 12) and now considering 85/97 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/170 variables, 85/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 13/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/170 variables, 85/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 84/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 21248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 23932ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23932ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/97 places, 85/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24022 ms. Remains : 85/97 places, 85/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1969090925170570460.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17414004396073503880.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1969090925170570460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17414004396073503880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.86259e+07,0.087097,8320,2,1062,5,13425,6,0,427,28791,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p78==0) + A((((A((p33==1) U (p88==1)) + (p1!=1)) * ((p43==1)||(p32==1))) * (p99==1)) U E(AX((p87==1)) U (p71!=1)))) + ((A(((p3==1)|...330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p78==0) + !((E(!(E(!(EX(!((p87==1)))) U (p71!=1))) U (!((((!((E(!((p88==1)) U (!((p33==1)) * !((p8...568
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t17, t19, t23, t27, t29, t32, t33, t39, t40, t44, t46, t49, t50, t54, t56, t57, ...283
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,27.1156,913832,1,0,2950,4.75074e+06,240,1462,2563,8.2664e+06,3315
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 34 rules in 5 ms. Remains 80 /97 variables (removed 17) and now considering 80/97 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:51:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:51:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2310 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 9085 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 11400ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11400ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11491 ms. Remains : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3942747578575020600.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5817537728078085493.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3942747578575020600.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5817537728078085493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75469e+07,0.055804,6504,2,553,5,9350,6,0,402,15929,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(((p8==1) + AF((AX((p102==1)) * (p1==1)))) U EG((!(A((p102==1) U (p37==1))) + AG((p74==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((p8==1) + !(EG(!((!(EX(!((p102==1)))) * (p1==1)))))) U EG((!(!((E(!((p37==1)) U (!((p102==1)) ...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t13, t17, t22, t26, t30, t31, t37, t41, t46, t50, t59, t62, t66, t69, t74, Intersect...243
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,9.65518,347728,1,0,1403,1.89846e+06,206,835,2393,2.9713e+06,1746
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 97/97 places, 97/97 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 34 rules in 7 ms. Remains 80 /97 variables (removed 17) and now considering 80/97 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2297 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/80 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 7/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 7/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 6/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 9796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 12097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12097ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12181 ms. Remains : 80/97 places, 80/97 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16926935226738896427.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13155691962005171511.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16926935226738896427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13155691962005171511.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.08051e+07,0.064025,7024,2,623,5,10496,6,0,402,19884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((AG((p25==1)) + ((!(A((((p13==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p101==1)) U (p85==1))) * (p11==0)) * (((p4==0)||(p18==0))||(p52==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p25==1)))) + ((!(!((E(!((p85==1)) U (!((((p13==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p101==1))) * !((...248
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t19, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t58, t61, t65, t67, t69, t74, ...253
(forward)formula 0,0,3.36135,142520,1,0,1135,794224,200,570,2297,1.22498e+06,1174
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 03:52:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:52:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 291372 ms.

BK_STOP 1749095554757

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900202"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;