Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993900201.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900201
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749095254949

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Transformed 103 places.
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Transformed 103 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 103 places and 103 transitions and 242 arcs in 142 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 64 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 98 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 98 transition count 98
Applied a total of 10 rules in 17 ms. Remains 98 /103 variables (removed 5) and now considering 98/103 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 313 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:47:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 232 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/196 variables, 98/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 4522 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 4/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/196 variables, 98/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 97/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 11/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 5/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 34566ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34575ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/103 places, 98/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34920 ms. Remains : 98/103 places, 98/103 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 03:48:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 03:48:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Support contains 63 out of 98 places (down from 64) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (21 resets) in 1248 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 3/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (10 resets) in 222 ms. (179 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (13 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (13 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-05 03:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 56/65 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 33/98 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/196 variables, 98/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 56/65 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 33/98 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/196 variables, 98/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 633ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 223 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 72 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 69
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 61 transition count 60
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 56 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 56 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 56 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 53 transition count 52
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 36 transition count 35
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 31 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 31 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 30 transition count 35
Applied a total of 137 rules in 23 ms. Remains 30 /98 variables (removed 68) and now considering 35/98 (removed 63) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 30/98 places, 35/98 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (231 resets) in 291 ms. (136 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (65 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (90 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (82 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 2532 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 13282 steps, saw 2532 distinct states, run finished after 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=282 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 2532 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 13282 steps, saw 2532 distinct states, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=379 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 29 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 86 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 86 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 10 ms. Remains 84 /98 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 3124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 9/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 9144 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 12289ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12290ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12386 ms. Remains : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2480116699328954146.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16880031683661732610.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2480116699328954146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16880031683661732610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.56769e+07,0.091244,8032,2,926,5,14111,6,0,422,26188,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EG((EG(((p28==0)&&(p45==1))) + AX(FALSE))) * E((E((p93==0) U ((p47==0)||(p21==1))) * (p10!=0)) U A(((p15==0)&&((p38==0)||(p26==1))) ...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EG((EG(((p28==0)&&(p45==1))) + !(EX(!(FALSE))))) * E((E((p93==0) U ((p47==0)||(p21==1)...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t11, t14, t18, t21, t23, t27, t28, t29, t32, t33, t39, t43, t45, t49, t53, t58, ...283
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9371212432549689825.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9371212432549689825.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9371212432549689825.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9371212432549689825.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9371212432549689825.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13494327476095131492.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4684335288499169029.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13494327476095131492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4684335288499169029.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.56769e+07,0.033207,5188,244,23,2673,214,225,4175,40,409,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EG((EG(((i3.u8.p28==0)&&(i5.u14.p45==1))) + AX(FALSE))) * E((E((i9.u31.p93==0) U ((i5.u16.p47==0)||(i3.u7.p21==1))) * (i1.u5.p10!=0)...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EG((EG(((i3.u8.p28==0)&&(i5.u14.p45==1))) + !(EX(!(FALSE))))) * E((E((i9.u31.p93==0) U...467
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, i0.i0.u1.t73, i1.t65, i1.u4.t70, i1.u5.t66, i1.u5.t72, i3.t62, i3.t58, i4.t49, i4.u11.t5...410
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.2314,108228,1,0,205487,359,1494,328942,228,1178,246903
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 84 /98 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 2316 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 9/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 10747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 13094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13263 ms. Remains : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5289981622919331921.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11388976669376790714.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5289981622919331921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11388976669376790714.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.97622e+07,0.069314,7428,2,727,5,11886,6,0,422,22239,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((p69!=1)) + EG(((AX(EF(((p94==0)||(p22==1)))) + (p82==0)) + (p87==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((p94==0)||(p22==1)))))) + (p82==0)) + (p87==1))))),TRUE) * !((p69!=1)))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t13, t17, t19, t23, t27, t34, t40, t44, t49, t53, t64, t66, t70, t73, t74, t78, ...252
(forward)formula 0,1,2.14155,89712,1,0,411,469742,196,198,2389,567442,446
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 86 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 86 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 9 ms. Remains 84 /98 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 13/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 3698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 13/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 9/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 16378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 20095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20231 ms. Remains : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9539369647041096645.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8861855927611798226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9539369647041096645.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8861855927611798226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.80139e+07,0.125499,9468,2,1157,5,16624,6,0,422,38384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((p49==0)||(p93==1))) * (A(!(((AX(((p20==0)||(p21==1))) * ((p78==0)||(p82==1))) * (p14==0))) U AF((p2==1))) + ((E((((p91==1)||(p89...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p49==0)||(p93==1)))))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((p2==...468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t8, t10, t13, t17, t19, t21, t24, t28, t29, t32, t33, t39, t40, t44, t46, t49, t53, t...282
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,15.0769,524628,1,0,1370,2.73284e+06,208,736,2484,4.51927e+06,1554
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 38 rules in 14 ms. Remains 79 /98 variables (removed 19) and now considering 79/98 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2371 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5777 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8175ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8176ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8273 ms. Remains : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16026074691125239517.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1677936057989367713.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16026074691125239517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1677936057989367713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75398e+07,0.053604,6496,2,544,5,9344,6,0,397,16022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF((((p30==0)&&(p5==1))&&(p50==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((p30==0)&&(p5==1))&&(p50==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t58, t61, t65, t68, t73, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,1,0.230035,14688,1,0,376,53112,185,212,2265,64771,331
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 97 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 66 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 65 transition count 64
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 65 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 57 transition count 56
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 48 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 48 transition count 47
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 48 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 44 transition count 43
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 28 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 26 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 142 rules in 11 ms. Remains 25 /98 variables (removed 73) and now considering 25/98 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 205 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 228 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 459ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 459ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/98 places, 25/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 547 ms. Remains : 25/98 places, 25/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality436868859256973456.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4952161075613371269.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality436868859256973456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4952161075613371269.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7776,0.006538,3940,2,43,5,998,6,0,128,1221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p45==0)||(p13==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p45==0)||(p13==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.01353,4196,1,0,8,2059,18,5,655,2335,10
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 34 rules in 18 ms. Remains 81 /98 variables (removed 17) and now considering 81/98 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 350 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 406 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2863 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 6/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 7640 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 10521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10521ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/98 places, 81/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10945 ms. Remains : 81/98 places, 81/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4296967711314377647.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15764933599835759392.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4296967711314377647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15764933599835759392.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4375e+07,0.060952,6892,2,612,5,10291,6,0,407,19065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p37==1) * (EX((EF((p44==1)) * A((p60==1) U (p101==1)))) + (p79==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p37==1))) * E(TRUE U (p44==1))) * !(EG(!((p101==1))))) * !(E(!((p101==1)) U (!((p60=...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t32, t37, t42, t44, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t70, t75, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,3.34392,140576,1,0,1108,766594,196,497,2323,1.10184e+06,1248
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 82 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 82 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 81
Applied a total of 34 rules in 5 ms. Remains 81 /98 variables (removed 17) and now considering 81/98 (removed 17) transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 325 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/162 variables, 81/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 80/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 6/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 7382 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 10136ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10152ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/98 places, 81/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10584 ms. Remains : 81/98 places, 81/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8773708591929250110.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18149468697130963129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8773708591929250110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18149468697130963129.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4375e+07,0.076047,6896,2,612,5,10291,6,0,407,19065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p44==0) * AF(AG((p60==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * (p44==0)) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p60==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t32, t37, t42, t44, t47, t51, t56, t60, t63, t67, t70, t75, ...253
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.34694,98688,1,0,378,599109,193,220,2422,557859,440
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 38 rules in 3 ms. Remains 79 /98 variables (removed 19) and now considering 79/98 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:50:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2290 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5646 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 7976ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7976ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8106 ms. Remains : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3922291866507406002.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8547521080605638740.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3922291866507406002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8547521080605638740.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75398e+07,0.071903,6504,2,544,5,9344,6,0,397,16022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((p30==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((p30==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t58, t61, t65, t68, t73, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.155035,9704,1,0,158,29318,174,83,2107,30440,165
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 83
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /98 variables (removed 15) and now considering 83/98 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:50:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 3918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 82/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 15922 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 19858ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19858ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/98 places, 83/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20082 ms. Remains : 83/98 places, 83/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1451390376395628383.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6672968249063606.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1451390376395628383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6672968249063606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...280
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.13547e+07,0.092207,7932,2,889,5,13426,6,0,417,25842,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((EG(((AX((p21==1)) + (p6==1)) + (p73==1))) * !((((p3==0)||(p77==0))||(p45==1))))) * ((p35==0)||(p93==1))) U EG(!(E(!(((p51==1)||(p67...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!((EG(((!(EX(!((p21==1)))) + (p6==1)) + (p73==1))) * !((((p3==0)||(p77==0))||(p45==1))))) * ((p...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t17, t22, t26, t28, t31, t32, t38, t39, t43, t45, t46, t49, t53, t58, t62, ...268
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,12.7068,422716,1,0,1655,1.99052e+06,210,1067,2389,3.56021e+06,1528
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 84 /98 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 2766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/168 variables, 84/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 8/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 6/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 7422 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 10204ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10204ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10292 ms. Remains : 84/98 places, 84/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13246397186023439288.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14561947520273373591.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13246397186023439288.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14561947520273373591.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.7139e+07,0.061509,6900,2,597,5,10328,6,0,422,18200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EX(((p16==0)||(p91==1))) + (((p86==0)||(p78==1))&&((p71==0)||(p61==1)))) + (AG(A(AF((p86==1)) U ((p7==0)&&(p97==0)))) * E(AG(((p58==...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EX(((p16==0)||(p91==1))) + (((p86==0)||(p78==1))&&((p71==0)||(p61==1)))) + (!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((p...324
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t22, t26, t28, t30, t34, t35, t41, t45, t50, t54, t63, t66, t70, t73, t78, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,6.63389,255972,1,0,1614,1.43409e+06,212,741,2524,2.15081e+06,1791
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 79
Applied a total of 38 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /98 variables (removed 19) and now considering 79/98 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 03:51:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:51:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2513 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/158 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 78/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5752 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 8302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8308ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8396 ms. Remains : 79/98 places, 79/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8287732816420373687.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8569376848648841644.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8287732816420373687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8569376848648841644.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75398e+07,0.080819,6508,2,544,5,9344,6,0,397,16022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((EG(AF((p70==0))) * AG(EX(((p76==0)||(p47==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EG(!(EG(!((p70==0))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p76==0)||(p47==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t12, t16, t21, t25, t29, t30, t36, t40, t45, t49, t58, t61, t65, t68, t73, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,1.94704,79636,1,0,411,423999,184,197,2264,500964,444
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 84 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 84 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 83 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 83
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 83 /98 variables (removed 15) and now considering 83/98 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 4191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/166 variables, 83/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 82/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 7/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 4/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 13131 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 17341ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17342ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/98 places, 83/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17439 ms. Remains : 83/98 places, 83/98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2575848221428929408.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10634763208733398916.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2575848221428929408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10634763208733398916.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.79341e+07,0.085008,8056,2,914,5,13541,6,0,417,26943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((p93==0)||(p30==1)) + ((EX(((p101==0)||(p90==1))) * AF((p21==1))) + (((p45==0)||(p89==1))&&(((p100==1)||(p0==0))||(p11==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p93==0)||(p30==1)))) * !((((p45==0)||(p89==1))&&(((p100==1)||(p0==0))||(p11==1))))) *...333
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.199522,12024,1,0,47,38850,24,8,1923,32100,42
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 03:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 255670 ms.

BK_STOP 1749095511845

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993900201"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;