About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-050B
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TFFT?TTTFFTT?FFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993800155.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-050B, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993800155
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.1M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 135K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 625K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749072678940
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-050B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 148 ms
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Transformed 2003 places.
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Transformed 2253 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 21:31:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 2003 places and 2253 transitions and 7200 arcs in 290 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 23 out of 2003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 2003/2003 places, 2253/2253 transitions.
Discarding 342 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 342 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 1661 transition count 1911
Iterating global reduction 0 with 342 rules applied. Total rules applied 684 place count 1661 transition count 1911
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 685 place count 1660 transition count 1910
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 686 place count 1660 transition count 1910
Applied a total of 686 rules in 500 ms. Remains 1660 /2003 variables (removed 343) and now considering 1910/2253 (removed 343) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1910 rows 1660 cols
[2025-06-04 21:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 47 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 813 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:31:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1565 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1909 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:31:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
(s1004 1.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 1.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 1.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 1.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 1.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 1.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 1.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 1.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 1.0)
(s214 1.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 1.0)
(s217 1.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 1.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 1.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 1.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 1.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 1.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 1.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 1.0)
(s248 1.0)
(s249 1.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 1.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 1.0)
(s255 1.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 1.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 1.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 1.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 1.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 1.0)
(s273 1.0)
(s274 1.0)
(s275 1.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 1.0)
(s278 1.0)
(s279 1.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 1.0)
(s282 1.0)
(s283 1.0)
(s284 1.0)
(s285 1.0)
(s286 1.0)
(s287 1.0)
(s288 1.0)
(s289 1.0)
(s290 1.0)
(s291 1.0)
(s292 1.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 1.0)
(s295 1.0)
(s296 1.0)
(s297 1.0)
(s298 1.0)
(s299 1.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 1.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 1.0)
(s304 1.0)
(s305 1.0)
(s306 1.0)
(s307 1.0)
(s308 1.0)
(s309 1.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 1.0)
(s313 1.0)
(s314 1.0)
(s315 1.0)
(s316 1.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 1.0)
(s319 1.0)
(s320 1.0)
(s321 1.0)
(s322 1.0)
(s323 1.0)
(s324 1.0)
(s325 1.0)
(s326 1.0)
(s327 1.0)
(s328 1.0)
(s329 1.0)
(s330 1.0)
(s331 1.0)
(s332 1.0)
(s333 1.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 1.0)
(s336 1.0)
(s337 1.0)
(s338 1.0)
(s339 1.0)
(s340 1.0)
(s341 1.0)
(s342 1.0)
(s343 1.0)
(s344 1.0)
(s345 1.0)
(s346 1.0)
(s347 1.0)
(s348 1.0)
(s349 1.0)
(s350 1.0)
(s351 1.0)
(s352 1.0)
(s353 1.0)
(s354 1.0)
(s355 1.0)
(s356 1.0)
(s357 1.0)
(s358 1.0)
(s359 1.0)
(s360 1.0)
(s361 1.0)
(s362 1.0)
(s363 1.0)
(s364 1.0)
(s365 1.0)
(s366 1.0)
(s367 1.0)
(s368 1.0)
(s369 1.0)
(s370 1.0)
(s371 1.0)
(s372 1.0)
(s373 1.0)
(s374 1.0)
(s375 1.0)
(s376 1.0)
(s377 1.0)
(s378 1.0)
(s379 1.0)
(s380 1.0)
(s381 1.0)
(s382 1.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 1.0)
(s385 1.0)
(s386 1.0)
(s387 1.0)
(s388 1.0)
(s389 1.0)
(s390 1.0)
(s391 1.0)
(s392 1.0)
(s393 1.0)
(s394 1.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 1.0)
(s397 1.0)
(s398 1.0)
(s399 1.0)
(s400 1.0)
(s401 1.0)
(s402 1.0)
(s403 1.0)
(s404 1.0)
(s405 1.0)
(s406 1.0)
(s407 1.0)
(s408 1.0)
(s409 1.0)
(s410 1.0)
(s411 1.0)
(s412 1.0)
(s413 1.0)
(s414 1.0)
(s415 1.0)
(s416 1.0)
(s417 1.0)
(s418 1.0)
(s419 1.0)
(s420 1.0)
(s421 1.0)
(s422 1.0)
(s423 1.0)
(s424 1.0)
(s425 1.0)
(s426 1.0)
(s427 1.0)
(s428 1.0)
(s429 1.0)
(s430 1.0)
(s431 1.0)
(s432 1.0)
(s433 1.0)
(s434 1.0)
(s435 1.0)
(s436 1.0)
(s437 1.0)
(s438 1.0)
(s439 1.0)
(s440 1.0)
(s441 1.0)
(s442 1.0)
(s443 1.0)
(s444 1.0)
(s445 1.0)
(s446 1.0)
(s447 1.0)
(s448 1.0)
(s449 1.0)
(s450 1.0)
(s451 1.0)
(s452 1.0)
(s453 1.0)
(s454 1.0)
(s455 1.0)
(s456 1.0)
(s457 1.0)
(s458 1.0)
(s459 1.0)
(s460 1.0)
(s461 1.0)
(s462 1.0)
(s463 1.0)
(s464 1.0)
(s465 1.0)
(s466 1.0)
(s467 1.0)
(s468 1.0)
(s469 1.0)
(s470 1.0)
(s471 1.0)
(s472 1.0)
(s473 1.0)
(s474 1.0)
(s475 1.0)
(s476 1.0)
(s477 1.0)
(s478 1.0)
(s479 1.0)
(s480 1.0)
(s481 1.0)
(s482 1.0)
(s483 1.0)
(s484 1.0)
(s485 1.0)
(s486 1.0)
(s487 1.0)
(s488 1.0)
(s489 1.0)
(s490 1.0)
(s491 1.0)
(s492 1.0)
(s493 1.0)
(s494 1.0)
(s495 1.0)
(s496 1.0)
(s497 1.0)
(s498 1.0)
(s499 1.0)
(s500 1.0)
(s501 1.0)
(s502 1.0)
(s503 1.0)
(s504 1.0)
(s505 1.0)
(s506 1.0)
(s507 1.0)
(s508 1.0)
(s509 1.0)
(s510 1.0)
(s511 1.0)
(s512 1.0)
(s513 1.0)
(s514 1.0)
(s515 1.0)
(s516 1.0)
(s517 1.0)
(s518 1.0)
(s519 1.0)
(s520 1.0)
(s521 1.0)
(s522 1.0)
(s523 1.0)
(s524 1.0)
(s525 1.0)
(s526 1.0)
(s527 1.0)
(s528 1.0)
(s529 1.0)
(s530 1.0)
(s531 1.0)
(s532 1.0)
(s533 1.0)
(s534 1.0)
(s535 1.0)
(s536 1.0)
(s537 1.0)
(s538 1.0)
(s539 1.0)
(s540 1.0)
(s541 1.0)
(s542 1.0)
(s543 1.0)
(s544 1.0)
(s545 1.0)
(s546 1.0)
(s547 1.0)
(s548 1.0)
(s549 1.0)
(s550 1.0)
(s551 1.0)
(s552 1.0)
(s553 1.0)
(s554 1.0)
(s555 1.0)
(s556 1.0)
(s557 1.0)
(s558 1.0)
(s559 1.0)
(s560 1.0)
(s561 1.0)
(s562 1.0)
(s563 1.0)
(s564 1.0)
(s565 1.0)
(s566 1.0)
(s567 1.0)
(s568 1.0)
(s569 1.0)
(s570 1.0)
(s571 1.0)
(s572 1.0)
(s573 1.0)
(s574 1.0)
(s575 1.0)
(s576 1.0)
(s577 1.0)
(s578 1.0)
(s579 1.0)
(s580 1.0)
(s581 1.0)
(s582 1.0)
(s583 1.0)
(s584 1.0)
(s585 1.0)
(s586 1.0)
(s587 1.0)
(s588 1.0)
(s589 1.0)
(s590 1.0)
(s591 1.0)
(s592 1.0)
(s593 1.0)
(s594 1.0)
(s595 1.0)
(s596 1.0)
(s597 1.0)
(s598 1.0)
(s599 1.0)
(s600 1.0)
(s601 1.0)
(s602 1.0)
(s603 1.0)
(s604 1.0)
(s605 1.0)
(s606 1.0)
(s607 1.0)
(s608 1.0)
(s609 1.0)
(s610 1.0)
(s611 1.0)
(s612 1.0)
(s613 1.0)
(s614 1.0)
(s615 1.0)
(s616 1.0)
(s617 1.0)
(s618 1.0)
(s619 1.0)
(s620 1.0)
(s621 1.0)
(s622 1.0)
(s623 1.0)
(s624 1.0)
(s625 1.0)
(s626 1.0)
(s627 1.0)
(s628 1.0)
(s629 1.0)
(s630 1.0)
(s631 1.0)
(s632 1.0)
(s633 1.0)
(s634 1.0)
(s635 1.0)
(s636 1.0)
(s637 1.0)
(s638 1.0)
(s639 1.0)
(s640 1.0)
(s641 1.0)
(s642 1.0)
(s643 1.0)
(s644 1.0)
(s645 1.0)
(s646 1.0)
(s647 1.0)
(s648 1.0)
(s649 1.0)
(s650 1.0)
(s651 1.0)
(s652 1.0)
(s653 1.0)
(s654 1.0)
(s655 1.0)
(s656 1.0)
(s657 1.0)
(s658 1.0)
(s659 1.0)
(s660 1.0)
(s661 1.0)
(s662 1.0)
(s663 1.0)
(s664 1.0)
(s665 1.0)
(s666 1.0)
(s667 1.0)
(s668 1.0)
(s669 1.0)
(s670 1.0)
(s671 1.0)
(s672 1.0)
(s673 1.0)
(s674 1.0)
(s675 1.0)
(s676 1.0)
(s677 1.0)
(s678 1.0)
(s679 1.0)
(s680 1.0)
(s681 1.0)
(s682 1.0)
(s683 1.0)
(s684 1.0)
(s685 1.0)
(s686 1.0)
(s687 1.0)
(s688 1.0)
(s689 1.0)
(s690 1.0)
(s691 1.0)
(s692 1.0)
(s693 1.0)
(s694 1.0)
(s695 1.0)
(s696 1.0)
(s697 1.0)
(s698 1.0)
(s699 1.0)
(s700 1.0)
(s701 1.0)
(s702 1.0)
(s703 1.0)
(s704 1.0)
(s705 1.0)
(s706 1.0)
(s707 1.0)
(s708 1.0)
(s709 1.0)
(s710 1.0)
(s711 1.0)
(s712 1.0)
(s713 1.0)
(s714 1.0)
(s715 1.0)
(s716 1.0)
(s717 1.0)
(s718 1.0)
(s719 1.0)
(s720 1.0)
(s721 1.0)
(s722 1.0)
(s723 1.0)
(s724 1.0)
(s725 1.0)
(s726 1.0)
(s727 1.0)
(s728 1.0)
(s729 1.0)
(s730 1.0)
(s731 1.0)
(s732 1.0)
(s733 1.0)
(s734 1.0)
(s735 1.0)
(s736 1.0)
(s737 1.0)
(s738 1.0)
(s739 1.0)
(s740 1.0)
(s741 1.0)
(s742 1.0)
(s743 1.0)
(s744 1.0)
(s745 1.0)
(s746 1.0)
(s747 1.0)
(s748 1.0)
(s749 1.0)
(s750 1.0)
(s751 1.0)
(s752 1.0)
(s753 1.0)
(s754 1.0)
(s755 1.0)
(s756 1.0)
(s757 1.0)
(s758 1.0)
(s759 1.0)
(s760 1.0)
(s761 1.0)
(s762 1.0)
(s763 1.0)
(s764 1.0)
(s765 1.0)
(s766 1.0)
(s767 1.0)
(s768 1.0)
(s769 1.0)
(s770 1.0)
(s771 1.0)
(s772 1.0)
(s773 1.0)
(s774 1.0)
(s775 1.0)
(s776 1.0)
(s777 1.0)
(s778 1.0)
(s779 1.0)
(s780 1.0)
(s781 1.0)
(s782 1.0)
(s783 1.0)
(s784 1.0)
(s785 1.0)
(s786 1.0)
(s787 1.0)
(s788 1.0)
(s789 1.0)
(s790 1.0)
(s791 1.0)
(s792 1.0)
(s793 1.0)
(s794 1.0)
(s795 1.0)
(s796 1.0)
(s797 1.0)
(s798 1.0)
(s799 1.0)
(s800 1.0)
(s801 1.0)
(s802 1.0)
(s803 1.0)
(s804 1.0)
(s805 1.0)
(s806 1.0)
(s807 1.0)
(s808 1.0)
(s809 1.0)
(s810 1.0)
(s811 1.0)
(s812 1.0)
(s813 1.0)
(s814 1.0)
(s815 1.0)
(s816 1.0)
(s817 1.0)
(s818 1.0)
(s819 1.0)
(s820 1.0)
(s821 1.0)
(s822 1.0)
(s823 1.0)
(s824 1.0)
(s825 1.0)
(s826 1.0)
(s827 1.0)
(s828 1.0)
(s829 1.0)
(s830 1.0)
(s831 1.0)
(s832 1.0)
(s833 1.0)
(s834 1.0)
(s835 1.0)
(s836 1.0)
(s837 1.0)
(s838 1.0)
(s839 1.0)
(s840 1.0)
(s841 1.0)
(s842 1.0)
(s843 1.0)
(s844 1.0)
(s845 1.0)
(s846 1.0)
(s847 1.0)
(s848 1.0)
(s849 1.0)
(s850 1.0)
(s851 1.0)
(s852 1.0)
(s853 1.0)
(s854 1.0)
(s855 1.0)
(s856 1.0)
(s857 1.0)
(s858 1.0)
(s859 1.0)
(s860 1.0)
(s861 1.0)
(s862 1.0)
(s863 1.0)
(s864 1.0)
(s865 1.0)
(s866 1.0)
(s867 1.0)
(s868 1.0)
(s869 1.0)
(s870 1.0)
(s871 1.0)
(s872 1.0)
(s873 1.0)
(s874 1.0)
(s875 1.0)
(s876 1.0)
(s877 1.0)
(s878 1.0)
(s879 1.0)
(s880 1.0)
(s881 1.0)
(s882 1.0)
(s883 1.0)
(s884 1.0)
(s885 1.0)
(s886 1.0)
(s887 1.0)
(s888 1.0)
(s889 1.0)
(s890 1.0)
(s891 1.0)
(s892 1.0)
(s893 1.0)
(s894 1.0)
(s895 1.0)
(s896 1.0)
(s897 1.0)
(s898 1.0)
(s899 1.0)
(s900 1.0)
(s901 1.0)
(s902 1.0)
(s903 1.0)
(s904 1.0)
(s905 1.0)
(s906 1.0)
(s907 1.0)
(s908 1.0)
(s909 1.0)
(s910 1.0)
(s911 1.0)
(s912 1.0)
(s913 1.0)
(s914 1.0)
(s915 1.0)
(s916 1.0)
(s917 1.0)
(s918 1.0)
(s919 1.0)
(s920 1.0)
(s921 1.0)
(s922 1.0)
(s923 1.0)
(s924 1.0)
(s925 1.0)
(s926 1.0)
(s927 1.0)
(s928 1.0)
(s929 1.0)
(s930 1.0)
(s931 1.0)
(s932 1.0)
(s933 1.0)
(s934 1.0)
(s935 1.0)
(s936 1.0)
(s937 1.0)
(s938 1.0)
(s939 1.0)
(s940 1.0)
(s941 1.0)
(s942 1.0)
(s943 1.0)
(s944 1.0)
(s945 1.0)
(s946 1.0)
(s947 1.0)
(s948 1.0)
(s949 1.0)
(s950 1.0)
(s951 1.0)
(s952 1.0)
(s953 1.0)
(s954 1.0)
(s955 1.0)
(s956 1.0)
(s957 1.0)
(s958 1.0)
(s959 1.0)
(s960 1.0)
(s961 1.0)
(s962 1.0)
(s963 1.0)
(s964 1.0)
(s965 1.0)
(s966 1.0)
(s967 1.0)
(s968 1.0)
(s969 1.0)
(s970 1.0)
(s971 1.0)
(s972 1.0)
(s973 1.0)
(s974 1.0)
(s975 1.0)
(s976 1.0)
(s977 1.0)
(s978 1.0)
(s979 1.0)
(s980 1.0)
(s981 1.0)
(s982 1.0)
(s983 1.0)
(s984 1.0)
(s985 1.0)
(s986 1.0)
(s987 1.0)
(s988 1.0)
(s989 1.0)
(s990 1.0)
(s991 1.0)
(s992 1.0)
(s993 1.0)
(s994 1.0)
(s995 1.0)
(s996 1.0)
(s997 1.0)
(s998 1.0)
(s999 1.0)
(s1000 1.0)
(s1001 1.0)
(s1002 1.0)
(s1003 1.0)
(s1004 1.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1659/3570 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1909 unsolved in 30052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1660 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1909/1909 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1909 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1659/3570 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1909 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1660 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1909 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60676ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1909 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60696ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1660/2003 places, 1910/2253 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63633 ms. Remains : 1660/2003 places, 1910/2253 transitions.
Support contains 23 out of 1660 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 21:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 155 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 89 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1910 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (16 resets) in 1270 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 1/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 21:32:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 57/59 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1601/1660 variables, 199/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 326 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 305 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 301 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 279 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 261 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 271 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 261 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 267 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 254 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 262 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 252 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 263 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 263 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 237 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 251 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 2 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 201 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 201 transitions
Performed 201 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 201
Iterating post reduction 0 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 1660 transition count 1709
Reduce places removed 201 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1459 transition count 1709
Performed 249 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 249 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1459 transition count 1460
Deduced a syphon composed of 249 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 249 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 498 rules applied. Total rules applied 900 place count 1210 transition count 1460
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 906 place count 1204 transition count 1454
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 912 place count 1204 transition count 1454
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 912 place count 1204 transition count 1452
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 916 place count 1202 transition count 1452
Performed 498 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 498
Deduced a syphon composed of 498 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 498 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 996 rules applied. Total rules applied 1912 place count 704 transition count 954
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 102 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 102 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 2014 place count 704 transition count 954
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2015 place count 703 transition count 953
Applied a total of 2015 rules in 461 ms. Remains 703 /1660 variables (removed 957) and now considering 953/1910 (removed 957) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 461 ms. Remains : 703/1660 places, 953/1910 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 10320 steps (15 resets) in 139 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 402 stabilizing places and 402 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X((X(X(p1))||p0))))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Applied a total of 12 rules in 113 ms. Remains 1654 /1660 variables (removed 6) and now considering 1904/1910 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1904 rows 1654 cols
[2025-06-04 21:32:31] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 493 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:32:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:32:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1596 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2091 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1903 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:32:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1903/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30036 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60585ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60591ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62806 ms. Remains : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 401 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 387 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 281 ms.
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 72 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 209 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 4128 steps (0 resets) in 56 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 94 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 243 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 1654 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1654/1654 places, 1904/1904 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 62 ms. Remains 1654 /1654 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1904/1904 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:33:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 456 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:33:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1592 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2050 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1903 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:33:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1903/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60479ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60485ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62607 ms. Remains : 1654/1654 places, 1904/1904 transitions.
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 62 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 223 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 4062 steps (0 resets) in 40 ms. (99 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 231 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 231 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 272 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 271 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false, false, true, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 215 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 1654 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1654/1654 places, 1904/1904 transitions.
Performed 200 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Performed 101 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 101 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1654 transition count 1954
Deduced a syphon composed of 301 places in 3 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 1654 transition count 1954
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 1652 transition count 1952
Deduced a syphon composed of 300 places in 2 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 1652 transition count 1952
Performed 647 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 947 places in 2 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 647 rules applied. Total rules applied 952 place count 1652 transition count 1952
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Discarding 350 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 350 rule applications. Total rules 1302 place count 1302 transition count 1602
Deduced a syphon composed of 597 places in 2 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 350 rules applied. Total rules applied 1652 place count 1302 transition count 1602
Deduced a syphon composed of 597 places in 2 ms
Applied a total of 1652 rules in 742 ms. Remains 1302 /1654 variables (removed 352) and now considering 1602/1904 (removed 302) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:34:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 325 ms returned [1601]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 1600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1601 rows 1302 cols
[2025-06-04 21:34:41] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 15 ms
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1301/2903 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1600 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1302 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1600/1249 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1301/2903 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1600 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1302 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 351/1249 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61169ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61172ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1302/1654 places, 1601/1904 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 597 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 55 ms. Remains 1302 /1302 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1601/1601 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62304 ms. Remains : 1302/1654 places, 1601/1904 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8237436370559506561
[2025-06-04 21:35:42] [INFO ] Built C files in 56ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8237436370559506561
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8237436370559506561;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread failed on error :java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin8237436370559506561;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin8237436370559506561;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:93)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Support contains 4 out of 1654 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1654/1654 places, 1904/1904 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 1653 transition count 1903
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 1653 transition count 1903
Applied a total of 2 rules in 116 ms. Remains 1653 /1654 variables (removed 1) and now considering 1903/1904 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1903 rows 1653 cols
[2025-06-04 21:35:46] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:35:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 508 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:35:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:35:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1541 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2052 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1902 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:35:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1652/3556 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1902 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1653 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1902/1902 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1902 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1652/3556 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1902 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1653 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1902 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1902 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60424ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1653/1654 places, 1903/1904 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62597 ms. Remains : 1653/1654 places, 1903/1904 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3698753441869511963
[2025-06-04 21:36:48] [INFO ] Built C files in 28ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3698753441869511963
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3698753441869511963;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread failed on error :java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin3698753441869511963;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin3698753441869511963;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:93)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-06-04 21:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2025-06-04 21:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-04 21:36:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL1550046050797926223.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 21:36:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL13243708573437694841.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL1550046050797926223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut14886097533741951911.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL13243708573437694841.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL13243708573437694841.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut14886097533741951911.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL371017166903291001.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5552426681348730722.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL371017166903291001.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL5552426681348730722.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...274
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((X(X(X(("((p1798==0)||(p1382==1))")||(X(X("((p102==0)&&(p1440==1))")))))))&&(F("((p1494==0)||(p74==1))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXX(!"((p1798==0)||(p1382==1))" & XX!"((p102==0)&&(p1440==1))") | G!"((p1494==0)||(p74==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2014774329445148355.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2014774329445148355.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2014774329445148355.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2014774329445148355.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2014774329445148355.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1791 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:37:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14493979192430444624.gal : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2259139537047414166.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14493979192430444624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2259139537047414166.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((X(X(X(("((i20.u563.p1798==0)||(i15.u433.p1382==1))")||(X(X("((i0.u39.p102==0)&&(i16.u451.p1440==1))")))))))&&(F("((i16.u467.p1494=...181
Formula 0 simplified : XXX(!"((i20.u563.p1798==0)||(i15.u433.p1382==1))" & XX!"((i0.u39.p102==0)&&(i16.u451.p1440==1))") | G!"((i16.u467.p1494==0)||(i0.u31...165
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 307170 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1659 transition count 1709
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1709
Performed 250 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 250 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1459
Deduced a syphon composed of 250 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 250 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 500 rules applied. Total rules applied 900 place count 1209 transition count 1459
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 908 place count 1201 transition count 1451
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 916 place count 1201 transition count 1451
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 916 place count 1201 transition count 1449
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 920 place count 1199 transition count 1449
Performed 493 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 493
Deduced a syphon composed of 493 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 493 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 986 rules applied. Total rules applied 1906 place count 706 transition count 956
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1908 place count 704 transition count 954
Applied a total of 1908 rules in 217 ms. Remains 704 /1660 variables (removed 956) and now considering 954/1910 (removed 956) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 954 rows 704 cols
[2025-06-04 21:37:38] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 273 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:37:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 596 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 870 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 143 ms returned [953]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 950 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 953 rows 704 cols
[2025-06-04 21:37:39] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 188 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)timeout
(s82 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 702/1657 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 197/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/704 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 950/950 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 62/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 164 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 175 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 169 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 186 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 173 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 184 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 189 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 175 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 174 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 161 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 185 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 195 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 175 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60213ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60215ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 704/1660 places, 953/1910 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 28 ms. Remains 704 /704 variables (removed 0) and now considering 953/953 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61485 ms. Remains : 704/1660 places, 953/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 214 reset in 578 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 210 reset in 681 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 186 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 1273 steps (2 resets) in 15 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 185 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 704 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 704/704 places, 953/953 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 27 ms. Remains 704 /704 variables (removed 0) and now considering 953/953 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:38:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 277 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:38:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 697 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 976 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 157 ms returned []
Running 950 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:38:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 184 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 178 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 183 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 181 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 702/1657 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 197/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/704 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 950/950 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 62/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 175 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 191 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 185 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 186 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 164 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 185 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 184 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 191 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 189 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 169 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 160 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 156 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 159 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 179 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60248ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60251ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61423 ms. Remains : 704/704 places, 953/953 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 2660 steps (4 resets) in 29 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 191 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 232 reset in 491 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 212 reset in 572 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1638255830168636114
[2025-06-04 21:39:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:39:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:39:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:39:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:39:45] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:39:45] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 30 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:39:45] [INFO ] Built C files in 233ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1638255830168636114
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1638255830168636114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2837 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1638255830168636114;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 64 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1638255830168636114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8170201267588916620.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 704 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 704/704 places, 953/953 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 704 /704 variables (removed 0) and now considering 953/953 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:39:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:40:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 643 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 913 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 158 ms returned []
Running 950 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:40:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 161 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 184 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 702/1657 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 197/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/704 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 950/950 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 197/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 63/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 156 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 179 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 172 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 189 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 179 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 186 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 192 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 173 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 180 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 180 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 179 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 193 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 155 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 185 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 188 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 185 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/702 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 189 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60189ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 950 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60191ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61293 ms. Remains : 704/704 places, 953/953 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2300706647803607307
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 953 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 8 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:41:01] [INFO ] Built C files in 160ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2300706647803607307
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2300706647803607307;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2824 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2300706647803607307;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 53 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2300706647803607307;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16968703425679314666.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 21:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3384806286561761584.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL3044504806167594908.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3384806286561761584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut6049706043894386153.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL3044504806167594908.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL3044504806167594908.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut6049706043894386153.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16796896263348165322.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL8868450618440806371.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16796896263348165322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL8868450618440806371.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((p1670==0)||(p337==1))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG!"((p1670==0)||(p337==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3118936280434027640.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3118936280434027640.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3118936280434027640.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3118936280434027640.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3118936280434027640.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1057 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 810 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2274076246430071756.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 21:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL13116144321284859408.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2274076246430071756.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL13116144321284859408.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((i14.u168.p1670==0)||(i2.u29.p337==1))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG!"((i14.u168.p1670==0)||(i2.u29.p337==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 263680 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1659 transition count 1709
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1709
Performed 251 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 251 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1458
Deduced a syphon composed of 251 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 251 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 502 rules applied. Total rules applied 902 place count 1208 transition count 1458
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 910 place count 1200 transition count 1450
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 918 place count 1200 transition count 1450
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 918 place count 1200 transition count 1448
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 922 place count 1198 transition count 1448
Performed 490 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 490
Deduced a syphon composed of 490 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 490 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 980 rules applied. Total rules applied 1902 place count 708 transition count 958
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1904 place count 706 transition count 956
Applied a total of 1904 rules in 205 ms. Remains 706 /1660 variables (removed 954) and now considering 956/1910 (removed 954) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 956 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:42:02] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 279 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:42:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 655 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 938 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 193 ms returned [955]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 952 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 955 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 194/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 1.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s77 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s85 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 1.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 1.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 1.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 1.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 1.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 1.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 1.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 1.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 1.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 1.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 1.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 1.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 1.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 1.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 1.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 1.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 1.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 1.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 1.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 1.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 1.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 1.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 1.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 1.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 1.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 1.0)
(s361 0.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 1.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 0.0)
(s367 1.0)
(s368 0.0)
(s369 0.0)
(s370 1.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 0.0)
(s374 1.0)
(s375 0.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 1.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 0.0)
(s380 0.0)
(s381 1.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 0.0)
(s384 1.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 0.0)
(s387 0.0)
(s388 1.0)
(s389 0.0)
(s390 0.0)
(s391 1.0)
(s392 0.0)
(s393 0.0)
(s394 0.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 0.0)
(s397 0.0)
(s398 1.0)
(s399 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 704/1661 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 194/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/706 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 952/952 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 194/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 80/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60203ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60205ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 706/1660 places, 955/1910 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 955/955 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61570 ms. Remains : 706/1660 places, 955/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 657 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 61712 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 201 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 201 transitions
Performed 201 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 201
Iterating post reduction 0 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 1659 transition count 1708
Reduce places removed 201 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1458 transition count 1708
Performed 250 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 250 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1458 transition count 1458
Deduced a syphon composed of 250 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 250 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 500 rules applied. Total rules applied 902 place count 1208 transition count 1458
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 910 place count 1200 transition count 1450
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 918 place count 1200 transition count 1450
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 918 place count 1200 transition count 1448
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 922 place count 1198 transition count 1448
Performed 495 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 495
Deduced a syphon composed of 495 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 495 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 990 rules applied. Total rules applied 1912 place count 703 transition count 953
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1914 place count 701 transition count 951
Applied a total of 1914 rules in 198 ms. Remains 701 /1660 variables (removed 959) and now considering 951/1910 (removed 959) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 951 rows 701 cols
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 617 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 876 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 152 ms returned [950]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 949 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 950 rows 701 cols
[2025-06-04 21:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 201/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 168 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 170 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 183 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 187 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 168 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 174 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 153 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 179 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 177 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 190 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 701/1651 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 201/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/701 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 949/949 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 201/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 60/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 187 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 143 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 174 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 179 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 185 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 171 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 177 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 186 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 176 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 170 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 176 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 187 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 190 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 184 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 176 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 187 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 169 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 174 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/701 variables, 20/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 206 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60309ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 949 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60312ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 701/1660 places, 950/1910 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 701 /701 variables (removed 0) and now considering 950/950 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61579 ms. Remains : 701/1660 places, 950/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 688 steps with 0 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 61655 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Applied a total of 12 rules in 117 ms. Remains 1654 /1660 variables (removed 6) and now considering 1904/1910 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1904 rows 1654 cols
[2025-06-04 21:44:05] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 500 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:44:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:44:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1524 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2026 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1903 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:44:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 timeout
1.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1903/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60427ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62575 ms. Remains : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 114 reset in 408 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 111 reset in 494 ms.
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Computed a total of 400 stabilizing places and 400 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 93 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 12013 steps (4 resets) in 104 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 294 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 1654 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1654/1654 places, 1904/1904 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1653 transition count 1703
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1453 transition count 1703
Performed 249 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 249 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1453 transition count 1454
Deduced a syphon composed of 249 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 249 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 498 rules applied. Total rules applied 898 place count 1204 transition count 1454
Performed 496 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 496
Deduced a syphon composed of 496 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 496 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 992 rules applied. Total rules applied 1890 place count 708 transition count 958
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1892 place count 706 transition count 956
Applied a total of 1892 rules in 185 ms. Remains 706 /1654 variables (removed 948) and now considering 956/1904 (removed 948) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 956 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:45:10] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:45:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 669 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 942 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 164 ms returned [955]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 952 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 955 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:45:11] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30193ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30195ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 706/1654 places, 955/1904 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 955/955 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31525 ms. Remains : 706/1654 places, 955/1904 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 587 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 2664 steps (4 resets) in 27 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 649 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23936 reset in 494 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23832 reset in 577 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15671053267975544140
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:45:44] [INFO ] Built C files in 150ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15671053267975544140
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15671053267975544140;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2860 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15671053267975544140;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 53 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15671053267975544140;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16564180858946427152.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 706 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 706/706 places, 955/955 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 955/955 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:45:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:45:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:45:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 664 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 936 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 149 ms returned []
Running 952 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30228ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30230ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31346 ms. Remains : 706/706 places, 955/955 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin18380034933694708394
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:46:30] [INFO ] Built C files in 147ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin18380034933694708394
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18380034933694708394;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2974 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18380034933694708394;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 50 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin18380034933694708394;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5042293761346909779.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 21:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2343196290844276316.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 21:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL6017586129271179706.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2343196290844276316.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut573579146771926135.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL6017586129271179706.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...316
Loading property file /tmp/LTL6017586129271179706.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut573579146771926135.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16758835288594506324.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2528399781307262441.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16758835288594506324.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2528399781307262441.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((G("((p1747==0)||(p488==1))"))||(X(F("((p934==0)&&(p573==1))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : F!"((p1747==0)||(p488==1))" & XG!"((p934==0)&&(p573==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8885669227996583628.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8885669227996583628.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8885669227996583628.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8885669227996583628.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8885669227996583628.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1051 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 950 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL17361393528525016927.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5589664655409989134.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL17361393528525016927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL5589664655409989134.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((G("((i14.i0.i1.u175.p1747==0)||(i4.i0.i1.u45.p488==1))"))||(X(F("((i7.u92.p934==0)&&(i4.i1.i1.u54.p573==1))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : F!"((i14.i0.i1.u175.p1747==0)||(i4.i0.i1.u45.p488==1))" & XG!"((i7.u92.p934==0)&&(i4.i1.i1.u54.p573==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 206181 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 201 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 201 transitions
Performed 201 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 201
Iterating post reduction 0 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 1659 transition count 1708
Reduce places removed 201 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1458 transition count 1708
Performed 249 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 249 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 1458 transition count 1459
Deduced a syphon composed of 249 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 249 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 498 rules applied. Total rules applied 900 place count 1209 transition count 1459
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 906 place count 1203 transition count 1453
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 912 place count 1203 transition count 1453
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 912 place count 1203 transition count 1451
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 916 place count 1201 transition count 1451
Performed 496 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 496
Deduced a syphon composed of 496 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 496 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 992 rules applied. Total rules applied 1908 place count 705 transition count 955
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1910 place count 703 transition count 953
Applied a total of 1910 rules in 215 ms. Remains 703 /1660 variables (removed 957) and now considering 953/1910 (removed 957) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 953 rows 703 cols
[2025-06-04 21:47:31] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:47:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 638 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 915 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 153 ms returned [952]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 951 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 952 rows 703 cols
[2025-06-04 21:47:32] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 201/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 198 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 177 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 192 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 193 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 194 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 173 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 182 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 168 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 183 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 703/1655 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 201/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/703 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 951/951 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 201/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 60/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 179 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 174 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 178 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 168 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 181 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 199 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 188 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 182 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 181 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 183 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 204 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 188 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 184 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 185 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 185 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 184 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 181 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 197 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 196 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 182 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 190 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 185 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 20/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 189 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60282ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 951 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60284ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 703/1660 places, 952/1910 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 703 /703 variables (removed 0) and now considering 952/952 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61599 ms. Remains : 703/1660 places, 952/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 659 steps with 0 reset in 7 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 61671 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 1654 transition count 1904
Applied a total of 12 rules in 116 ms. Remains 1654 /1660 variables (removed 6) and now considering 1904/1910 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1904 rows 1654 cols
[2025-06-04 21:48:33] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 487 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:48:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:48:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1546 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2034 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1903 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:48:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1903/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1653/3558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/1654 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1903 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1903 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60417ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62575 ms. Remains : 1654/1660 places, 1904/1910 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 62676 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X((X(X(p1))||p0))))&&F(p2)))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F(p1))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 1660 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1660/1660 places, 1910/1910 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 1659 transition count 1709
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1709
Performed 249 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 249 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 1459 transition count 1460
Deduced a syphon composed of 249 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 249 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 498 rules applied. Total rules applied 898 place count 1210 transition count 1460
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 904 place count 1204 transition count 1454
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 910 place count 1204 transition count 1454
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 910 place count 1204 transition count 1453
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 912 place count 1203 transition count 1453
Performed 495 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 495
Deduced a syphon composed of 495 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 495 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 990 rules applied. Total rules applied 1902 place count 708 transition count 958
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1904 place count 706 transition count 956
Applied a total of 1904 rules in 196 ms. Remains 706 /1660 variables (removed 954) and now considering 956/1910 (removed 954) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 956 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:49:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 656 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 905 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 953 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:49:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 704/1662 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 199/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/706 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 953/953 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 80/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 161 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 175 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 158 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 112 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 172 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 704/1662 variables, and 399 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 199/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/706 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/953 constraints, Known Traps: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 953 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60184ms
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 706/1660 places, 956/1910 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61289 ms. Remains : 706/1660 places, 956/1910 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23700 reset in 446 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23766 reset in 540 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 478 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 1325 steps (2 resets) in 12 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 623 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 199 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 212 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 706 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 706/706 places, 956/956 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 956/956 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:50:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:50:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 712 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 958 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 146 ms returned [955]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 952 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 955 rows 706 cols
[2025-06-04 21:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 201 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 704/1661 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 199/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/706 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 952/952 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 79/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 191 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 184 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 174 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60193ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60194ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 706/706 places, 955/956 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 955/955 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61355 ms. Remains : 706/706 places, 955/956 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 526 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 4792 steps (7 resets) in 46 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 687 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23897 reset in 472 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23869 reset in 540 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin10552229464678404494
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 6 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:51:44] [INFO ] Built C files in 137ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin10552229464678404494
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10552229464678404494;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2823 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10552229464678404494;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 53 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10552229464678404494;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased587369054607574599.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 706 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 706/706 places, 955/955 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 706 /706 variables (removed 0) and now considering 955/955 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:51:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:51:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 21:51:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 655 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 931 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 160 ms returned []
Running 952 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 20/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 704/1661 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 199/201 constraints, State Equation: 0/706 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 952/952 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 199/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 80/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 25517 ms of which 25364 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 237 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 179 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 247 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60198ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 952 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60207ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61333 ms. Remains : 706/706 places, 955/955 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7629610269680591000
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 11 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:53:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:53:01] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 955 transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:53:01] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 21:53:01] [INFO ] Built C files in 525ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7629610269680591000
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7629610269680591000;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2835 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7629610269680591000;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 57 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7629610269680591000;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14236608784460659665.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 21:53:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL4113135613227052921.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL3064677510707387426.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL4113135613227052921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut783091525093576363.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL3064677510707387426.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...316
Loading property file /tmp/LTL3064677510707387426.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut783091525093576363.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 104 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 102 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13697507934694669664.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL12841390592931787992.ltl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL13697507934694669664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL12841390592931787992.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((G("((p1747==0)||(p488==1))"))||(X(F("((p934==0)&&(p573==1))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : F!"((p1747==0)||(p488==1))" & XG!"((p934==0)&&(p573==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 21:53:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 21:53:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 101 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3071184458503451045.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3071184458503451045.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3071184458503451045.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3071184458503451045.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3071184458503451045.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1051 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 100 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 896 labels/synchronizations in 34 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3893557511086361946.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 21:53:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2558436763478715829.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3893557511086361946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2558436763478715829.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((G("((i12.i1.i1.u175.p1747==0)||(i3.u45.p488==1))"))||(X(F("((i6.i1.i1.u92.p934==0)&&(i4.u54.p573==1))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : F!"((i12.i1.i1.u175.p1747==0)||(i3.u45.p488==1))" & XG!"((i6.i1.i1.u92.p934==0)&&(i4.u54.p573==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 266883 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340
[2025-06-04 21:54:02] [INFO ] Too many transitions (1910) to apply POR reductions. Disabling POR matrices.
[2025-06-04 21:54:02] [INFO ] Built C files in 40ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '240' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-06-04 21:54:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18340929802598407575.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18340929802598407575.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340929802598407575.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18340929802598407575.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340929802598407575.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1791 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality2955294748586643242.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 21:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality1749342995118305164.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality2955294748586643242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality1749342995118305164.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 3 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((X(X(X(("((i20.u561.p1798==0)||(i15.u432.p1382==1))")||(X(X("((i0.u38.p102==0)&&(i16.u450.p1440==1))")))))))&&(F("((i16.u466.p1494=...181
Formula 0 simplified : XXX(!"((i20.u561.p1798==0)||(i15.u432.p1382==1))" & XX!"((i0.u38.p102==0)&&(i16.u450.p1440==1))") | G!"((i16.u466.p1494==0)||(i0.u30...165
Compilation finished in 3735 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '(X(X(X((X(X((LTLAPp1==true)))||(LTLAPp0==true)))))&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 864 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-050B-LTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>400 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '([]((LTLAPp4==true))||X(<>((LTLAPp5==true))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>400 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '([]((LTLAPp4==true))||X(<>((LTLAPp5==true))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Retrying LTSmin with larger timeout 9600 s
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10977476340465594340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 22:21:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 22:21:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 966 ms
[2025-06-04 22:21:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 22:21:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 22:21:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1047 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 22:21:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3056 ms
[2025-06-04 22:21:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 1592 labels/synchronizations in 1955 ms.
[2025-06-04 22:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality11444228323955559261.gal : 108 ms
[2025-06-04 22:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality9948686474852095449.ltl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality11444228323955559261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality9948686474852095449.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 2 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u343.p1670==0)||(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0...232
Formula 0 simplified : FG!"((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u343.p1670==0)||(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i...226
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-050B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-050B, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993800155"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-050B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-050B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;