Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993700140.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-040B, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700140
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 876K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 498K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749062452843

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-040B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 18:40:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 137 ms
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Transformed 1603 places.
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Transformed 1803 transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1603 places and 1803 transitions and 5760 arcs in 272 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 1603 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1603/1603 places, 1803/1803 transitions.
Discarding 271 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 271 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 1332 transition count 1532
Iterating global reduction 0 with 271 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 1332 transition count 1532
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 543 place count 1331 transition count 1531
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 544 place count 1331 transition count 1531
Applied a total of 544 rules in 306 ms. Remains 1331 /1603 variables (removed 272) and now considering 1531/1803 (removed 272) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1531 rows 1331 cols
[2025-06-04 18:40:54] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 34 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:40:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 797 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:40:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1530 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:40:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1330/2862 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1530 unsolved in 30045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1530/1530 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1530 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1330/2862 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1530 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1530 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60471ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1530 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60494ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1331/1603 places, 1531/1803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62931 ms. Remains : 1331/1603 places, 1531/1803 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 1331 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 18:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 139 ms
[2025-06-04 18:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-06-04 18:41:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1531 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 1331 places (down from 51) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (20 resets) in 1800 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 3/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-04 18:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/136 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1195/1331 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1331 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1531/2862 variables, 1331/1492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2862 variables, 0/1492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/2862 variables, 0/1492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2862/2862 variables, and 1492 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 835 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 161/161 constraints, State Equation: 1331/1331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/136 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1195/1331 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 262 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 262 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 298 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 255 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 268 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 240 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 224 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 232 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 207 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 240 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 233 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 189 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 186 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 185 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 182 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 179 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 172 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5873ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 160 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 160 transitions
Performed 160 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 160
Iterating post reduction 0 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 1331 transition count 1371
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1171 transition count 1371
Performed 200 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 200 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1171 transition count 1171
Deduced a syphon composed of 200 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 400 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 971 transition count 1171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 729 place count 962 transition count 1162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 962 transition count 1162
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 962 transition count 1160
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 742 place count 960 transition count 1160
Performed 394 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 394
Deduced a syphon composed of 394 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 394 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 788 rules applied. Total rules applied 1530 place count 566 transition count 766
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 78 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 78 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 1608 place count 566 transition count 766
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1609 place count 565 transition count 765
Applied a total of 1609 rules in 367 ms. Remains 565 /1331 variables (removed 766) and now considering 765/1531 (removed 766) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 368 ms. Remains : 565/1331 places, 765/1531 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 22677 steps (45 resets) in 205 ms. (110 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 324 stabilizing places and 324 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X((F(G(p2))&&p1))))'
Support contains 7 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Applied a total of 16 rules in 56 ms. Remains 1323 /1331 variables (removed 8) and now considering 1523/1531 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1523 rows 1323 cols
[2025-06-04 18:42:05] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 413 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:42:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:42:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1370 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1788 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1522 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:42:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1522/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1)
(s2 1)
(s3 1)
(s4 1)
(s5 1)
(s6 1)
(s7 1)
(s8 1)
(s9 1)
(s10 1)
(s11 1)
(s12 1)
(s13 1)
(s14 1)
(s15 1)
(s16 1)
(s17 1)
(s18 1)
(s19 1)
(s20 1)
(s21 1)
(s22 1)
(s23 1)
(s24 1)
(s25 1)
(s26 1)
(s27 1)
(s28 1)
(s29 1)
(s30 1)
(s31 1)
(s32 1)
(s33 1)
(s34 1)
(s35 1)
(s36 1)
(s37 1)
(s38 1)
(s39 1)
(s40 1)
(s41 1)
(s42 1)
(s43 1)
(s44 1)
(s45 1)
(s46 1)
(s47 1)
(s48 1)
(s49 1)
(s50 1)
(s51 1)
(s52 1)
(s53 1)
(s54 1)
(s55 1)
(s56 1)
(s57 1)
(s58 1)
(s59 1)
(s60 1)
(s61 1)
(s62 1)
(s63 1)
(s64 1)
(s65 1)
(s66 1)
(s67 1)
(s68 1)
(s69 1)
(s70 1)
(s71 1)
(s72 1)
(s73 1)
(s74 1)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 1)
(s78 1)
(s79 1)
(s80 1)
(s81 1)
(s82 1)
(s83 1)
(s84 1)
(s85 1)
(s86 1)
(s87 1)
(s88 1)
(s89 1)
(s90 1)
(s91 1)
(s92 1)
(s93 1)
(s94 1)
(s95 1)
(s96 1)
(s97 1)
(s98 1)
(s99 1)
(s100 1)
(s101 1)
(s102 1)
(s103 1)
(s104 1)
(s105 1)
(s106 1)
(s107 1)
(s108 1)
(s109 1)
(s110 1)
(s111 1)
(s112 1)
(s113 1)
(s114 1)
(s115 1)
(s116 1)
(s117 1)
(s118 1)
(s119 1)
(s120 1)
(s121 1)
(s122 1)
(s123 1)
(s124 1)
(s125 1)
(s126 1)
(s127 1)
(s128 1)
(s129 1)
(s130 1)
(s131 1)
(s132 1)
(s133 1)
(s134 1)
(s135 1)
(s136 1)
(s137 1)
(s138 1)
(s139 1)
(s140 timeout
1)
(s141 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60396ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60400ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62251 ms. Remains : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 355 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 238 steps with 0 reset in 6 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-00 finished in 62684 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((F(p0)&&(G(p1)||G(p2)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 161 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 161 transitions
Performed 161 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 161
Iterating post reduction 0 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 1330 transition count 1369
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 1169 transition count 1369
Performed 200 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 200 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 1169 transition count 1169
Deduced a syphon composed of 200 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 400 rules applied. Total rules applied 722 place count 969 transition count 1169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 730 place count 961 transition count 1161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 961 transition count 1161
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 961 transition count 1160
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 740 place count 960 transition count 1160
Performed 396 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 396
Deduced a syphon composed of 396 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 396 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 792 rules applied. Total rules applied 1532 place count 564 transition count 764
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1534 place count 562 transition count 762
Applied a total of 1534 rules in 175 ms. Remains 562 /1331 variables (removed 769) and now considering 762/1531 (removed 769) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 762 rows 562 cols
[2025-06-04 18:43:08] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 470 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 682 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 185 ms returned [761]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 760 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 761 rows 562 cols
[2025-06-04 18:43:09] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 161/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 147 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 562/1323 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 161/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/562 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 760/760 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 161/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 95/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 157 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 150 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 151 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 157 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 163 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 156 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 159 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60154ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60156ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 562/1331 places, 761/1531 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 31 ms. Remains 562 /562 variables (removed 0) and now considering 761/761 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61239 ms. Remains : 562/1331 places, 761/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 273 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 723 steps with 1 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-04 finished in 61544 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U X(X((X(p1)||F(p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Applied a total of 16 rules in 82 ms. Remains 1323 /1331 variables (removed 8) and now considering 1523/1531 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1523 rows 1323 cols
[2025-06-04 18:44:09] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 443 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:44:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:44:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1572 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1522 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:44:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1522/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60309ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60313ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61972 ms. Remains : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 326 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 335 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 284 ms.
Computed a total of 319 stabilizing places and 319 stable transitions
Computed a total of 319 stabilizing places and 319 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 27 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-06 finished in 63005 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(((p0 U p1)&&F(G((p0 U p1))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 160 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 160 transitions
Performed 160 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 160
Iterating post reduction 0 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 1330 transition count 1370
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1170 transition count 1370
Performed 199 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 199 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1170 transition count 1171
Deduced a syphon composed of 199 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 199 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 398 rules applied. Total rules applied 718 place count 971 transition count 1171
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 726 place count 963 transition count 1163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 734 place count 963 transition count 1163
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 734 place count 963 transition count 1161
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 961 transition count 1161
Performed 395 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 395
Deduced a syphon composed of 395 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 395 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 790 rules applied. Total rules applied 1528 place count 566 transition count 766
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1530 place count 564 transition count 764
Applied a total of 1530 rules in 195 ms. Remains 564 /1331 variables (removed 767) and now considering 764/1531 (removed 767) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 764 rows 564 cols
[2025-06-04 18:45:12] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 366 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:45:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 520 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 886 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 114 ms returned [763]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 761 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 763 rows 564 cols
[2025-06-04 18:45:13] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 160/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 153 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 146 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 157 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30196ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30198ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 564/1331 places, 763/1531 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 564 /564 variables (removed 0) and now considering 763/763 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31422 ms. Remains : 564/1331 places, 763/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 587 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-07 finished in 31521 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0&&G(p1)) U (p2||X(p0))))'
Support contains 3 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 1323 transition count 1523
Applied a total of 16 rules in 56 ms. Remains 1323 /1331 variables (removed 8) and now considering 1523/1531 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1523 rows 1323 cols
[2025-06-04 18:45:44] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 438 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:45:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:45:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1600 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1522 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:45:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1522/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1322/2846 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1323 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1522 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1522 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60292ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61952 ms. Remains : 1323/1331 places, 1523/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-08 finished in 62136 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(F((X(p1)||p0)))&&(!p2 U X(p3))))'
Support contains 8 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Applied a total of 18 rules in 65 ms. Remains 1322 /1331 variables (removed 9) and now considering 1522/1531 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1522 rows 1322 cols
[2025-06-04 18:46:46] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1527 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1521 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:46:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1521/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60300ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60303ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61900 ms. Remains : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 5540 steps with 62 reset in 21 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-09 finished in 62143 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||(F(p1) U X((p2&&F(p3)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 1324 transition count 1524
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 1324 transition count 1524
Applied a total of 14 rules in 67 ms. Remains 1324 /1331 variables (removed 7) and now considering 1524/1531 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1524 rows 1324 cols
[2025-06-04 18:47:48] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:47:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 387 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:47:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1557 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1523 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 1.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 1.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 timeout
1.0)
(s190 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1323/2848 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1523 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1523/1523 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1523 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1323/2848 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1523 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1523 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1523 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60292ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1324/1331 places, 1524/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61921 ms. Remains : 1324/1331 places, 1524/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1132 reset in 243 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1119 reset in 286 ms.
Computed a total of 319 stabilizing places and 319 stable transitions
Computed a total of 319 stabilizing places and 319 stable transitions
Detected a total of 319/1324 stabilizing places and 319/1524 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 21 factoid took 137 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 263 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (20 resets) in 327 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p3))), (F p2), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (F p0), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 21 factoid took 446 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 243 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 235 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
[2025-06-04 18:48:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:48:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 161 positive place invariants in 296 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 18:49:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6736 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 18:49:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:49:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 161 positive place invariants in 295 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 18:49:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 7849 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 18:49:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 1523/4826/1523 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 68 ms.
[2025-06-04 18:49:15] [INFO ] Added : 300 causal constraints over 60 iterations in 6335 ms. Result :unknown
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
[2025-06-04 18:49:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:49:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 161 positive place invariants in 99 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p3))), (F p2), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (F p0), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (G (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))
Knowledge based reduction with 21 factoid took 493 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-11 finished in 87882 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||(X((p1 U X(p2)))&&!(!p1 U p3))))'
Support contains 5 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Applied a total of 18 rules in 60 ms. Remains 1322 /1331 variables (removed 9) and now considering 1522/1531 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1522 rows 1322 cols
[2025-06-04 18:49:16] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:49:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 415 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:49:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:49:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1551 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1521 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:49:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1521/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60289ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60293ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61910 ms. Remains : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) p3)), true, p3, (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) p3), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 441 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-12 finished in 62322 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0 U p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 160 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 160 transitions
Performed 160 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 160
Iterating post reduction 0 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 1330 transition count 1370
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1170 transition count 1370
Performed 200 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 200 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 1170 transition count 1170
Deduced a syphon composed of 200 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 400 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 970 transition count 1170
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 728 place count 962 transition count 1162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 962 transition count 1162
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 962 transition count 1160
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 740 place count 960 transition count 1160
Performed 393 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 393
Deduced a syphon composed of 393 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 393 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 786 rules applied. Total rules applied 1526 place count 567 transition count 767
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1528 place count 565 transition count 765
Applied a total of 1528 rules in 128 ms. Remains 565 /1331 variables (removed 766) and now considering 765/1531 (removed 766) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 765 rows 565 cols
[2025-06-04 18:50:18] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:50:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 479 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 690 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 113 ms returned [764]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 761 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 764 rows 565 cols
[2025-06-04 18:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 155/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 563/1329 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 155/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/565 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 761/761 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 155/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 119/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 20/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 563/1329 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 155/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/565 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/761 constraints, Known Traps: 265/265 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60151ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 761 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60152ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 565/1331 places, 764/1531 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 565 /565 variables (removed 0) and now considering 764/764 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61105 ms. Remains : 565/1331 places, 764/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 574 steps with 1 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-13 finished in 61194 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 1322 transition count 1522
Applied a total of 18 rules in 63 ms. Remains 1322 /1331 variables (removed 9) and now considering 1522/1531 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1522 rows 1322 cols
[2025-06-04 18:51:19] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 403 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:51:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:51:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1559 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1521 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 18:51:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1521/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
(s333 1timeout
^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 1timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1)
(s2 1)
(s3 1)
(s4 1)
(s5 1)
(s6 1)
(s7 1)
(s8 1)
(s9 1)
(s10 1)
(s11 1)
(s12 1)
(s13 1)
(s14 1)
(s15 1)
(s16 1)
(s17 1)
(s18 1)
(s19 1)
(s20 1)
(s21 1)
(s22 1)
(s23 1)
(s24 1)
(s25 1)
(s26 1)
(s27 1)
(s28 1)
(s29 1)
(s30 1)
(s31 1)
(s32 1)
(s33 1)
(s34 1)
(s35 1)
(s36 1)
(s37 1)
(s38 1)
(s39 1)
(s40 1)
(s41 1)
(s42 1)
(s43 1)
(s44 1)
(s45 1)
(s46 1)
(s47 1)
(s48 1)
(s49 1)
(s50 1)
(s51 1)
(s52 1)
(s53 1)
(s54 1)
(s55 1)
(s56 1)
(s57 1)
(s58 1)
(s59 1)
(s60 1)
(s61 1)
(s62 1)
(s63 1)
(s64 1)
(s65 1)
(s66 1)
(s67 1)
(s68 1)
(s69 1)
(s70 1)
(s71 1)
(s72 1)
(s73 1)
(s74 1)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 1)
(s78 1)
(s79 1)
(s80 1)
(s81 1)
(s82 1)
(s83 1)
(s84 1)
(s85 1)
(s86 1)
(s87 1)
(s88 1)
(s89 1)
(s90 1)
(s91 1)
(s92 1)
(s93 1)
(s94 1)
(s95 1)
(s96 1)
(s97 1)
(s98 1)
(s99 1)
(s100 1)
(s101 1)
(s102 1)
(s103 1)
(s104 1)
(s105 1)
(s106 1)
(s107 1)
(s108 1)
(s109 1)
(s110 1)
(s111 1)
(s112 1)
(s113 1)
(s114 1)
(s115 1)
(s116 1)
(s117 1)
(s118 1)
(s119 1)
(s120 1)
(s121 1)
(s122 1)
(s123 1)
(s124 1)
(s125 1)
(s126 1)
(s127 1)
(s128 1)
(s129 1)
(s130 1)
(s131 1)
(s132 1)
(s133 1)
(s134 1)
(s135 1)
(s136 1)
(s137 1)
(s138 1)
(s139 1)
(s140 1)
(s141 1)
(s142 1)
(s143 1)
(s144 1)
(s145 1)
(s146 1)
(s147 1)
(s148 1)
(s149 1)
(s150 1)
(s151 1)
(s152 1)
(s153 1)
(s154 1)
(s155 1)
(s156 1)
(s157 1)
(s158 1)
(s159 1)
(s160 1)
(s161 1)
(s162 1)
(s163 1)
(s164 1)
(s165 1)
(s166 1)
(s167 1)
(s168 1)
(s169 1)
(s170 1)
(s171 1)
(s172 1)
(s173 1)
(s174 1)
(s175 1)
(s176 1)
(s177 1)
(s178 1)
(s179 1)
(s180 1)
(s181 1)
(s182 1)
(s183 1)
(s184 1)
(s185 1)
(s186 1)
(s187 1)
(s188 1)
(s189 1)
(s190 1)
(s191 1)
(s192 1)
(s193 1)
(s194 1)
(s195 1)
(s196 1)
(s197 1)
(s198 1)
(s199 1)
(s200 1)
(s201 1)
(s202 1)
(s203 1)
(s204 1)
(s205 1)
(s206 1)
(s207 1)
(s208 1)
(s209 1)
(s210 1)
(s211 1)
(s212 1)
(s213 1)
(s214 1)
(s215 1)
(s216 1)
(s217 1)
(s218 1)
(s219 1)
(s220 1)
(s221 1)
(s222 1)
(s223 1)
(s224 1)
(s225 1)
(s226 1)
(s227 1)
(s228 1)
(s229 1)
(s230 1)
(s231 1)
(s232 1)
(s233 1)
(s234 1)
(s235 1)
(s236 1)
(s237 1)
(s238 1)
(s239 1)
(s240 1)
(s241 1)
(s242 1)
(s243 1)
(s244 1)
(s245 1)
(s246 1)
(s247 1)
(s248 1)
(s249 1)
(s250 1)
(s251 1)
(s252 1)
(s253 1)
(s254 1)
(s255 1)
(s256 1)
(s257 1)
(s258 1)
(s259 1)
(s260 1)
(s261 1)
(s262 1)
(s263 1)
(s264 1)
(s265 1)
(s266 1)
(s267 1)
(s268 1)
(s269 1)
(s270 1)
(s271 1)
(s272 1)
(s273 1)
(s274 1)
(s275 1)
(s276 1)
(s277 1)
(s278 1)
(s279 1)
(s280 1)
(s281 1)
(s282 1)
(s283 1)
(s284 1)
(s285 1)
(s286 1)
(s287 1)
(s288 1)
(s289 1)
(s290 1)
(s291 1)
(s292 1)
(s293 1)
(s294 1)
(s295 1)
(s296 1)
(s297 1)
(s298 1)
(s299 1)
(s300 1)
(s301 1)
(s302 1)
(s303 1)
(s304 1)
(s305 1)
(s306 1)
(s307 1)
(s308 1)
(s309 1)
(s310 1)
(s311 1)
(s312 1)
(s313 1)
(s314 1)
(s315 1)
(s316 1)
(s317 1)
(s318 1)
(s319 1)
(s320 1)
(s321 1)
(s322 1)
(s323 1)
(s324 1)
(s325 1)
(s326 1)
(s327 1)
(s328 1)
(s329 1)
(s330 1)
(s331 1)
(s332 1)
(s333 1timeout
)
(s334 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1321/2844 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/1322 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1521 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60299ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1521 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60303ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61929 ms. Remains : 1322/1331 places, 1522/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1749 steps with 0 reset in 10 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-14 finished in 62076 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 1331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1331/1331 places, 1531/1531 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 161 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 161 transitions
Performed 161 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 161
Iterating post reduction 0 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 1330 transition count 1369
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 1169 transition count 1369
Performed 199 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 199 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 1169 transition count 1170
Deduced a syphon composed of 199 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 199 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 398 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 970 transition count 1170
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 728 place count 962 transition count 1162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 962 transition count 1162
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 962 transition count 1160
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 740 place count 960 transition count 1160
Performed 395 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 395
Deduced a syphon composed of 395 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 395 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 790 rules applied. Total rules applied 1530 place count 565 transition count 765
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1532 place count 563 transition count 763
Applied a total of 1532 rules in 131 ms. Remains 563 /1331 variables (removed 768) and now considering 763/1531 (removed 768) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 763 rows 563 cols
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 500 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 717 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 116 ms returned [762]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 760 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 762 rows 563 cols
[2025-06-04 18:52:22] [INFO ] Computed 161 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 159/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 562/1325 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 159/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/563 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 760/760 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 159/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 109/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 18:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 562/1325 variables, and 411 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 159/161 constraints, State Equation: 0/563 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/760 constraints, Known Traps: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60156ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 760 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60157ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 563/1331 places, 762/1531 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 563 /563 variables (removed 0) and now considering 762/762 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61143 ms. Remains : 563/1331 places, 762/1531 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 520 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-040B-LTLFireability-15 finished in 61207 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 749106 ms.

BK_STOP 1749063203160

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-040B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-040B, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700140"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-040B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-040B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;