Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993700123.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-030B, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700123
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 796K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 370K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749054891396

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-030B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 135 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Transformed 1203 places.
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Transformed 1353 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 16:34:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1203 places and 1353 transitions and 4320 arcs in 255 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 36 out of 1203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1203/1203 places, 1353/1353 transitions.
Discarding 196 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 196 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 1007 transition count 1157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 1007 transition count 1157
Applied a total of 392 rules in 204 ms. Remains 1007 /1203 variables (removed 196) and now considering 1157/1353 (removed 196) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1157 rows 1007 cols
[2025-06-04 16:34:53] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 36 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 529 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:34:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 844 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1403 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:34:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1006/2164 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1156 unsolved in 30045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/1007 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1156/1156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1006/2164 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1156 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/1007 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60403ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60420ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1007/1203 places, 1157/1353 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62059 ms. Remains : 1007/1203 places, 1157/1353 transitions.
Support contains 36 out of 1007 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 16:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1157 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 1007 places (down from 36) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (28 resets) in 1399 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 1/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 16:35:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 971/975 variables, 117/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/975 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/1007 variables, 4/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1007 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1157/2164 variables, 1007/1128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2164 variables, 0/1128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/2164 variables, 0/1128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2164/2164 variables, and 1128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 613 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 121/121 constraints, State Equation: 1007/1007 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 975/2164 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 117/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/1007 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 751ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 8 simplifications.
Computed a total of 248 stabilizing places and 248 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((X(X(p1))||p0)) U (X(p2)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 6 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 994 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 994 transition count 1144
Applied a total of 26 rules in 57 ms. Remains 994 /1007 variables (removed 13) and now considering 1144/1157 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1144 rows 994 cols
[2025-06-04 16:35:57] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 351 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:35:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 830 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:35:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/993 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30278ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30282ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 994/1007 places, 1144/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31540 ms. Remains : 994/1007 places, 1144/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 379 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 399 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 350 ms.
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Detected a total of 240/994 stabilizing places and 240/1144 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p2 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 25 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 12 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 32805 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 993 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 993 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 28 rules in 68 ms. Remains 993 /1007 variables (removed 14) and now considering 1143/1157 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:36:30] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 325 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:36:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 841 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:36:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30182ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30186ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31426 ms. Remains : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 246 reset in 319 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 238 reset in 324 ms.
Computed a total of 239 stabilizing places and 239 stable transitions
Computed a total of 239 stabilizing places and 239 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 71 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 1576 steps (0 resets) in 27 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-04 16:37:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 145 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3193 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:06] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 155 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3243 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 1142/3615/1142 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 54 ms.
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 993 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 993/993 places, 1143/1143 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 993 /993 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1143/1143 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:37:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:37:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 824 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:37:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30166ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30169ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31300 ms. Remains : 993/993 places, 1143/1143 transitions.
Computed a total of 239 stabilizing places and 239 stable transitions
Computed a total of 239 stabilizing places and 239 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 74 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 1542 steps (0 resets) in 16 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 103 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 142 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-04 16:37:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 146 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3301 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:37:57] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 149 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:38:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3272 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:38:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 1142/3615/1142 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 51 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:38:12] [INFO ] Added : 565 causal constraints over 113 iterations in 11202 ms. Result :unknown
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 243 reset in 306 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 240 reset in 347 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 993 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 993/993 places, 1143/1143 transitions.
Performed 120 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 993 transition count 1143
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 993 transition count 1173
Deduced a syphon composed of 181 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 993 transition count 1173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 992 transition count 1172
Deduced a syphon composed of 180 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 992 transition count 1172
Performed 389 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 569 places in 3 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 389 rules applied. Total rules applied 572 place count 992 transition count 1172
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Discarding 210 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 210 rule applications. Total rules 782 place count 782 transition count 962
Deduced a syphon composed of 359 places in 2 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 992 place count 782 transition count 962
Deduced a syphon composed of 359 places in 3 ms
Applied a total of 992 rules in 287 ms. Remains 782 /993 variables (removed 211) and now considering 962/1143 (removed 181) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 237 ms returned [961]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 960 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 961 rows 782 cols
[2025-06-04 16:38:14] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 1.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 1.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 1.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 1.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 1.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 1.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 1.0)
(s214 1.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 1.0)
(s217 1.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 1.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 1.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 1.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 1.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 1.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 1.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 1.0)
(s248 1.0)
(s249 1.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 1.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 1.0)
(s255 1.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 1.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 1.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 1.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 1.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 1.0)
(s273 1.0)
(s274 1.0)
(s275 1.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 1.0)
(s278 1.0)
(s279 1.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 1.0)
(s282 1.0)
(s283 1.0)
(s284 1.0)
(s285 1.0)
(s286 1.0)
(s287 1.0)
(s288 1.0)
(s289 1.0)
(s290 1.0)
(s291 1.0)
(s292 1.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 1.0)
(s295 1.0)
(s296 1.0)
(s297 1.0)
(s298 1.0)
(s299 1.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 1.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 1.0)
(s304 1.0)
(s305 1.0)
(s306 1.0)
(s307 1.0)
(s308 1.0)
(s309 1.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 1.0)
(s313 1.0)
(s314 1.0)
(s315 1.0)
(s316 1.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 1.0)
(s319 1.0)
(s320 1.0)
(s321 1.0)
(s322 1.0)
(s323 1.0)
(s324 1.0)
(s325 1.0)
(s326 1.0)
(s327 1.0)
(s328 1.0)
(s329 1.0)
(s330 1.0)
(s331 1.0)
(s332 1.0)
(s333 1.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 1.0)
(s336 1.0)
(s337 1.0)
(s338 1.0)
(s339 1.0)
(s340 1.0)
(s341 1.0)
(s342 1.0)
(s343 1.0)
(s344 1.0)
(s345 1.0)
(s346 1.0)
(s347 1.0)
(s348 1.0)
(s349 1.0)
(s350 1.0)
(s351 1.0)
(s352 1.0)
(s353 1.0)
(s354 1.0)
(s355 1.0)
(s356 1.0)
(s357 1.0)
(s358 1.0)
(s359 1.0)
(s360 1.0)
(s361 1.0)
(s362 1.0)
(s363 1.0)
(s364 1.0)
(s365 1.0)
(s366 1.0)
(s367 1.0)
(s368 1.0)
(s369 1.0)
(s370 1.0)
(s371 1.0)
(s372 1.0)
(s373 1.0)
(s374 1.0)
(s375 1.0)
(s376 1.0)
(s377 1.0)
(s378 1.0)
(s379 1.0)
(s380 1.0)
(s381 1.0)
(s382 1.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 1.0)
(s385 1.0)
(s386 1.0)
(s387 1.0)
(s388 1.0)
(s389 1.0)
(s390 1.0)
(s391 1.0)
(s392 1.0)
(s393 1.0)
(s394 1.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 1.0)
(s397 1.0)
(s398 1.0)
(s399 1.0)
(s400 1.0)
(s401 1.0)
(s402 1.0)
(s403 1.0)
(s404 1.0)
(s405 1.0)
(s406 1.0)
(s407 1.0)
(s408 1.0)
(s409 1.0)
(s410 1.0)
(s411 1.0)
(s412 1.0)
(s413 1.0)
(s414 1.0)
(s415 1.0)
(s416 1.0)
(s417 1.0)
(s418 1.0)
(s419 1.0)
(s420 1.0)
(s421 1.0)
(s422 1.0)
(s423 1.0)
(s424 1.0)
(s425 1.0)
(s426 1.0)
(s427 1.0)
(s428 1.0)
(s429 1.0)
(s430 1.0)
(s431 1.0)
(s432 1.0)
(s433 1.0)
(s434 1.0)
(s435 1.0)
(s436 1.0)
(s437 1.0)
(s438 1.0)
(s439 1.0)
(s440 1.0)
(s441 1.0)
(s442 1.0)
(s443 1.0)
(s444 1.0)
(s445 1.0)
(s446 1.0)
(s447 1.0)
(s448 1.0)
(s449 1.0)
(s450 1.0)
(s451 1.0)
(s452 1.0)
(s453 1.0)
(s454 1.0)
(s455 1.0)
(s456 1.0)
(s457 1.0)
(s458 1.0)
(s459 1.0)
(s460 1.0)
(s461 1.0)
(s462 1.0)
(s463 1.0)
(s464 1.0)
(s465 1.0)
(s466 1.0)
(s467 1.0)
(s468 1.0)
(s469 1.0)
(s470 1.0)
(s471 1.0)
(s472 1.0)
(s473 1.0)
(s474 1.0)
(s475 1.0)
(s476 1.0)
(s477 1.0)
(s478 1.0)
(s479 1.0)
(s480 1.0)
(s481 1.0)
(s482 1.0)
(s483 1.0)
(s484 1.0)
(s485 1.0)
(s486 1.0)
(s487 1.0)
(s488 1.0)
(s489 1.0)
(s490 1.0)
(s491 1.0)
(s492 1.0)
(s493 1.0)
(s494 1.0)
(s495 1.0)
(s496 1.0)
(s497 1.0)
(s498 1.0)
(s499 1.0)
(s500 1.0)
(s501 1.0)
(s502 1.0)
(s503 1.0)
(s504 1.0)
(s505 1.0)
(s506 1.0)
(s507 1.0)
(s508 1.0)
(s509 1.0)
(s510 1.0)
(s511 1.0)
(s512 1.0)
(s513 1.0)
(s514 1.0)
(s515 1.0)
(s516 1.0)
(s517 1.0)
(s518 1.0)
(s519 1.0)
(s520 1.0)
(s521 1.0)
(s522 1.0)
(s523 1.0)
(s524 1.0)
(s525 1.0)
(s526 1.0)
(s527 1.0)
(s528 1.0)
(s529 1.0)
(s530 1.0)
(s531 1.0)
(s532 1.0)
(s533 1.0)
(s534 timeout
1.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/781 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30441ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30443ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 782/993 places, 961/1143 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 359 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 42 ms. Remains 782 /782 variables (removed 0) and now considering 961/961 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31033 ms. Remains : 782/993 places, 961/1143 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13907853194564504947
[2025-06-04 16:38:44] [INFO ] Built C files in 45ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13907853194564504947
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13907853194564504947;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2106 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13907853194564504947;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 50 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13907853194564504947;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15181116054257674818.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 993 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 993/993 places, 1143/1143 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 993 /993 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1143/1143 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:38:59] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:39:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 816 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1086 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:39:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30164ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30167ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31272 ms. Remains : 993/993 places, 1143/1143 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5321008382720363951
[2025-06-04 16:39:31] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5321008382720363951
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5321008382720363951;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1918 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5321008382720363951;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5321008382720363951;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9295904822729677011.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 16:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL8931657468707965901.gal : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL15977088610281646632.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL8931657468707965901.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut9489335100814502711.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL15977088610281646632.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL15977088610281646632.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut9489335100814502711.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7192135268567819078.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL4762419279029207630.ltl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7192135268567819078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL4762419279029207630.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(F("((p915!=0)&&(p1159!=1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXG!"((p915!=0)&&(p1159!=1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7925948590997454915.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7925948590997454915.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7925948590997454915.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7925948590997454915.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7925948590997454915.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:40:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 124 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16055004006741964888.gal : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL16274641892422554066.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16055004006741964888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL16274641892422554066.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(F("((i14.i0.i0.u285.p915!=0)&&(i17.u360.p1159!=1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXG!"((i14.i0.i0.u285.p915!=0)&&(i17.u360.p1159!=1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 242231 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X((X(p1)&&p0)))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 995 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 995 transition count 1145
Applied a total of 24 rules in 50 ms. Remains 995 /1007 variables (removed 12) and now considering 1145/1157 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1145 rows 995 cols
[2025-06-04 16:40:32] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 353 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:40:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 800 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:40:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/994 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30167ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30169ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1007 places, 1145/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31377 ms. Remains : 995/1007 places, 1145/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 214 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 31622 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&X(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 993 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 993 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 28 rules in 48 ms. Remains 993 /1007 variables (removed 14) and now considering 1143/1157 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 983 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1285 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30159ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30162ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31498 ms. Remains : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 257 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 271 ms.
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 68 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 32185 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 119 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 119 transitions
Performed 119 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 119
Iterating post reduction 0 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 1006 transition count 1037
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 887 transition count 1037
Performed 150 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 150 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 887 transition count 887
Deduced a syphon composed of 150 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 737 transition count 887
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 551 place count 724 transition count 874
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 724 transition count 874
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 724 transition count 868
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 718 transition count 868
Performed 292 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 292
Deduced a syphon composed of 292 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 292 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 584 rules applied. Total rules applied 1160 place count 426 transition count 576
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1162 place count 424 transition count 574
Applied a total of 1162 rules in 104 ms. Remains 424 /1007 variables (removed 583) and now considering 574/1157 (removed 583) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 574 rows 424 cols
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 371 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 586 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 93 ms returned [573]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 573 rows 424 cols
[2025-06-04 16:41:36] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/997 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 571/571 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 140/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/997 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/571 constraints, Known Traps: 320/320 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60106ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60107ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 424/1007 places, 573/1157 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 424 /424 variables (removed 0) and now considering 573/573 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60924 ms. Remains : 424/1007 places, 573/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 454 reset in 380 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 454 reset in 479 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 67 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 890 steps (0 resets) in 10 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-04 16:42:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 31 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:42:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 406 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:42:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 37 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:42:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 407 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:42:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 512/2201/512 causal constraints (skipped 59 transitions) in 28 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Added : 476 causal constraints over 96 iterations in 5968 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 424 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 424/424 places, 573/573 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 424 /424 variables (removed 0) and now considering 573/573 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 369 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 531 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 84 ms returned []
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30146ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30147ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30783 ms. Remains : 424/424 places, 573/573 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 63 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 57 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 861 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 82 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 31 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:43:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 404 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:43:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 121 positive place invariants in 31 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:43:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 405 ms returned sat
[2025-06-04 16:43:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 512/2201/512 causal constraints (skipped 59 transitions) in 26 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:43:23] [INFO ] Added : 476 causal constraints over 96 iterations in 5815 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 454 reset in 406 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 453 reset in 444 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16230636484383050517
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 15 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:43:24] [INFO ] Built C files in 109ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16230636484383050517
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16230636484383050517;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1390 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16230636484383050517;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 45 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16230636484383050517;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1602504801357158071.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 424 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 424/424 places, 573/573 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 424 /424 variables (removed 0) and now considering 573/573 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:43:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 392 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 559 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 102 ms returned []
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/997 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 571/571 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 140/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/997 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/571 constraints, Known Traps: 323/323 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60099ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60784 ms. Remains : 424/424 places, 573/573 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16717992962120270916
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 9 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:44:40] [INFO ] Built C files in 76ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16717992962120270916
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16717992962120270916;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1381 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16717992962120270916;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 42 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16717992962120270916;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14944982000456410502.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 16:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL11472339774669465402.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL694106930378203917.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL11472339774669465402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut4454621610973942183.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL694106930378203917.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL694106930378203917.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut4454621610973942183.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:45:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14536505755501043504.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL13929359665988453738.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14536505755501043504.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL13929359665988453738.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((p333==0)&&(p530==1))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG!"((p333==0)&&(p530==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13536460850641105095.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13536460850641105095.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13536460850641105095.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13536460850641105095.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13536460850641105095.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 634 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 634 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL12041152614333788376.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL10361713158515458621.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL12041152614333788376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL10361713158515458621.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((i2.i2.u31.p333==0)&&(i5.i0.u53.p530==1))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG!"((i2.i2.u31.p333==0)&&(i5.i0.u53.p530==1))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 245201 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(p0)||G((p1||(X(!p2) U ((p3&&X(!p2))||X(G(!p2)))))))))'
Support contains 8 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 995 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 995 transition count 1145
Applied a total of 24 rules in 49 ms. Remains 995 /1007 variables (removed 12) and now considering 1145/1157 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1145 rows 995 cols
[2025-06-04 16:45:41] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 297 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:45:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 829 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:45:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/994 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30165ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30167ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1007 places, 1145/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31348 ms. Remains : 995/1007 places, 1145/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, p2, (AND (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 218 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 227 ms.
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0 p3 p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 25 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 32251 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 993 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 993 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 28 rules in 49 ms. Remains 993 /1007 variables (removed 14) and now considering 1143/1157 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:46:13] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 293 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:46:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 912 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:46:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30165ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30167ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31426 ms. Remains : 993/1007 places, 1143/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 490 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 31537 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 994 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 994 transition count 1144
Applied a total of 26 rules in 49 ms. Remains 994 /1007 variables (removed 13) and now considering 1144/1157 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1144 rows 994 cols
[2025-06-04 16:46:45] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 297 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:46:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 869 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/993 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30184ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30186ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 994/1007 places, 1144/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31405 ms. Remains : 994/1007 places, 1144/1157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 271 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 256 ms.
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Computed a total of 240 stabilizing places and 240 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 32066 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 1007 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1007/1007 places, 1157/1157 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 120 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 120 transitions
Performed 120 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 120
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 1006 transition count 1036
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 886 transition count 1036
Performed 150 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 150 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 886 transition count 886
Deduced a syphon composed of 150 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 736 transition count 886
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 554 place count 722 transition count 872
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 722 transition count 872
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 722 transition count 864
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 714 transition count 864
Performed 290 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 290
Deduced a syphon composed of 290 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 290 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 580 rules applied. Total rules applied 1164 place count 424 transition count 574
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1166 place count 422 transition count 572
Applied a total of 1166 rules in 95 ms. Remains 422 /1007 variables (removed 585) and now considering 572/1157 (removed 585) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 572 rows 422 cols
[2025-06-04 16:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 405 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 571 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 121/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30110ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30111ms
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 422/1007 places, 572/1157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30779 ms. Remains : 422/1007 places, 572/1157 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 76573 steps with 1139 reset in 288 ms.
Treatment of property ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 31372 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 1157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 1157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2120059146932315790.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2120059146932315790.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2120059146932315790.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2120059146932315790.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2120059146932315790.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 1157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 8 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Built C files in 220ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '360' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality8520848994582560302.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality14739250019700738990.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality8520848994582560302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality14739250019700738990.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 2 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(F("((i12.i3.u286.p915!=0)&&(i17.i2.u361.p1159!=1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXG!"((i12.i3.u286.p915!=0)&&(i17.i2.u361.p1159!=1))"
Compilation finished in 3675 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 61 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>900 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>((LTLAPp1==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 45816 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Retrying LTSmin with larger timeout 14400 s
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11520595221690529647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 17:12:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 17:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 373 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 627 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 402 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 952 labels/synchronizations in 740 ms.
[2025-06-04 17:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality4376869239136939744.gal : 56 ms
[2025-06-04 17:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality4882980333303705256.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality4376869239136939744.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality4882980333303705256.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(F("((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u190.p915!=0)&&(i0.i1.u233.p1159!=1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXG!"((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.u190.p915!=0)&&(i0.i1.u233.p1159!=1))"

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-030B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-030B, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700123"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-030B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-030B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;