Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993700122.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-030B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700122
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 796K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 370K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749054493827

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-030B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 16:28:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 121 ms
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Transformed 1203 places.
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Transformed 1353 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1203 places and 1353 transitions and 4320 arcs in 233 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 227 out of 1203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1203/1203 places, 1353/1353 transitions.
Discarding 171 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 171 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 1032 transition count 1182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 171 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 1032 transition count 1182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 1031 transition count 1181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 1031 transition count 1181
Applied a total of 344 rules in 187 ms. Remains 1031 /1203 variables (removed 172) and now considering 1181/1353 (removed 172) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1181 rows 1031 cols
[2025-06-04 16:28:15] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 36 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:28:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 574 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:28:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:28:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1638 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:28:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1030/2212 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1180 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/1031 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1180/1180 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1030/2212 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1180 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/1031 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1180 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60440ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1031/1203 places, 1181/1353 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62908 ms. Remains : 1031/1203 places, 1181/1353 transitions.
Support contains 227 out of 1031 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 16:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 114 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1181 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (28 resets) in 1845 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 13/116 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 264 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 166 ms. (239 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 195 ms. (204 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-06-04 16:29:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 383/431 variables, 42/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 600/1031 variables, 79/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1031 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1181/2212 variables, 1031/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2212 variables, 0/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/2212 variables, 0/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2212/2212 variables, and 1152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved in 1331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 121/121 constraints, State Equation: 1031/1031 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 364/408 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 623/1031 variables, 82/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 188 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 172 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1031 variables, 18/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1031 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1181/2212 variables, 1031/1171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2212 variables, 11/1182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 180 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 177 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 2212/2212 variables, and 1186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved in 5012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 121/121 constraints, State Equation: 1031/1031 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/12 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6360ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 44 out of 1031 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 1031 transition count 1069
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 919 transition count 1068
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 918 transition count 1068
Performed 145 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 145 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 918 transition count 923
Deduced a syphon composed of 145 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 145 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 290 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 773 transition count 923
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 551 place count 738 transition count 888
Iterating global reduction 3 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 738 transition count 888
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 738 transition count 873
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 723 transition count 873
Performed 272 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 272
Deduced a syphon composed of 272 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 272 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 544 rules applied. Total rules applied 1160 place count 451 transition count 601
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 58 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 58 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 1218 place count 451 transition count 601
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1219 place count 450 transition count 600
Applied a total of 1219 rules in 241 ms. Remains 450 /1031 variables (removed 581) and now considering 600/1181 (removed 581) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 450/1031 places, 600/1181 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (97 resets) in 439 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 6/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (11 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 159 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 11100 steps (2 resets) in 32 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 16:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1181 transitions.
Computed a total of 265 stabilizing places and 265 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 995 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 995 transition count 1145
Applied a total of 72 rules in 48 ms. Remains 995 /1031 variables (removed 36) and now considering 1145/1181 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1145 rows 995 cols
[2025-06-04 16:29:27] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 278 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:29:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 930 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/994 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30185ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30189ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31451 ms. Remains : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1145 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6432942365627526943.gal : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6682332288284667998.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6432942365627526943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6682332288284667998.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 16:30:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10738587068458593481.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10738587068458593481.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10738587068458593481.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10738587068458593481.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10738587068458593481.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 113 ms
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9630123923006476010.gal : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 16:30:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3015202189026494510.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9630123923006476010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3015202189026494510.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 997 transition count 1147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 997 transition count 1147
Applied a total of 68 rules in 50 ms. Remains 997 /1031 variables (removed 34) and now considering 1147/1181 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1147 rows 997 cols
[2025-06-04 16:30:59] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 795 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 996/2144 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/997 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1146/1146 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/996 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/997 variables, 121/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 175 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60333ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60335ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61497 ms. Remains : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5948068038867470889.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability599116508626909784.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5948068038867470889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability599116508626909784.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph637209769505694807.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph637209769505694807.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph637209769505694807.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph637209769505694807.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph637209769505694807.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability556695302733172251.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 16:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10218504059236675286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability556695302733172251.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10218504059236675286.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 993 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 993 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 76 rules in 59 ms. Remains 993 /1031 variables (removed 38) and now considering 1143/1181 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:33:01] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 847 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30170ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30174ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 993/1031 places, 1143/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31366 ms. Remains : 993/1031 places, 1143/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1143 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9256424975536833783.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:33:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12788173033207708860.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9256424975536833783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12788173033207708860.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3000046713696032266.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3000046713696032266.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3000046713696032266.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3000046713696032266.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3000046713696032266.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7913726219268656955.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2593774669821666221.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7913726219268656955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2593774669821666221.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 992 transition count 1142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 992 transition count 1142
Applied a total of 78 rules in 57 ms. Remains 992 /1031 variables (removed 39) and now considering 1142/1181 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1142 rows 992 cols
[2025-06-04 16:34:33] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 274 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:34:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:34:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 836 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:34:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 1.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 1.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 1.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 1.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 1.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 1.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 1.0)
(s214 1.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 1.0)
(s217 1.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 1.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 1.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 1.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 1.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 1.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 1.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 1.0)
(s248 1.0)
(s249 1.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 1.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 1.0)
(s255 1.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 1.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 1.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 1.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 1.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 1.0)
(s273 1.0)
(s274 1.0)
(s275 1.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 1.0)
(s278 1.0)
(s279 1.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 1.0)
(s282 1.0)
(s283 1.0)
(s284 1.0)
(s285 1.0)
(s286 1.0)
(s287 1.0)
(s288 timeout
1.0)
(s289 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/991 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1141 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30194ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30198ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 992/1031 places, 1142/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31370 ms. Remains : 992/1031 places, 1142/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1142 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5529164855808085311.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11151279699898094435.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5529164855808085311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11151279699898094435.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12072008266898305943.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12072008266898305943.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12072008266898305943.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12072008266898305943.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12072008266898305943.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8187572309881426335.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 16:35:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability27064311623659397.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8187572309881426335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability27064311623659397.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 995 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 995 transition count 1145
Applied a total of 72 rules in 62 ms. Remains 995 /1031 variables (removed 36) and now considering 1145/1181 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1145 rows 995 cols
[2025-06-04 16:36:05] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:36:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 803 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1088 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:36:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/994 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30168ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30171ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31325 ms. Remains : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1145 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12695809431353604668.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16240883308898560615.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12695809431353604668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16240883308898560615.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14856491708934673921.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14856491708934673921.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14856491708934673921.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14856491708934673921.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14856491708934673921.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16866540654893694507.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11390362114353414420.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16866540654893694507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11390362114353414420.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 997 transition count 1147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 997 transition count 1147
Applied a total of 68 rules in 48 ms. Remains 997 /1031 variables (removed 34) and now considering 1147/1181 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1147 rows 997 cols
[2025-06-04 16:37:37] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 291 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:37:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:37:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 868 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:37:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/996 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30200ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30202ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31414 ms. Remains : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18368467159633174014.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5928454227132580486.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18368467159633174014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5928454227132580486.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10734834302905818969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10734834302905818969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10734834302905818969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10734834302905818969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10734834302905818969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9589384362498408854.gal : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 16:38:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14528122442404484430.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9589384362498408854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14528122442404484430.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 997 transition count 1147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 997 transition count 1147
Applied a total of 68 rules in 62 ms. Remains 997 /1031 variables (removed 34) and now considering 1147/1181 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1147 rows 997 cols
[2025-06-04 16:39:09] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:39:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 792 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1069 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:39:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/996 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30175ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30177ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31310 ms. Remains : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5275238388515971773.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 16:39:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14400889783767522909.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5275238388515971773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14400889783767522909.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2962768665982787401.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2962768665982787401.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2962768665982787401.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2962768665982787401.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2962768665982787401.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14601048644802219874.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3177047535336567174.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14601048644802219874.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3177047535336567174.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 121 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 121 transitions
Performed 121 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 121
Iterating post reduction 0 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 1030 transition count 1059
Reduce places removed 121 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 909 transition count 1059
Performed 150 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 150 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 909 transition count 909
Deduced a syphon composed of 150 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 759 transition count 909
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 580 place count 721 transition count 871
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 721 transition count 871
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 721 transition count 854
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 704 transition count 854
Performed 280 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 280
Deduced a syphon composed of 280 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 280 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 560 rules applied. Total rules applied 1212 place count 424 transition count 574
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1214 place count 422 transition count 572
Applied a total of 1214 rules in 131 ms. Remains 422 /1031 variables (removed 609) and now considering 572/1181 (removed 609) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 572 rows 422 cols
[2025-06-04 16:40:41] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:40:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 384 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 561 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 133 ms returned [571]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 570 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 571 rows 422 cols
[2025-06-04 16:40:42] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 121/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30097ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30098ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 422/1031 places, 571/1181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 422 /422 variables (removed 0) and now considering 571/571 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 30952 ms. Remains : 422/1031 places, 571/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 571 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 716 steps (0 resets) in 10 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-030B-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12950797412997393364.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5728546796791648005.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12950797412997393364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5728546796791648005.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 998 transition count 1148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 998 transition count 1148
Applied a total of 66 rules in 53 ms. Remains 998 /1031 variables (removed 33) and now considering 1148/1181 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1148 rows 998 cols
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 264 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 823 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1090 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1147 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30161ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30162ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 998/1031 places, 1148/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31309 ms. Remains : 998/1031 places, 1148/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1148 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10713106916692995739.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 16:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7128470486459751266.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10713106916692995739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7128470486459751266.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5183717762728688222.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5183717762728688222.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5183717762728688222.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5183717762728688222.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5183717762728688222.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9130287855141903989.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7888556969354433023.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9130287855141903989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7888556969354433023.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 994 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 994 transition count 1144
Applied a total of 74 rules in 42 ms. Remains 994 /1031 variables (removed 37) and now considering 1144/1181 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1144 rows 994 cols
[2025-06-04 16:42:44] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:42:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 833 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s1 1.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 1.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 1.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 1.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 1.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 1.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 1.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 1.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 1.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 1.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 1.0)
(s214 1.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 1.0)
(s217 1.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 1.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 1.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 1.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 1.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 1.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 1.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 1.0)
(s248 1.0)
(s249 1.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 1.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 1.0)
(s255 1.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 1.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 1.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 1.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 1.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 1.0)
(s273 1.0)
(s274 1.0)
(s275 1.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 1.0)
(s278 1.0)
(s279 1.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 1.0)
(s282 1.0)
(s283 1.0)
(s284 1.0)
(s285 1.0)
(s286 1.0)
(s287 1.0)
(s288 1.0)
(s289 1.0)
(s290 1.0)
(s291 1.0)
(s292 1.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 1.0)
(s295 1.0)
(s296 1.0)
(s297 1.0)
(s298 1.0)
(s299 1.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 1.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 1.0)
(s304 1.0)
(s305 1.0)
(s306 1.0)
(s307 1.0)
(s308 1.0)
(s309 1.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 1.0)
(s313 1.0)
(s314 1.0)
(s315 1.0)
(s316 1.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 1.0)
(s319 1.0)
(s320 1.0)
(s321 1.0)
(s322 1.0)
(s323 1.0)
(s324 1.0)
(s325 1.0)
(s326 1.0)
(s327 1.0)
(s328 1.0)
(s329 1.0)
(s330 1.0)
(s331 1.0)
(s332 1.0)
(s333 1.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 1.0)
(s336 1.0)
(s337 1.0)
(s338 1.0)
(s339 1.0)
(s340 1.0)
(s341 1.0)
(s342 1.0)
(s343 1.0)
(s344 1.0)
(s345 1.0)
(s346 1.0)
(s347 1.0)
(s348 1.0)
(s349 1.0)
(s350 1.0)
(s351 1.0)
(s352 1.0)
(s353 1.0)
(s354 1.0)
(s355 1.0)
(s356 1.0)
(s357 1.0)
(s358 1.0)
(s359 1.0)
(s360 1.0)
(s361 1.0)
(s362 1.0)
(s363 1.0)
(s364 1.0)
(s365 1.0)
(s366 1.0)
(s367 1.0)
(s368 1.0)
(s369 1.0)
(s370 1.0)
(s371 1.0)
(s372 1.0)
(s373 1.0)
(s374 1.0)
(s375 1.0)
(s376 1.0)
(s377 1.0)
(s378 1.0)
(s379 1.0)
(s380 1.0)
(s381 1.0)
(s382 1.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 1.0)
(s385 1.0)
(s386 1.0)
(s387 1.0)
(s388 1.0)
(s389 1.0)
(s390 1.0)
(s391 1.0)
(s392 1.0)
(s393 1.0)
(s394 1.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 1.0)
(s397 1.0)
(s398 1.0)
(s399 1.0)
(s400 1.0)
(s401 1.0)
(s402 1.0)
(s403 1.0)
(s404 1.0)
(s405 1.0)
(s406 1.0)
(s407 1.0)
(s408 1.0)
(s409 1.0)
(s410 1.0)
(s411 1.0)
(s412 1.0)
(s413 1.0)
(s414 1.0)
(s415 1.0)
(s416 1.0)
(s417 1.0)
(s418 1.0)
(s419 1.0)
(s420 1.0)
(s421 1.0)
(s422 1.0)
(s423 1.0)
(s424 1.0)
(s425 1.0)
(s426 1.0)
(s427 1.0)
(s428 1.0)
(s429 1.0)
(s430 1.0)
(s431 1.0)
(s432 1.0)
(s433 1.0)
(s434 1.0)
(s435 1.0)
(s436 1.0)
(s437 1.0)
(s438 1.0)
(s439 1.0)
(s440 1.0)
(s441 1.0)
(s442 1.0)
(s443 1.0)
(s444 1.0)
(s445 1.0)
(s446 1.0)
(s447 1.0)
(s448 1.0)
(s449 1.0)
(s450 1.0)
(s451 1.0)
(s452 1.0)
(s453 1.0)
(s454 1.0)
(s455 1.0)
(s456 1.0)
(s457 1.0)
(s458 1.0)
(s459 1.0)
(s460 1.0)
(s461 1.0)
(s462 1.0)
(s463 1.0)
(s464 1.0)
(s465 1.0)
(s466 1.0)
(s467 1.0)
(s468 1.0)
(s469 1.0)
(s470 1.0)
(s471 1.0)
(s472 1.0)
(s473 1.0)
(s474 1.0)
(s475 1.0)
(s476 1.0)
(s477 1.0)
(s478 1.0)
(s479 1.0)
(s480 1.0)
(s481 1.0)
(s482 1.0)
(s483 1.0)
(s484 1.0)
(s485 1.0)
(s486 1.0)
(s487 1.0)
(s488 1.0)
(s489 1.0)
(s490 1.0)
(s491 1.0)
(s492 1.0)
(s493 1.0)
(s494 1.0)
(s495 1.0)
(s496 1.0)
(s497 1.0)
(s498 1.0)
(s499 1.0)
(s500 1.0)
(s501 1.0)
(s502 1.0)
(s503 1.0)
(s504 1.0)
(s505 1.0)
(s506 1.0)
(s507 1.0)
(s508 1.0)
(s509 1.0)
(s510 1.0)
(s511 1.0)
(s512 1.0)
(s513 1.0)
(s514 1.0)
(s515 1.0)
(s516 1.0)
(s517 1.0)
(s518 1.0)
(s519 1.0)
(s520 1.0)
(s521 1.0)
(s522 1.0)
(s523 1.0)
(s524 1.0)
(s525 1.0)
(s526 1.0)
(s527 1.0)
(s528 1.0)
(s529 1.0)
(s530 1.0)
(s531 1.0)
(s532 1.0)
(s533 1.0)
(s534 1.0)
(s535 1.0)
(s536 1.0)
(s537 1.0)
(s538 1.0)
(s539 1.0)
(s540 1.0)
(s541 1.0)
(s542 1.0)
(s543 1.0)
(s544 1.0)
(s545 1.0)
(s546 1.0)
(s547 1.0)
(s548 1.0)
(s549 1.0)
(s550 1.0)
(s551 1.0)
(s552 1.0)
(s553 1.0)
(s554 1.0)
(s555 1.0)
(s556 1.0)
(s557 1.0)
(s558 1.0)
(s559 1.0)
(s560 1.0)
(s561 1.0)
(s562 1.0)
(s563 1.0)
(s564 1.0)
(s565 1.0)
(s566 1.0)
(s567 1.0)
(s568 1.0)
(s569 1.0)
(s570 1.0)
(s571 1.0)
(s572 1.0)
(s573 1.0)
(s574 1.0)
(s575 1.0)
(s576 1.0)
(s577 1.0)
(s578 1.0)
(s579 1.0)
(s580 1.0)
(s581 1.0)
(s582 1.0)
(s583 1.0)
(s584 1.0)
(s585 1.0)
(s586 1.0)
(s587 1.0)
(s588 1.0)
(s589 1.0)
(s590 1.0)
(s591 1.0)
(s592 1.0)
(s593 1.0)
(s594 1.0)
(s595 1.0)
(s596 1.0)
(s597 1.0)
(s598 1.0)
(s599 1.0)
(s600 1.0)
(s601 1.0)
(s602 1.0)
(s603 1.0)
(s604 1.0)
(s605 1.0)
(s606 1.0)
(s607 1.0)
(s608 1.0)
(s609 1.0)
(s610 1.0)
(s611 1.0)
(s612 1.0)
(s613 1.0)
(s614 1.0)
(s615 1.0)
(s616 1.0)
(s617 1.0)
(s618 1.0)
(s619 1.0)
(s620 1.0)
(s621 1.0)
(s622 1.0)
(s623 1.0)
(s624 1.0)
(s625 1.0)
(s626 1.0)
(s627 1.0)
(s628 1.0)
(s629 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/993 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30161ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30164ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 994/1031 places, 1144/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31312 ms. Remains : 994/1031 places, 1144/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1144 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15544113852551468317.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7453323026269373157.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15544113852551468317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7453323026269373157.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14859724098489025839.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14859724098489025839.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14859724098489025839.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14859724098489025839.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14859724098489025839.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16201849167351784557.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 16:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14146933661769473374.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16201849167351784557.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14146933661769473374.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 993 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 993 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 76 rules in 46 ms. Remains 993 /1031 variables (removed 38) and now considering 1143/1181 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1143 rows 993 cols
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:44:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 829 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1083 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/992 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30167ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30169ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 993/1031 places, 1143/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31301 ms. Remains : 993/1031 places, 1143/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1143 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1776671515295330218.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:44:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18297485331382763999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1776671515295330218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18297485331382763999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3597625387139505691.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3597625387139505691.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3597625387139505691.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3597625387139505691.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3597625387139505691.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7218607458763939061.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5019860284027187817.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7218607458763939061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5019860284027187817.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 995 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 995 transition count 1145
Applied a total of 72 rules in 52 ms. Remains 995 /1031 variables (removed 36) and now considering 1145/1181 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1145 rows 995 cols
[2025-06-04 16:45:48] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 264 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:45:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 725 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 991 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/994 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30161ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30163ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31211 ms. Remains : 995/1031 places, 1145/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1145 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4443357725487437062.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7222728193753311703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4443357725487437062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7222728193753311703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13297964702995514142.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13297964702995514142.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13297964702995514142.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13297964702995514142.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13297964702995514142.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2253776591244515596.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 16:46:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4073264203138672304.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2253776591244515596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4073264203138672304.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 119 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 119 transitions
Performed 119 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 119
Iterating post reduction 0 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 1030 transition count 1061
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 911 transition count 1061
Performed 149 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 149 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 911 transition count 912
Deduced a syphon composed of 149 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 149 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 298 rules applied. Total rules applied 536 place count 762 transition count 912
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 575 place count 723 transition count 873
Iterating global reduction 2 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 723 transition count 873
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 723 transition count 855
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 705 transition count 855
Performed 278 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 278 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 278 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 556 rules applied. Total rules applied 1206 place count 427 transition count 577
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1208 place count 425 transition count 575
Applied a total of 1208 rules in 97 ms. Remains 425 /1031 variables (removed 606) and now considering 575/1181 (removed 606) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 575 rows 425 cols
[2025-06-04 16:47:19] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:47:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 366 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 553 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 81 ms returned [574]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 574 rows 425 cols
[2025-06-04 16:47:20] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 116/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/999 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 116/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/425 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 571/571 constraints, Known Traps: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 116/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 160/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 14/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/999 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 116/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/425 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/571 constraints, Known Traps: 330/330 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60099ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 425/1031 places, 574/1181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 425 /425 variables (removed 0) and now considering 574/574 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60847 ms. Remains : 425/1031 places, 574/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 574 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability670773861269645435.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17971468260696193391.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability670773861269645435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17971468260696193391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14049052006814503303.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14049052006814503303.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14049052006814503303.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14049052006814503303.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14049052006814503303.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 631 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 662 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17581162026574896552.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 16:48:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4970400618771468630.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17581162026574896552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4970400618771468630.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 120 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 120 transitions
Performed 120 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 120
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 1030 transition count 1060
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 910 transition count 1060
Performed 150 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 150 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 910 transition count 910
Deduced a syphon composed of 150 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 760 transition count 910
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 578 place count 722 transition count 872
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 722 transition count 872
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 722 transition count 855
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 705 transition count 855
Performed 280 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 280
Deduced a syphon composed of 280 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 280 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 560 rules applied. Total rules applied 1210 place count 425 transition count 575
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1212 place count 423 transition count 573
Applied a total of 1212 rules in 89 ms. Remains 423 /1031 variables (removed 608) and now considering 573/1181 (removed 608) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 573 rows 423 cols
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 353 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 553 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 114 ms returned [572]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 570 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 572 rows 423 cols
[2025-06-04 16:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 5210 ms of which 5152 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 422/995 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/423 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 570/570 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 120/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 122 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 20/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 422/995 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/423 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/570 constraints, Known Traps: 283/283 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60099ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 570 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 423/1031 places, 572/1181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 423 /423 variables (removed 0) and now considering 572/572 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60890 ms. Remains : 423/1031 places, 572/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 572 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16955878640111771292.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10421120895800301626.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16955878640111771292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10421120895800301626.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12932230002550828282.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12932230002550828282.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12932230002550828282.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12932230002550828282.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12932230002550828282.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 637 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 650 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4882814193711043325.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 16:50:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13683128213119536864.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4882814193711043325.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13683128213119536864.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 997 transition count 1147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 997 transition count 1147
Applied a total of 68 rules in 41 ms. Remains 997 /1031 variables (removed 34) and now considering 1147/1181 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1147 rows 997 cols
[2025-06-04 16:51:22] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:51:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 765 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1030 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:51:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/996 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30165ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30169ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31245 ms. Remains : 997/1031 places, 1147/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16470826459239536249.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 16:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13006037592987295560.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16470826459239536249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13006037592987295560.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18101961830804884049.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18101961830804884049.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18101961830804884049.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18101961830804884049.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18101961830804884049.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12875307076186803645.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2689142387977809714.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12875307076186803645.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2689142387977809714.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 1031/1031 places, 1181/1181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 120 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 120 transitions
Performed 120 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 120
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 1030 transition count 1060
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 910 transition count 1060
Performed 150 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 150 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 910 transition count 910
Deduced a syphon composed of 150 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 760 transition count 910
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 578 place count 722 transition count 872
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 722 transition count 872
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 722 transition count 855
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 705 transition count 855
Performed 279 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 279 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 279 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 558 rules applied. Total rules applied 1208 place count 426 transition count 576
Renaming transitions due to excessive name length > 1024 char.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1210 place count 424 transition count 574
Applied a total of 1210 rules in 79 ms. Remains 424 /1031 variables (removed 607) and now considering 574/1181 (removed 607) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 574 rows 424 cols
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 388 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 566 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 145 ms returned [573]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 573 rows 424 cols
[2025-06-04 16:52:54] [INFO ] Computed 121 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 131 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/997 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 571/571 constraints, Known Traps: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 120/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 158/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 1)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 1)
(s7 0)
(s8 1)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 1)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 1)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 1)
(s21 0)
(s22 1)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 1)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 1)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 1)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 1)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 1)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 1)
(s50 1)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 1)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 1)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 1)
(s63 0)
(s64 1)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 1)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 1)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 1)
(s78 1)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 1)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 1)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 1)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 1)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 1)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 1)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 1)
(s105 0)
(s106 1)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 1)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 1)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 1)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 1)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 1)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 1)
(s134 0)
(s135 1)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 1)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 1)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 0)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 1)
(s157 1)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 1)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 1)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 1)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 1)
(s176 0)
(s177 1)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 1)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 1)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 1)
(s190 0)
(s191 1)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 1)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 1)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 1)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 1)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s210 1)
(s211 1)
(s212 1)
(s213 1)
(s214 1)
(s215 1)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 1)
(s220 0)
(s221 1)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 1)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 1)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 1)
(s234 0)
(s235 0)
(s236 1)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 1)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 1)
(s244 0)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 1)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 1)
(s252 0)
(s253 1)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 0)
(s257 1)
(s258 0)
(s259 0)
(s260 0)
(s261 1)
(s262 0)
(s263 1)
(s264 0)
(s265 0)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 1)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 1)
(s272 0)
(s273 0)
(s274 0)
(s275 1)
(s276 0)
(s277 0)
(s278 0)
(s279 0)
(s280 1)
(s281 0)
(s282 1)
(s283 0)
(s284 0)
(s285 0)
(s286 1)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 1)
(s290 0)
(s291 1)
(s292 0)
(s293 0)
(s294 0)
(s295 1)
(s296 0)
(s297 0)
(s298 0)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 1)
(s302 0)
(s303 1)
(s304 0)
(s305 0)
(s306 1)
(s307 0)
(s308 0)
(s309 0)
(s310 1)
(s311 0)
(s312 0)
(s313 0)
(s314 1)
(s315 0)
(s316 0)
(s317 1)
(s318 0)
(s319 1)
(s320 0)
(s321 0)
(s322 0)
(s323 1)
(s324 0)
(s325 0)
(s326 0)
(s327 0)
(s328 1)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 1)
(s332 0)
(s333 1)
(s334 0)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 1)
(s338 0)
(s339 0)
(s340 0)
(s341 0)
(s342 1)
(s343 0)
(s344 0)
(s345 1)
(s346 0)
(s347 1)
(s348 0)
(s349 0)
(s350 0)
(s351 1)
(s352 0)
(s353 0)
(s354 0)
(s355 0)
(s356 1)
(s357 timeout
0)
(s358 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/997 variables, and 430 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 120/121 constraints, State Equation: 0/424 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/571 constraints, Known Traps: 310/310 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60111ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60111ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 424/1031 places, 573/1181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 424 /424 variables (removed 0) and now considering 573/573 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60930 ms. Remains : 424/1031 places, 573/1181 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 573 transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7137597112543146955.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 16:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5709395425575275054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7137597112543146955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5709395425575275054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16312946130454128558.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16312946130454128558.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16312946130454128558.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16312946130454128558.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16312946130454128558.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 628 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 602 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7727050383653671306.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12627585653392276877.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7727050383653671306.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12627585653392276877.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3028520481414526617.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3028520481414526617.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3028520481414526617.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3028520481414526617.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3028520481414526617.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1071 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10837569801823649335.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 16:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16140200515794625402.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10837569801823649335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16140200515794625402.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 17:23:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 17:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 199 ms
[2025-06-04 17:23:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 17:23:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 17:23:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 627 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 17:23:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 745 ms
[2025-06-04 17:23:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 952 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-04 17:23:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8596338586848873601.gal : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 17:23:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15708985009944726973.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8596338586848873601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15708985009944726973.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-030B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-030B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993700122"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-030B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-030B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;